Again you digress and miss the point.
Where did I say, a WG doesn’t have a choice, to see who she wants 
My post said, what these WGs are doing is discrimination and it shouldn’t be dressed up.
Winky, made the mistake of conflating discrimination with racism, now you’re implying, I said WGs shouldn’t have a choice about who they see 
Yes I agree we should all have a choice, it’s a fascinating ideal. That’s why I put it to you, if the only person that could save your life, declined cos of the colour, of your skin, maybe you’ll qualify, your choice idealism, from it’s absolute inference In my experience absolutism, tends to breed extremism, hence we have laws, to qualify such ideals. Quoting a politician’s line, which almost certainly, was made, in an attempt, to bring people together, doesn’t really address my initial point, that discrimination, shouldn’t be dressed up.
I fully understand the point you're making, but permit me to say that you digressed from the issue discussed here with the below statement twice.
"
That’s why I put it to you, if the only person that could save your life, declined cos of the colour, of your skin, maybe you’ll qualify, your choice idealism, from it’s absolute inference
In my experience absolutism, tends to breed extremism, hence we have laws, to qualify such ideals.
"
The medical profession has ethics, while prostitution doesn't hence comparing an attempt to save one's life to an other person's right's as an individual is a very trivial argument.
One thing is certain where your right's stops another person's right's starts, even in countries where prostitution is legal and regulated ie Germany while you can easily ban BBBJ with proven evidence of the health risk - when it comes to folks individual rights you can't make a case, although your paying an SP it still has to be consensual.
As Sun Tzu stated in the Art of War never fight a battle you cant win, hence my quote because your fighting an ideology in a very unpragmatic manner...
