Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Escorte Victoria – Ilford, IG1  (Read 746 times)

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Neither prayer nor looks can redeem lazy, dishonest service - advertised and confirmed “enjoys” declined

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
+447415037392
07415037392

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Thank you to Chas Bar for the TOFTT review. I have seen her twice.  First was a neutral and second a negative.  Her current banner runs “REAL GFE***69***OWO***CIM***NO EXTRAS***100% GENUINE”  The “GFE” consists of no kissing  and no CIM, both confirmed by text and both declined in the room.  The phone usually goes on sometime around 12 midday (frequently later and not reliable) and she gives terse answers in conversation. Her confirmation is a pack of lies.

Make your way to the Ilford Methodist Church for a shot at redemption before casting hope aside and continuing the punt.  She shares with External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only who is her sister and External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only both previously at Maryland. Duo’s are not on offer. It is a large Victorian House with a number of bedrooms.  I was initially shown in to the large front room on the ground floor but then, after I had paid, relocated to a cramped bedroom on the first.  On the day this room was overheated.  She could not leave the windows open for fear of the noise. This inauspicious start should have served as a warning.  I should also say that a search of her phone number throws up a review on another site that will be depressingly familiar to anyone who reads here and confirms my concerns about manufactured reviews.  Having met her, whoever wrote it was undoubtedly incentivised.

She is 19 and attractive.  The photos give you an idea.  You are really unlikely to see her ever smile, they hide the sagginess in her bust, she has cut her hair and given it a disastrous blue colouring that has really disfigured her.  She is dress size 8 rather than six and reasonably tall about 5’6”.  She looks good in civvies but once undressed the lack of tone in her bust is a bit of let down.  I would give her and 7 for both face and figure. It could be 8 if she made more of herself.  This is just another sign alongside the service that she really does not want to be doing this anymore.  It is a Romanian house.  Her English is limited.

For my £80 hour I got OWO, RO, HR, Pen, (Doggy).  She wore a dress request but was absolutely adamant that she would not do CIM or kiss.  After the act she loosens up and was quite engaging. On the first booking I got a shared shower and some fun interaction.  It was on this basis I tried a second booking which was really poor.  I kept her at it and I got a reasonable amount of time but the service was unacceptable.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2018, 10:33:42 am by mrhappypants »

Offline king tarzan

Neither prayer nor looks can redeem lazy, dishonest service - advertised and confirmed “enjoys” declined

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
+447415037392
07415037392

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Thank you to Chas Bar for the TOFTT review. I have seen her twice.  First was a neutral and second a negative.  Her current banner runs “REAL GFE***69***OWO***CIM***NO EXTRAS***100% GENUINE”  The “GFE” consists of no kissing  and no CIM, both confirmed by text and both declined in the room.  The phone usually goes on sometime around 12 midday (frequently later and not reliable) and she gives terse answers in conversation. Her confirmation is a pack of lies.

Make your way to the Ilford Methodist Church for a shot at redemption before casting hope aside and continuing the punt.  She shares with External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only who is her sister and External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only both previously at Maryland. Duo’s are not on offer. It is a large Victorian House with a number of bedrooms.  I was initially shown in to the large front room on the ground floor but then, after I had paid, relocated to a cramped bedroom on the first.  On the day this room was overheated.  She could not leave the windows open for fear of the noise. This inauspicious start should have served as a warning.  I should also say that a search of her phone number throws up a review on another site that will be depressingly familiar to anyone who reads here and confirms my concerns about manufactured reviews.  Having met her, whoever wrote it was undoubtedly incentivised.

She is 19 and attractive.  The photos give you an idea.  You are really unlikely to see her ever smile, they hide the sagginess in her bust, she has cut her hair and given it a disastrous blue colouring that has really disfigured her.  She is dress size 8 rather than six and reasonably tall about 5’6”.  She looks good in civvies but once undressed the lack of tone in her bust is a bit of let down.  I would give her and 7 for both face and figure. It could be 8 if she made more of herself.  This is just another sign alongside the service that she really does not want to be doing this anymore.  It is a Romanian house.  Her English is limited.

For my £80 hour I got OWO, RO, HR, Pen, (Doggy).  She wore a dress request but was absolutely adamant that she would not do CIM or kiss.  After the act she loosens up and was quite engaging. On the first booking I got a shared shower and some fun interaction.  It was on this basis I tried a second booking which was really poor.  I kept her at it and I got a reasonable amount of time but the service was unacceptable.

Definitely would of been a 100% failure on my £20 kiss test had I gone and seen her..

Sorry it did not work out..

At least we both have our tests before handing full amount over and they do work..

Weeds out honest from dishonest


Mr HP you said you have seen her twice
First time round did she kiss or do cim?
When you 1st saw her...
« Last Edit: June 21, 2018, 10:44:50 am by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

mrhappypants

  • Guest
KT, I don't use the kiss test because I suspect refusal will rule out a lot of SP's that I would have an enjoyable punt with (kissing is less important for me). It works for you, ensuring you only go ahead if they are going to suit you but I suspect it also pushes up the average cost of your punting. 

Victoria is an unusual case because there was quite a gap between the two meetings and I did not qualify in the room second time (bad mistake).

Stortford

  • Guest
Her sister I had my eye on on viva street little video looks lovely but can't trust her booked another girl for tomorrow who's  not as good looking  but gives a good  service.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Her sister I had my eye on on viva street little video looks lovely but can't trust her booked another girl for tomorrow who's  not as good looking  but gives a good  service.

External Link/Members Only

Link indicates "Sarah" but actually leads correctly to Nicole.

You will see I reviewed her at Maryland.  Nicole is very petite, probably 5'1" and dress size 4.  She always wears a pancake of foundation which I take as a really bad sign.  I met her again yesterday but would not book her for this one very reliable warning sign.  I would be grateful for a pm if you can recommend alternatives.  :hi:
« Last Edit: June 21, 2018, 11:17:51 am by mrhappypants »

Offline king tarzan

KT, I don't use the kiss test because I suspect refusal will rule out a lot of SP's that I would have an enjoyable punt with (kissing is less important for me). It works for you, ensuring you only go ahead if they are going to suit you but I suspect it also pushes up the average cost of your punting. 

Victoria is an unusual case because there was quite a gap between the two meetings and I did not qualify in the room second time (bad mistake).


Each to there own way in doing things...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac