Sussy Busty Natural (Liverpool street; walked, too ugly)

[NotThe]

External Link/Members Only

When: 1st half of 2022

Where: a flat near Liverpool street. I understand she moves around and is not there any more

Price: 160

I walked. Maybe the service would have been amazing but I walked, she was simply too fat and ugly.

She was short, really ugly facially, had some kind of dental braces on, and overall she was just really fat. I get it that the naturally busty tend to be on the curvy side, but there's curvy, and there's blobs of fat.

I noticed she has only 8 negative reviews and about 50 positives, and the negatives were for no shows rather than for poor service. I don't know if she has put on more weight recently, if there are maybe more girls sharing the same profile, or if other punters simply have different preferences. But no way was I going to pay £160 for that.

I guess that more girls sharing the same profile is a possibility, because, even if her eyes are blurred, what you can see from her face in the profile picture looks does not look much like what I saw in the flesh.

When she opened the door and I saw her, I simply said: "I'm sorry, I'm really sorry, but I don't think I can do it". I am not sure if giving a negative after having walked away is against the rules; if it is, could the admin please remove this post? Or maybe move it to the discussion section?

[Kevin Boss]

Faking hell mate, that's one damming review and title    :lol. Probs got B&S so good you walked.

[PilotMan]

I am not sure if giving a negative after having walked away is against the rules; if it is, could the admin please remove this post? Or maybe move it to the discussion section?

Not against the rules - it was a confirmed booking, you showed up, but the girl in the pictures didn't 

If the pictures aren't representative of the girl and you don't fancy what's in front of you, that's what I would do 🚶‍♀️🚶‍♀️🚶‍♀️

[MysteryManNo.7]

Lol 'only 8 negative reviews' (not to mention a bunch of neutrals). You're far too kind considering, if a girl has even a single negative that will likely torpedo any intent I have of ever booking her.

[PilotMan]

External Link/Members Only

Banging body. Huge. Firm tits.

Would I return.  Always. But need to find others with similar figure

Quote from Roger111, who saw her on May 30th - maybe he can shed some more light on who he met and whether the profile is now being run by a different SP - .

[puntingpumping1920]

Faking hell mate, that's one damming review and title    :lol. Probs got B&S so good you walked.

I don't think he got B&S 🤔

It was mentioned on a few reviews she isn't a looker

[NotThe]

Lol 'only 8 negative reviews' (not to mention a bunch of neutrals). You're far too kind considering, if a girl has even a single negative that will likely torpedo any intent I have of ever booking her.

Well, it kinda depends...
If the negative reviews are because she didn't show up, and not because the service was bad, maybe it's a case of an unreliable girl offering good service if you're lucky enough that she doesn't cancel on you.
Not ideal, but different from someone who gets all negatives because the service is crap

[NotThe]

I don't think he got B&S 🤔

It was mentioned on a few reviews she isn't a looker

If I think of her gallery, eg here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=342845.0

This thing she's wearing here https://www.ukpunting.com/uploaded/6e15cdebce747d8dc966ac2b86e7e65a1ec6cb12.jpg seems fairly similar to what she had on

But no way was this https://www.ukpunting.com/uploaded/430d009088cd6efadee57f886e695ba273a7adef.jpg

the same girl who opened the door, no bloody way, not even imagining the heaviest photoshopping on Earth.

[oinki]

Not sure this warrants a negative unless there is a b&s considering looks is subjective. Personally I would have just posted a warning/ FYI on the last review of her or a new post in London section.

Good on you for walking though and I appreciate the warning nonetheless.

[PilotMan]

Not sure this warrants a negative unless there is a b&s considering looks is subjective.

Agreed, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but the rating is for the reviewer to decide.

The reviewer thinks the pictures are far from reality, so he's perfectly entitled to rate it as a negative purely on that basis. It serves as a warning for other punters, they can take a view on it based on other factors such as service etc. whether they still want to attend.

One recent reviewer reports her as having a "banging body" - so this could lead Punters to book her.

This review describes her as short with "blobs of fat" - this could lead to Punters avoiding her.

[Gurgel9165]

Saw her 5 months ago and she was in great shape back then. Could be b&s, but then how likely is it that it was with another chebtastic woman with braces? Maybe quick weight gain.

[Payyourwaymate]

 

[Mario7769]

LMAO Jesus Christ... and this WGSs/ Prossies, is why you NEVER catfish people with fake representations of yourself!!!!   

[supastarjay]

Will add my two cents, I saw her within the last year in Camden.. She was definitely in good shape then, she seemed like a gym bunny so surprising if she has ballooned up. Facially, I'd agree not great, not butt ugly but certainly no more than a 6/10 probably more like a 4 or 5 for me.

[Clooney]

Yeah, I’d echo the above points. When I last saw her her body was outrageously hot.

Firm and curvy with enormous natural breasts with big dark brown nipples which get lovely and stiff.

Facially I thought she was very hot too. The braces on her teeth I didn’t mind at all. I actually quite like them.

Each to their own I suppose.

[beea400]

Think the ugly tag is a bit harsh, i've seen her a few times and don't find her ugly at all, typical south american look. She has an amazing body, huge tits, firm bubble arse and a biggish pussy lips. More importantly, she gets right into it and gives a great service and if you get her turned on enough will squirt too.

Agree with a few comments about being non responsive but that's because she's very popular and busy. Had at least 1 occasion where i was made to wait, but i did wait and as usual it was well worth it

[90125]

Think the ugly tag is a bit harsh, i've seen her a few times and don't find her ugly at all, typical south american look. She has an amazing body, huge tits, firm bubble arse and a biggish pussy lips. More importantly, she gets right into it and gives a great service and if you get her turned on enough will squirt too.

Agree with a few comments about being non responsive but that's because she's very popular and busy. Had at least 1 occasion where i was made to wait, but i did wait and as usual it was well worth it

Hi Sussy.

[daviemac]

Think the ugly tag is a bit harsh, i've seen her a few times and don't find her ugly at all, typical south american look. She has an amazing body, huge tits, firm bubble arse and a biggish pussy lips. More importantly, she gets right into it and gives a great service and if you get her turned on enough will squirt too.

Agree with a few comments about being non responsive but that's because she's very popular and busy. Had at least 1 occasion where i was made to wait, but i did wait and as usual it was well worth it

Are you having a laugh, because you find her attractive you expect everyone else to? 

If you are trying to promote yourself her you aren't doing a very good job by bringing an old negative review back to the top of the board.   

Any reason for no reviews? 

[VladtheImpaleHer]

I've seen Sussy a few times. I think ugly is harsh. I think she's attractive.

I know we can hide our true identities behind these forums. But even my worst experience with a girl or a girl i didn't find attractive I would never write the word 'ugly'. Says more about the punter that they feel ok writing this!

[scutty brown]

the profile dates from 2017.
How many times has it changed hands since then? I think it unlikely that a Brazilian girl is going to stay seven years whoring in the UK. I'm sure that profile must have been traded on at some point, especially as it seems to be one of a pair - ComeFuckMyArse being the other, dating from 2015

Wouldn't surprise me if you've got one pimp, two profiles, changing girls

[supastarjay]

I'll add my two cents, I saw Sussy early last year (I think), I didn't bother to review but would probably have given a neutral. Excellent body, decent service but short changed me on time. I'd agree to an extent, facially not great in my opinion either (certainly wouldn't turn my head in the street ), ugly might be harsh but I think she's closer to ugly than she is to being hot.

[syfodas]

She’s got plenty of positive reviews on AW, including six this year

[jakplo22]

She’s got plenty of positive reviews on AW, including six this year

I think AW reviews are generally less trustworthy than those on here. People are giving positive reviews out of fear of receiving negative feedback in return.

[MCullen71]

the profile dates from 2017.
How many times has it changed hands since then? I think it unlikely that a Brazilian girl is going to stay seven years whoring in the UK. I'm sure that profile must have been traded on at some point, especially as it seems to be one of a pair - ComeFuckMyArse being the other, dating from 2015

Wouldn't surprise me if you've got one pimp, two profiles, changing girls

Haven't seen Sussy, so no comment on that, but CFMA/Lily has been around for ages and the profile has not been traded.  I've seen her since 2018.  The photos are not recent and were probably adulterated but are her and the descriptions of her in each review (positive or negative) are always pretty consistent, but the key thing is the descriptions of her services and in particular squirting are really consistent, so she has not been B&Sed.  She published a book in 2023 about her 8 years as an escort 

[PilotMan]

She’s got plenty of positive reviews on AW, including six this year

 

Ahh yes, AW reviews, the bona fide source of truth and accuracy 

I think AW reviews are generally less trustworthy than those on here. People are giving positive reviews out of fear of receiving negative feedback in return.

Generally less trustworthy??

So UKP reviews are not trustworthy, but a little more trustworthy than those on AW, are you serious?

So we shouldn't trust your 12 reviews then?

[Bassman]

I eventually saw this one in 2020. Those aren’t the pics that were on the page when I saw her. And that’s not who I saw either. The woman I saw was average in the looks but with a decent body. Either she’s put in weight or the profile has been passed on.

Either way it’s a B&S

[beea400]

Hi Sussy.

How ridiculous to think that i'm Sussy, i gave an honest view based on having seen her a number of times. She's a top class provider and when her schedule lines up with mione, I most definitely will be seeing her again!

I'm not the only person who has stated that she's not ugly either, I genuinely think that assessment is very harsh so decided to speak up.

[TheJoker147]

Used to be on my hot list, but something just seemed off for me and so, no longer there!

[daviemac]

How ridiculous to think that i'm Sussy, i gave an honest view based on having seen her a number of times. She's a top class provider and when her schedule lines up with mione, I most definitely will be seeing her again!

I'm not the only person who has stated that she's not ugly either, I genuinely think that assessment is very harsh so decided to speak up.

The trouble is you are basing your opinion on your definition of attractive but the OP is basing his comment on his definition of what he finds attractive.

You do realise that by posting on this negative review you have not only brought it from languishing on page 181 to the top of page 1 but also moved it to the top of the list of her reviews and brought it once again to everyone's attention.   

[patelprat]

The trouble is you are basing your opinion on your definition of attractive but the OP is basing his comment on his definition of what he finds attractive.

You do realise that by posting on this negative review you have not only brought it from languishing on page 181 to the top of page 1 but also moved it to the top of the list of her reviews and brought it once again to everyone's attention.   

Maybe there should be a time period after which old reviews automatically get locked and can't accept new posts.

[jrhunter]

It's a bit odd that this thread has resurfaced but I will add my 2c that Sussy has been around for many years and I have seen her many times. "Ugly" whilst subjective, is pretty harsh. Personally I think she's hot but she is definitely not slim but curvy with huge tits. Some of her photos are quite old now altyhough she has added new ones recently. As mentioned above she has (IMO) an excellent service and I've had many good times with her. I saw her at some point in the second half of last year for the first time in a while and she was much the same but has put on a little bit of weight but then she's likely late-30s now and can't keep that figure forever.   

[scutty brown]

It's a bit odd that this thread has resurfaced but I will add my 2c that Sussy has been around for many years and I have seen her many times. "Ugly" whilst subjective, is pretty harsh. Personally I think she's hot but she is definitely not slim but curvy with huge tits. Some of her photos are quite old now altyhough she has added new ones recently. As mentioned above she has (IMO) an excellent service and I've had many good times with her. I saw her at some point in the second half of last year for the first time in a while and she was much the same but has put on a little bit of weight but then she's likely late-30s now and can't keep that figure forever.   

Seen her many times but not reviewed her?

[PilotMan]

Seen her many times but not reviewed her?

Pulls out the excuse book..

1. Keeping her to himself 

2. I was busy.

3. She's been reviewed so meany times before, I didn't see the point in reviewing her (but now I'll add my 2c).

If the OP couldn't be bothered to review her before, then STFU now, or do a review if it's within the last 6 months.

[Payyourwaymate]

It's a bit odd that this thread has resurfaced but I will add my 2c that Sussy has been around for many years and I have seen her many times. "Ugly" whilst subjective, is pretty harsh. Personally I think she's hot but she is definitely not slim but curvy with huge tits. Some of her photos are quite old now altyhough she has added new ones recently. As mentioned above she has (IMO) an excellent service and I've had many good times with her. I saw her at some point in the second half of last year for the first time in a while and she was much the same but has put on a little bit of weight but then she's likely late-30s now and can't keep that figure forever.   

So she's an overweight unattractive SP that gives good service. Fixed for you.

If the selling point of your post is her service, with you beating around the bush trying to not be "harsh" or realistic about her appearance, chances are she is not attractive  .

[daviemac]

It's a bit odd that this thread has resurfaced but I will add my 2c that Sussy has been around for many years and I have seen her many times. "Ugly" whilst subjective, is pretty harsh. Personally I think she's hot but she is definitely not slim but curvy with huge tits. Some of her photos are quite old now altyhough she has added new ones recently. As mentioned above she has (IMO) an excellent service and I've had many good times with her. I saw her at some point in the second half of last year for the first time in a while and she was much the same but has put on a little bit of weight but then she's likely late-30s now and can't keep that figure forever.   

I've just been looking through the list of her 66 reviews but can't see your's yet you are posting here white knighting her, is there a reason you haven't posted a review of her? 

BTW the OP has based his opinion that she's ugly on his standards and his perception of what is attractive not your's, you may think it's harsh but that is by your own standards which appear to be quite lower than the OP's.

[moe19966]

Nothing wrong with someone finding another person to be ugly, tbh I find about 80% of the women I see on these reviews to be unattractive and sometimes downright hideous, boggles my mind how people pay money for some of them but each to their own.

Yes I have really high standards and very picky, it’s probably why I only request oral/CIM cause I literally can’t get myself to fuck most of these girls

And before anyone asks, I haven’t seen a provider since my last review, please don’t bite me about it I haven’t found anyone I find attractive enough yet 😂

[jrhunter]

Pulls out the excuse book..

1. Keeping her to himself 

2. I was busy.

3. She's been reviewed so meany times before, I didn't see the point in reviewing her (but now I'll add my 2c).

If the OP couldn't be bothered to review her before, then STFU now, or do a review if it's within the last 6 months.

I don't religiously make my way to this site to post a review every time I've seen a girl. Sorry.

I contribute and use the site from time to time but what stops being on here more often and posting more widely is the sanctimonious bullshit of so many of the people on here when someone gives a viewpoint or a position that doesn't somehow align with their pumped up view of themselves because they've reviewed seven hundred and fifty working girls.

You guys never let me down.

[jakplo22]

Ahh yes, AW reviews, the bona fide source of truth and accuracy 




Generally less trustworthy??

So UKP reviews are not trustworthy, but a little more trustworthy than those on AW, are you serious?

So we shouldn't trust your 12 reviews then?

I didn't see this reply until now - I meant "generally" as in "most people would agree". You're attaching a lot of meaning to one little word. 

[JO6688]

How ridiculous to think that i'm Sussy, i gave an honest view based on having seen her a number of times. She's a top class provider and when her schedule lines up with mione, I most definitely will be seeing her again!

I'm not the only person who has stated that she's not ugly either, I genuinely think that assessment is very harsh so decided to speak up.

Generally I agree with your comments above. But why only one review? More reviews shed any doubt and let us know you are genuine. Please write up any reviews for punts you have undertaken within the last 6 months

[JO6688]

Following the theme from these threads, I have seen her twice (once as a duo with CFMA/Lily and the more recently as a solo meet), and feel that ugly is very harsh.

Whilst she is not a stunner, she's not unattractive and was enthusiastic and gave me a good service when I saw her (still wanking from the FFM, even today).

BTW, I'm gonna write a review based on my recent meet with Sussy. Unfortunately I can't write about the FFM with her and CFMA/Lily as it occurred in 2021 and UK Punting only allows for reviews for meets that happened in the last 12 months.