That naughty Lindsey is teasing us from Malaysia

[brolin_76]

whilst this thread may not be everyone's cup of tea, you're kidding yourself if you think that just because you have £150, you'd get to a booking with Lindsey or indeed any highly regarded girl for that matter.

£150 May be the monetary cost, but the actual requirement is far higher. A girl like Lindsey or Miss KDD turn down more punters than they see. They accept bookings in the basis of simple stuff like manners, communication and I guess also on imagination.

Having £150 in your pocket does not guarantee you "next in line" because there is no line. Punters gain consideration through the behaviour they exhibit. A sense of righteous entitlement would rule you straight out.

Of course the hard of thinking will be crowing "fluffy!!!" But that's the difference between operating at the top end of the game, where your money is immaterial to a girl because she can turn you down easily if you are a twat, and the run of the mill, where the punter believes that £150 makes him king for an hour and the girl just had to suffer it because she needs the £150.

Attitudes of such entitlement and self-aggrandisement are nasty and low rent. It sounds like "I've paid my money! I can do as I like!"

£150 doesn't get me to see the top girls out there. My behaviour and manners do. Once those have been accepted, it may cost me £150.

That's not me being a fluffy, that's me being a decent human being. The precise nature of the transaction aside, I treat the ladies I see with exactly the same level of courtesy I treat anyone - colleagues, friends, clients or indeed people who serve me in sainsburys for that matter.

When she's back, try waving your £150 at her. I'd suggest you do so just before bedtime Because the deathly silence that will follow will be perfect for getting to sleep at night.

what a load of bollocks you are talking. you are completely clueless about prostitution. prostitution cannot be equivalent to a real job. I understand miss Kdd. Lindsey are well reviewed here. But if I cannot book them so what? will I miss something. No. after all they are prostitutes.

[Bikerboy]

You miss the point, no one is saying that you should not be polite when arranging or meeting a WG, but I do not lose sight of the fact that this is a WG and I am paying for sex. The ££ are the only reason she is entertaining me.

What I will not do is fawn on here over a WG and act as if it is a date rather than a paid for sexual encounter.

Anyway, each to their own. 

BBR

I agree, each to thier own. But you are disagreeing with some girls when you say:

'I do not lose sight of the fact that this is a WG and I am paying for sex. The ££ are the only reason she is entertaining me.'

Nor do I lose sight of that fact, but the 'only' reason? Really?

Some girls (a minority of course) would dissagree with you.
Some will say it's not the only reason, it's one of them.
So you are saying you know best what motivates all working girls. I doubt that.

Some escorts would find your assumption worrying.

 

Back to the thread - my favourite picture on that profile is the shibari. Hmm...

[squeezebox]

We're all entitled to our opinion on what we want from the punting scene. There are those that just want to pump and dump, and those that want to experience more with, "variety being the spice of life."

I knew someone that would enjoy fried eggs and bacon with slices of toast for breakfast and would only want it served as it came on the plate...standard presentation, that's okay...

However, my preference is eggs&bacon, baked in avocado. Scoop it out at put it on toast..Voila!
External Link/Members Only

There you go....same food, but with an added spice and variety that makes a difference. (if you like avocado's of course) and if you can find any avocado's when you want one...

Oh and if interested...they are very healthy for you too.. External Link/Members Only

[Clooney]

what a load of bollocks you are talking. you are completely clueless about prostitution. prostitution cannot be equivalent to a real job. I understand miss Kdd. Lindsey are well reviewed here. But if I cannot book them so what? will I miss something. No. after all they are prostitutes.

Yeah, that's right. They can't possibly be normal not be entitled to any sort of common decency because they are "prostitutes" 

It's not me who's talking bollocks mate, it's you. It's why your reviews are 50/50 positive and negative, and even your positive ones sound low quality and shit to me.

Mine are almost exclusively excellent, because I behave better than you clearly do and am not a sociopath.

If I know nothing of prostitution I'm having a better time than you. I've been punting for 14 odd years and have an ex who was an escort, so I think your stupid assumptions are well off the mark.

[hendrix]

Two observations from the retired punters home (sole occupant me, yes, yes I know)

1) In any Lindsey thread, it's dead easy to spot who's never met her and is fucked off about it (not everybody obviously)

2) I'm amazed that Abdul still gets away with it you're all slipping! :p

[Bigus Dickus]

what a load of bollocks you are talking. you are completely clueless about prostitution. prostitution cannot be equivalent to a real job. I understand miss Kdd. Lindsey are well reviewed here. But if I cannot book them so what? will I miss something. No. after all they are prostitutes.

Is that you Abdul? 

[Clooney]

Two observations from the retired punters home (sole occupant me, yes, yes I know)

1) In any Lindsey thread, it's dead easy to spot who's never met her and is fucked off about it (not everybody obviously)

2) I'm amazed that Abdul still gets away with it you're all slipping! :p

My thoughts exactly the instant this guy popped up.

Poor diction and stunted writing style...

Belief that they are "only prostitutes"...

I could go on...

[unclesweetheart]

Two observations from the retired punters home (sole occupant me, yes, yes I know)

1) In any Lindsey thread, it's dead easy to spot who's never met her and is fucked off about it (not everybody obviously)

2) I'm amazed that Abdul still gets away with it you're all slipping! :p

+1.

The argument is moronic. If all girls were the same, what would be the point of this site?

[lewishamguy]

+1.

The argument is moronic. If all girls were the same, what would be the point of this site?

Perhaps you should start your own fluffy site.

 

[Type_O_Negative]

When certain WG's gets fully established and are in demand, they look upon "escorting" as a life's experience rather than a need to survive and fill her fridge/freezer, pay mortgage/rent.

That's where I believe L is at the moment and is currently reaping the benefits along the way. All the others mentioned and LK, won't be far behind.

A form of "job satisfaction" where a level of contentment improves performance and passion is enhanced....and get shed loads of cash too! 

Well i'm sorry but you live on different planet. Prostitution is money making business only.

Life experience - she would get it working as a volunteer in nursing home or hospital.

 

[Type_O_Negative]

Yeah, that's right. They can't possibly be normal not be entitled to any sort of common decency because they are "prostitutes" 

It's not me who's talking bollocks mate, it's you. It's why your reviews are 50/50 positive and negative, and even your positive ones sound low quality and shit to me.

Mine are almost exclusively excellent, because I behave better than you clearly do and am not a sociopath.

If I know nothing of prostitution I'm having a better time than you. I've been punting for 14 odd years and have an ex who was an escort, so I think your stupid assumptions are well off the mark.

Come on Clooney, your reviews are positive because you book well reviewed prossies only so you don't face a risk of bad punt. The others try to find "alternatives" for forum darlings and do TOFTTs. As we know TOFTTs are risky and may lead to negative reviews. I don't understand this banging about positive/negative review ratio...
 

[smiths]

Yeah, that's right. They can't possibly be normal not be entitled to any sort of common decency because they are "prostitutes" 

It's not me who's talking bollocks mate, it's you. It's why your reviews are 50/50 positive and negative, and even your positive ones sound low quality and shit to me.

Mine are almost exclusively excellent, because I behave better than you clearly do and am not a sociopath.

If I know nothing of prostitution I'm having a better time than you. I've been punting for 14 odd years and have an ex who was an escort, so I think your stupid assumptions are well off the mark.

Back in the world of reality you cant know how many good or bad punts a punter you don't know has had unless they post so as they might not have reviewed some or many WGs, so just going on reviews is NOT a precise way of judging. In addition its been posted by loads of punters for years that they only review either their good or bad punts.

As to behaving better your purely guessing their, having met many punters who have posted on forums over the years they aren't always the same in real life as their online persona, and its how a punter behaves with the WG that matters ultimately.

As to WGs the good ones deserve praise and the bad ones deserve to be castigated in my view, that's what UKP is all about to some of us. What i do when punting is treat EVERY WG as the individual they are giving them a clean slate.

[Cuntminion]

The fuck is all the shit you posting Rooney ? 

In any walk of life if you are an out and out cunt most places will refuse you service and politeness costs nothing , just common sense really

It's almost has a negative impact when punters i.e. you Mr Clooney post what a wg desired standards are because people will think fuck that seems like a pain if they have a stage three standards and vetting procedure

I for one have looked at reviews and aw profiles and thought nope sounds like a pain

As for turning away more than she see's , I very much doubt it and think that's an exaggeration

[smiths]

The fuck is all the shit you posting Rooney ? 

In any walk of life if you are an out and out cunt most places will refuse you service and politeness costs nothing , just common sense really

It's almost has a negative impact when punters i.e. you Mr Clooney post what a wg desired standards are because people will think fuck that seems like a pain if they have a stage three standards and vetting procedure

I for one have looked at reviews and aw profiles and thought nope sounds like a pain

As for turning away more than she see's , I very much doubt it and think that's an exaggeration

The fact is ANY punter who doesn't live with the WG or have her under 24/7 survellience (which i hope is none) is reliant on what the WG tells him about who she punts with outside those the punter might know personally or off here, AND what the WG tells a punter might be true, but then again it might not, and so its clear i have no idea if Lindsay IS a liar or not, i am making a general point of fact.

Where you say it almost has a negative impact if you think about it that COULD suit some of those punters who punt with a fave WG of theirs already as it COULD mean she is less busy so can fit him in as suits him, and again i am not saying that's what Clooney is thinking as i don't know that obviously.

[Cuntminion]

The fact is ANY punter who doesn't live with the WG or have her under 24/7 survellience (which i hope is none) is reliant on what the WG tells him about who she punts with outside those the punter might know personally or off here, AND what the WG tells a punter might be true, but then again it might not, and so its clear i have no idea if Lindsay IS a liar or not, i am making a general point of fact.

Where you say it almost has a negative impact if you think about it that COULD suit some of those punters who punt with a fave WG of theirs already as it COULD mean she is less busy so can fit him in as suits him, and again i am not saying that's what Clooney is thinking as i don't know that obviously.

You make a fair point

I just think Clooney is going off the deep end for what was a three line tounge in cheek comment

Every wg has a right to refuse punters for whatever reason I just don't see any turning away more than they see unless say they are a booking a day type

Also on a side note this whole thread is a bit fanboy fluffy

[azrael]

Also on a side note this whole thread is a bit fanboy fluffy

+1, from where this started from to looking at where its gone/got to. Im sure lindsey's sitting on a beach reading this and laughing. Knowing only to well that if and when she comes back she'll still have a steady clients list to fall back on 

[Cuntminion]

+1, from where this started from to looking at where its gone/got to. Im sure lindsey's sitting on a beach reading this and laughing. Knowing only to well that if and when she comes back she'll still have a steady clients list to fall back on 

It's just fucking perplexing

I can understand positive reviews, maybe discussion inside generic topics about services etc

My favourite wg is on holiday , I wouldn't dream of doing a holiday/where she at  thread

It's fluffy, needy and creepy

[spkmstr48]

What a twat......all these girls are interested in is your cash, stop talking bollocks ! Some people on here are so full of their own self importance it makes me cringe.

You're another one for the ignore list 

[spkmstr48]

what a load of bollocks you are talking. you are completely clueless about prostitution. prostitution cannot be equivalent to a real job. I understand miss Kdd. Lindsey are well reviewed here. But if I cannot book them so what? will I miss something. No. after all they are prostitutes.

I must be missing something

[BeesKnees]

...what the WG tells a punter might be true, but then again it might not, and so its clear i have no idea if Lindsay IS a liar or not, i am making a general point of fact.

I think generally speaking, wgs are actresses from the get go. Punters pay for a wg to act like their girlfriend in the bedroom (GFE), or pay to act like a pornstar (PSE). They are paid to make punters feel like the one. So everything they say has be taken with a pinch of salt when looking at it OUTSIDE the session. During the session, you can believe everything she says because she's paid to get on with you.

Also on a side note this whole thread is a bit fanboy fluffy

Damn right. It's so far from being a London info post that it shouldn't even exist or should be shut down completely

It's fluffy, needy and creepy

It's just an outlet for the fluffs to air their, literal, love for her. It benefits no one in London looking for a punt because she isn't even in the city anymore and won't be for a long time

[vw]

It benefits no one in London looking for a punt because she isn't even in the city anymore and won't be for a long time

Should it be on the New Zealand board ?

[smiths]

+1, from where this started from to looking at where its gone/got to. Im sure lindsey's sitting on a beach reading this and laughing. Knowing only to well that if and when she comes back she'll still have a steady clients list to fall back on 

Assuming she IS going to return here as a WG I have no doubt your right, masses of free publicity on THE top punting forum in the UK is priceless, in this case going on her excellent feedback on here I have no problem with that, but some punters love to go on and on about her and others that's for sure but that's up to them.

[slow and low]

I haven't seen  Lindsey and doubt I ever will but all I can say is good luck to her and her enterprising business spirit is commendable wish I could do the same.

[Bikerboy]

Guys, this thread is way off topic now.

I have tried to drag it back to the profile pics, but the snipes continue.

Can we all just agree to leave it where it is? Please.

 

[smiths]

It's just fucking perplexing

I can understand positive reviews, maybe discussion inside generic topics about services etc

My favourite wg is on holiday , I wouldn't dream of doing a holiday/where she at  thread

It's fluffy, needy and creepy

Its certainly fluffy in my view, the WG isn't even working here at present, to ME its not On-Topic as it was posted after she stopped working here and isn't even a review thread about her. However, I assume admin hasn't a problem with it as its still on this regional board.

[Cuntminion]

Its certainly fluffy in my view, the WG isn't even working here at present, to ME its not On-Topic as it was posted after she stopped working here and isn't even a review thread about her. However, I assume admin hasn't a problem with it as its still on this regional board.

It has nothing to do with regional punting in present maybe in a past tense

But I don't think it's a lock and move thread either sometimes in forum world's it makes sense to allow threads like this to exist keeps the boards alive not that ukp needs help it's popular as it is but it stops discussion becomes formatted and routine plus gives me a good idea of the fluffys so I can be more astute when reading their reviews and see if the wg would be any good for me

[The Beano]

It appears that my tongue in cheek thread has stirred up a hornets nest, which was not intended. I'm not going to get into the wider arguement as its getting a bit tedious, but if I've posted in the wrong place I'm sure Admin will move if he sees fit. Will make amends to the London board shortly as I've got a booking with Adele, so will write a review.

Going back to Lindsey, I wonder when we will see the first "is she back yet?"thread.
TB

[Bikerboy]

It has nothing to do with regional punting in present maybe in a past tense

But I don't think it's a lock and move thread either sometimes in forum world's it makes sense to allow threads like this to exist keeps the boards alive not that ukp needs help it's popular as it is but it stops discussion becomes formatted and routine plus gives me a good idea of the fluffys so I can be more astute when reading their reviews and see if the wg would be any good for me

If you and Co want to continue arguing the hind legs
off a rather knackered donkey thread, carry on. Anti fluffies already stick out like a sore thumb.
 

[Bigus Dickus]

It has nothing to do with regional punting in present maybe in a past tense

But I don't think it's a lock and move thread either sometimes in forum world's it makes sense to allow threads like this to exist keeps the boards alive not that ukp needs help it's popular as it is but it stops discussion becomes formatted and routine plus gives me a good idea of the fluffys so I can be more astute when reading their reviews and see if the wg would be any good for me

For someone who's reviewed the same girl 3 times with two of those being less than a fortnight apart and all the fluffy cat pictures, I am wondering what your definition of fluffy is? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[password02]

For someone who's reviewed the same girl 3 times with two of those being less than a fortnight apart and all the fluffy cat pictures, I am wondering what your definition of fluffy is? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

+1 - Love the picture - 

[Cuntminion]

For someone who's reviewed the same girl 3 times with two of those being less than a fortnight apart and all the fluffy cat pictures, I am wondering what your definition of fluffy is? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

I keep entirely in the remit of my reviews, plus the two close proximity reviews where when I was new and green to punting the third was the one I always the one I wanted to write and I was honing my review style

I love me some fluffy kittehs, that's a separate issue

My definition of unjustly fluffy is a thread on a regional punting board cooing where an sp (bear in mind she has had your money and is on the other side of the world) currently is

When you know full well she is holiday till 2016

She was gone for half a week and so it begins

Memorial threads are for the dead, not for people on holiday

[tonysoprano]

Fuck me, the level of pathetic fawning from grown men over this particular prostitute is extremely embarrassing.

You would think some of you have never actually had sex with anyone else. Get the fuck over her.

[slow and low]

Fuck me, the level of pathetic fawning from grown men over this particular prostitute is extremely embarrassing.

You would think some of you have never actually had sex with anyone else. Get the fuck over her.

+ 1 first sensible post here.

[Quesadilla]

Fuck me, the level of pathetic fawning from grown men over this particular prostitute is extremely embarrassing.

You would think some of you have never actually had sex with anyone else. Get the fuck over her.

With a very brief count I can see that those that have raised the 61 resoundingly positive reviews of Lindsey have well over 450 reviews between them, so clearly have had a fair amount of sex with other WGs - and that's only those that they've reviewed.

Now, no disrespect intended (well, no more than you offered here), but having read your rather brief resume of reviews (3 negs, 1 positive) it does rather seem that your experience of prostitutes is a bit less comprehensive by comparison, and that your expectations as a punter may perhaps be a little more....rudimentary.  Indeed, a less charitable type of punter might conclude from reading your reviews that for you a warm wet hole that's not too much like a blow up doll seems to fit the bill for you - and hey, that's all fine - to each their own after all.  But why do you find it so hard to accept that some punters actually want a bit more from a punt than you do? 

I suspect that many punters would take on board the views of those - ahem - more experienced punters that have actually seen Lindsey and raved about her as opposed to those that have not and are criticising without any knowledge of the girl in question. 

[rafatheira]

Live and let live folks.

Those who had a great time with Lindsey and want to reminisce...let them. Why are people getting mad at others 'fawning over' this girl, even if they are?

Crack open a beer, plan your next punt, review your recent ones and take it easy. Far too much angst in this thread.

No reason for condescending responses about others punting either, at least they took the time to review the negatives unlike the trillion lurkers who don't contribute to the site.

There's much in life to be angry about. Punting should be all about the good times 

[password02]

Live and let live folks.
Those who had a great time with Lindsey and want to reminisce...let them. Why are people getting mad at others 'fawning over' this girl, even if they are?
Crack open a beer, plan your next punt, review your recent ones and take it easy. Far too much angst in this thread.
No reason for condescending responses about others punting either, at least they took the time to review the negatives unlike the trillion lurkers who don't contribute to the site.
There's much in life to be angry about. Punting should be all about the good times 

Agree 1000%

[poi]

Wow. A simple post goes to 4 pages 

Sometime I am thinking some people has no another fun expect punting  and write review here right after punting.

Have you ever think how many hours you spend time in UKP?
Some users are online even in mid night for hours and arguing about some wgs. ..

As other user said sex and punting is all about fun and nothing else
Have fun and keep punting   

[spkmstr48]

Live and let live folks.

Those who had a great time with Lindsey and want to reminisce...let them. Why are people getting mad at others 'fawning over' this girl, even if they are?

Crack open a beer, plan your next punt, review your recent ones and take it easy. Far too much angst in this thread.

No reason for condescending responses about others punting either, at least they took the time to review the negatives unlike the trillion lurkers who don't contribute to the site.

There's much in life to be angry about. Punting should be all about the good times 

Absolutely!

I have never met Lindsey but am prepared to accept, as the evidence suggests, that she's one of the best.

As in all things there is a distribution of quality levels in WGs with most being fairly average, some awful, some great, etc.

As I see it, this site enables us to discuss the good, the bad and the indifferent, on a safe and controlled forum.

We all punt for different reasons and we all have different expectations. The same is true for the girls for that matter.

I would also like to thank Admin and everyone else on this site for raising my expectations, I am now having more fun than ever before and my attitude has become a lot more positive.

 

[rafatheira]

Absolutely!

I have never met Lindsey but am prepared to accept, as the evidence suggests, that she's one of the best.

As in all things there is a distribution of quality levels in WGs with most being fairly average, some awful, some great, etc.

As I see it, this site enables us to discuss the good, the bad and the indifferent, on a safe and controlled forum.

We all punt for different reasons and we all have different expectations. The same is true for the girls for that matter.

I would also like to thank Admin and everyone else on this site for raising my expectations, I am now having more fun than ever before and my attitude has become a lot more positive.

 

What a fluffy cunt   

[Bigus Dickus]

That rope looks rather rough, I hope it didn't cause any chafing.
TB

There was no chafing, although there was a little bit of redness that went away by the morning! 

[spkmstr48]

What a fluffy cunt   

 

Hardly 

But certainly less bitter and twisted 

 

[rafatheira]

Hardly 

But certainly less bitter and twisted 

 

 

[S_holmes]

Fuck me, the level of pathetic fawning from grown men over this particular prostitute is extremely embarrassing.

You would think some of you have never actually had sex with anyone else. Get the fuck over her.

+2

Get a Life.

[NightKid]

@Those who are attacking a user's positive/negative ratio of reviews because they aired their views about this overpopularised girl, you lot are fucking pathetic.