SugarDaddyMeet - Site Review / Comments

[AnthG]

I haven't been on the site as I have had literally nothing to contribute as I haven't punted in four years. I haven't done anything except joining seeking three years ago (and for the most part it being a disaster when i did). I have been wanting to punt a specific girl for 6 months now, but she works once a fortnight and never seems to be working when I am off work and only goes down as working abruptly. So no way to advance plan to see her.

As a result of the above, a few weeks ago I signed up to Seeking again and had much better success on there this time around (I have been in two minds about posting a geeky guys guide to seeking as a result of my much better success on there this time than I did in 2020).

However I did also sign up a fortnight ago to sugardaddymeet<dot>com After I did. I seen this below topic of a whole series of people seeking info about it and seeking a review about the site, but nobody willing to take the plunge on a $50 tester subscription..

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=ajesor4m9a014kcc0gr589qun1&topic=351124.0

So have signed back in as I finally have something (I hope) worthwhile to contribute to the forum. I will try and help out if I can with a review of it now.

I signed up a fortnight ago and one major plus, they don't add VAT to your membership. It was $50 for a month which worked out as £40. No shock of an extra 20% VAT ontop like Seeking does.

You can message girls on the site when you are premium, and when you've messaged them, they can message back. They cannot message you until you've messaged them first - unless they also have a premium subscription. But from what I have seen that means $50 for them too as I might be wrong but its no discounted membership for the girls.

That means you have to take the first step. If a girl is interested she can click a "like" button to say she would  like a message from you but that is really it.

What non premium people can do is also send some set standard stock messages already typed out for you "I like you and want to meet please message me about a potential meet" Or "I like you can you post up some more photos". But its impossible - uniles someone signs up for premium - to get any further than this generic stock messaging as neithher one of you has the ability to type in your phone number.

Now the girls, looking down the north east, almost all the girls are all drop dead gorgeous, and such a step up from the vast majority of girls on Seeking (in my personal opinion). And many of them are university students. About two thirds of the girls are not on seeking or whatsyourprice at the same time. They are only on SugarDaddyMee. It means you have to join there if you want to potentially see them as there is no other place to message them than on there.

So I signed up, sent a bunch of them a message waiting for them to reply. Now here is the stupidist thing I have ever seen. The website doesn't email you when you get a new message from someone. It relies on you logging in to the site on your own initiative to see any new messages you may have received waiting for you.

That means you can send a girl a message and you just have to sit back waiting for her to log in on her own initiative to then eventually see it and potentially reply.

Now here is the real problem, so far I have chatted with 8 girls on the site. Moved 3 of them over to Whatsapp. And all of them are platonic only. They don't know anything about Seeking.com, they don't know anything about sugaring, they just have read university girls were getting large amounts of money for spending time having a meal with men and that is it.

A few of them, the idea of them even having sex with you as part of an arrangement had never even entered their thinking and were seemingly disgusted at the whole idea (or thats what they were pretending to me in the chat at least). They signed up to get money to go for a meal with you and that is it.

I have two weeks left of membership, a bunch of messages I am waiting for a reply from girls waiting for them to sign in, a pile of super hot 9s and 10s all very eager wanting to see me....but all just for platonic.

In the end I am not sure if its worth it. You would naturally think these girls will realize there is no money in platonic so they might suddenly change to regular meets. If they did you've just discovered the entrance to King Solomans mine as these girls are gorgeous. But i don't know. They will probably all just leave never having a single meet.

I am suspecting the girls who are willing to have a normal meet, would be those who have also signed up for seeking at the same time (nothing to base that assumption on, I am just guessing, but it seems logical to me)

If there is anything else anyone wants to know before my subscription to there expires in a fortnights time I can try and help.

If there is another north east person with really good communication skills willing to do a £40 test, I am curious if they fare any better than me as some of the girls on that site are straight 10s in my attractive scaling system but hearing they only do platonic is like sticking a wooden stake right into my chest for the level of "oh damn" type feeling. Other Geordie guys might fare better than me though?

[tynetunnel]

Firstly, welcome back AnthG 

[AdamRidgewell97]

Interesting post, thanks for taking the plunge on the new site for us! Not sure where all these platonic girls are coming from, must have been a few TikTok’s that went viral and inspired the mass. Anyway, I’d love to read that guide you mentioned about seeking!

[daviemac]

To be honest Anth, I don't think those type of sites are the best place for you.   

[AnthG]

To be honest Anth, I don't think those type of sites are the best place for you.   

I actually agree completely, but punting in the north east seems dead.

That is one of the main reasons I haven't had a regular punt. And I just liked doing overnighters for my punts now anyway.  I just figured I might as well give a tester try of Seeking with a brand new process I wanted to test. And that is being no-nonse with my Seeking membership this time around and seen a lot more success - that would be the basis of my guide that I mentioned.

But Sugardaddymeet just seems to be a load of platonic only's.

[southcoastpunter]

  I just figured I might as well give a tester try of Seeking with a brand new process I wanted to test. And that is being no-nonse with my Seeking membership this time around and seen a lot more success

But Sugardaddymeet just seems to be a load of platonic only's.

interesting. But when you say being "no-nonse" with your seeking membership this time - what exactly do you mean?

[AnthG]

interesting. But when you say being "no-nonse" with your seeking membership this time - what exactly do you mean?

I meant no no-nonsense. That's actually freaky as I didn't know I did that there. Its amazing how a simple spelling error can change the whole context of a post.

But by no-nonsense[ I mean I am blocking girls at the slightest little thing that doesn't feel right - Zero tolerance and zero benefit of the doubt given their way this time around. And trust me doing it this way is so much better in so many different ways. I say this as strongly to anyone as I possibly can. Just block them at the slightest thing.

There are so many different girls on that site that there is no need to give them benefit of the doubt and what I have seen after constantly giving them the benefit of the doubt 9/10 you shouldn't have done it and they were a scammer/thief, picture seller or cat-fisher.

[JontyR]

Maybe rather than spend the money on subscription you should spend it on bus fare and entry to a lapdancing club

At least there you have the expectation of seeing some flesh and the girls will  often make it clear if (stress if)  they are willing to work "off the clock."

To suggest that someone who may have signed up to going out on dates without any sexual follow on will open themselves up to sex because they aren't getting bookings is misunderstanding their decision to sign up at that site (as opposed to others) in the first place.

[southcoastpunter]

There are so many different girls on that site

,

 that may depend on where you are and perhaps depending upon what you are looking for. In my location, i would say that is not true. there are not that many ladies within 25 miles of me who are slim/petite, age 18-35 and looking for real meets, not platonic or not hotel meets only that i like the look of.

it also makes me laugh when guys talk about going to a (traditional) punt saying things like "always have a plan B and plan C ready incase of no shows etc. I have difficulty in finding a plan A!! Maybe i am just too fussy! or perhaps i should look at "sugardaddymeets"

[AnthG]

Maybe rather than spend the money on subscription you should spend it on bus fare and entry to a lapdancing club

At least there you have the expectation of seeing some flesh and the girls will  often make it clear if (stress if)  they are willing to work "off the clock."

To suggest that someone who may have signed up to going out on dates without any sexual follow on will open themselves up to sex because they aren't getting bookings is misunderstanding their decision to sign up at that site (as opposed to others) in the first place.

Sex is not what i am hoping for from them. Obviously sex is good but its a distant second to what i am really after. I want them to come and watch movies with me. And then chat about it afterwards. This is the problem I have. Escorts when I say that to them think I am crazy and trying it on with them somehow.

And SBs think I am really wanting sex and thus trying it on.

This is the tightrope I am stuck within trying to navigate.

But if I went to a lap-dance club and said to one of the girls will you come and watch a movie with me. Likely the response back would be "security...."

[AnthG]

it also makes me laugh when guys talk about going to a (traditional) punt saying things like "always have a plan B and plan C ready incase of no shows etc. I have difficulty in finding a plan A!! Maybe i am just too fussy! or perhaps i should look at "sugardaddymeets"

Join up and look it over, you don't have to give them money to do that. The only problem is, you have to sign up to see the last sign on date of the girl.

But if you wanted to, you could mention anyone you are curious about and I could look and tell you when she last logged in for you. I say this as if its over a month since she last logged in, its likely she is not coming back any time soon. Last fortnight then yes good chance she will be back.

And yes, I hate seeing people say I have a plan B and C, and I have arranged meets with two girls incase one flakes on me...When I see that I just feel to myself "that's not right".

For me, I intend to just have one girl. And take it all exactly how its intended when I get that one girl - as in give her all my spare money when she needs it and not see anyone else.

[KatieEdinburgh]

Sex is not what i am hoping for from them. Obviously sex is good but its a distant second to what i am really after. I want them to come and watch movies with me. And then chat about it afterwards. This is the problem I have. Escorts when I say that to them think I am crazy and trying it on with them somehow.

And SBs think I am really wanting sex and thus trying it on.

This is the tightrope I am stuck within trying to navigate.

But if I went to a lap-dance club and said to one of the girls will you come and watch a movie with me. Likely the response back would be "security...."

In many ways that would be in fact a platonic meet which you say all these girls are searching for on there? When they reply they’re looking for platonic arrangement you could certainly try ask for dinner and a movie…… just at your place rather than a restaurant. With coffee first publicly if worried about stranger danger. That fulfills their criteria too

You may get some sexual activities thrown in if they decide they fancy you but it does sound like a high chance of becoming messy/blurred boundaries which is why I don’t see the point compared to visiting a professional.

Also most escorts will be down for watching a movie with you or cuddling services I reckon.
You can always suggest this once an SP has arrived you don’t need to describe every little detail in comms before you’ve met (timewaster sign to SPs) simply ask when there.

An escort you’ve visited before won’t think you are ”trying it on with them somehow” if they already know you are genuine

Not all of us, but many ladies may have a cheaper “social rate” if you only want to watch films all night. But if with sex included then be prepared for regular rates

[MissWolf]

For me, I intend to just have one girl. And take it all exactly how its intended when I get that one girl - as in give her all my spare money when she needs it and not see anyone else.

So basically you want a girlfriend 

You are looking in all the wrong places, like looking for shoes in a cookware shop ffs

Go out and socialise, join some singles clubs, you should even be able to find and join a film club that meet to watch and review films as a social group, make friends there and you will meet like minded women.

There are so many interest clubs and online forums that are far better suited to what your aim is than escorting and sugardaddy type sites,

[AnthG]

So basically you want a girlfriend 

The implied ethos of Sugaring is you have one sugar babe and one sugar daddy. And its not for sex, its for companionship.

If I am wrong, please can someone correct me. But I am sure when I signed up to SugarDaddyMeets even the terms of service made me click an agree to some kind of words to that effect saying the above.

Problem is, a lot of men seem to use Sugaring to get sex and only sex. So girls are heavily on their guard for that.

To be honest also, escorts also say, you are paying for my time what we do in that time is us to two consenting adults. Every north east agency has that right on their front page. So kind of its the ethos of escorting too.

[Strawberry]

The implied ethos of Sugaring is you have one sugar babe and one sugar daddy. And its not for sex, its for companionship.

If I am wrong, please can someone correct me. But I am sure when I signed up to SugarDaddyMeets even the terms of service made me click an agree to some kind of words to that effect saying the above.

Problem is, a lot of men seem to use Sugaring to get sex and only sex. So girls are heavily on their guard for that.

To be honest also, escorts also say, you are paying for my time what we do in that time is us to two consenting adults. Every north east agency has that right on their front page. So kind of its the ethos of escorting too.

I suspect the words are an attempt to cover their backs legally, as do parlours (brothels) and agencies. I remember the documentary about a well known NE agency, constantly saying "It's all about companionship, whatever happens is between consenting adults(if they decide they cannot keep their hands off each other)". 

Right.

[daviemac]

Anth, read the many threads on here about Seeking and associated sites, they don't allow direct offers of PPM for sex but that's what the majority of women are on there for, including out and out escorts.

[KatieEdinburgh]

The implied ethos of Sugaring is you have one sugar babe and one sugar daddy. And its not for sex, its for companionship.

If I am wrong, please can someone correct me. But I am sure when I signed up to SugarDaddyMeets even the terms of service made me click an agree to some kind of words to that effect saying the above.

Problem is, a lot of men seem to use Sugaring to get sex and only sex. So girls are heavily on their guard for that.

To be honest also, escorts also say, you are paying for my time what we do in that time is us to two consenting adults. Every north east agency has that right on their front page. So kind of its the ethos of escorting too.

There are some ladies who look for Sugar daddy arrangements with the way you describe, as companionship or platonic, they exist but it will still be expected to contribute financially by means of an allowance.

What you won’t be able to find is sugar babes willing to offer that for next to nothing / your spare money when you’re able to 🤣 especially if you expect her to be seeing you only no one else, as she’s looking for someone to be helping out with her rent, bills or study costs I imagine.

A sugar baby when you remove the financial rewards is just a girlfriend, which is where you might be going wrong when approaching these women. X

[AnthG]

There are some ladies who look for Sugar daddy arrangements with the way you describe, as companionship or platonic, they exist but it will still be expected to contribute financially by means of an allowance.

I have a lot of spare money. Enough to keep one girl very happy.

And my experience with platonic is they will just go to a restaurant with a meal. They won't do meets to your place or a hotel. Maybe if you had a bunch of platonic meets they might be more amenable. But in initial chats its, public retaurants only stipulated - like i say because they probably think you want sex off them

[KatieEdinburgh]

Between the 1-2k a month allowance range would be a good place to start for one of these 10/10 hot student type sugar babies to visit you regularly multiple times a week for extended dates with lots of girlfriend-ish activities like watching movies together (with some sexy time).

If your budget is much less than that it will make it harder as that is what other SDs will be offering them

If you are offering that amount but still finding it impossible consider working on your charm skills…?

If you don’t want it to be so transactional consider Miss Wolfs advice to try out the normal dating route with joining some clubs with like minded people

[Strawberry]

I have a lot of spare money. Enough to keep one girl very happy.

And my experience with platonic is they will just go to a restaurant with a meal. They won't do meets to your place or a hotel. Maybe if you had a bunch of platonic meets they might be more amenable. But in initial chats its, public retaurants only stipulated - like i say because they probably think you want sex off them

So you need to build up their trust, but in the meantime and going forward I would guess you'll need to offer the usual level of expected income.

[Doc Holliday]

So basically you want a girlfriend 

That was my initial deduction but reading it again I'm not sure he does?

Anth ,would I be nearer the mark in saying that you want a young (?student) companion who is very attractive, to meet up at your place for girlfriend/social activities, but not particularly for any sexual activity.

The only way you feel you can achieve this is to pay for such a setup?

[AnthG]

Anth ,would I be nearer the mark in saying that you want a young (university student) companion who is very attractive, to meet up at your place for girlfriend/social activities, but not particularly for any sexual activity.

The only way you feel you can achieve this is to pay for such a setup?

Yes, to all of this.

[JontyR]

Sex is not what i am hoping for from them. Obviously sex is good but its a distant second to what i am really after. I want them to come and watch movies with me. And then chat about it afterwards. This is the problem I have. Escorts when I say that to them think I am crazy and trying it on with them somehow.

Apologies if I missed the intention.

on top of the other posts suggesting that you want a girlfriend or joining clubs there are a couple of other thoughts.

Relating to the post above - if you are insisting on it - why not post a reverse booking on AW and see what you get.

Some dating apps, bumble for instance, also have links for friends rather than dating. Maybe consider posting something on there. Responses aren't guaranteed but more exposure means more chance.

If what you say is legit, and you genuinely don't want to push for sex, and you are insisting on paying for it....I'd pay for housekeeper. Maybe even advertising at a uni with a film course. Would save the time on the washing up, tidying, laundry and maybe you could learn off them as well.

[Lou2019]

AnthG with all due respect, it’s  like déjà vu I’m sure the same conversations were had 4/5 years ago 

[AnthG]

AnthG with all due respect, it’s  like déjà vu I’m sure the same conversations were had 4/5 years ago 

If you read my first post I said I was doing quite well on seeking this time. I then repeated it twice afterwards in subsequent posts. Everyone has assumed I am doing badly for some reason.

I came on literally just to post a review of SugarDaddyMeets to help others. And that was to say its full of platonics only.

As a result of the above, a few weeks ago I signed up to Seeking again and had much better success on there this time around (I have been in two minds about posting a geeky guys guide to seeking as a result of my much better success on there this time than I did in 2020).

I wouldn't do that if I was crashing and burning non stop

[Al R]

Yes, to all of this.

Have you detailed exactly what you are looking for on your profiles?

[MissWolf]

That was my initial deduction but reading it again I'm not sure he does?

Anth ,would I be nearer the mark in saying that you want a young (?student) companion who is very attractive, to meet up at your place for girlfriend/social activities, but not particularly for any sexual activity.

The only way you feel you can achieve this is to pay for such a setup?

Just come back to this and that was my next attempt Doc

A girlfriend or companion type relationship doesn't have to have a sexual side to it, I would still advise going down the specific interest club route, even if that is online to begin, if films are your thing which it seems it is then there are film clubs and forums where you can strike up friendships and go to meeting nights to meet people in person.

Expand your circle of real life friends and you will stand more chance of finding and meeting someone who ticks your boxes.

I'm aware you're fixated on, student, red brick University,  looks, age etc but many times that blinkered view will be what's hampering your ability and opportunity to find the right person.

Build your social skills and circle of friends because the route you are taking now will not work for you IMO

[MissWolf]

If you read my first post I said I was doing quite well on seeking this time. I then repeated it twice afterwards in subsequent posts. Everyone has assumed I am doing badly for some reason.

I came on literally just to post a review of SugarDaddyMeets to help others. And that was to say its full of platonics only.

I wouldn't do that if I was crashing and burning non stop

But isn't that what you're looking for....I'm confused

[AnthG]

But isn't that what you're looking for....I'm confused

Platonic's who refuse point blank to go to your house or hotel. They will only meet in public in a restaurant.

[MissWolf]

Platonic's who refuse point blank to go to your house or hotel. They will only meet in public in a restaurant.

But you need to build trust so that to me is reasonable for the first couple of meets

Surely it's also safer for you to meet women in public first till you make sure they are what you are expecting and not a complete fruitcake 

[southcoastpunter]

But you need to build trust so that to me is reasonable for the first couple of meets

Surely it's also safer for you to meet women in public first till you make sure they are what you are expecting and not a complete fruitcake 

have to say i go along with Miss W - AnthG, me and you aren't the only trustworthy nice guys out there but as you know from reading the Seeking threads on here, most guys are really just after sex and the ladies know that and are , with justification, probably very wary of going to people's homes until trust has been built up. Plus there are some not so nice guys out there too.

so I can't really blame them. And it helps protect you from "fruitcases" and scammers too. i would have thought it was a good place for an informal, friendly, "get to know you" chat and if your thing, discussion about films etc. Or do you have issues to do with "discretion" and being seen in public to consider?

[AnthG]

so I can't really blame them. And it helps protect you from "fruitcases" and scammers too. i would have thought it was a good place for an informal, friendly, "get to know you" chat and if your thing, discussion about films etc. Or do you have issues to do with "discretion" and being seen in public to consider?

No, not bothered about discretion at all. I am single. My concern was I was going to be wasting mine and the girls time perusing something she made very clear she was not going to be up for.

There is one girl I asked if we could keep numbers on each others phone incase I changed my mind about the paid for meal. I am now thinking I might message her sometime for it to give it a chance. 

In case anyone is curious, I will report back in a month or two how I get on as my plan was to only join up for one month as a test to both sites. [By the way I have given you and MissWolf a like for your helpful advice there]

[sensualencounter]

I’ve got serious deja vu here  you’re searching for the unobtainable (for you). You really need to reassess your expectations and do a lot of self reflection. But again that’s deja vu. You’ve been told this so many times.

[AnthG]

I’ve got serious deja vu here  you’re searching for the unobtainable (for you). You really need to reassess your expectations and do a lot of self reflection. But again that’s deja vu. You’ve been told this so many times.

I am more amazed so many people can remember me and my posts. Its been over 3 years since I logged in.

I was expecting other than a few North East members everyone else saying "who the heck is that". And needing someone from the olden days of the forum say, he's one of the old members of the forum.

I come back after 3 whole years and its like, remember that post you made....

[datwabbit]

Seeking is whatever you want it to be. That bit is important as it might not be what others are saying it is on threads.. Just make sure that you are not scammed and mainly that is paying before meeting, which I think is more likely if it's sex only. There is something called a sugar boyfriend in the US. Must admit I thought Seeking looked poor in the NE as it was the same faces for months and I didn't catch any students.

[scutty brown]

Anth

how do you know that these Sugardaddybabies you're talking with are actually real?
Past indications have been that they're mainly - or all - computer bots

My feeling is you're just chasing electronic ghosts. Again.

[marc_hotsteppa]

There is one girl I asked if we could keep numbers on each others phone incase I changed my mind about the paid for meal. I am now thinking I might message her sometime for it to give it a chance. 

Why not message her with something along the lines of

"Hi [name], I am not seeking anything sexual, rather a companion to watch films with and discuss them.  I want you to feel comfortable with this and suggest we meet up for a coffee and discuss my offer of paid meets further with you."

Just so that she knows that sex isn't an expectation she may be more inclined to agree with what you're after. 

[datwabbit]

There's an excellent thread on Secret Benefits by Vice Admiral. Secret Benefits is generally a scam and you need to ask why SDM is more popular with hot students in the NE than (I believe) the leader in the UK.

There's definitely genuine women on there but more likely in the bigger cities.

If you're going for anything either platonic or sexual try to avoid paying before you've met for coffee.

[FLYING BLUE]

Firstly, welcome back AnthG 

It's really good to see you back again Anth
FB

[datwabbit]

Yes, to all of this.

That is doable. The number of students on Seeking has dropped though in the NE. Be careful though, your idea of good conversation might not be theirs.

[AnthG]

Anth

how do you know that these Sugardaddybabies you're talking with are actually real?
Past indications have been that they're mainly - or all - computer bots

My feeling is you're just chasing electronic ghosts. Again.

There are a lot of suspicious accounts. When I signed up I have quite literally blocked about 2/3rds of the north east profiles in one quick swoop. Yesterday, I went down the last two pages of the north east section seeking thread here seeing all the girls people were asking about here and found I had already blocked every single one of them. So it seems my spider senses are working better this time for spotting fakes.

On another time, when I moved girls over to Whatsapp. One girl had a guys name on her whatsapp profile, another girl had a totally different person on her whatsapp photo.

Seeking really is a cesspool of criminals, scammers and fakers. Anyone signing up really needs to have a mindset that these lovely 21 year old blond girl you are chatting to. Could be a 50 year old guy trying to steal from you.

[scutty brown]

Seeking really is a cesspool of criminals, scammers and fakers. Anyone signing up really needs to have a mindset that these lovely 21 year old blond girl you are chatting to. Could be a 50 year old guy trying to steal from you.

But aren't you being naive by treating SugarDaddyMeet any differently? Looks to me like just another scam

[Al R]

But aren't you being naive by treating SugarDaddyMeet any differently? Looks to me like just another scam

It’s the same with any of the “sugar baby” sites as it is with AW, Vivastreet or anywhere else. There are genuine profiles & there are scammers. Vigilance and careful vetting of profiles is necessary with all of them

[AnthG]

But aren't you being naive by treating SugarDaddyMeet any differently? Looks to me like just another scam

There are some girls that pass your checks. For me I am chatting with the girls until something doesn't hold true and then I am just blocking them and moving to the next girl.

2020 I gave them the benefit of the doubt and then realized I shouldn't have done - I suspect its my giving these girls benefit of the doubt why everyone is now keep saying "deja vu" and "not him again". But now in 2023 I am not giving them the benefit of the doubt and I feel so much happier for it. I went into both sites with a plan simply as a £60 and £40 tester to see if it worked. And so far things are going ok.

Blocking 3/4 of the north east means I still have 1/4 left to work qith. And all I want is one girl to setup an agreement with. I am not doing Sugaring like other guys are to just get frequent sex from many student girls.

If would be interesting if Datwabbit or TyneTunnel joined up to SugarDaddyMeets to see if they fared any differently to me just to compare my results with theirs though.

[datwabbit]

There are some girls that pass your checks. For me I am chatting with the girls until something doesn't hold true and then I am just blocking them and moving to the next girl.

2020 I gave them the benefit of the doubt and then realized I shouldn't have done - I suspect its my giving these girls benefit of the doubt why everyone is now keep saying "deja vu" and "not him again". But now in 2023 I am not giving them the benefit of the doubt and I feel so much happier for it. I went into both sites with a plan simply as a £60 and £40 tester to see if it worked. And so far things are going ok.

Blocking 3/4 of the north east means I still have 1/4 left to work qith. And all I want is one girl to setup an agreement with. I am not doing Sugaring like other guys are to just get frequent sex from many student girls.

If would be interesting if Datwabbit or TyneTunnel joined up to SugarDaddyMeets to see if they fared any differently to me just to compare my results with theirs though.

I've stopped because it's the same profiles that I found. The same onlines, scammers, too high amounts and didn't connects. There's ones that are new but not enough to justify £80 a month.

[tynetunnel]

If would be interesting if Datwabbit or TyneTunnel joined up to SugarDaddyMeets to see if they fared any differently to me just to compare my results with theirs though.

I’m half way through a SA membership. I don’t have the cash or the time to sign up to another one atm Anth

[sensualencounter]

Again, deja vu. You’re on a punting site looking for something that isn’t paid sex. You’re looking in the wrong places for what you want. But I can’t even tell you where to look other than dating or friendship type places maybe?

But then who wants to only be friends with a young hot female red brick university student who enjoys watching movies round a stranger’s house and that stranger has no sexual intentions? It’s so niche a pipe dream. So specific it’s weird as fuck and no wonder they run for the hills. You really do need to completely change your expectations.

If you have no sexual intentions then surely the appearance of the companion doesn’t matter? It’s all again your crazy fantastic dream world.

[AnthG]

Again, deja vu. You’re on a punting site looking for something that isn’t paid sex. You’re looking in the wrong places for what you want. But I can’t even tell you where to look other than dating or friendship type places maybe

I am on a site that has a large Seeking Arrangement / Sugaring contingent and advice pages on good girls, discussions, and chats about it.

I signed in to offer some comments on a sugaring site because I seen over 20+ posts of people literally calling out for a review and real world comments from someone who had signed up to SugarDaddyMeet. I had this info that people wanted so signed in to try and help the people of the forum.

And you are making assumptions they are running for the hills. Throughout this topic so many non northeasters have made assumption after assumption with no evidence to back those assumptions up than apparent claims about posts I made well over 3-4 years ago. When in total honesty, I don't know who any of you are. I don't remember speaking to any of you 3-4 years ago.

Honestly, I don't mean this to come across as bad. I don't remember any of you all. I remember Flying Blue, Tyne Tunnel, Datwabbit, DavieMac, Strawberry and Scutty. Everyone. My minds a blank who you all are. You all keep mentioning Deja vu though?

[southcoastpunter]

i disagree with SE to some extent. There seem to be a number of younger ladies looking for platonic paid meets - everyone on SA reports getting too many of them. I think your mistake has been trying to get them to come to your home from the start. it raises questions and red flags in the head immediately. why does he want that if he says platonic?
You need to build trust with them - most will be happy to do that once they have had a few meets with you and see for themselves that you are a nice guy and can be trusted.

[sensualencounter]

I am on a site that has a large Seeking Arrangement / Sugaring contingent and advice pages on good girls, discussions, and chats about it.

I signed in to offer some comments on a sugaring site because I seen over 20+ posts of people literally calling out for a review and real world comments from someone who had signed up to SugarDaddyMeet. I had this info that people wanted so signed in to try and help the people of the forum.

It’s called UKPunting. Not UKPlatonicfriendships. So there really needs to be an element of paid for sex. And also it doesn’t really seem like you’re giving info and help but here looking for advice and attention.

Anyway, good luck in whatever it is you’re looking for, you’re going to need it.