Higher rate for multiple hours

[binbag]

I usually book longer sessions, partly because multiple hours were typically better value but I've been surprised lately at how many women charge more for the second hour than the first. In my experience it used to be quite rare but it seems to be happening more often. My presumption is that longer appointments would be preferable for most women but perhaps I'm wrong? The current pricing trends seem to be designed to discourage extended bookings. Am I correct in thinking this type of pricing is becoming more common and, if so, why would that be? What's the downside from the girl's point of view?

[PunterNumber69]

I think they do it to discourage longer bookings. Some prefer 1 or 2 hrs max.

[SeekingSteve]

What's the downside from the girl's point of view?

Not saying this is the case here, but i'd assume they would rather not have to suffer a long afternoon/evening with some random bloke they can't stand to look at rather than the chance of seeing a couple of quicker bookings with more chances of not getting the worst of the worst ?

[GingerNuts]

Not saying this is the case here, but i'd assume they would rather not have to suffer a long afternoon/evening with some random bloke they can't stand to look at rather than the chance of seeing a couple of quicker bookings with more chances of not getting the worst of the worst ?

I think they do it to discourage longer bookings. Some prefer 1 or 2 hrs max.

If they don't want to do bookings of a certain length they can simply not quote prices. There are many on AW who only give prices for, say, 30 minutes and one hour.

[southcoastpunter]

i guess most of us guys can only speculate but i would suspect that there maybe a number of reasons rather than just one - perhaps including the fact that more younger guys are punting these days (more stamina) and increasing use of the "little blue pill" has meant more guys can keep pumping away for longer periods of time.  Perhaps WG's are combating that a little by encouraging shorter time so allowing themselves some recovery time inbetween.

Or maybe they think some us are thick and can't do multiplication! Or, as seekingsteve says, they just don't want to spend too long with some of us!

[Will2k]

If they wanna say no, they should just say no.

[Jeremy]

I wonder how many punters actually stay for the duration after they've cum. I know most here are savvy about getting their money's worth in terms of time, but I reckon the average punter isn't. So imagine a WG can choose between seeing 1 guy for 3 hours, or 3 guys for 1hr sessions that might leave before their time is up. Less time spent working, more time to herself, to muck about on her phone or whatever she does inbetween punts.

[Moby Dick]

Not noticed. Got any links?

[Joball87]

It's an odd one. I can absolutely get they don't want to "act" for a long time - so much beyond 2 hours can be tiresome unless they really fancy the guy. On the other hand , yes, having multiple shorter bookings gives more variety/mitigates against the awful client & could give more income,  but equally opens them up to more risk (catching something, dodgy client etc etc) if not seeing multiple regs back-back. Anyway, their rules/rates - punters will either pay them or not.

[contentguy]

Not noticed. Got any links?

I’ve seen it a few times recently.  Another that irks is offering a 90 minute session for the same as 30 min rate + the hour rate.  Some examples:

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[binbag]

Here are a few whose hourly rates increase as the session gets longer instead of decreasing. And there are many who keep the rate the same instead of discounting for multiple hrs. It makes sense if the woman doesn't like longer sessions but I would have thought that, in general, seeing one guy for 3hrs is a lot less hassle and probably safer than seeing 3 guys for an hour each and therefore this would be reflected in the pricing. It's true that most women still seem to hold that attitude but the trend seems to be going away from that.   
 
External Link/Members Only 1st hr 150, 2nd hr 200

External Link/Members Only 1st hr 140, 2nd hr 210

External Link/Members Only 2nd hr 150, 3rd hr 200

External Link/Members Only 1st & 2nd hrs 180, 3rd hr 190

External Link/Members Only 2nd hr is 60, 3rd hr 100

External Link/Members Only 1st & 2nd hrs 160, 3rd hr 180

External Link/Members Only 1st & 2nd hrs are 110, 3rd hr is 130

External Link/Members Only 2nd hr 100, 3rd hr 120

[Moby Dick]

Dunno 
Doesn’t make sense.
Maybe maths just ain’t their strongpoint.

[mrfishyfoo]

I usually book longer sessions, partly because multiple hours were typically better value but I've been surprised lately at how many women charge more for the second hour than the first. In my experience it used to be quite rare but it seems to be happening more often. My presumption is that longer appointments would be preferable for most women but perhaps I'm wrong? The current pricing trends seem to be designed to discourage extended bookings. Am I correct in thinking this type of pricing is becoming more common and, if so, why would that be? What's the downside from the girl's point of view?

Pro$$ie logic !!! 

There's no point trying to get your head round it. 

My advice is that if you have the cash to drop on a lass then offer her what you have and see what happens.

[binbag]

Good advice, Fishy. Thanks.

[mrfishyfoo]

Good advice, Fishy. Thanks.

If you don't ask you don't get even if what you get is a NO !!! 

[Payyourwaymate]

They can only pretend for so long. The higher price is to discourage long bookers as mentioned by another member, although...anyone determined to pay will still pay up and they will have to find a way to deal with it if they really need the money.

[niceguy30!!]

Seen a lot like this, I put it down to poor maths.

[The Owl]

I think they do it to discourage longer bookings. Some prefer 1 or 2 hrs max.

+1

Some escorts may find it harder to keep up the performance over a longer period of time. Also most of us guys last longer after cumming the 1st time so they may risk getting more sore and unable to take as many bookings afterwards.

[Marmalade]

One escort said to me that the short half-hour bookings mean she doesn’t have to ‘get to know’ the punter, which she finds trying.

[binbag]

Yes, that makes sense. I hadn't thought about that. Forced socialising, when you're not in the mood can be hard work. I can see some women would rather keep to the sex and then be done with the guy after that. Neither party is there to be a 'friend' even though it might well be a friendly encounter. And becoming a 'friend' can lead to possible complications later.

[SamOmar]

Most Wgs unless those who hold regular party bookings do not like extended durations in my experience. Difficult do deliver the same enthusiasm / acting abd even variety to a booking for an extended period of time. Whilst you may want to connect with a lady over a longer booking (I tried that recently) I find 1 hour - 90 mins is the sweet spot for me.