The £20 kiss test?

[versace]

I think Versace was joking 

I wasn’t.


Hidden Image/Members Only

[Lou2019]

Oh god I see it now jesus  cringe

[Strawberry]

There's also a reference to UKP in his feedback.

[Strawberry]

If the police are now involved, this video may very well play a part in there investigation, so taking the video down, is the right thing to do

It's not possible to post images or video on SAAFE.

[Lou2019]

There's also a reference to UKP in his feedback.

and his fans 

[Punting2022]

tbh what can the police do, its hard enough to catch murders today, do you think they are going after yaba daba doo man

[daviemac]

tbh what can the police do, its hard enough to catch murders today, do you think they are going after yaba daba doo man

Different departments mate, murder squad detectives don't patrol the motorways either. If you think they don't investigate crimes against sex workers you are sadly mistaken.

[Placebo88]

tbh what can the police do, its hard enough to catch murders today, do you think they are going after yaba daba doo man

If the SAAFE reports about him sending threatening texts are accurate the police may be able to trace them back to him and maybe he'd get given a warning. Although her SAAFE posts said she gave him a false phone number so that doesn't add up.

A customer having sex with a prostitute who is not working of her own free will is I believe liable to charges, even if unaware. The most severe charges for coercion would lie with the agency in the case outlined on SAAFE. The more women who were prepared to collaborate the story to the police the more likely something could come of it.

[bugsybum]

What's the legal situation on the Escorts taking videos of mangoman without his consent? Not defending him in this current situation but it is always a fear of being a monger and being videod secretly and being posted online or a potential blackmail situation.

[Cee92]

What's the legal situation on the Escorts taking videos of mangoman without his consent? Not defending him in this current situation but it is always a fear of being a monger and being videod secretly and being posted online or a potential blackmail situation.

I would assume it falls under the same catergory as revenge porn no?

[webpunter]

I'm pretty sure that the last thing they wanted to do was film this funt
However it would appear that this resulted from him 'kicking off', not for the 1st time
Amongst all the other shite behaviour, at whichever escort gaff it is & on here being weird being very generous
So funt can behave as he wants but object to being filmed in his finest moments, not giving his consent ??
Unless i'm mistaken the estabishments he perused are hardly gonna wanna get a rep for filming punters
Reading stuff on related threads it appears to me that they felt like they had no choice given funt's antics

You rock up & behave like a normal punter [KT ain't, obvs] & there is jack-shit chance of being filmed 
You are inadvertently defending KT in the sense that you are giving the impression that a punter can behave as he sees fit yet not consent to being filmed
When the other party on the receiving end is just trying to get some evidence rather than 'he said this & did that & we said this & did that' etc
I'd do the same
Get real

Clearly you are worried about blackmail
Most escort set-ups are interested in one thing & that's your money

Anyways what is there to worry about for you ? 
A phenomenal 7 reviews in as many years
& the last review 3+ years ago
Highly unlikely that you are gonna be blackmailed just looking @ UKP, Awank & interweb porn so you can rest easy
Bless & good luck 

What's the legal situation on the Escorts taking videos of mangoman without his consent? Not defending him in this current situation but it is always a fear of being a monger and being videod secretly and being posted online or a potential blackmail situation.

[myothernameis]

What's the legal situation on the Escorts taking videos of mangoman without his consent? Not defending him in this current situation but it is always a fear of being a monger and being videod secretly and being posted online or a potential blackmail situation.

The way I have read the reports of KT, is that he became abusive and threatening, which include verbal abuse against one or more escorts.   Now was KT filmed secretly or filmed in the open, maybe by use a mobile phone


The matter of his consent, could have gone out the window, with his abusive and threatening behaviour.   There no legal reason to post the video online, which I would say, would contravene KT right to privacy, but should not expect privacy if video is handed to the police as evidence of his behaviour

[webpunter]

Err
>
>
>
>
>
No
 

I would assume it falls under the same catergory as revenge porn no?

[larryshouse]

I have to say that KT aggressive responses and puerile idiotic style has made me hold back from writing one or two reviews.

It is important this forum can be a place where members can confidently write reviews without having to deal with puerile behaviour.

[bugsybum]

Anyways what is there to worry about for you ? 
A phenomenal 7 reviews in as many years
& the last review 3+ years ago
Highly unlikely that you are gonna be blackmailed just looking @ UKP, Awank & interweb porn so you can rest easy
Bless & good luck 

Your right there is nothing for me to worry about because the way the punting scene is in Liverpool i wont be punting much in the future. I have had one punt in the last 3 years which i never reviewed because it was the same women Molly Swedish in Manchester as my last review. It would have been against site rules to review the same bird i am led to believe.

I wont be paying the 90/100 half hour or 160-200 hour rip off for punts and on top of this i have to use public transport to go into Manchester for a decent punt at a decent price. Too much trouble and requires military planning precision for me to pull off. I also during lockdown had a bit of a breakdown due to gyms closing and my Libido was non existant.

You obviously looked through my review history perhaps you should have looked at my post history and you would have seen i left a very detailed report on my 2 weeks in Thailand in June last year. I provided plenty of useful information for other site members and would have contributed to lads who are looking to go to Thailand post pandemic for a spot of mongering. 

Finally on Yabber Dabber Doo man. He is very clearly a wrong-un and a danger to women at worst or someone with mental health problems at best. Who can forget his endorsement of Bolsonaro and Mike Pence it seemed like in every post he made a few years back?  Defo not the full shilling.

[Liverpool]

Your right there is nothing for me to worry about because the way the punting scene is in Liverpool i wont be punting much in the future. I have had one punt in the last 3 years which i never reviewed because it was the same women Molly Swedish in Manchester as my last review. It would have been against site rules to review the same bird i am led to believe.

No such rule. You can review the same person more than once. You just need to make sure you're not touting.

[90125]

No such rule. You can review the same person more than once. You just need to make sure you're not touting.

Correct.

[webpunter]

A brief check on review timings only
And indeed Punting Abroad [PA] doesnt show
I know that given that i've done a few in europe
Duly noted & this puts a different complexion on things 
PA intel can be very valuable, i know coz i've researched here b4 going on my travels
The kind of stuff that is helpful for when on the ground wherever it may be

You obviously looked through my review history perhaps you should have looked at my post history and you would have seen i left a very detailed report on my 2 weeks in Thailand in June last year. I provided plenty of useful information for other site members and would have contributed to lads who are looking to go to Thailand post pandemic for a spot of mongering. 

A couple more sentences & the interpretation [of the original post which i responded to] & things view different
I cant recall YDDM's endorsements & wont be checking
Yet more typical suspect fan bollox from him, the repetitive nature thru & thru
Well remembered
Though it wont be long before he is soon not remembered
Not the full shilling indeed, a few bricks short ....

Finally on Yabber Dabber Doo man. He is very clearly a wrong-un and a danger to women at worst or someone with mental health problems at best. Who can forget his endorsement of Bolsonaro and Mike Pence it seemed like in every post he made a few years back?  Defo not the full shilling.

Think we are squared-up now

[webpunter]

My understanding is that the general criteria is about a minimum year between reviews, no touting etc
Exceptions for a shorter time period, being that stuff has changed
EG - for example looks wise getting to the gym or conversly Greggs
Or the 'offering' is amended, services added / removed
Is this about right ?

Correct.

[daviemac]

My understanding is that the general criteria is about a minimum year between reviews, no touting etc
Exceptions for a shorter time period, being that stuff has changed
EG - for example looks wise getting to the gym or conversly Greggs
Or the 'offering' is amended, services added / removed
Is this about right ?

The basic criteria as far as I'm concerned is what value would a second review within a short space of time add to the site if nothing has changed, in most cases a post added to the member's last review saying they'd been back and the punt was just as good is all that is needed.

Personally speaking if I'm looking at a profile with a view to make a booking I would rather see several reviews from different punters than several from the same punter. We all have different standards and reviews from a variety of punters shows she gives good service to all commers, whereas several reviews from one bloke could mean that he is just very easily pleased and it makes him look like a fanboy.

If we put ourselves in the readers shoes and think how we would feel if we were reading instead of posting.

[akauya]

The basic criteria as far as I'm concerned is what value would a second review within a short space of time add to the site if nothing has changed, in most cases a post added to the member's last review saying they'd been back and the punt was just as good is all that is needed.

Quite. That's what I did with my last review. I just replied to my post saying "visited again, all good, etc."

I would see a punter posting separate reviews for the same WG within a short space of time just as a way of increasing his review count.

[Billy no mates]

Quite. That's what I did with my last review. I just replied to my post saying "visited again, all good, etc."

I would see a punter posting separate reviews for the same WG within a short space of time just as a way of increasing his review count.

Yeah, I also did the same for my last review, saw her twice over Christmas. Posted a review of the first meet, then a reply to that which was written like a review for the second meet, so all nicely referred to in one thread.

[Hobbit]

Is it not time for everyone to move on with this? He's gone.

Have to fully agree. It's getting quite boring now. Humanity seems to like to gossip as it takes away our attention from our deficiencies and the sins we commit.

It also doesn't help with hookers coming on this forum fuelling the issue and not letting it subside.

[myothernameis]

Trust p.@?t
Not sure if it can be said but it’s a well known review site

It seems KT rant about saafe has been removed from Trust p.@?t, but now now someone else has posted a review, which seems to be aimed at Saafe to get KT banned

Now just wonder who has complained and then the review has been removed, but then why leave up Nadya Shaglina review of KT and UKpunting

[whiskyfan]

It seems KT rant about saafe has been removed from Trust p.@?t, but now now someone else has posted a review, which seems to be aimed at Saafe to get KT banned

Now just wonder who has complained and then the review has been removed, but then why leave up Nadya Shaglina review of KT and UKpunting

TP is best ignored. The "KT rant" that was removed almost certainly wasn't written by KT himself. It's not the first time it's been used to spread garbage about UKP (and UKE when it existed). Often fake reviews were posted on it under the usernames of prolific forum posters.

[MissWolf]

TP is best ignored. The "KT rant" that was removed almost certainly wasn't written by KT himself. It's not the first time it's been used to spread garbage about UKP (and UKE when it existed). Often fake reviews were posted on it under the usernames of prolific forum posters.

Exactly this, when Escortinghub was born to replace the old UKE we had a slew of shit reviews on TP all from established forum names both on there and here, none of which were from those actual people.

It's a very sad existence when places like this live rent free in sad idiots heads the way they seem to do

We simply kept reporting and the whole lot were binned and EH can no longer be reviewed

[whiskyfan]

Exactly this, when Escortinghub was born to replace the old UKE we had a slew of shit reviews on TP all from established forum names both on there and here, none of which were from those actual people.

It's a very sad existence when places like this live rent free in sad idiots heads the way they seem to do

We simply kept reporting and the whole lot were binned and EH can no longer be reviewed

I believe all UKP, UKE and EH reviews on there were taken down.

[bugsybum]

A brief check on review timings only
And indeed Punting Abroad [PA] doesnt show
I know that given that i've done a few in europe
Duly noted & this puts a different complexion on things 
PA intel can be very valuable, i know coz i've researched here b4 going on my travels
The kind of stuff that is helpful for when on the ground wherever it may be

A couple more sentences & the interpretation [of the original post which i responded to] & things view different
I cant recall YDDM's endorsements & wont be checking
Yet more typical suspect fan bollox from him, the repetitive nature thru & thru
Well remembered
Though it wont be long before he is soon not remembered
Not the full shilling indeed, a few bricks short ....

Think we are squared-up now

 

[Nz]

If KT is banned, why is he showing as online?

[alabama1]

If KT is banned, why is he showing as online?

Does it really matter 

[DoorDash]

If KT is banned, why is he showing as online?

Hidden Image/Members Only