I’m often quite forthright with strong language when it comes to fluffies: I honestly believe that’s the best thing to do. There will always be another fluffie or two to say give newbies a hug and encourage posters and so on so I don’t need to do that. Experience shoes that if a fluffie is told gently to be more factual then usually nothing happens. The short, sharp treatment is better. It’s not a case of calling a prossie’s cunt a cunt but recognising reality. All that flowery language might be fine
during the punt (though what evidence there is suggests honest prossies don’t
really like fluffies either: if you do an honestly good service, who needs a lapdog??) other punters are not best mates you’ve grown up with and facts cut more ice than saying “trust me”.
There are many sites where punters hang out and tell each other what a “wonderful time” they had with a an “amazing prossie”. Feels good, doesn’t it? But it reminds me of the joke about the guy down the pub saying he fucked his wife six times last night cos she couldn’t get enough (‘of his enormous cock’). Bullshit might be entertaining over a few pints of strong lager but not so much on UKP. This is a
hard won website to provide solid facts about prossies with the aim of helping other punters get value for money. That’s all.
(Admittedly some newbies have a problem separating facts and opinions, so there’s is a very good guide in the UKP punting wiki. An opinion is also a type of fact admittedly, but of a lower order. It’s important to know if someone ‘had a great time’ but the basic facts of profile accuracy, services received, a proper link, an estimation of the quality of looks/service/premises in relation to other prossies one has seen, and other basics that might be relevant if unusual like poor hygiene or flabby tits not apparent in the profile picture.) She is
paid to be nice to you. She is
paid to give certain sexual services with a good attitude. She is
paid to be reasonable attractive to fuck and not lying about what she does. She is not ‘Jasmin’ or any of the other personalities she assumes for the job so what she’s like as a real person is both irrelevant, none of our business, and (unless you knew her personally first, outside of punting)
torally unknown.I have no special allegiances on here other than towards the Forum itself and the owner — out of inclination for an amazing job and free service, but that sort of allegiance should be automatic and part and parcel of joining, otherwise wtf are you doing here. I don’t hold grudges or have personal feelings good or bad about anyone — I only respond to the post itself (I don’t know any of the members personally, only as online personalities). I’m not a mod (there aren’t any) and I’m only expressing my own opinions, but if I tell someone they are sounding cuntstruck it’s a simple comment based on thousands of posts. If someone can’t get the difference into their heads between honest talk between punters and “nice talk in fairness to the “lady” / “princess” / “most beautiful woman ever” through their heads then they aren’t contributing and probably won’t last long.
So for goodness sake, fluffies, man up. Make sure your identity on here is private: we can’t stop a prossie reading your review but it is not intended for her, it is intended for critical purchasers, and purchasers who want some facts rather than only trusting the opinion of a newcomer. Surely that is reasonable isn’t it? Good points, bad points. You wouldn’t expect a
Which report to say every toaster was the best and most amazing thing any kitchen could have. It’s just a bloody toaster. Or in this case, a prostitute.
