Fluffies on AdultWork

[MilleMiglia]

He saw her (and apparently only her) for a year and a half, sometimes more than once per week. Her feedback to him got just as fluffy and then..... Her last feedback to him in July said "nice meeting". He then disappears for a couple of months before seeing three different escorts in a row!

God damn it I need to know what happened!!!!! 

I'm guessing he went full psycho and declared undying love (possibly involving a ring)!

My bet is that someone on her side realised the gravity of the situation, and told her to make an amicable, yet unequivocal, withdrawal.   

[Doombar]

He saw her (and apparently only her) for a year and a half, sometimes more than once per week. Her feedback to him got just as fluffy and then..... Her last feedback to him in July said "nice meeting". He then disappears for a couple of months before seeing three different escorts in a row!

God damn it I need to know what happened!!!!! 

I'm guessing he went full psycho and declared undying love (possibly involving a ring)!

That "nice meeting" feedback probably totally devastated him. Its about as negative as you can get without actually being negative, and so different to all her previous feedback.  I think it was her way of getting rid of someone she recognised as a dangerous stalker. 

[5th Musketeer]

My pet hate are the reviews that state " I'm too much of a gentleman to disclose what went on between us"

What's the fucking point of your review

Agreed - and I was relieved to see in one review: "This is where you will be wondering if I’m going to say that details are private between us …. but I’m not, as there’s little point in leaving a review without at least giving an overview" because THAT'S the point of a review.

[TimeForTea]

That "nice meeting" feedback probably totally devastated him. Its about as negative as you can get without actually being negative, and so different to all her previous feedback.  I think it was her way of getting rid of someone she recognised as a dangerous stalker. 

I concur. Good for her though. I'd love to know what happened in that last meeting though!  I would guess at something very inappropriate.......

[Doombar]

Both of these reviews made me laugh, some guys really need to man up.


External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Yeah that first one at least has an appropriate name "fluffybunnyfeet" 

He goes on holiday to ibiza, immediately gets bored so get his fave WG over for a day at a cost of £3000.  Some people have more money tyhan sense!! 

[MilleMiglia]

Yeah that first one at least has an appropriate name "fluffybunnyfeet" 

He goes on holiday to ibiza, immediately gets bored so get his fave WG over for a day at a cost of £3000.  Some people have more money tyhan sense!! 

Three fucking grand! I could get a whole week for that much, and she would have been a damn sight better looking as well! I hope he never runs into one of the more ruthless EE types, as they'll eat him alive.

[Jeff_withpetersen]

Each to their own but I do think there's something weird about guys asking WGs to write feedback every single time - sometimes seemingly dozens of meets over many years. What's the point? Clearly they get off on a one sentence ego-boost from someone they have to pay over £100 an hour to tolerate being around them.

[Brazilian Martian]

Yeah that first one at least has an appropriate name "fluffybunnyfeet" 

He goes on holiday to ibiza, immediately gets bored so get his fave WG over for a day at a cost of £3000.  Some people have more money tyhan sense!! 

Indeed, what makes it worse is he was in Ibiza it's full of young girls that would of went with him for less.

[fly fifer]

By far the most cringe worthy fluffy  review is the one that says "treat her well or you will have to answer to me"
So exactly how are you going to do that big man?
 

[Brazilian Martian]

By far the most cringe worthy fluffy  review is the one that says "treat her well or you will have to answer to me"
So exactly how are you going to do that big man?
 

Most fluffies have superhuman strength and translocation powers so its easy for them to track down guys who don't treat prossies right

[Type_O_Negative]

Fluffies are the natural part of punting, you read these love poems they write and you laugh how deluded they are. But what makes me chuckle even more are punters who think punting is dating or something spectacular. They write things like "i'm so jealous because you have visited her/had good time"  Get a grip men - make sure you look good, behave in proper way and have enough money in your pocket! It's not pulling civvies in tha club on Saturady night 

[Ed Ward]

Fuckin hell... that's disturbingly deluded

In fairness, if you read her feedback for him she's likely led him up the garden path with her comments.

Still an idiot

[RogerBoner]

In fairness, if you read her feedback for him she's likely led him up the garden path with her comments.

Still an idiot

MFord knows that Cecilia didn't write the feedback because she can hardly speak a word of English. I might as well add that she's nothing special. She uses her tongue over every part of the client, uses hot and cold water in her BJ technique. She comes a lot and enjoys giving and receiving rimming. Only if MFord is Chinese could he form a meaningful relationship because her language skills are poor. She's a bit awkward and robotic.

[Newtothisstuff]

I don't bother to read most AW feedback. What's the point? All I do is look to make sure it isn't hidden and check for bad feedback. If someone has the balls to give bad feedback then she must be really bad.
I ignore the 'treat her well' and 'look after her guys' phrases as sometimes it's a fluffy. Not all the time though. Sometimes I think it's probably just someone genuinely not knowing a lot about AW or UKP just copying a phrase they've seen others write. I think my first few AW feedbacks were probably just me doing a cut and paste from some other review.

[shagmore]

Feedback is subjective, it just gives an indication as to if the person is legitimate, not how good or accurate.

[Stav096]

A good number of them will the reviews provide as part of paid service. A lot of the high-scoring providers appear to use paid services, and by looking at the patterns of reviews you can see groups of reviewers/feedback reporting on the same group of girls. Even some of the popular girls seem to be doing this.

[shagmore]

A good number of them will the reviews provide as part of paid service. A lot of the high-scoring providers appear to use paid services, and by looking at the patterns of reviews you can see groups of reviewers/feedback reporting on the same group of girls. Even some of the popular girls seem to be doing this.

True, but as mentioned its a good indication, if you see a WG with 5 reviews all from people with 1 or 2 feedback themselves or "this member is no longer registered" then you know instinctively that something is not quite right.
But always check on UKP to see what the real punters say

[pamplona]

True, but as mentioned its a good indication, if you see a WG with 5 reviews all from people with 1 or 2 feedback themselves or "this member is no longer registered" then you know instinctively that something is not quite right.
But always check on UKP to see what the real punters say

This is great advice and the one that has probably helped me the most. 

[WHG]

 I've got to admit, that in my first year of first year of punting, i wrote 2-3 fluffy reports on aw. I think I may have even Used the dreaded "treat her well" once. After reading a whole bunch of field reports on aw, I thought that was the norm and basically copied what some people said. Another factor was that I was said this stuff in order to get some rating/feedback from the wg so, I could go ahead and book another wh who wouldn't see anyone without any rating/feedback.
The embellishment was needless because the punt was a positive anyway.
Joining this forum though, has made me cut the fluff out of my reviews (well, at least I hope I have.)
I was never as bad as MFord though. Poor fella.
And yeah, the "whatever happened will stay between me and the lady" sends me into a fit of rage too! Properly pointless!

[Marmalade]

I've got to admit, that in my first year of first year of punting, i wrote 2-3 fluffy reports on aw. I think I may have even Used the dreaded "treat her well" once. After reading a whole bunch of field reports on aw, I thought that was the norm and basically copied what some people said. Another factor was that I was said this stuff in order to get some rating/feedback from the wg so, I could go ahead and book another wh who wouldn't see anyone without any rating/feedback.
The embellishment was needless because the punt was a positive anyway.
Joining this forum though, has made me cut the fluff out of my reviews (well, at least I hope I have.)
I was never as bad as MFord though. Poor fella.
And yeah, the "whatever happened will stay between me and the lady" sends me into a fit of rage too! Properly pointless!

I think that would echo the experience of a very large number of punters. Of course, there are a few lapdogs that never fucking learn but we do try to give them a wake-up call.  After that, Admin usually bans the worst offenders: they are simply a nuisance, like bits of fluff in the champagne of puntville.

[HarryZZ]

As an alternative voice, reading some of the rebukes, "good" can now equal "fluffy",  I get that some of the reviews sound like love letters sent through a third party but there has to be room to post a good review that doesn't just detail the mechanics of a meeting without having the reviewer torn to ribbons, sometimes if you're lucky you really can have a fantastic punt. The danger is that people will be put off posting a positive review for fear of ridicule, and then the reviewing process become useless, good reviews are as valuable as bad reviews, excellent reviews even more so.

The definition of fluffy news to be better defined, and the person that unjustifiably accuses of fluffiness should receive the same scorn as the truly fluffy reviewer.

[Stav096]

True, but as mentioned its a good indication, if you see a WG with 5 reviews all from people with 1 or 2 feedback themselves or "this member is no longer registered" then you know instinctively that something is not quite right.
But always check on UKP to see what the real punters say

If the provider is getting fake reviews on her profile you know that there is a problem, and are best to avoid no matter what others might say - after all, there is no guarantee that their reviews are genuine either.

[PatMacGroin]

Both of these reviews made me laugh, some guys really need to man up.


External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

I've got to call bullshit, fake feedback, on that first field report. Which leads me to believe many of the others on her profile will be too.

To me these look like tell tale signs:

- What sort of man chooses the nickname "fluffybunnyfeet", FFS?

- His profile has only 3 AW feedback, each one for that same WG and each one comes with a field report.

- Over the course of those 3 meetings he's spent over £13k, but he's not spent a penny trying out any of the other stunners on AW? How likely does that sound to any punter, no matter how big your budget?

- The reviews read like some sort of Mills and Boon style WG's fantasy about what her perfect out call would be like. Other than the ultimate fantsy of, "he paid for me to come to Ibiza then he fucked off and left me on my own with his credit cards" (I know I write pretty long, full on reviews myself, but these are ridiculous!)

Absolutely everything about this WG profile rings alarm bells for me.
(Warning reference for any one seriously considering booking "her" - AW Profile number 3566435)

[MilleMiglia]

My ex reg had a plethora of stories to tell, some of which make made Mr Fluffywhatever look like a pauper.

[shagmore]

I've got to call bullshit, fake feedback, on that first field report. Which leads me to believe many of the others on her profile will be too.

To me these look like tell tale signs:

- What sort of man chooses the nickname "fluffybunnyfeet", FFS?

- His profile has only 3 AW feedback, each one for that same WG and each one comes with a field report.

- Over the course of those 3 meetings he's spent over £13k, but he's not spent a penny trying out any of the other stunners on AW? How likely does that sound to any punter, no matter how big your budget?

- The reviews read like some sort of Mills and Boon style WG's fantasy about what her perfect out call would be like. Other than the ultimate fantsy of, "he paid for me to come to Ibiza then he fucked off and left me on my own with his credit cards" (I know I write pretty long, full on reviews myself, but these are ridiculous!)

Absolutely everything about this WG profile rings alarm bells for me.
(Warning reference for any one seriously considering booking "her" - AW Profile number 3566435)

Read the review, nearly pissed myself laughing, does he/she expect us to believe that shite. 
For that you get  a

[PatMacGroin]

why not ?

There used to be a thread about fluffy posts on here, that was a classic

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=61763.0

Long thread but worth reading.

Lot of interesting points, funny put downs and examples of how discussions can turn into a heated slagging match when comments get taken personally. By the end it was nothing like the purpose Admin had intended for it.

Whatever happened to the co-ordinated hidden fluffy agenda to take over the world of punting? Has it happened yet? 

[maggsy]

Out of interest, how do you know I someone is hiding feedback on AW?

[CatBBW]

Out of interest, how do you know I someone is hiding feedback on AW?

It tells you when you click on the feedback number. "This member has chosen to hide their feedback" etc.

[sparkus]

It tells you when you click on the feedback number. "This member has chosen to hide their feedback" etc.

Which is always a no-no for me.

[Newtothisstuff]

There is another side to this whole debate about being a fluffy.

There are a few people in these groups who are undoubtedly 'fluffies' but there are also others who seem determined to spot fluffyness where there isn't any and attack the punter.

I've done a couple of photo sessions with different WGs. I took photos, 3D pictures and shot short videos for them. I didn't pay for the session in cash. Instead I paid by giving them the photos and helping upload them to AW. I don't regard that as being a fluffy but I've had some people accuse me of everything from being a fluffy to being a pimp lurking in the forums.
There are genuine fluffies about. Either because of inexperience or some misguided idea that there's more to the punt than there is. If we run round the forums looking for the slightest opportunity to hurl accusations about, we risk silencing new members or driving them away.

[Brazilian Martian]

There is another side to this whole debate about being a fluffy.

There are a few people in these groups who are undoubtedly 'fluffies' but there are also others who seem determined to spot fluffyness where there isn't any and attack the punter.

I've done a couple of photo sessions with different WGs. I took photos, 3D pictures and shot short videos for them. I didn't pay for the session in cash. Instead I paid by giving them the photos and helping upload them to AW. I don't regard that as being a fluffy but I've had some people accuse me of everything from being a fluffy to being a pimp lurking in the forums.
There are genuine fluffies about. Either because of inexperience or some misguided idea that there's more to the punt than there is. If we run round the forums looking for the slightest opportunity to hurl accusations about, we risk silencing new members or driving them away.

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[vw]

There is another side to this whole debate about being a fluffy.

There are a few people in these groups who are undoubtedly 'fluffies' but there are also others who seem determined to spot fluffyness where there isn't any and attack the punter.

I've done a couple of photo sessions with different WGs. I took photos, 3D pictures and shot short videos for them. I didn't pay for the session in cash. Instead I paid by giving them the photos and helping upload them to AW. I don't regard that as being a fluffy but I've had some people accuse me of everything from being a fluffy to being a pimp lurking in the forums.
There are genuine fluffies about. Either because of inexperience or some misguided idea that there's more to the punt than there is. If we run round the forums looking for the slightest opportunity to hurl accusations about, we risk silencing new members or driving them away.

Hope you declare that if you review your clients.   

Sounds like you have something to hide well shady IMO.

[Newtothisstuff]

Its not a real punt so it wouldn't be something to review. I agree it could be shady if you went on and reviewed them.

[vw]

Its not a real punt so it wouldn't be something to review. I agree it could be shady if you went on and reviewed them.

Commenting on them favorably would be shady too IMO, have fun anyway.   

[Newtothisstuff]

That''s if you comment. Personally I don't give a fuck.

[Marmalade]

That''s if you comment. Personally I don't give a fuck.

But you give enough of a fuck to be a prevaricating apologist for fluffy newcomers.

Or did you just want to boast about your ‘photo shoot’ (I wouldn’t if I were you — lots of us have done it but aren’t daft or shady enough to boast about it, thereby identifying themselves to the prossie.)

[sparkus]

That''s if you comment. Personally I don't give a fuck.

I've never understood why people do. What next, write them a reference?

[cueball]

If we run round the forums looking for the slightest opportunity to hurl accusations about, we risk silencing new members or driving them away.

Well, as ukp is refreshingly frank, honest, blunt and has a membership that grows hourly... I'd say your talking bollocks

[Marmalade]

Well, as ukp is refreshingly frank, honest, blunt and has a membership that grows hourly... I'd say your talking bollocks

+ 1000

And if fuckwitted fluffie would-be ‘members’ are still a testicle short of a ball bag then UKP will stay frank, honest and blunt without such mildewed fuckers.

Remember prossienet had an enormous membership at its height — and its usefulness to the real punter was null.

[shagmore]

+ 1000

And if fuckwitted fluffie would-be ‘members’ are still a testicle short of a ball bag then UKP will stay frank, honest and blunt without such mildewed fuckers.

Remember prossienet had an enormous membership at its height — and its usefulness to the real punter was null.

Eloquently put there Marmalade 

[Doombar]

Here's one from LK's twitter, its the "Yay yay yay!!!!!!" from a 50/60 year old man that really made me want to puke 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[vw]

Here's one from LK's twitter, its the "Yay yay yay!" from a 50/60 year old man that really made me want to puke 

Hidden Image/Members Only

probably one of the vermin banned from here.   

[sparkus]

I'm glad that Mental Health Act's on the statute books, reading that shite.

[Shearer1955]

probably one of the vermin banned from here.   

He probably spent longer on preparation of his little rhyme than the 2 hours shagging her
Daft twat that he must be   

[Doombar]

probably one of the vermin banned from here.   

and the bit that made me laff was the "whoops almost forgot to ask for a 2 hour appointment".  Lying cunt - that's why he wrote his pathetic ode - to try to get a booking!  He's probably still waiting...because I doubt she is stupid and has spotted him as a deluded obsessive that she would rather avoid 

[vw]

and the bit that made me laff was the "whoops almost forgot to ask for a 2 hour appointment".  Lying cunt - that's why he wrote his pathetic ode - to try to get a booking!  He's probably still waiting...because I doubt she is stupid and has spotted him as a deluded obsessive that she would rather avoid 

could be mcfly.   

Or Marcus

Or Salt

Or lancspunter the peado

[vw]

Just spotted this sad case of unrequited feedback love

looks like chuck51 is in love with her.   

External Link/Members Only

What a sad case.   

[Doombar]

Just spotted this sad case of unrequited feedback love

yeah looks like "Chucky's in love".

He's written 7 feedbacks for her and she hasn't written a single one for him.  Devastating! 

[Happiness]

My assumption is most leave great feedback as they will most likely get bookings with other girls as a result. A lot of it probably isn't how they genuinely feel.

[Jjon]

Kept waiting for 20 mins by a rom beggar a couple of months ago. Slightly fluffy but she kept me informed by text. When I got in I was offered a glass of champers from a huge bottle (still nearly full) & a ferre roche from a giant box (about 4 had gone). What did he do with those? I asked half-impressed, my imagination running riot. He ate them she replied. Guess the fluffy fuckwit gave up early as her English was rubbish.