Of course some would, it's regarded as vulgar slang and arguably the most offensive word in the English language. Personally I like the word.
I like it too. If the daft associations are dispensed with, it becomes a proud word with a fine heritage. Women use it as well of course, especially PSE fans.
It comes down to asking what is (the much maligned) "objectification" of women and if it is in fact bad. I have been "used" as a sex object, as a cock, quite a few times, and thoroughly enjoyed it. It's not the same as calling someone a cunt in a derogatory way as it is to use the word cunt meaning vagina. 'Vagina' has an almost medical vibe. It doesn't mean the organ as an organ for fucking with, it means something that is examined, treated, a part of anatomy in a biology text. 'Pussy' is slightly romanticised but common in many languages. However that is a fictional use when applied to a prostitute.
e.g. A man meets a civvie, gets to know her, starts to enjoy her personality and hanging out with her, and eventually they get close and have sex. It would incorrect to say that for him, she is a piece of 'cunt' as he is interested in more than that.
e.g. a woman goes out on the hunt, bragging to her mates that she wants to get laid. She doesn't care too much who it is as long as he's not objectionable. She's basically looking for cock. And there are plenty of men willing to become an "object" while she gets laid with them.
e.g. A man books a prossie on Adultwork. What he is looking for is similar to the one-night-stander that wants to get laid. It is even formalised. He is
not to get to know her, not to become attached to her personality. He might go on about wanting a certain type of girl but, like the one-night stand woman (or man), it doesn't count if he doesn't get laid. He wants cunt, quite literally. Even a fetishist is interested in a simple sexualised encounter and only ever sees the professional facade, so 'cunt' is a very reasonable slang word,.
Henry Miller used the same level of language, constantly referred to women as cunts, and he is\was a great writer. It's all just semantics. It's thinking like what you have posted why men are afraid to call fat women anything other than "curvy" even if they resemble a blob. The reason why men are afraid to open the door open for a woman in fear of being branded sexist. The reason why a man is embarrassed to sexualise a woman; a perfectly human desire. We are already in a society were calling a fuck, a fuck is deemed misogynistic. How can you make love if no love is involved?
Absolutely, what a great man, a real man's man if I might say so. PC correctness never squashed his manly spirit. He could tell the difference between love and fucking. He was never short of women too: strong women! (Now a man might
fuck his beloved partner
in real life, but the sexual buzz is highly related to his emotional involvement. To feel that, he sees her as more than 'cunt' and 'fucking' is an extreme bit of dirty talk they might use. Emotional involvement with a fantasy, a personality that a prostitute creates, is a sort of 'pretend.'
But what is the importance of all this they might ask, and not surprisingly if they've read this far. Simply, Gentlemen, to distinguish between material fact and imagination. Judging things like money, vfm, security, gifts, being "respectful' (instead of polite), writing reviews, are the realm of the head. Fucking (under any name) is the realm of the senses, when one thinks with that inner urge that manifests in a throbbing erection. It's a primal urge, To fuck with intensity, not the fucking of the accountant. Any idea of love is logically totally irrelevant. We are talking about a lower class of society (unless we go back to ancient rites in India and Greece and probably Egypt). Sure, this person is a human being, but the punter has no knowledge of their real 'person.' Politeness an tact win the day. I think the word 'respect' is often substituted to give it some sort of unwarranted emphasis, but it is incorrect in my opinion and liable to lead to error.
There would appear to be just as many 'cunts' responding to your fine post as we usually find on the Scotland board. Perhaps they need to understand Marmalade is often best taken at the morning breakfast and then they may have the full day to understand before putting up minionesque type posts!
Thanks mate. Seems they complain if I use a big word and complain if I use a four-letter word. Of course some people will be offended but that really is their business, not mine. I occasionally like to write in a way for people who enjoy disentangling something -- that of course is very simple -- but a reality that is rejected by many. It gets a bit samey when the predictable topics come up in the same way an the fluffies get no further forward from fantasy. So at least it gives them something to winge about and maybe think it over and find a different, equally valid view.
p.s. there is no 'obligation' or even piss-take of the fluffie, at least in this in my posts on this thread. It is simply there for those that want it. I could get a little offended by their language occasionally too but I mind my own business.
There will be one or two who think I go to punt and say hello, cunt, which of course is silly. It reminds me of a man who, when a stranger admires his dog and asks his name, replies, 'It's a dog, it's name is dog, it's an "it." '
I'm no Ernest Hemingway (before someone moans about that and if you don't like the literary allusions, it works just the same without them) but there is a good reason for choosing words in a specific context and I can only take my hat off to such a great writer.
(By the way, the two punting examples I used were real, though for certain reasons I don't intend to review them just yet. All in good time!)
