Interesting to see "fanboys" in this thread who have subsequently been banned and those, still active "members" who side with them.
For what it's worth, if a WG does not publish a face photo in her public gallery I think your entirely in your rights to walk if you are not attracted when you meet her AND to publish a negative review as a reflection of the fact that you do not feel she is value for money if you stay. When I first joined UKP, before there was the option of a neutral rating, the guidance was "if you would't go back - it's a negative."
Dave