Review Count

[Tdydl]

Has something happened to remove a load of reviews from the count?

Take this WG for example ... External Link/Members Only

I am sure she used to have positives in the mid 30's, but now down to mid 20's

[OldAdmin]

Reviews by banned accounts are no longer counted.
They are not deleted, simply moved out of the review section into the "regional discussion" section. They'll still show up in search facility.

[Kev40ish]

Message from Admin...
Banned members now have their reviews moved to the regional discussion section so they no longer count towards review counts. Around 7,000 reviews were affected. It doesn't happen instantly upon banning, but within 24 hours.

[Kev40ish]

Reviews by banned accounts are no longer counted.

You obviously too quick for me 

[Tdydl]

Ah! Thanks

Might need to do a recount on all in my recommended list in case any need to move out to the TOFTT or black lists

[nigel4498]

It's certainly affecting some popular SP's review counts.
Noticed Ellie Rose had I think about 110 positive reviews.
Now down to 93 positives.

[Waterhouse]

It's certainly affecting some popular SP's review counts.
Noticed Ellie Rose had I think about 110 positive reviews.
Now down to 93 positives.

Ditto... I noticed too and thought it was a shame to have been back to below a tonne, but can practically guarantee Ellie will be back up there again and still with a zero neutral/neg count in her favour. 

[Winker121]

Ditto... I noticed too and thought it was a shame to have been back to below a tonne, but can practically guarantee Ellie will be back up there again and still with a zero neutral/neg count in her favour. 

Can't see why you think it's a shame.  Makes it more likely that the reviews that are left are more accurate with fewer WKs writing them.

[Waterhouse]

Can't see why you think it's a shame.  Makes it more likely that the reviews that are left are more accurate with fewer WKs writing them.

It's a shame because I believe Ellie was the first escort to achieve 100+ positive reviews with zero neg/neuts. Take a look at her reviews and you'll see she delivers a consistently first class service every time, so WK'ing is very unlikely in one of her reviews, unless you think all remaining 93 reviews were written and posted by WKs.

[Kev40ish]

It's a shame because I believe Ellie was the first escort to achieve 100+ positive reviews with zero neg/neuts. Take a look at her reviews and you'll see she delivers a consistently first class service every time, so WK'ing is very unlikely in one of her reviews, unless you think all remaining 93 reviews were written and posted by WKs.

It’s a shame, but Admin hasn’t got time to go through all the banning individually to decide what to delete.
So it’s easier for him just to run a script.

[Bangers and Gash]

Ditto... I noticed too and thought it was a shame to have been back to below a tonne, but can practically guarantee Ellie will be back up there again and still with a zero neutral/neg count in her favour. 

Why do you give a fuck? Are you going to quickly pen a glowing review for this tart - you pathetic little white knight/fanboy? 

[lewishamguy]

Reviews by banned accounts are no longer counted.

That's a very good modification of review count. 

[scutty brown]

I take it that means most of the Cardiff reviews got binned? 

[Happyjose]

Ditto... I noticed too and thought it was a shame to have been back to below a tonne, but can practically guarantee Ellie will be back up there again and still with a zero neutral/neg count in her favour. 

You can practically guarantee it

How sweet

[johnplatano]

Great modification

[Waterhouse]

Why do you give a fuck? Are you going to quickly pen a glowing review for this tart - you pathetic little white knight/fanboy? 

How the fuck am I white knighting? What am I disputing?  Who or what am I attempting to contest?

All of her reviews are positive and no one would refute the fact she’s a solid provider... were they all written by white knights?  She certainly doesn’t need rescuing by me, her rep speaks for itself.

* White Knight: Popular internet slang for a forum member that rushes to a defend a prostitute after she has been poorly reviewed. He might not have seen her or could be a pimp.

Get your facts straight before you start throwing accusations around.  Pillock *

The only real shame here is twats like you and Holland (ex-twat) always trying to act the big hard man at every perceived opportunity, real or otherwise.   


Definition of pillock to save you looking that up as well...

*Pillock: (mildly derogatory, slang) a stupid or annoying person; simpleton; fool.

[cueball]

Reviews by banned accounts are no longer counted.

Good 

The banned don't deserve their reviews keeping on the database.

They're always banned for good reason so there is nothing good to come from keeping their plop.

[houseboot]

I take it that means most of the Cardiff reviews got binned? 

The average word count per Review has reduced dramatically 

[LLPunting]

Good 

The banned don't deserve their reviews keeping on the database.

They're always banned for good reason so there is nothing good to come from keeping their plop.

That's very small-minded.  Quite a number of recent bannings were for foolish behaviour, that does not invalidate the significant contribution that some of those blokes made before they lost the plot.  And some of those reviewers were very competent ones.  It will make research just a little more tedious especially where we've lost Negatives and Neutrals from the aggregates.

[cueball]

That's very small-minded.  Quite a number of recent bannings were for foolish behaviour, that does not invalidate the significant contribution that some of those blokes made before they lost the plot. 

I don't agree. I've always found that admin on here gives a fair hand, foolishness is often warned about before banning.... The idiots get themselves deservedly and rightly banned.

The ones you talk about who have contributed but end up banned usually have a shady agenda that comes to light.

Happypants had two nics, star lord was a deluded fuck wit in the background etc, the contribution of their like has question marks over their validity when their real story and behaviour comes to light.

So, I stand by what I posted earlier, it's right to have their reviews down graded.

[LLPunting]

I don't agree. I've always found that admin on here gives a fair hand, foolishness is often warned about before banning.... The idiots get themselves deservedly and rightly banned.

The ones you talk about who have contributed but end up banned usually have a shady agenda that comes to light.

Happypants had two nics, star lord was a deluded fuck wit in the background etc, the contribution of their like has question marks over their validity when their real story and behaviour comes to light.

So, I stand by what I posted earlier, it's right to have their reviews down graded.

Nope, you're not thinking about or addressing my point.  Your rationale would equally justify the elimination of any poster's review that was suspicious whether too fluffy, an uncharacteristic neg for a forum darling, an overly generous or harsh rating of described experiences.

Since the content is retained and considered valuable it would make sense to surface it when an SPs summary link listing all reviews is clicked so then you can see all reports, regardless of whether they contribute to the aggregate or not.  That would maintain punters' ability to judge all commentary for themselves.  The banning reason would still be visible and would hopefully assist due consideration.

[James999]

How the fuck am I white knighting?

If she had an agent / pimp he would be saying exactly the things you are, whinging she lost reviews and them commenting that all are positive and she's a solid provider etc, why do you feel the need to point this out assuming you're not her agent / pimp then it's just pointless white knighting, I suppose you've already messaged her to tell her how you're helping / promoting her 

[cueball]

Thing is LL, for that to work it would have to be done on a case by case basis. I can see your point but i still agree with the review down grading for the banned.

I can see and understand why the boss has chosen a blanket policy, there would be a mountain of work otherwise.

The best advice is act right on here, remember the site ethos, post & contribute without agenda and they'll never get banned and never have a review down graded.

[magnetico]

Excellent idea Admin, thanks 

[RedKettle]

If she had an agent / pimp he would be saying exactly the things you are, whinging she lost reviews and them commenting that all are positive and she's a solid provider etc, why do you feel the need to point this out assuming you're not her agent / pimp then it's just pointless white knighting, I suppose you've already messaged her to tell her how you're helping / promoting her 

Or he was just making conversation on a punting forum about a WG........

[magnetico]

you'll see she delivers a consistently first class service every time

You've already written a review, and it's maximum one per year per prossie 
Move on....

[Waterhouse]

You've already written a review, and it's maximum one per year per prossie 
Move on....

Cheers, but you're quoting out of context. I know the rules. 

[LLPunting]

You've already written a review, and it's maximum one per year per prossie 
Move on....

Wrong!
One Positive review per SP per 12 month period, but you can update your review with further positive visits happening under same conditions.
You can submit a new Positive if she's part of a multi-SP encounter.
You can submit non-positive reviews any time after.

[Bangers and Gash]

Or he was just making conversation on a punting forum about a WG........

Huh. You would say that, being someone who buys Brasso by the pallet. 

[RedKettle]

Huh. You would say that, being someone who buys Brasso by the pallet. 

Back at making up shit again. Thought you might have learnt your lesson with the number of times you have been made to look a total idiot........

[Bangers and Gash]

Back at making up shit again. Thought you might have learnt your lesson with the number of times you have been made to look a total idiot........

Deflection. A WK's default setting. 

[Mr_Shins]

I just saw this after asking the same question about the same service provider.