Anyone up for a gangbang in East Anglia?

[Terry30]

Potential girl sorted. I will PM those who have PMd me and those who have replied on this thread with further details later this evening.
Date, venue and cost still TBC. She's up for as many as possible so the more the merrier and will make it cheaper per bloke.

Would certainly be interested

[daviemac]

Would certainly be interested

Are you taking the piss? 3 1/2 years you've been here, used the site in a regular basis, contributed sweet FA and you want an invitation.   

[Bornslippy]

can't PM you......

[jimbobted]

Right, a bit of interest in this. Unfortunately the PM anti spam functions are getting in the way a bit and I'm unable to reply to people as quickly as I'd like.

[daviemac]

Right, a bit of interest in this. Unfortunately the PM anti spam functions are getting in the way a bit and I'm unable to reply to people as quickly as I'd like.

Things of this nature have to be organised privately, not on the open forum.

[jimbobted]

Things of this nature have to be organised privately, not on the open forum.

Fair enough, that's exactly what I was trying to do when I asked people to put contact details in their PM to me, but that got snipped out along with the other stuff.
I don't want to organise it through the forum because frankly it's a pain in the ass with the PM restrictions etc so I'd rather move it to WhatsApp and email and sort privately.
I think we both want the same thing here. 

[daviemac]

Fair enough, that's exactly what I was trying to do when I asked people to put contact details in their PM to me, but that got snipped out along with the other stuff.
I don't want to organise it through the forum because frankly it's a pain in the ass with the PM restrictions etc so I'd rather move it to WhatsApp and email and sort privately.
I think we both want the same thing here. 

The trouble is threads like this bring the likes of Terry30 out of the woodwork, his only contribution in 3 1/2 years is to want to join your party and as the site is primarily here for people to share information that's why PM restrictions are in place.

[jimbobted]

The trouble is threads like this bring the likes of Terry30 out of the woodwork, his only contribution in 3 1/2 years is to want to join your party and as the site is primarily here for people to share information that's why PM restrictions are in place.

Oh I agree with that sentiment 100%.
The only reason I resorted to posting some generic details and a plea for interested people to PM me other contact details is because the PM system is so restricted as to be useless for organising a gangbang.
I get that isn't the primary purpose of the site, but it's only to be expected punters with similar interests are going to want to try to organise parties etc.

[Bornslippy]

yep. would love the possibility to experience a first gb but if you can't even pm the organisers...I shall carry on waiting

[jimbobted]

yep. would love the possibility to experience a first gb but if you can't even pm the organisers...I shall carry on waiting

Tried to PM you last night but the anti-spam thing stopped me. Just tried to reply to someone now. Guess what, no can do due to anti-spam.
I get why it might restrict you to one new contact each 12 hours to avoid spamming, but how the fuck can replying to someone be "spam"?
Do we even need protecting in this way?

[Bornslippy]

Nope. I have probably only 20 messages since I joined this site. none are spam

[sa31]

Tried to PM you last night but the anti-spam thing stopped me. Just tried to reply to someone now. Guess what, no can do due to anti-spam.
I get why it might restrict you to one new contact each 12 hours to avoid spamming, but how the fuck can replying to someone be "spam"?
Do we even need protecting in this way?

Hello Mate, would like to take part and happy to give details just a bit confused on how to do it with all these restrictions.

[jimbobted]

Hello Mate, would like to take part and happy to give details just a bit confused on how to do it with all these restrictions.

PM me with contact details please.

[daviemac]

Tried to PM you last night but the anti-spam thing stopped me. Just tried to reply to someone now. Guess what, no can do due to anti-spam.
I get why it might restrict you to one new contact each 12 hours to avoid spamming, but how the fuck can replying to someone be "spam"?
Do we even need protecting in this way?

Your PM facility could always be removed totally if you don't like the system as it is. It's been explained to you why the restrictions are in place.

How does someone leeching off the site for 3 1/2 years then posting wanting information privately benefit anyone other than them.   

[jimbobted]

Your PM facility could always be removed totally if you don't like the system as it is. It's been explained to you why the restrictions are in place.

How does someone leeching off the site for 3 1/2 years then posting wanting information privately benefit anyone other than them.   

Leechers won't be getting an invite, and that's a separate thing from the PM system

Understand the restrictions, but the crude application isn't helpful is all I'm saying. Replying to a message received can't possibly be spam, can it?
We can organise stuff on the open forum, fair enough. But we can't organise stuff privately because not only are we limited on the number of conversations we can initiate, we're also limited in the number of different people we can reply to in a time period. I'm not asking for the ability to initiate unlimited conversations, just suggesting being able to reply unhindered to those already running would be useful.
Just a suggestion to help make it a better place 

No need to threaten to remove my PM abilities, I'm not arguing with you. It is what it is, it could be better implemented is all I'm suggesting.

[daviemac]

No need to threaten to remove my PM abilities, I'm not arguing with you. It is what it is, it could be better implemented is all I'm suggesting.

I keep saying this forum is for the benefit of all members and the restrictions are in place to prevent information being shared privately, which is something that happens all too often.

It's unfortunate that the few spoil it for the many and something like this gets caught up in it, but we can't exempt individual members, you either have PM facilities subject to the restrictions or you don't have them at all.

[sa31]

PM me with contact details please.

I cant PM you due to restrictions.

[jimbobted]

I keep saying this forum is for the benefit of all members and the restrictions are in place to prevent information being shared privately, which is something that happens all too often.

It's unfortunate that the few spoil it for the many and something like this gets caught up in it, but we can't exempt individual members, you either have PM facilities subject to the restrictions or you don't have them at all.

OK that makes sense. I'm wasn't t asking for special treatment, more suggesting the policy might be tweakable without destroying the incentive to share reviews etc publically.
Appreciate it's a fine line to tread. Maybe it isn't tweakable.

[LEOJONTY]

Pm sent

[jimbobted]

Guys, please include a WhatsApp or email contact details in your PMs. If you don't do that I can only reply to you one per day.
If you've already PMd and not got a reply, please do so again with contact details. Thanks.

[Greenanchor]

I’m very quiet on here, but would be interested. Would be grateful for a pm, and will send you an email address, to see if it works out ?

[jimbobted]

I’m very quiet on here, but would be interested. Would be grateful for a pm, and will send you an email address, to see if it works out ?

Sorry I'm not going to PM you as it will slow down the responses to those who have messaged me.
I believe if you contribute you will be able to send PMs.
 

[norwichfunseeker]

Sorry I'm not going to PM you as it will slow down the responses to those who have messaged me.
I believe if you contribute you will be able to send PMs.
 

Member for nearly 4 years, 6 posts and no reviews despite mentioning in a previous post he has a regular.

Some people 

[isaac_gauss]

Replying to subscribe to the thread

Raquel is a fine gangbang option. But she doesn't do anal. So, better with a smaller group. I'll review (positive overall).

[oli7474]

Replying to subscribe to the thread

Raquel is a fine gangbang option. But she doesn't do anal. So, better with a smaller group. I'll review (positive overall).

Yeah i really want to try Raquel she has brilliant reviews

[driller66]

Guys, please include a WhatsApp or email contact details in your PMs. If you don't do that I can only reply to you one per day.
If you've already PMd and not got a reply, please do so again with contact details. Thanks.

Hi mate, i would too be interested. Please PM me so i can reply, it won't let me PM you first?
Thanks

[reeves25]

Just an idea that might help get around the communication issue

Telegram is a great app for communicating and keeping your mobile number private it’s very similar to Whatapp but you can use just a username instead of a mobile number

You could first start a broadcast channel that you could post on here and anyone would be able to join that and then you could pick out the people you want to run with and invite them to a private group chat for the attendees. Also let’s you do polls so you can vote for providers etc

Anyone that’s on the swingers scene and London party scene will already have telegram as it’s used loads for that

[Iloveoral]

Just an idea that might help get around the communication issue

Telegram is a great app for communicating and keeping your mobile number private it’s very similar to Whatapp but you can use just a username instead of a mobile number

You could first start a broadcast channel that you could post on here and anyone would be able to join that and then you could pick out the people you want to run with and invite them to a private group chat for the attendees. Also let’s you do polls so you can vote for providers etc

Anyone that’s on the swingers scene and London party scene will already have telegram as it’s used loads for that

Don’t post any socials here please as per rules (there’s a link at the bottom of the page)
That also includes..

19 Social meets
None will be sanctioned by the admin and not be allowed to be organized on the forums. Use the PM facility instead to organize such meetups.

 

[cunningman]

19 Social meets
None will be sanctioned by the admin and not be allowed to be organized on the forums. Use the PM facility instead to organize such meetups.

Well fine but it is becoming increasingly hard to PM (for 'reasons' I disagree with, TBH).

[daviemac]

Well fine but it is becoming increasingly hard to PM (for 'reasons' I disagree with, TBH).

This isn't a private members club for people to organise meetings in private and the restrictions are in place because of that. The more people post things like you the more restrictions will be put in place.

This site is to discuss and review paid sex for the benefit of all.

If I can add, any attempt to circumvent the rules will result in a ban.

[sparkus]

This isn't a private members club for people to organise meetings in private and the restrictions are in place because of that. The more people post things like you the more restrictions will be put in place.

This site is to discuss and review paid sex for the benefit of all.

If I can add, any attempt to circumvent the rules will result in a ban.

Several have sent PMs irked at my Alan Partridge references

External Link/Members Only

[jimbobted]

This isn't a private members club for people to organise meetings in private and the restrictions are in place because of that. The more people post things like you the more restrictions will be put in place.

This site is to discuss and review paid sex for the benefit of all.

Why can't it be both? I'm sure there will be a review or two after the event to benefit those who don't attend.

[reeves25]

What about of the OP makes a AW profile and links that in here would that be keeping within the rules?

[myothernameis]

What about of the OP makes a AW profile and links that in here would that be keeping within the rules?

If the OP made a AW male profile to more or less advertise these parties, I would see this as pimping  the escorts, so this would be against the rules

[daviemac]

Why can't it be both? I'm sure there will be a review or two after the event to benefit those who don't attend.

It isn't what the site is designed for and it's against the rules.

What about of the OP makes a AW profile and links that in here would that be keeping within the rules?

If the OP makes an AW profile, they would have to be classed as an SP and SPs can't advertise themselves on here.

Far better idea is for everyone to use THIS site for what it's meant to be used for and accept the rules as they are.

[cunningman]

It isn't what the site is designed for and it's against the rules.

The wording of Rule 19 suggests to me otherwise.  It must not be organized in Open Forum, and must use PM.

Organising a GB with an SP seems to me entirely within the site ethos.  What would Rule 19 apply to otherwise?

I understand that there can be abuses of PM facilities, but I think there are entirely legitimate and benign uses also.

[tony22]

Several have sent PMs irked at my Alan Partridge references

External Link/Members Only

highlight of the thread for me. I won't be part of your sex festival.

[daviemac]

The wording of Rule 19 suggests to me otherwise.  It must not be organized in Open Forum, and must use PM.

Organising a GB with an SP seems to me entirely within the site ethos.  What would Rule 19 apply to otherwise?

I understand that there can be abuses of PM facilities, but I think there are entirely legitimate and benign uses also.

Yes you are quite correct, any social meets must be organised by PM and not on the open forum. However that does not supersede the requirements to be granted PM privileges (note the word privilege as that's what it is not a right).

To put it in simple terms if you want be involved in gangbangs or whatever you first need PM privileges and to get PM access the criteria needs to be met.

[cunningman]

the criteria needs to be met.

I think it would be fair if we knew what they are.  They seem to evolve, and be secret.  Its not clear that they are universally fair and personally I think this is quite a big deal, because we have a natural churn of members arriving and retiring and we need to keep a status quo of privileged and unprivileged to keep the community balanced and viable.

Just saying - we've had long-time members who don't review and have been quite abusive and clearly using all facilities.  We like to say 'share reviews' but its clearly not it, and discriminates people who are active in sugarbaby or abroad subfora.

I understand that sharing the algorithm might (will?) result in gaming the system, but surely that's better than 'who the mods like?' if you want the forum to continue to be a good place.  And gaming it sufficiently subtly is likely to be hard.

[sparkus]

highlight of the thread for me. I won't be part of your sex festival.

They might get more takers if the thread was renamed 'East Anglia Sex Festival'.

[jimbobted]

It isn't what the site is designed for and it's against the rules.

Is it though? You've said yourself event like this should be organised via PM, not open forum. But the PM privileges don't allow us to do that either.
I asked why the community can't be both, your answer is "cos of the rules", which is just a dodge of the the actual question. If the answer is "because the mods don't want to allow it" fair enough, but why not just say that straight?
I'm not really sure why you seem to be so scared of people PMing. It would be easy to keep tabs on PM activity and take away PM priviliges from those who PM heavily but don't contribute otherwise, which ought to stop the risk of people not sharing reviews publically (and I do understand that concern).

If the OP makes an AW profile, they would have to be classed as an SP and SPs can't advertise themselves on here.

Completely agree. I have no desire to be, or be seen as, a pimp. I've told the girl in question I'm happy to organise with up to half a dozen blokes I know. If she want more than that she can organise and me and the others will book in as a punter same as everyone else.
I don't want to be seen as a pimp and I don't want to take responsibility for the behaviour of a dozen or more guys that I've never met and don't know from Adam.

[90125]

I think it would be fair if we knew what they are.  They seem to evolve, and be secret.  Its not clear that they are universally fair and personally I think this is quite a big deal, because we have a natural churn of members arriving and retiring and we need to keep a status quo of privileged and unprivileged to keep the community balanced and viable.

Just saying - we've had long-time members who don't review and have been quite abusive and clearly using all facilities.  We like to say 'share reviews' but its clearly not it, and discriminates people who are active in sugarbaby or abroad subfora.

I understand that sharing the algorithm might (will?) result in gaming the system, but surely that's better than 'who the mods like?' if you want the forum to continue to be a good place.  And gaming it sufficiently subtly is likely to be hard.

This is bollocks.

[daviemac]

I think it would be fair if we knew what they are.  They seem to evolve, and be secret.  Its not clear that they are universally fair and personally I think this is quite a big deal, because we have a natural churn of members arriving and retiring and we need to keep a status quo of privileged and unprivileged to keep the community balanced and viable.

Just saying - we've had long-time members who don't review and have been quite abusive and clearly using all facilities.  We like to say 'share reviews' but its clearly not it, and discriminates people who are active in sugarbaby or abroad subfora.

I understand that sharing the algorithm might (will?) result in gaming the system, but surely that's better than 'who the mods like?' if you want the forum to continue to be a good place.  And gaming it sufficiently subtly is likely to be hard.

To put it very bluntly, the mods have fuck all to do with what the criteria for PM privileges is set at, that is done by the owner and admin of the site.

The mods just have to deal with people like you who keep whinging on about things you don't like about the site, it is what it is learn to live with it.

Is it though? You've said yourself event like this should be organised via PM, not open forum. But the PM privileges don't allow us to do that either.
I asked why the community can't be both, your answer is "cos of the rules", which is just a dodge of the the actual question. If the answer is "because the mods don't want to allow it" fair enough, but why not just say that straight?
I'm not really sure why you seem to be so scared of people PMing. It would be easy to keep tabs on PM activity and take away PM priviliges from those who PM heavily but don't contribute otherwise, which ought to stop the risk of people not sharing reviews publically (and I do understand that concern).Completely agree. I have no desire to be, or be seen as, a pimp. I've told the girl in question I'm happy to organise with up to half a dozen blokes I know. If she want more than that she can organise and me and the others will book in as a punter same as everyone else.
I don't want to be seen as a pimp and I don't want to take responsibility for the behaviour of a dozen or more guys that I've never met and don't know from Adam.

As I said above I don't make the rules I just have to waste time on people like you who can't accept them.

The rules are very clear no social meets to be organised on the open forum, they have to be done by PM, in order to have PM privileges they have to meet the criteria set by the site owner.

Why should the site owner and the site admin have to waste time checking the messages of the 97,270 members to make sure they aren't misusing the facility?? 

This site is for the benefit of all members not a select few who share info by PM. Those who use the site the way it's intended will have access  to more facilities than those that don't.

Having members posting to gain something is counter productive.

[Iloveoral]

Just a daft question, so there’s a girl and a bunch of you want to fuck her, why don’t the girl set up a aw/vs ad and you all send her a message, you can post a link to the aw/vs ad here?

Is that just too simple?

As mentioned above as a mod we have no override button etc, the system is set in place by the owner and admin, it’s their site they wish to be ran in that way, that’s their choice.

There’s also a few members here piping up that haven’t contributed in 5-12 years, I’ve a good guess why maybe their pm doesn’t work.

At the end of the day, the site rules are there for a reason guys, appreciated that might not be the answer your looking for, again set by the owner of the site, that’s the way it is, other than that there’s a button near the top to log out.

I probably shouldn’t say too much here but the owner only took this place on for you guys else it would be gone, so a little respect to him, his rules, his system and thankfully we still have an awesome site that you must admit is better than it was before. 

[sensualencounter]

I’m pretty certain that if gangbangs are your thing then there are other sites out there for you to engage in. And if not then maybe all of you whinging could get together and make your own site? Just a thought.

[jimbobted]

As I said above I don't make the rules I just have to waste time on people like you who can't accept them.
...
Why should the site owner and the site admin have to waste time checking the messages of the 97,270 members to make sure they aren't misusing the facility?? 

This site is for the benefit of all members not a select few who share info by PM. Those who use the site the way it's intended will have access  to more facilities than those that don't.

To you first point, I specifically did say if that's the way the owners/mods want it then fine. It's their toybox, at no point have I said I don't accept it?

As to the second point, they wouldn't need to. You write a script to do that, same as there will be a script now allowing/rescinding PM messages, because as you say you aren't manually going to check 97,000 members privileges every day. It's not rocket science. But if the owners don't want to do that fair enough, I think it could benefit the community as a whole though, just my opinion.

[daviemac]

To you first point, I specifically did say if that's the way the owners/mods want it then fine. It's their toybox, at no point have I said I don't accept it?

As to the second point, they wouldn't need to. You write a script to do that, same as there will be a script now allowing/rescinding PM messages, because as you say you aren't manually going to check 97,000 members privileges every day. It's not rocket science. But if the owners don't want to do that fair enough, I think it could benefit the community as a whole though, just my opinion.

No, it would be a lot of work to set up for the benefit of the minority and leave the system open to abuse by anyone so inclined.

The situation with messages isn't rocket science either, those who use the site in the way it's intended to be used have access to more privileges than those who don't.

[Bornslippy]

Did this gangbang ever actually take place? If not can we close this thread?

[daviemac]

If not can we close this thread?

Just stop posting on it and it will drop off the page.

[jimbobted]

Did this gangbang ever actually take place? If not can we close this thread?

Should be happening sometime in February, fingers crossed.