Delightful Dianne - Anyone seen?

[chatman]

Hi all,

Has anyone seen Delightful Dianne?
External Link/Members Only

I see she has 5 feedback, but they are not being shared, makes me a little nervous!

A little expensive for the hour, however, I do like the idea of the woodland walk option
Have had some great experiences with some alfresco fun in the sunshine
the chance of being seen adds to a heightened state of arousal

Any thoughts from fellow punters, most welcome ..... cheers

[muddy funxter]

reckon it is pvt gallery scam if any one falls for it?

[faggins]

"Enjoys" list ticks a lot of my boxes, but hidden feedback and rates are a little off putting - I don't think my bank balance would stand me TOFTT right at the mo...

[chatman]

Cheers guys

MF - Yes, I noticed the private gallery pics were very expensive, don't think I have seen any this high before!
I'm certainly not going to pay those prices!

F - Will let you know if I TOFTT, I have emailed her re a possible meet and why the hidden feedback, will let you know if she gets back to me.

[wannabe]

If you hover the mouse over the number of feedbacks, it shows there are 7 positives and 2 negatives. Some of them may not be for escorting which may be why it only shows 5.

The negs may be why she's hidden them.

[unclepokey]

I'm hoping to find a moment to visit this woman myself sometime. The two negative feedbacks arose on the day that her son had a major breathing difficulty and had to be bluelighted to hospital. Dianne travelled with him in the ambulance and in her haste she forgot her phone so was unable to contact the two punters that she had booked for that morning/afternoon. Later in the day and back home she was able to contact me and explain why an evening appointment with yours truly had to be cancelled. The punters booked earlier in the day were naturally somewhat miffed hence the two negatives.

I agree the cost for a peek at her private gallery is egregious.
And I think I'll try to be her first client of the day.
Uncle Pokey

[wannabe]

Feedback is visible now.

[chatman]

Thanks to UncleP for the update and Wannabee for alerting me the feedback is now visible

Emailed her several days ago, she has read my email, but not replied yet, so still waiting to make an appointment 

[Cash drawers]

By the look of her feed back, her Kids are probably ill!!!!!

[PhilYaboots]

I can report that the private gallery is genuine. Over 150 photos, most of them very revealing. Certainly gives a good idea of what to expect.

[finn5555]

Another pro$$ie who has lowered her age by at least 10 years 

[Sparta Prada]

How dim is this woman to tell the world where she meets guys for car meets?!!

[finn5555]

How dim is this woman to tell the world where she meets guys for car meets?!!

What if St Albans RFC have a home game 

[Sparta Prada]

What if St Albans RFC have a home game 

I guess it's the right place to find a hooker!

*Grabs coat and leaves*

[Badvicar]

I'm hoping to find a moment to visit this woman myself sometime. The two negative feedbacks arose on the day that her son had a major breathing difficulty and had to be bluelighted to hospital. Dianne travelled with him in the ambulance and in her haste she forgot her phone so was unable to contact the two punters that she had booked for that morning/afternoon. Later in the day and back home she was able to contact me and explain why an evening appointment with yours truly had to be cancelled. The punters booked earlier in the day were naturally somewhat miffed hence the two negatives.

I agree the cost for a peek at her private gallery is egregious.
And I think I'll try to be her first client of the day.
Uncle Pokey

On so many levels this post is either pimp, prossie, fluffy or wk.... how do you know so much, speak so much on her behalf, or claim so much without seeing her?

[faggins]

On so many levels this post is either pimp, prossie, fluffy or wk.... how do you know so much, speak so much on her behalf, or claim so much without seeing her?

She maybe told him all that via AW e-mail...? I've had WGs cancel on me and give chapter and verse explanations, when a simple "sorry - family emergency" would have sufficed...

[Badvicar]

She maybe told him all that via AW e-mail...? I've had WGs cancel on me and give chapter and verse explanations, when a simple "sorry - family emergency" would have sufficed...

Yeah she messaged all that personal info on AW. Pokey will explain, I hope.

[faggins]

Yeah she messaged all that personal info on AW. Pokey will explain, I hope.

Or they spoke on the phone. Whatever. Just giving the benefit of the doubt. Perfectly possible to be able to engage with SPs on a personal level without being a WK or a fluffy.

[Badvicar]

Or they spoke on the phone. Whatever. Just giving the benefit of the doubt. Perfectly possible to be able to engage with SPs on a personal level without being a WK or a fluffy.

Benefit any doubt you want, but read his text. Too much knowledge, and too friendly to be impartial. Pimp, WK or fluffy.

[faggins]

Benefit any doubt you want, but read his text. Too much knowledge, and too friendly to be impartial. Pimp, WK or fluffy.

Given the reviewer in question has posted 7 reviews, some of which are in the NW region, I doubt pimp given the geographical range (unlikely, though not impossible).  As to white knighting, the lack of follow up posts endlessly extolling the lady's virtues would seem to put paid to that - we're not in Footie Mad Jonny/Endearing Emily territory here. Possibly fluffy, but then that's such an arbitrary term. A failure to describe a WG in purely misogynistic "piece of meat" terms doesn't necessarily indicate "fluffiness", just good manners? Maybe not everyone's a cynic. But, you're going to remain unconvinced whatever, so let's leave it at that.

[Students Notebook]

Given the reviewer in question has posted 7 reviews, some of which are in the NW region, I doubt pimp given the geographical range (unlikely, though not impossible).  As to white knighting, the lack of follow up posts endlessly extolling the lady's virtues would seem to put paid to that - we're not in Footie Mad Jonny/Endearing Emily territory here. Possibly fluffy, but then that's such an arbitrary term. A failure to describe a WG in purely misogynistic "piece of meat" terms doesn't necessarily indicate "fluffiness", just good manners? Maybe not everyone's a cynic. But, you're going to remain unconvinced whatever, so let's leave it at that.

Plus 1.

Nutty

[faggins]

For avoidance of doubt, I'm not jumping on any "Uncle Pokey = good/Badvicar = bad" bandwagon, nor am I likely to resort to posting "amusing" pictures of "Fuck off spray"; I just genuinely don't get (and given I'm in my 50s and have punted since god knows when, am not completely naive) how an explanation as to why an SP wasn't available turns into suspicions of pimping, etc., when there are far more obvious pimps, WKs and fluffies about.

As to SP in question, she's posted a few pics in her AW gallery that have made me think twice about having her on my HL, so I'm unlikely to be agreeing/disagreeing with any reviews on this one.