There have been a couple of WGs I've punted over the years who have been so good that I can't believe they haven't been reviewed more.
Do you think that some punters don't review their favourite WGs so they can "keep them to themselves"?
. . . and come on . . . fess up if you've ever done it!
It definitely does happen. How much, I don't know. As you've also said, you can't really "keep a WG to yourself" anyway but I'm sure some people naively try.
I personally always review the "best" girls I've punted, with the exception of those with lots of reviews although I review a few of them as well. However, when it comes to great girls with no or very few reviews, I will often significantly delay the posting of my review and see them at least a couple of times in the interim. I don't delay for all that long though (no more than a few months), especially if they have absolutely no reviews - usually I'll do those in a matter of weeks, sometimes days but may choose to delay a bit more if someone posts a review in the meantime.
To be honest, it amazes me how many people review so many of their positive punts. There is absolutely no benefit to the punter for doing that, unless their dodgy or you factor in the long term benefit of becoming a valuable and trustworthy contributor. Indeed there only downsides for the punter, most notably the risk of becoming harder to book. Even if you wait a while before posting, many WG's often find it easy to work out who you are so sometimes a minority of them will react poorly (often in subtle ways), especially if your review didn't make them out to be a totally perfect princess (because no girl is).
Even though there are number of girls I see repeatedly, none of them are "special" enough for me to care that much about, e.g. if I find them really difficult to book (which actually isn't that common anyway except with girls who were already disorganised/had poor comms), I'll just choose someone else. Of course I'm fortunate enough to live in area which gives me such choice. To be clear though, I don't have loads of choice, there is a massive lack of good escorts in Manchester, it's just even worse in many other areas/cities.
. . . but I am convinced it goes on, but not a lot of punters will admit it - want evidence? How many times have you seen a WG criticised in a review only for some white knight who has never even reviewed her coming to the rescue to counter the criticism with "Well, when I saw her [ ] . . ."
I agree but of course I'm sure the main reason for the lack of most reviews is just lack of incentive and also laziness. Indeed, this is a problem with all kinds of forums, not just this one. Also, there are plenty of example in negative review threads, where someone pops up saying they experienced the same months ago too but never bothered to say anything sooner. Indeed, I could give you 2 examples from just North West section, posted just today!
Actually, that's not entirely accurate, there has been one girl I didn't review, because she essentially offered me BB - look on the thread to see the reasons why I refused to review and name her:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=221126.0
I've only read the first few posts but to be honest, that thread just comes across as dumb, pointless and attention seeking.
