My area is complete shit for paid sex.

[NIK]

Have the possibility of going for a punt this weekend, but there is absolutely nothing in my area these days.

Just checked AWank and it gets worse.
Maybe two to three hundred profiles in my chosen category (under 30) and there is nothing. I mean absolutely nothing in terms of decent indies.
For a start about three quarters of them are parlour and agency girls advertising. GFE alone must have about 20. If I want to go to fucking GFE which seems to be the only place in Sheffield these days then I don't have to trawl through bloody AW to do it.

Then they either have:
No contact number
No log in for ages.
Crap photos.
Offputting profiles (Don't do this that or the other)
Webcam only.
Etcetera, etcetera

For example I looked at this one I hadn't seen before

External Link/Members Only

At first looked interesting, but despite all the positive feedback there is something about the profile that doesn't ring true. Looks like most of it refers to fucking webcam in which I have zero interest. Sooner watch higher quality porn for free. Her phone number appears to be a high cost number. There is also plenty of up her own arse stuff about hygiene in the profile. And we have the usual 'wow greatest escort ever crap' in the extensive feedback.
In other words a load of fucking shite. And this is typical of most of them.

I really despair around here. 

You punters in the south don't know how lucky you are.

[NIK]

Then I come across this

External Link/Members Only

It says 'Make your selection' - They only have one!

I suppose they all have to start somewhere.

[jackdaw]

Sympathy.

My areas just the same. It's main reason why I've virtually retired from punting. ( I keep in touch with this site because I like the banter. But must admit I often have a wry smile when the guys in good punting areas "say" things like "I never bother if they don't display a phone number…etc, etc". If only they knew what it was like in a punting desert.)

I agree with you about the AW profile being suspect. For a start a hell of a lot of the "AdultWork's Finest" mob are Cam or picture sellers who indicate they are escorts to increase Cam bookings/ picture sales.

This one looks like she did a few escort bookings once upon a time…. but not for ages. Maybe…once in a blue moon… if she fancies some particular role play, you look like Brad Pitt, and offer way over the stated escort price for a booking at the Ritz… she might do a booking now. But I doubt it.

[dilettante]

I agree, same as for eg a lot of freelance work London is the only place where you can make a go of it.  I was in Manchester a couple  of weeks ago and narrowed it down to about 5 possibles in the whole area, not many more than that in Brum either - but at least 30 on my London HL, and those are just the ones I've found so far.

[codemonkey]

Sexylicious4u in Huddersfield.

Happy to help

[Jimmyredcab]

NIK, London is no better --------------- that is why you fall back on regulars when you pay us a visit.   

I get hundreds of profiles when I search within 20 miles of my postcode, 90% of those are totally useless and get rejected right away, headless photos are no good to me ------------ it is like punting in brothels 20 years ago when we had no idea what the girl was going to look like.   

[Roland D Hay]

You and me both Nik, I was up for it today and faced a minimum 40 mile drive. Got up this morning and just couldn't be arsed. The East Midlands is a punting desert.

[Iblisuk]

Brooke89 Leicester

Happy to help.

[Roland D Hay]

Brooke89 Leicester

Happy to help.

Good tip but almost 40 miles from me, as I said, I just can't be arsed today.

[Steve2]

NIK, London is no better --------------- that is why you fall back on regulars when you pay us a visit.   

I get hundreds of profiles when I search within 20 miles of my postcode, 90% of those are totally useless and get rejected right away, headless photos are no good to me ------------ it is like punting in brothels 20 years ago when we had no idea what the girl was going to look like.   

NOT TRUE Jimbo. There are many girls in London that have POSITIVE reports from Respected members on here

 

[Jimmyredcab]

NOT TRUE Jimbo. There are many girls in London that have POSITIVE reports from Respected members on here

 

Respected by who exactly.     

Many reviews are marked positive when they should be negative.

I remember one that was bait and switch and still got a positive --------- totally ridiculous.   

[smiths]

NIK, London is no better --------------- that is why you fall back on regulars when you pay us a visit.   

I get hundreds of profiles when I search within 20 miles of my postcode, 90% of those are totally useless and get rejected right away, headless photos are no good to me ------------ it is like punting in brothels 20 years ago when we had no idea what the girl was going to look like.   

Absolute crap of the highest order, again.

[smiths]

NOT TRUE Jimbo. There are many girls in London that have POSITIVE reports from Respected members on here

 

Yep, to name but a few WGs rated by a number of punters on here; Michelle Independent, Platinum Cindy, Madlin Moon, GEN who i punted with recently and Hot Katalina although as she charges under £100 an hour she is a skank in Jims bizarre thinking.

[Jimmyredcab]

Yep, to name but a few WGs rated by a number of punters on here; Michelle Independent, Platinum Cindy, Madlin Moon, GEN who i punted with recently and Hot Katalina although as she charges under £100 an hour she is a skank in Jims bizarre thinking.

So do you think that bait and switch punts should be marked as POSITIVE, that is what I have seen on here.

[Jimmyredcab]

Absolute crap of the highest order, again.

No it's not ------------------- only in your warped mind.

In the 1980's when I used to visit the numerous brothels in the Newham area I had absolutely no idea who I was going to see, you had to rely on the maid's description which was rarely accurate ----------- I walked many times.

When you visit Adultwork girls with headless photos you are turning the clock back to pre-internet days.   

[smiths]

So do you think that bait and switch punts should be marked as POSITIVE, that is what I have seen on here.

Of course not, i have been vocal in how much i despise bait and switch.

[smiths]

No it's not ------------------- only in your warped mind.

In the 1980's when I used to visit the numerous brothels in the Newham area I had absolutely no idea who I was going to see, you had to rely on the maid's description which was rarely accurate ----------- I walked many times.

When you visit Adultwork girls with headless photos you are turning the clock back to pre-internet days.   

Classic MY warped mind, talk about pots and kettles, you couldnt make it up.

You dont just have to rely on A/W to get a good punt, you could go to HOD, a number of good WGs their i have punted with mainly at LMP who have good feedback from a number of punters.

[Steve2]

Respected by who exactly.     

To quote yourself Jimbo

"You could have an argument with yourself in an empty lift"

Do you not repect any of the members here who post positive reviews? Myself excluded of course as I only see lowlife skanks

 

[Ali Katt]

I have to agree. I try not to see women over 35, but the problem is most lie about their age the women that are 28 are probably nearer 38, like this waster:
External Link/Members Only

Not too mention the stupid shit on profiles: £10 extra OWO, £10 extra CIM, I only do kissing if I fancy you - I thought these were indies, not fucking parlours. Too many Romanians and Hungarians I am happy to see them in parlours, but I am put off seeing EE indies as they are probably working flats or B&S. Worst of all most are too fucking expensive. I would need a lobotomy before I pay £150 an hour to see a 50 year old. Probably a quarter of the profiles are parlours or agencies.

My main issue is there is no genuine talent, fake tits, chav stamps and text speak are all massive turn offs for me. So, I am faced with lowering my standards or fucking someone who might be fit, but has almost irredeemable features, which is like a force field.

And Leeds seems too far away,  considering my last punt there was a literal fucking disaster.

[mattylondon]

I get hundreds of profiles when I search within 20 miles of my postcode, 90% of those are totally useless and get rejected right away, headless photos are no good to me

I'm not interested in petty point scoring, but I'm genuinely puzzled that you say there are no decent prossies within a 20 mile radius of East London/Essex?

Correct me if I'm wrong but are your criteria the following: white, young (18 - 25), preferably British, incall friendly?

I read you and others, use the term 'skank', quite a lot. Can I establish your criteria for what constitutes a skank? I shall provide you with mine.

I use it as a derogatory term to describe a woman who appears to be physically malnourished or obese, ugly, has no regards to personal hygiene and takes risks with certain services. For example, bareback penetration, hard sports and water sports. In a slightly wider context, a liar, thief and a fraud. Generally described by many as a 'low life'.

To me, none of my criteria have anything to do with a girls age, race, nationality, location for the job and rate she charges. If a girl is friendly, scrupulously clean, treats her punters well, offers a good service, is comfortable with her rate, then how is such a girl a skank?For example, let's pick a girl you approve of. If MI drops her rate to £90 from £100, does she become a skank? 

[Steve2]

Matty, while you have been away Jimbo's values have changed

Basically any Romanian is a skank

Anyone charging less than £100/hr is a skank

All girls charging £60/hr MUST be skanks

...and the list goes on unfortunately

I hope this helps but I am sure Jimbo will be along soon with his expert opinion

 

[mattylondon]

Matty, while you have been away Jimbo's values have changed

Basically any Romanian is a skank

Anyone charging less than £100/hr is a skank

That leaves little hope for me then because all I generally do these days is punt minus £100!

I'm sure Jim will correct me or at least offer his own view of a skank, so I'll ask you then Steve. Do you recognise the term skank and if you do, what's your definition? 

[akauya]

I use it as a derogatory term to describe a woman who appears to be physically malnourished or obese, ugly, has no regards to personal hygiene and takes risks with certain services. For example, bareback penetration, hard sports and water sports. In a slightly wider context, a liar, thief and a fraud. Generally described by many as a 'low life'.

That would be my definition of a skank too... but you will notice that some posters are using the term now sarcastically because Jimmy and his followers have decided to use that term as Steve's post above explains.

[Taggart]

You and me both Nik, I was up for it today and faced a minimum 40 mile drive. Got up this morning and just couldn't be arsed. The East Midlands is a punting desert.

Have to agree 100%.  Where I live, I have the choice of 30 min trips to Leicestershire/Notts/Derby area and it is an appalling situation. Add 20 mins to my travel time and that brings in southern Lincolnshire and Peterborough/Stamford, and again the choice is still awful.

Considering Leicester and Nottingham have two universities each, students dont seem interested in being paid for sex.  I am beginning to wonder if, with the EE influx, many girls have said 'fck it' and got proper jobs?

Adding to NIKs list:

No recent feedback
Dont reply to emails when needing to clarify something
Dont update pictures regularly
Claim to be an escort but only have webcam feedback
Too old
Too fat
Too ugly
Romanian
War & peace style profiles
Contradictory profiles - listing A or CIM, then stating its N/A
Haphazard pricing structure: incall £140 outcall £220 or 1 hour in £110, out £130 then in and out at £150.

There are only a few girls' profiles I genuinely trust, having seen them and been given a good seeing to, but I dont like to encourage familiarity and a changes is as good as a rest.

Overall, like all you guys, I too am very disillusioned with the poor choice, and while money is not burning a hole in my pocket, I am loathe to waste it on crap punts just to get satisfied.  I am thinking of taking up a new hobby.......

[Ali Katt]

Classic MY warped mind, talk about pots and kettles, you couldnt make it up.

You dont just have to rely on A/W to get a good punt, you could go to HOD, a number of good WGs their i have punted with mainly at LMP who have good feedback from a number of punters.

Hoping to bring this back on track, but coincidentally Sheffield parlour, GFE was described as the HOD of the North, yes, really. One of the main arguments against GFE was the use of heavily airbrushed pictures which prevented a true representation of the girl, such as this one that had several large tattoos brushed out:
External Link/Members Only

I'm not sure if the HOD pictures are as airbrushed at least some show the girl's face, GFE have a blanket policy of not showing faces, i.e. hide the mingers. And whilst it is easy to walk out of a parlour, it can be a wasted journey for many. I haven't been to GFE for over a year, I used to go once a month, and would eye up who I would see next time whilst seeing my first choice, when it was managed by a male, now the women have taken over and with abysmal pricing schemes and petty shit, 50p for a can of coke anyone?  it isn't worth my time, not to mention the girls working there seem to be getting fatter and uglier from what I can tell by the heavily airbrushed pictures.

[NIK]

I seem to have started something again!

I do agree with what Jimmy says about AW almost turning the clock back to pre internet days. He's also correct in that I tend to stick to what I know these days when I visit London. Indeed the only bad punt I had last year was locally in Rotherham, and it was the only local punt I had! To be fair the girl tried hard, but as she was a fat minger it made no difference.

I think a huge part of the problem is to do with me. Like Jimmy I'm far less likely to take a chance these days. Once upon a time I'd think nothing of risking money on prossies, but now I simply can't afford to. But even if I could I wouldn't.  I'm also less inclined to travel very far. I used to find the travelling an exciting part of the punt. Now I just find it a pain in the arse. Even thought briefly about having outcalls once again, but I haven't done that at home for about thirteen years and can't really see me risking it again.  Indeed sex is less important to me than it once was. I guess it's an age thing.

Therefore when I do go for a punt it will have to be a guaranteed one. I used to find the unknown exciting and have had more 'blind' punts than you could shake a stick at. Not anymore.
Ultimately I would rather save myself and my cash for London than waste £60/£70 here and there locally as I used to do regularly.
The problem is to have a decent time for even 3/4 nights in London I usually need at least a grand. 2/3 punts £500-£600, even acceptable accommodation is £300 - £500, first class travel £70 - £80, travel in London and plenty of food and drink! 

I used to go for a couple of nights, but these days I think if I can't do at least three or four nights with correspondingly more punts and increased accommodation expenses it's not worth it - the travel costs are the same. More time also allows me to meet more punting friends.

[Jimmyredcab]

Do you not respect any of the members here who post positive reviews?

 

Yes, unless they see £70 an hour Romanians obviously.   

Some guys would fuck anything with a pulse.   

[smiths]

That would be my definition of a skank too... but you will notice that some posters are using the term now sarcastically because Jimmy and his followers have decided to use that term as Steve's post above explains.

Jim posted ALL WGs that charged under £100 an hour are skanks. That is in my opinion among the biggest complete load of old bollocks posted on here that i have yet seen. Now London is rubbish, that is also among the biggest load of old bollocks i have read on here.

Its also totally untrue as reviews and feedback posted by credible to me punters have shown on here. In addition i have punted with loads of WGs over the years who charged under £100 an hour, in London, as ever what makes a good or bad WG is not what they or their pimps happen to charge but the WGs attitude. Jim used to agree with this but now its blah, blah, blah as he posted in reply to me the other day.

In very recent times Hot Katalina charged me £80 an hour and is a very good WG in my view, yet according to Jims arbitory thinking she is automatically a skank. A number of other credible to me punters have also punted with her who dont agree she is a skank.

I just hope that newbie punters reading this forum read reviews and posts by many punters to get a rounded view about the reality, there is NO correlation between what a WG charges and how good a WG she is.

[smiths]

Hoping to bring this back on track, but coincidentally Sheffield parlour, GFE was described as the HOD of the North, yes, really. One of the main arguments against GFE was the use of heavily airbrushed pictures which prevented a true representation of the girl, such as this one that had several large tattoos brushed out:
External Link/Members Only

I'm not sure if the HOD pictures are as airbrushed at least some show the girl's face, GFE have a blanket policy of not showing faces, i.e. hide the mingers. And whilst it is easy to walk out of a parlour, it can be a wasted journey for many. I haven't been to GFE for over a year, I used to go once a month, and would eye up who I would see next time whilst seeing my first choice, when it was managed by a male, now the women have taken over and with abysmal pricing schemes and petty shit, 50p for a can of coke anyone?  it isn't worth my time, not to mention the girls working there seem to be getting fatter and uglier from what I can tell by the heavily airbrushed pictures.

HOD use photoshopping although Divine posted on Pnet before he stormed off as his touting got restricted that he would cut it right down. I already know what the WGs i have punted with look like obviously, Jim has punted at HOD before as he posted about punting with Elise so knows they offer a generally good service. And for £130 an hour or £70 (i think) for half hour they are good VFM in my view, especially when in London the entry price for most Agencies is £150 an hour. So if as a punter you dont mind punting in a Parlour it could be ideal.

[Jimmyredcab]

Jim posted ALL WGs that charged under £100 an hour are skanks.

I can't remember saying exactly that so let me clarify my opinion on this subject ------------  any girl charging below £100 should be treated with caution, a pretty young girl who provides a good service has no need to go under £100, they may of course be totally genuine but there is a chance that they will want extras, try to cut your time down ----------- or be unable to string a sentence together.

Let's take a girl we both know, Seductive Scarlett, her prices went up and down like a see saw but she never went below that figure of £100 because she didn't have to, her phone was never dusty.

[Jimmyredcab]

HOD use photoshopping although Divine posted on Pnet before he stormed off as his touting got restricted that he would cut it right down. I already know what the WGs i have punted with look like obviously, Jim has punted at HOD before as he posted about punting with Elise so knows they offer a generally good service. And for £130 an hour or £70 (i think) for half hour they are good VFM in my view, especially when in London the entry price for most Agencies is £150 an hour. So if as a punter you dont mind punting in a Parlour it could be ideal.

My experience with HOD is very limited but my visit to see Elise was a five star punt, her photos are doctored but she is a very pretty young lady.

I agree that it is VFM when you consider the area, I also like the option of 45 minutes at £100 ---------- many Indies have a one hour minimum.

[smiths]

I can't remember saying exactly that so let me clarify my opinion on this subject ------------  any girl charging below £100 should be treated with caution, a pretty young girl who provides a good service has no need to go under £100, they may of course be totally genuine but there is a chance that they will want extras, try to cut your time down ----------- or be unable to string a sentence together.

Let's take a girl we both know, Seductive Scarlett, her prices went up and down like a see saw but she never went below that figure of £100 because she didn't have to, her phone was never dusty.

Let me remind you. You posted it on post 38 of a review thread on the London board called SexyLetiyah18. "Only low life skanks need to charge less" than £100 an hour.

There is a chance ANY WG who charges any amount will offer a bad service, thats why this forum can help punters locate WGs recommended by other punters. To post ALL WGs who charges under £100 an hour is a skank is rubbish and untrue. Good to see you have backtracked on that and admitted there can be at least some good WGs who charge under £100 an hour. Hot Katalina being one in my experience.

[mattylondon]

I can't remember saying exactly that so let me clarify my opinion on this subject ------------  any girl charging below £100 should be treated with caution, a pretty young girl who provides a good service has no need to go under £100, they may of course be totally genuine but there is a chance that they will want extras, try to cut your time down ----------- or be unable to string a sentence together.

If the part I highlighted is your criteria, it's little wonder you can't find anybody 

But seriously, I thought your last post was a lot more measured and sensible, rather than simply dismissing all minus £100 girls as skanks. I used to be ripped off regardless of the rate charged Jim, so I treat all new girls with caution unless I receive a recommendation from a punter I trust. And also consider that not everybody believes in charging top dollar, just because they could. Either way you cut it, £80 a hour is a lot of money. 

Where I will go somewhere towards you, is that I treat Private Gallery only profiles, places where several girls work and profiles clearly written by others, with extreme caution. As this practice is quite prevalent with many Romanian and Bulgarian girls, the temptation is to make blanket assumptions, when I think this is more a problem with language and time spent in the UK. I have noticed that once settled here, quite a few of these women stop working for other people and go independent. 

[smiths]

My experience with HOD is very limited but my visit to see Elise was a five star punt, her photos are doctored but she is a very pretty young lady.

I agree that it is VFM when you consider the area, I also like the option of 45 minutes at £100 ---------- many Indies have a one hour minimum.

I recommend Amy who is a Brit, mid-20s, tall but offers a good service and Jade who is Brazilian but is excellent in my view. Also note HOD 2 is re-opening in St Johns Wood on Monday, they have moved out of that dump in Maida Vale.

[mattylondon]

I agree that it is VFM when you consider the area, I also like the option of 45 minutes at £100 ---------- many Indies have a one hour minimum.

This is something which I've suggested to more than one girl privately. It all depends on the rate set, of course. I think we're going to see a lot more of this and especially since many of them read UKP. Even if they hate it, it cannot be ignored! 

If the rate is 'fair', then it's a win, win, as far as I'm concerned. A punter who cannot or doesn't want to pay her full 1 hour rate can punt her and she generally receives more than she could charge for 30 minutes. Clever marketing, in my opinion.

[badsin]

I also live in the east midlands - long known to be a desert, in comparison to London and the south east!

I am genuinely amazed at all these guys bickering at each other, further up this thread - try living here! haha

I have been reading the London reviews in recent days, and am amazed at the quality of the girls - let alone their prices £100p/h thats a fantastic rate.

Ive had a bit of a a punting break, since October'13 - but have been keeping an eye out for when I get back in the saddle. To be honest a lot of w/g's in Nottingham/Derby/Leicester look as though their pimps have set the profiles up. Whilst the quantities now offering BB, just makes me cringe.

Thankfully CoolTiger likes to point a few of us in the right direction with his advice and guidance for this area. I find the information he provides extremely useful - even if its who to definitely avoid

I think I'll be heading over to Manchester (Sandys - Farah!) once the spuds turn to melons, and require professional draining

[Jimmyredcab]

Let me remind you. You posted it on post 38 of a review thread on the London board called SexyLetiyah18. "Only low life skanks need to charge less" than £100 an hour.

OK, Thanks -------------------- but I still strongly believe that when the rate drops below £100 your risks increase, I look forward to reading your reviews of some cheapo girls in the near future.     

I believe that NIK made a similar comment recently, something like he would be very wary of girls charging less than £100 in London, maybe we have both got it wrong.   

[CoolTiger]

I also live in the east midlands - long known to be a desert, in comparison to London and the south east!

I am genuinely amazed at all these guys bickering at each other, further up this thread - try living here! haha

I have been reading the London reviews in recent days, and am amazed at the quality of the girls - let alone their prices £100p/h thats a fantastic rate.

Ive had a bit of a a punting break, since October'13 - but have been keeping an eye out for when I get back in the saddle. To be honest a lot of w/g's in Nottingham/Derby/Leicester look as though their pimps have set the profiles up. Whilst the quantities now offering BB, just makes me cringe.

Thankfully CoolTiger likes to point a few of us in the right direction with his advice and guidance for this area. I find the information he provides extremely useful - even if its who to definitely avoid

I think I'll be heading over to Manchester (Sandys - Farah!) once the spuds turn to melons, and require professional draining

 

[smiths]

OK, Thanks -------------------- but I still strongly believe that when the rate drops below £100 your risks increase, I look forward to reading your reviews of some cheapo girls in the near future.     

I believe that NIK made a similar comment recently, something like he would be very wary of girls charging less than £100 in London, maybe we have both got it wrong.   

Why are you trying to draw me into bringing NIK into this, your tactics wont work their Jim. Its YOU that has posted ANY WG that charged under £100 an hour is a skank. Anyway, you have backtracked that now. I punted with Hot Katalina at £80 an hour, i added my view to an existing thread about her before Adam brought in the new guidance.

I have no problem paying £100 an hour or more if i rate the WG, just did a review on GEN of Barnet who i have punted with off and on since 2008, she was £100 an hour, a very good WG in my view.

[Jimmyredcab]

Why are you trying to draw me into bringing NIK into this, your tactics wont work their Jim.

No "tactics" --------------- simply pointing out what NIK said, not sure why that is a problem to you.   

[potato]

Higher prices have never been a guarantee of better service.  We need to be careful that we are not simply talking girls rates up on here. Saying things like " any girls under £100 should be viewed with caution" just encourages them to put their rates up to £100 plus otherwise we will automatically view them as no good - and girls on higher rates to push theirs up further to maintain a differential - this is madness!   As UKP gathers ground and more SP's read this site, we are effectively encouraging them to increase their rates regardless of their service level. £100 should be a maximum not a minimum!

[James999]

Why

No

Hidden Image/Members Only

[DJ Fruit Polo]

Also note HOD 2 is re-opening in St Johns Wood on Monday, they have moved out of that dump in Maida Vale.

That sounds good, the Maida Vale flat had a bus stop pretty much right outside...not very discreet!

[smiths]

No "tactics" --------------- simply pointing out what NIK said, not sure why that is a problem to you.   

Thats it you concentrate on choosing one part of my reply to you, good to see you arent disagreeing with the rest. It ALWAYS depends on the WG if she is good or not, what she or her pimp happen to charge isnt what defines her as being good or bad, thats her attitude.

[smiths]

Higher prices have never been a guarantee of better service.  We need to be careful that we are not simply talking girls rates up on here. Saying things like " any girls under £100 should be viewed with caution" just encourages them to put their rates up to £100 plus otherwise we will automatically view them as no good - and girls on higher rates to push theirs up further to maintain a differential - this is madness!   As UKP gathers ground and more SP's read this site, we are effectively encouraging them to increase their rates regardless of their service level. £100 should be a maximum not a minimum!

Yeah right, exactly.

[smiths]

That sounds good, the Maida Vale flat had a bus stop pretty much right outside...not very discreet!

They were desperate to find a premises after the Euston Road one fell through when it was discovered the "landlord" was subletting without the real Landlords permission and resulting in them being given the boot by the real Landlord.

Who knows at this stage though if the new premises are any better, we shall see on that of course.

[mattylondon]

Higher prices have never been a guarantee of better service.  We need to be careful that we are not simply talking girls rates up on here.

I don't think that will happen. If some women are daft enough and act accordingly, let them. The only thing that many will receive is a dusty phone. 

I still maintain that £100 an hour is a ridiculously high rate, for what is after all, a non skilled job, which requires no education or training. Many women, especially British women, who refuse to even consider dropping their rates are the very same people who frequent forums, complaining about having that dusty phone.

I don't think price should be their only consideration. Improved marketing and better pictures. And dare I say it, many prossies are lazy people and expect the work to come to them. You'll be lucky to find an SP awake and ready for action before 1200pm. How about some of them getting off their lazy arses and going out to find the work? After all, that's what some of us have to do? I take my hat of to those who have that work ethic and they deserve their success. 

[Jimmyredcab]

Higher prices have never been a guarantee of better service. 

Absolutely correct ----------- but I am suspicious of low prices in any walk of life, if a Polish plumber wanted to charge me £60 a day I would be concerned about his quality of work.

Good quality prostitutes don't have to work for very low rates, they will always be busy ---------- however with these foreign "groups" of girls it is the pimp who decides the rate, he simply wants a high turnover.   

[Jimmyredcab]

I still maintain that £100 an hour is a ridiculously high rate, for what is after all, a non skilled job, which requires no education or training.

I agree entirely, who else in life would you pay £100+ an hour, I can only think of my dentist and he had to train for years.

They charge what they charge simply because they can, they don't have to justify it.   

[vorian]

Absolutely correct ----------- but I am suspicious of low prices in any walk of life, if a Polish plumber wanted to charge me £60 a day I would be concerned about his quality of work.

Good quality prostitutes don't have to work for very low rates, they will always be busy ---------- however with these foreign "groups" of girls it is the pimp who decides the rate, he simply wants a high turnover.   

I agree Jimmy about the low price raising concerns on the whole, also the pimp factor does come in.  However I also think that some good prossies can be found at the sub £100 mark ,they are very few and far between but can occasionally be found.