Unexpected bareback.... (Yes I know)

[MissWolf]

It's a and b to be honest.. although I see sense now
I'm away with work for a while , no signal here and aw is blocked on WiFi (here isn't for some reason)

I will review and post link later in the week
Been daft I know, in the moment it just surprised me

The point is he doesn't intend to ever post a link to her he wants to dip his dirty dick again. AW being blocked is an excuse, I quote " SP
Reasonable feedback on here"

So he doesn't need AW he just needs to go to her reasonable feedback on here and copy paste her link from there.

OP you have been online almost constantly keeping an eye on your little thread baby, how about you grow a pair of big boy balls and do the right thing..........

No wait of course you won't cos you are a FUCKWIT

[finn5555]

He is just attention seeking 
Maybe he wants to fuck her bareback but she said no

[gbyld87]

I don't want to name her on here, I know you won't like that, but has anyone had this happen

Please do, so I can avoid her, and anyone with a review from anyone she's seen, at all costs in the future.

[Zeusthedoc]

Well this has been a totally fucking useless thread.

Personally I think it's all made up - but let's see if owly boy proves me wrong

[Bigowl]

I don't think he is actually under any obligation to do so, and the way things degenerate to an angry holier-than-thou mob is quite disturbing, whether its bb or lurking.  What next?  Punting with a tickly cough, maybe?

I thought we tried to be a broad church?  There's plenty of cock sucking and even some bottoming being reviewed and welcomed - so long as the SP has tits, however fake.

I actually agree with this entirely, yeah maybe my initial post was just asking if this has happened to any of you lot, but it seems to have turned into a "name the hooker you wanker" post

Some people calling me out, yeah I agree, what happened shouldn't have... And I was surprised by it... However I made the active choice to go along with it...

I can guarantee the minute I name her, someone will contact her, I guarantee it ... With all good intentions I was going to post a review saying what happened... I honestly was, however I wanted to wait a few weeks, so it wasn't clear it was me!! (Reviews can be posted up to six months right, I have maybe a dozen reviews to post, I just wait so I'm not identified)

Yes I could just block her number etc and then name her, but If Im honest I loved it, was good sex and I want to return for oral to completion!

I understand about STDs and the risks, but from reviews etc, I would happily guess about 80% of you receive oral without... And I would guess a higher percentage give oral...both come with risks. (Albeit a lot lower than what I did.)

Yeah someone might make the decision to ban me, they could...I guess rules exist for a reason. If I have gone against them, I apologize.

I just asked if it happens....that's all

As for people checking if I'm online, maybe i leave my pc on

As for being labeled a fuckwit, so be it

[finn5555]

As for being labeled a fuckwit, so be it

No label required you are one ☝️

[millbush]

No label required you are one ☝️

Oh the irony 

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Can we please understand that most all girls have Someone barebacking them at some stage ! Pimp, old sergi, boyfriend, special customers etc.

The reason we use a CONDOM is to protect ourselves from anythiung that the SP may be carrying.

Screaming blue murder that this bloke should name the girl so we can avoid her is pointless.

We as the punters have to protect ourselves thats the real matter, we cannot trust any SP to say that she has nver BB'ed anyone can we?

[secretjones]

It's a and b to be honest.. although I see sense now
I'm away with work for a while , no signal here and aw is blocked on WiFi (here isn't for some reason)

I will review and post link later in the week
Been daft I know, in the moment it just surprised me

do a review , its more for the wider membership to then make their own decision on whether to persue this SP and also other SP to vet who they book given their feedback etc etc....plus there are too many lurkers / posters on here that dont review which is just not cricket

[finn5555]

Oh the irony 

Say what you want to say or wind your neck in big boy 

[daviemac]

Can we please understand that most all girls have Someone barebacking them at some stage ! Pimp, old sergi, boyfriend, special customers etc.

The reason we use a CONDOM is to protect ourselves from anythiung that the SP may be carrying.

Screaming blue murder that this bloke should name the girl so we can avoid her is pointless.

We as the punters have to protect ourselves thats the real matter, we cannot trust any SP to say that she has nver BB'ed anyone can we?

There's a whole world of difference between an escort barebacking her regular partner or some regular she trusts to one that barebacks all comers that could have anything for all she knows.

Would you really fancy having an appointment 15 minutes after the OP has spunked up her, I wouldn't.   

To be honest I can't see the point of this thread, apart from the "look at me, an escort liked me so much she barebacked" aspect.

If he didn't want to name her straight away then why post this now, why not wait until he's ready to post the review. If he only wants to know if others have been offered BB on the sly then ask that without mentioning what he did.   

Barebacking divides opinion, personally speaking I think those who don't advertise it and offer it on the sly should always be named and shamed.

This game is all about risk assessment, the risk of catching something from an escort who does not have anything is extremely low, the risk of catching something from an escort who has got something if infinitely higher, regardless of precautions taken. The risk of an escort who barebacks all comers having something is infinity higher than with one who doesn't.

[Lilywhite]

"In today's edition of 'Things That Didn't Actually Happen'..."

[Doc Holliday]

To be honest I can't see the point of this thread, apart from the "look at me, an escort liked me so much she barebacked" aspect.

Agree ... highly likely

"In today's edition of 'Things That Didn't Actually Happen'..."

  equally likely

[Bigowl]

Agree ... highly likely

  equally likely

Yay gang mentality!

Ok hypothetically

Let's say I picked a escort at random, and said it was her
Would you check? After all a text message from your punting phone wouldn't put you out would it.....

[Charlie Chalk]

Now the OP thinks he’s “special”; she’ll be able to identify him because he must be the only one she’s done this with  (if you ignore the other dozen punters she saw that day)

This either didn’t happen or he’s an utter moron. Either way he’s an attention-seeking twat who is best ignored.

[Kev40ish]

Oh the irony 

Obviously your ignore list must be broken 

[Foxtail17]

Yay gang mentality!

Ok hypothetically

Let's say I picked a escort at random, and said it was her
Would you check? After all a text message from your punting phone wouldn't put you out would it.....

You’ve been a member of this site for long enough to know how it works, give and receive is the ethos.
Presumably you have benefitted from the reviews on here, maybe even dodged a bullet.

As for your last comment about picking an escort at random and tarring her with your BB brush.....

[Bigowl]

I wouldn't just pick someone at random, I was just using it as a point , someone would contact her from here 100%

[daviemac]

Yay gang mentality!

Ok hypothetically

Let's say I picked a escort at random, and said it was her
Would you check? After all a text message from your punting phone wouldn't put you out would it.....

Can you please address the points I raised earlier and explain the point of this thread.   

To be honest I can't see the point of this thread, apart from the "look at me, an escort liked me so much she barebacked" aspect.

If he didn't want to name her straight away then why post this now, why not wait until he's ready to post the review. If he only wants to know if others have been offered BB on the sly then ask that without mentioning what he did.   

Barebacking divides opinion, personally speaking I think those who don't advertise it and offer it on the sly should always be named and shamed.

There is no 'gang mentality' the rules are clear -

12 Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members have the right to express disapproval of such activities.

Why you would even consider making false statements about any escorts leads me to question your integrity as a whole and your value to this site.

Perhaps you've forgotten rule #1 -

1 Site ethos / mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews.

[Bigowl]

Fair point, and I do respect your decision happily
I have said I will post a review and in short time I will


I wouldn't claim it was someone else, a review will follow

Same as others do, I don't review instantly, as it would be quite easy to tie my previous punts to this profile


I do understand that people can disapprove of it, and I do review most of the people I see.. I probably have around 10 reviews I haven't posted yet

 Not knocking the ethos of this site, or peoples opinion of it... I started of by asking a simple question, that's all...

[Fuzzyduck]

...
But this kind of nonsense puts us all at risk. That’s why we have a number of BB avoidance threads to pick up and record anyone offering BB. The OP knew the reaction he’d get by refusing (for reasons known only to himself) to name her. He’s putting her his own interests above ours and, on a punting forum operated by punters tor the benefit of punters, that is unacceptable. If you can’t understand that then I despair.

Fixed it for you. It's clear OP doesn't/didn't want other punters contacting her and fucking up his opportunity to bareback her again. The ease with which it happened and the motivation to protect self-interest makes me wonder if it's not the first time.

It also makes me wonder why he asked the question in the first place and what he hoped to gain, considering the flak he's got (he knew it would come). It can't just be a curious ponder. I suppose if I had future intentions to do similar again I'd want to know how common it was.

[Beamer]

Fair point, and I do respect your decision happily
I have said I will post a review and in short time I will


I wouldn't claim it was someone else, a review will follow

Same as others do, I don't review instantly, as it would be quite easy to tie my previous punts to this profile


I do understand that people can disapprove of it, and I do review most of the people I see.. I probably have around 10 reviews I haven't posted yet

 Not knocking the ethos of this site, or peoples opinion of it... I started of by asking a simple question, that's all...

You have no respect at all .......
This idiot Bigowl joined UKP in Oct 2015.  93 posts and 7 reviews in 4 years 4 months.
i.e. one review every 7 months
Not a sparkling record or a decent contribution to the forum.
It's a bitter shame that he doesn't respond to the simple requests from Daviemac and others so that punters can get themselves checked out if neccesary. 
It's the height of selfishness hence the flack. Also, he clearly has no idea of how the rules should work.
Selfish idiot.

[cueball]

I don't want to name her

That's fine, we'll guess then 

It were this lass wasn't it 
External Link/Members Only

I'm a bloody clever bugger I am, nowt gets past me 


If I'm wrong.... Do i get 2 more guesses?

[Dopedj]

That's fine, we'll guess then 

It were this lass wasn't it 
External Link/Members Only

I'm a bloody clever bugger I am, nowt gets past me 


If I'm wrong.... Do i get 2 more guesses?

He’s based In the Nottingham area.
I think I have idea who it is. 

[LLPunting]

I actually agree with this entirely, yeah maybe my initial post was just asking if this has happened to any of you lot, but it seems to have turned into a "name the hooker you wanker" post

Some people calling me out, yeah I agree, what happened shouldn't have... And I was surprised by it... However I made the active choice to go along with it...

I can guarantee the minute I name her, someone will contact her, I guarantee it ... With all good intentions I was going to post a review saying what happened... I honestly was, however I wanted to wait a few weeks, so it wasn't clear it was me!! (Reviews can be posted up to six months right, I have maybe a dozen reviews to post, I just wait so I'm not identified)

Yes I could just block her number etc and then name her, but If Im honest I loved it, was good sex and I want to return for oral to completion!

I understand about STDs and the risks, but from reviews etc, I would happily guess about 80% of you receive oral without... And I would guess a higher percentage give oral...both come with risks. (Albeit a lot lower than what I did.)

Yeah someone might make the decision to ban me, they could...I guess rules exist for a reason. If I have gone against them, I apologize.

I just asked if it happens....that's all

As for people checking if I'm online, maybe i leave my pc on

As for being labeled a fuckwit, so be it

This evidences wilful contempt for the membership and every intent to allow days/weeks/months of possible infection to continue.  Even if she was clean he may not
have been so the outing of this barebacking SP immediately is an honour amongst thieves issue.

The "I'm trying to protect my identity" claim is bollocks because, if he's taken UKP advice, at most she can come on here and post his used name, mobile number and description.  If he is the complete fuckwit some are tagging him with then he may have used his personal number and real first name, but there's still little risk there, and you can always change your number (and that public trail can also be cut-off quite easily).  Perhaps he was so smitten during pillow talk that they became FB friends, IG pals and Twitter twins?

The "I'm just curious" excuse is nonsense because there are numerous "accidental" bareback threads of very similar nature littered across this site, more than a few here in London.

DM, I hope that trigger finger's itching, it's a righteous itch.  Kindly do the honours on this contemptuous fellow if he doesn't post the AW name and ID before the day's out.

[bhudda]

Same as others do, I don't review instantly, as it would be quite easy to tie my previous punts to this profile

Either what you have already posted is enough for her to identify you or ... she barebacks all her customers.

So ... either there is no harm done you telling her name or ... its even more important that you do.

[LLPunting]

Either what you have already posted is enough for her to identify you or ... she barebacks all her customers.

So ... either there is no harm done you telling her name or ... its even more important that you do.

Nail well and truly hammered 

[antsz]

OP, you have stated you have unprotected sex with a prostitute, i can guarantee if she is telling you that "you are so special and no one else has the privilege of shooting there load up me" you are just another number/punter that is doing BB with her, in this case i think you should respect you fellow punters and name the girl to stop putting them at risk.

[Blackpool Rock]

You have no respect at all .......
This idiot Bigowl joined UKP in Oct 2015.  93 posts and 7 reviews in 4 years 4 months.
i.e. one review every 7 months
Not a sparkling record or a decent contribution to the forum.
It's a bitter shame that he doesn't respond to the simple requests from Daviemac and others so that punters can get themselves checked out if neccesary. 
It's the height of selfishness hence the flack. Also, he clearly has no idea of how the rules should work.
Selfish idiot.

Yeah and it also raises more questions for the OP -
Does the OP regularly get tested at the GUM clinic
Has the OP punted since BB'ing this girl
Can the OP at least commit to not punting again until he has an all clear

[Collegiate]

As bad as when checking feedback for a SP that clearly offers Bb to find out that man (clearly done Bb as reported by SP) has visited SP's that are on hot lists or been visited by oneself.

[myothernameis]

So a few weeks ago I booked a new SP  Reasonable feedback on here

I then told her I wanted to be inside of her, she basically pulled her hand down towards my cock, and pushed me inside of her..I came inside her and I enjoyed it


I don't want to name her on here, I know you won't like that, but has anyone had this happen

Let the guessing game begin, going from your reviews,and areas you punt, shouldn't be to hard to work this out, so you might as well name her

You came inside her, and you enjoyed it, do you do this alot

[antsz]

What pisses me off is the bold fact he comes out and tells us that he BBs, that's his own choice to do this but he refuses to name the SP if other punters want to avoid her or get themselves checked out at the GUM clinic if they have seen her recently, one word springs to mind, CUNT

[Blackpool Rock]

Let the guessing game begin, going from your reviews,and areas you punt, shouldn't be to hard to work this out, so you might as well name her

You came inside her, and you enjoyed it, do you do this alot

Yeah and if there's more than 1 on the short list we can check if any of them list "Pregnant" 

[Hobbit]

I think this thread is a waste of time because the OP has no intention of telling us who she is that he was barebacking. Either he’s a kid who is just wasting our time or he is a cunt. Simple as that.

[antsz]

I think this thread is a waste of time because the OP has no intention of telling us who she is that he was barebacking. Either he’s a kid who is just wasting our time or he is a cunt. Simple as that.

+1

[GingerNuts]

This happened "a few weeks ago".

The OP has posted three reviews in February of girls he's fucked. Members should think about that before seeing any of the three.

[Blackpool Rock]

This happened "a few weeks ago".

The OP has posted three reviews in February of girls he's fucked. Members should think about that before seeing any of the three.

While I do agree with you it's also not fair on the girls he's reviewed to be dragged into the line of "Suspicion", the only way to resolve this is for him to name the girl and name her NOW 

[millbush]

This happened "a few weeks ago".

The OP has posted three reviews in February of girls he's fucked. Members should think about that before seeing any of the three.

Presumptuous and without foundation.

[GingerNuts]

While I do agree with you it's also not fair on the girls he's reviewed to be dragged into the line of "Suspicion", the only way to resolve this is for him to name the girl and name her NOW 

So he should, and I'm not saying it's any of them, but unfortunately they've had meetings with a known bareback punter.

[Beamer]

This happened "a few weeks ago".

The OP has posted three reviews in February of girls he's fucked. Members should think about that before seeing any of the three.

The Prat said he had 10 reviews (I think) outstanding so based on his other comments I suspect the reviews were not of girls he saw in February.  But who knows, when he has demonstrated no respect or concern for other members.

[GingerNuts]

Presumptuous and without foundation.

Glad you're still reading.

I didn't say it was any of the three but they've had meetings with a known bareback punter.

[GingerNuts]

The Prat said he had 10 reviews (I think) outstanding so based on his other comments I suspect the reviews were not of girls he saw in February.  But who knows, when he has demonstrated no respect or concern for other members.

Indeed, we don't know exactly when the meetings took place but members should take note they did take place when considering visiting the ladies in question.

And maybe he's just one of those fantasists who claim they have a large number of reviews just waiting in the wings.

[Beamer]

Indeed, we don't know exactly when the meetings took place but members should take note they did take place when considering visiting the ladies in question.

And maybe he's just one of those fantasists who claim they have a large number of reviews just waiting in the wings.

Given his previous record of 7 reviews since 2015, i.e. 1 every 7 months, I suspect the claim of 10 outstanding reviews could well be in his imagination.
Why is his sort tolerated on the forum?

[tynetunnel]

Obviously your ignore list must be broken 

Mine is working just fine! 

[usroads]

Tell you something BigOwl - looking at the girls you've reviewed there'd be no way in hell I'm likely to fuck anyone like the ones you've fucked. 

[The sperminator]

Tell you something BigOwl - looking at the girls you've reviewed there'd be no way in hell I'm likely to fuck anyone like the ones you've fucked. 

I made the mistake of clicking on the link to the first one he reviewed. 

[monstar]

Pointless thread, attention seeking with no intention to post details 

[vikingjoe]

But what about the risk of pregnancy? If Baby owl comes along, does that make it :

Two Fuckwit T’woo ?

 

[Fuzzyduck]

But what about the risk of pregnancy? If Baby owl comes along, does that make it :

Two Fuckwit T’woo ?

 

Don't give up the day job, buddy.

[bhudda]

I made the mistake of clicking on the link to the first one he reviewed. 

Jesus, i hadnt done that before. If i had the memory of fucking that indelibly etched into my brain id want to die young as well.