30min, 60min or longer

[Salt]

I was just curious as to how other punters decide on the duration of their appointment?

Obviously money is an issue.....

I find it difficult to pop twice in a 60min booking so is the extension to 60min just a waste?

Are two 30min bookings separated better value?

[smiths]

I was just curious as to how other punters decide on the duration of their appointment?

Obviously money is an issue.....

I find it difficult to pop twice in a 60min booking so is the extension to 60min just a waste?

Are two 30min bookings separated better value?

As i said the other day on this issue there is no right or wrong just what suits the punter. Having tried half hours and even forty-five minutes i need an hour to get done what i want to get done at a 121 punt.

If i was a one pop and thats it guy i would stick with half hour punts primarily. Its also the case some WGs half hour rates arent half their hour rate so for me an hour is better VFM as i will use the additional half hour so its not wasted time. The cautious approach of course is to book half hour with a newbie to you WG and if she is good ask to extend.

[hendrix]

I was just curious as to how other punters decide on the duration of their appointment?

Obviously money is an issue.....

I find it difficult to pop twice in a 60min booking so is the extension to 60min just a waste?

Are two 30min bookings separated better value?

There is simply no way I can get through what I usually want in 30 minutes, so 1 hour is the minimum for me. It's not really tied in to how often (or not) I can pop, it's more to do with what I want to see and do during the booking. I usually cum once in an hours booking, so if I want to cum on her face, in her ass, in her pussy and perhaps in a bowl for her to drink...it all takes time

[vorian]

I have different times for different WG's as I get different things out of all of them. So some 30/45 min, some 1 hour, some 2 hours and some 4 hours plus. All depends on what I want out of that punt.

[grandmaster-ram-rod]

I always book 1 hour, mainly because it can take me ages to cum, but I'm a cum once guy and offen leave early (even when offered more service) as I cant be arsed to talk to prossies

I think in my case two 30 min punts the same day might be a better option, but having said that the difference in price is often only £20

[shagbambi]

I tend to prefer longer punts so that I can get through my likes.

I book 90mins as a minimum and up to 3 or 4 hours when I know the girl.
When I have punted for a shorter time, say an hour, it has been because of price and to tick off something specific on a bucket list. 
I can cum up to three times so I just pace myself to what is required for the session, though if the girl is not 100% my type the third pop is elusive.

[valleypunter]

I normally go for 30 minutes, its enough for me

[Markus]

Depends on a host of factors; primarily when the girl joined AW, her feedback and most importantly location.

If I am going to see a WG in a location which I have never been or is far away, then I book an hour minimum. I also hope that given I am booking an hour, I will get an unrushed service which is not always the case with 30 min punts.

[circusbizarre]

always an hour to relax and enjoy my experience

[wristjob]

What's best has varied throughout my punting "career"

Early days I used to cum quickly the first time so 1h was best - til I had quite a few bad girls so I primarily switched to 30 mins with the option to extend if she was good.

More recently price dictated 60 min bookings were better VFM with many girls charging £20-30 more for the hour.

As cum twice got harder I switched to 30 minutes because that let me do what I want and if using the same budget as an hour I got to see better looking girls.

Quitting booze puts cum twice in an hour back on the menu so I might try and get a few hour bookings.

Bottom line is same as others said really - it's what suits you, how you want to do things.

[latecomer]

It will vary depending on the punter.  I don't have a big punting budget so I'd rather have two 30 min sessions than a one hour one.  Other punters will of course enjoy more leisurely sessions of an hour or more.

[Jimmyredcab]

Generally speaking, whether you book an hour or 30 minutes you will get the same amount of sex, girls prefer hour bookings because it gives them more time to waste.

Another factor to consider is the price difference, if it is £70 for 30 minutes and £100 for the hour then I could be tempted into having the hour.

[Tjkooker]

Only done one half hour. Was good but left wanting more.

Prefer to take a bit more time and get a bit more into the booking not just shoot n go.

[broksonic]

I always book 30 mins with a WG I haven't seen before

[Bootleg]

For EE girls with poor English and limited services (no kissing) 30 minutes is plenty.

For a girl who enjoys DFK then 45 minutes is ideal - I prefer building up to one really good cum rather than a quick one then trying to force a second.

[pleasure]

30 minutes usually does me fine. It does seem a little rushed sometimes, but whenever I book an hour it's mostly wasted - nice and relaxing, but I just can't convince myself it's better value for money than taking another half hour the next week (or even the next day) when I'm fully recharged. On the rare occasions that I find a really special girl, I'll book a couple of hours, to really have time to get intimate.

[MDB72]

Depends on the cash available I guess but I prefer a longer appointment unless I just want a quickie.

[RandyF]

Depends entirely on the whore. I've yet to meet an EE girl yet who is worth more than spending 30mins with.

[wristjob]

30 minutes usually does me fine. It does seem a little rushed sometimes, but whenever I book an hour it's mostly wasted - nice and relaxing, but I just can't convince myself it's better value for money than taking another half hour the next week (or even the next day) when I'm fully recharged. On the rare occasions that I find a really special girl, I'll book a couple of hours, to really have time to get intimate.

Exactly. if the question is 30 mins or an hour that's one thing. if it's an hour or 2x30 - I'd go with the latter I think.

[domino131]

My MO is 30 minutes the first visit to a WG - or 1 hour if that's the minimum - and if I like them then I'd consider booking an hour another time.   I've yet to do a repeat visit however.  I'm fairly vanilla in my tastes and don't think I would manage twice in an hour, so half an hour is plenty for me at the moment.

There are also some WGs who only offer particular services (usually anal) in a one hour booking, so there's that to consider.

[ciscoxxx69]

There is simply no way I can get through what I usually want in 30 minutes, so 1 hour is the minimum for me. It's not really tied in to how often (or not) I can pop, it's more to do with what I want to see and do during the booking. I usually cum once in an hours booking, so if I want to cum on her face, in her ass, in her pussy and perhaps in a bowl for her to drink...it all takes time

Nice answer......that list would take me 4 days! 
Good list though.....

[Jimmyredcab]

I always book 30 mins with a WG I haven't seen before

Very wise.   

In most cases you can extend the booking to an hour if she turns out to be a gem.   

[Paul31]

With my regular girl it's always 3 hrs and I pop 3 times.

[LanceVance]

60mins for me. Enough time to do what I want without rushing and provides space for a second round if I want it.

[potato]

Its horses for courses ( and I think I have seen a few nags in my time  )

If you are after as many pops as you can for the £ and you can't pop twice in an hour then logic suggests 30 min bookings. If number of pops isn't important and the cost between 1/2hr and 1hr isn't great ( as it sometimes isn't) then go for the hour and have a better relaxed experience where you can do more and not have to have an eye on the clock.

If I was still punting generally then I would go for the hour anyway and if she was good then go back for 2 hours at a later stage. 30 mins is over in a flash and I would have forgotten it happened the minute I was out the door. 

Fortunately, I don't have to worry about time as my "off radar" regular girl is quite happy to spend the day for her modest fee to supplement her proper job.

[judgedredd]

30mins is enough for me...i tend to get bored afterwards,i dont care if the the WG is a porn star.
im weird like that..lol

[CBPaul]

I go for 30 or 60 mins, depends on the prossie and how I feel. Ideally I would go for 60 mins, 2 pops and a break in between.

I've learned that not every new prossie is suitable for a 60 min booking as the second round just ain't gonna happen - usually thanks to a disappointing first round or the prossie being inactive and periodically requiring as to my state of stiffness. In which case I would rather just cum n go. I'm now more careful about seeing new ones and will book 30 mins if unsure.

The difference in prices is rarely 1 hour being double a 30 min booking, so I tend to think 2x1 hours or 3x30mins out of my punting cash.

[rockharders]

30 mins is enough for me to cover the basics as long as the price is approx half to 60%ish of the hourly rate.

However, some WGs price it something like 30 mins=£80, 60 mins=£100 so I'll go for the hour, its obvious she don't want 30 min and the extra 20 bob is better value for me.

[Eager Thighs]

15 mins if I fancy a quick blowie. If I want some sex on top 30 mins.

[Mr Br1ghts1de]

An hour for me. Better pro-rata rates, more services, chance to cum twice which generally allows me to relax more. 30 mins is too restrictive for me.

[Rochdull lad]

As Elwood said, it's horses for courses.  As one who talks too much [a flaw in my character which I invite WGs to counteract by sitting on my face!] and who likes to take his time [haven't the stamina I once may have had], I'll book someone new to me for an hour.

I usually see my Regulars for 2 hours minimum, though.