Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Youngncury - Greater Manchester  (Read 7520 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 4628166) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline marcius2018

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Happened after having to send her a photo; she did send some photos of herself back, in return, showing face...girl next door look.

Met at what is clearly her home, nice flat in an OK area, with easy parking at the back.

£50 for up to an hour.....I was done in half that.

Facially, as I've said, girl next door look, mid 20's probably.

Bodily, has clearly been heavier in the past.

Had the look of a startled rabbit throughout...not sure she's completely comfortable with what she's doing, conversation stilted.

Fingering until she came (unspectacular), oral without (included) in price, covered fucking in various positions, then came over her boobs.

If the review seems perfunctary, it's because the event was!

Would I recommend? No!

Online Bustydusty

I was interested in seeing her tbh mainly because of her price but she said she wouldn’t meet without me sending her a face pic and that was never gonna happen
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 05:49:43 pm by Bustydusty »

Offline spiralnotebook

Send a face shot of  Peter Sutcliffe :D . . .

Offline antsz

she has the least attractive gallery i have seen in a long time! I suppose thats why she is only £50

Offline Silva21

What was bad about it?

Just reading your review seems like she did what was advertised? Was she just a shit shag or was she unclean or smelly etc?

Gotta ask as it's only £50 an hour.

Offline Silva21

Worth adding that she's listed as a known barebacker. I won't be seeing her then either way.

Offline marcius2018

What was bad about it?

Just reading your review seems like she did what was advertised? Was she just a shit shag or was she unclean or smelly etc?

Gotta ask as it's only £50 an hour.

Sex was covered...I didn't and never would consider bareback!
What was wrong? Principally attitude! I can't get into it when the other party doesn't (appear to) feel comfortable. Maybe that's just me.
Bottom line...would I go back?....would I recommend her?...No on both counts...that's a negative!

Offline marcius2018

What was bad about it?

Just reading your review seems like she did what was advertised? Was she just a shit shag or was she unclean or smelly etc?

Gotta ask as it's only £50 an hour.

Perhaps I should have added that she certainly didn't seem unclean...just unresponsive!

Offline Captain caveman 69

Fuck thats a bit rough even this dirty old farker would give that one a miss :scare:

Offline Drayki

She’s asking for a face pic  :dash: but then contradicts herself by saying looks are unimportant  :scare:

Cheap as chips, but one to definitely avoid  :bomb:

Offline Deepstroker

I have tried a few times to arrange a meet with this one . If you contact her in AW she asks you to email her in her email address and requests a face pic. She then sends some of her pics. Her comms were poor . Maybe she didn’t like the pic I sent ? Anyway no meet occurred . I know she’s no supermodel but I had fancied a bit of girl next door action .

Offline Firefox337

Seen her a few years ago She’s a swinger Boyfriends in other room on the CCTV watching you Known for it

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline marcius2018

Seen her a few years ago She’s a swinger Boyfriends in other room on the CCTV watching you Known for it

Hidden Image/Members Only

I don't mind being watched, but I prefer it when it's by the receptionist in the room......talking of which..... anyone know anywhere that does that these days?  ;)

Offline Deepstroker

Hmm another near miss then . I don’t mind him watching , he can come in if he likes but what they are doing now is a bit sneaky . You could end up being published on a porn website without your knowledge / agreement

Offline Deepstroker

These two have recently popped up on FAB as a couple . No single males .. I get the feeling she’s just going along with it for him .

Offline wearegreat

These two have recently popped up on FAB as a couple . No single males .. I get the feeling she’s just going along with it for him .
I managed to match the AW profile photos with a Fab Swingers profile Nawty_as_they_cum .
They have been on Fab for 9 years or so,and most of their umteen validations are from black single guys. Also 8/9 validations are from a single gang bang event in 2013. They must have changed tack recently and are now going for females and couples.
Maybe she is now getting enough cock as a service provider.
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline Deepstroker

I tried a few times this year to agree a meet and failed . I fancied a reasonably priced girl next door type liaison

Offline wearegreat

I tried a few times this year to agree a meet and failed . I fancied a reasonably priced girl next door type liaison
With a known barebacker?? :scare: :scare: :cry:
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Online Bustydusty

I’d have maybe seen her given the price but - how is she a known barebacker?
I’ve no idea either way but surely u can’t just state it is a fact without evidence?

Offline wearegreat

I’d have maybe seen her given the price but - how is she a known barebacker?
I’ve no idea either way but surely u can’t just state it is a fact without evidence?
If you read the full thread one of the previous posts from last year states she is a know BBer.
I have no evidence, just what I have read on here from other UKP members
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline Count Duckula

I’d have maybe seen her given the price but - how is she a known barebacker?
I’ve no idea either way but surely u can’t just state it is a fact without evidence?

bb probably ccomes from this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=104618.msg2012456#msg2012456

Offline wearegreat

bb probably ccomes from this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=104618.msg2012456#msg2012456
Good searching there Count Duckula. I looked through all 13 pages on the NW BB thread but couldn't find anything.
I never even considered looking at the AW  verifications thread.
So she was a barebacker in 2018 when she started on AW and may still be now..
Well done once again.
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline Deepstroker

I managed to match the AW profile photos with a Fab Swingers profile Nawty_as_they_cum .
They have been on Fab for 9 years or so,and most of their umteen validations are from black single guys. Also 8/9 validations are from a single gang bang event in 2013. They must have changed tack recently and are now going for females and couples.
Maybe she is now getting enough cock as a service provider.

Yes indeed . Despite what has been said on here , I was told that the male was unaware she was escorting which I find hard to believe given that someone else said he secretly watched her being fucked by punters ? I wonder if he hid in the wardrobe or he had a secret camera ?

Offline wearegreat

Just out of interest ,who told you that the male is unaware that she escorts?
Going off their Fabswingers verifications he must be completely aware that she has been gangbanged a few times and that she has been fucked by alot of black guys.
Check the public photos of hung manc ( verification from 2017) and you can clearly see it is the same bed/bedroom as her photos on AW.
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline Deepstroker

There seems to be some deception going on . The male party in the fab profile stated that she didn’t escort and when I sent the link to the AW profile he had a rant and stated to the effect that he was going to beat the truth out of her .

Offline wearegreat

There seems to be some deception going on . The male party in the fab profile stated that she didn’t escort and when I sent the link to the AW profile he had a rant and stated to the effect that he was going to beat the truth out of her .
So according to Fab her partner's name is Terry. I wonder if that is him in the photo earlier on in this thread.
Interesting to see who is deceiving who in this whole sordid episode.
Anyway thanks for the update pal. :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline Deepstroker

He clearly hasn't beaten her enough as she's still on AW

Offline wearegreat

She has changed her AW profile name to Jellybaby1991 which is also her email address. Everything else has stayed the same on her profile though.




Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger