Not in favour of something that so easily spoon feeds lurkers that don't contribute to the site.
The site has had 25,570 visitors today - 23,952 GUESTS, 1618 members.
For the sake of argument, let's assume that for every 10 non-contributing lurkers, the site receives one new, contributing member. A conversion/success rate of 10%.
That's a reasonable cost/benefit ratio which will (over time) draw new members and therefore new information / reviews to the site.
There are still hundreds or thousands of unreviewed girls on AW and likely many dozens more arriving each week.
The only way any site such as this could ever hope to have the 'manpower' to test drive a good majority is by attracting new members.
The site already has great success in so doing because of two factors:
1. The Reviews;
2. Top Google search rankings for virtually every AW girl reviewed on here.
To use the information already available on the site in a more targeted, focused way would only help to build on both of the above - and in so doing, organically expand the contributing membership.
Like password, I find the 'lurker' issue frustrating. I get private messages every day from '0' post members asking questions and whilst I answer most, it's getting a bit tiresome and time consuming. But the simple fact of the matter is that ANY site on ANY topic which has no paid subscription nor paywall is ALWAYS going to have a problem with lurkers.
If we can convince those lurkers to convert to contributors by offering them click-bait and the opportunity to secure a good punt, it's more than likely they will want to come back on here and return the favour in due course.
