Do you have any tangible proof to back this sweeping statement up, or are you just talking out of your arse again 
I do think we are starting to see very strong data that the youngest are worst hit economically in this. 16-24 year olds are 3 times more likely to be out of work than any other age group. 25-34 year olds 30% more likely to be unemployed than the next age group. They depend on jobs less secure at this time and moving forward, not to mention lost times in education for future generations.
QE pumps up values of assets, ownership of this is much more highly distributed in older people, average age ownership is now mid 30's, up from 20's just over a decade ago.
So hopefully we can agree, the under 34's are more likely to be worse off now and moving forward, than previously. And by data older (35+) people are more secure in employment and more likely to have larger assets and those are more lilkely to be supported by government policy. The data supports this.
Data on average client age is much harder to find. However, the data I can find indicates the likelyhood of purchasing some form of sexual service increases with age (around 1% under 24, up towards 10-15% 40+). A canadian study also indicated 70% of clients had a college or degree education. So again the evidence does suggest the average client profile is older and most likely from a professional background or secure employment.
So I do think we are seeing evidence the average client, who is older, is more likely to have assets and a secure employment position, now and moving forward, and we can start to draw a conclusion demand in the market will hold stable as and when we normalise society. Demand is much more likely to weaken in those areas that depend on income from lower age groups, nightclubs, for example.
