Thanks for the review @Azrael1404.
WOW this one has caused a bit of stir and looking at the subsequent comments there are things to take on either side.
Here is my Lt Columbo take on this one
I do find it strange how OP ended up at the wrong address not as if he was a regular and his previous meet was 6 months prior. WGs move around regular. Surely any reasonable person would fire off a simple "are you still at the same address" text. OP does not explain if the text convo identified him as someone she had previously fucked. I am going to assume she did not know who he was/ met before given the dialogue of the first meet.
I am also going to assume OP got angry that he ended up at the wrong place and the convo turned sour. The condom story is a mystery and frankly why buying a condom would add 15-20 mins to the arrival time is a bit of a joke almost every newsagent / off license in London sells condoms so frankly not buying that. SP now thinks OP is taking da piss regarding extra 15-20 mins to buy condoms
I am also going to assume she failed to identify the legendary Pele on his DP and assumed he was black.
We now have an angry punter and angry SP.
I do not believe OP that the text convo was as straightforward as he says and he is without blame.
I do believe OP that she used the N word I see no reason why he would want to hammer her further in a review that is already negative. The reason he gives of his WhatsApp Puc is reasonably sound to me.
@GLM you defence of this SP based on your own meet and the fact that she is mixed raced means she could never use the N word when angry is fundamentally flawed. As others have eloquently pointed out mixed raced people if their cultural experiences, circle of friends et al lean towards their non black parent/family then in anger using the N word would not be unusual nor would it make headlines. You eluding to her choice of men is not blackmen. Now that could be because she simply does not fancy Blackmen or it could be because of the aforementioned.
So in summary I am saying OP is not being totally truthful about the entire text exchange (probably why he won't show proof) but based on all the foregoing the N word was more than likely used.