A lot of FB on AW is written by fluffy soppy punters who have unbelievably low standards. These are the kind of blokes who would unwittingly fuck and fist a dairy cow up the shitter in the dark and still leave the "
she took me for a ride...as a gentleman I won't go into the details....treat this lady well" crap.
Some dog ugly ugly WGs get excellent FB, and some girls who are consistently rated badly on UKP are rated highly on AW.
For example, look at EnglishBlondeJenna / JennaUK FB. Hundreds of glowing, wonderful, fluffy FB!
External Link/Members OnlyExternal Link/Members OnlyYet if you do a quick search here on UKP for our own reviews, she is unanimously awful.
Therefore AW FB is not to be trusted.UKP says it as it is, warts and all. We get a few fluffies on UKP but they tend to be caught out as touts or newbies and are generally not welcome here.
Personally, I don't leave negative FB on AW because:
1) Negatives can be disputed and removed, and if its disputed the odds are 100% she will make up some story like "I never saw this guy" or "he has bad hygiene" or "aggressive nasty man tried to bareback me" etc.
2) Some WGs will check your FB for a booking if you are a new client, retaliatory negative FB from a WG will be noted and could dash your hopes of a new booking.
3) If Negative FB can be removed on AW by simply disputing it, then whats the point?
On UKP I am free to let rip and report on a bad service as I wish.
Some WGs will check here and some don't take it nicely, but I don't give a fuck. For example this girl wasn't too happy and slated me:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=13818.0 Did I care? No.