Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Bi couples review  (Read 1113 times)

Online Shutty238

I know male escort reviews are not allowed, but what about bi couples arranged via the m and where there is mm interaction?

Offline signy

I know male escort reviews are not allowed, but what about bi couples arranged via the m and where there is mm interaction?

Don't see why not. With many MF escort couples the booking is organised by the M partner. If he is bi-, then there can be MM interaction if that is required. The profile usually makes this clear.

Here is one of my reviews from last summer, which describes such a meet with a well-reviewed MF couple with bi-action, and there were no complaints from the mods, etc.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=381025.0

Offline scutty brown

there have been several previous similar reviews

Offline unclepokey

I also do not see why not.
Uncle Pokey


Offline Thephoenix

That surprises me a bit, after all the male is a prostitute is he not.

I've had a lot of meets with couples over the years but only ever reviewed one, and I avoided describing any interaction with the male for fear of breaking the rules.

I would have liked to go into more detail.

It seems a grey area, which is a shame in my opinion.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2024, 06:05:07 pm by Thephoenix »

Offline Stevelondon

That surprises me a bit, after all the male is a prostitute is he not.

I've had a lot of meets with couples over the years but only ever reviewed one, and I avoided describing any interaction with the male for fear of breaking the rules.

I would have liked to go into more detail.

It seems a grey area, which is a shame in my opinion.

Are there rules to say you cannot describe in details what happens between the punter and the male when reviewing a mmf/couples punt.
Seems strange if so.

Cos you can review a TS punt and isn’t that similar.
I mean a couple of cocks of course. 😂
« Last Edit: March 10, 2024, 07:00:58 am by Stevelondon »

Offline marc_hotsteppa

Cos you can review a TS punt and isn’t that similar.
I mean a couple of cocks of course. 😂

I've never done a TS meet but if I did I'd hope "she" would only have the one cock  :scare: :sarcastic:
Banned reason: Continued abuse despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Shutty238

Anyway. Review is up with no issues currently so assume I haven't offended anyone.

Offline Thephoenix

Are there rules to say you cannot describe in details what happens between the punter and the male when reviewing a mmf/couples punt.
Seems strange if so.

Cos you can review a TS punt and isn’t that similar.
I mean a couple of cocks of course. 😂

Rule 18. Male prostitution.
Discussion allowed but no reviews.

A male prostitute is someone who provides sexual services for money.

In relation to a M/F couple providing sexual services for money, I assume they're both prostitutes.

The rules seem to indicate that I can review the female but not the male.

That doesn't seem to make much sense, so in my review I avoided any detail about interacting with the male so as not to risk being admonished.

I've previously expressed my views on here about the peculiar situation whereby you can't review a fbsm from a male, but if he puts a wig and frock on it's ok.
However that subject has already been well covered, including a survey of members, and Head1 has reiterated that Rule 18 remains in place.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2024, 10:14:31 am by Thephoenix »

Offline Doc Holliday

Rule 18. Male prostitution.
Discussion allowed but no reviews.

A male prostitute is someone who provides sexual services for money.

In relation to a M/F couple providing sexual services for money, I assume they're both prostitutes.

The rules seem to indicate that I can review the female but not the male.

That doesn't seem to make much sense, so in my review I avoided any detail about interacting with the male so as not to risk being admonished.

I've previously expressed my views on here about the peculiar situation whereby you can't review a fbsm from a male, but if he puts a wig and frock on it's ok.
However that subject has already been well covered, including a survey of members, and Head1 has reiterated that Rule 18 remains in place.

The rule perhaps needs further clarification? I would think it was originally meant to exclude either just MM homosexual bookings or to a much lesser extent the very rare FM where the female is a punter.

In the case of couple bookings, where there is a couple profile which can be linked to (as with this one) then there are indeed many instances of reviews of such bookings. As such there are no restrictions on reporting detail of what took place as is the case with all reviews.

The potential elephant in the room with it all, is of course transsexual bookings in terms of how members view the sexuality involved, and that is a whole different can of worms discussion, but if someone advertises as transexual then it is clearly allowed in the rules with its own section.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2024, 10:56:28 am by Doc Holliday »

Offline MissWolf

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 339
  • Likes: 137
If there is so much uncertainty over this why not just report you own posts and in the report form ask a mod for a rule clarification  :unknown: