is this a good way of searching???

[grandaddybadman]

I think most of us can agree that even thought there are many women out there escorting, and very few are reliable of fit our criteria.

This results in many punters wasting time or giving up punting all together.

So i use a way of the search on adultwork.

I type in all my preferences and make it specific and when I get the results i look at all the profiles and any profile that does not impress me I put the profile on my BLACKLIST so it does not come in my search again when i search again.

What search techniques do you guys have?

[marndu]

Seriously I'm on the brink of quitting punting for the reasons you've specified. Do WG's not believe in repeat trade!!

[nigel4498]

Seriously I'm on the brink of quitting punting

With your review count, I thought you had.

[kaj314]

With your review count, I thought you had.

 

[poseidon]

I simply find a few WGs I like on AW, say 5 or 6. Then I search their AW numbers (External Link/Members Only1881630&Keywords=&KeySearch... => 1881630) in UKP to see what their reviews are like. UKP reviews have much more weight than AW feedback/field reports so I will base my decision primarily on UKP reviews.

[Bassman]

All I do is select female, escort and then select BB and US as dislikes and search the postcode area that I'll be heading to. Usually set it to within 2 miles. Sometimes, I'll search the postcodes I'm willing to stop in on my route to/from as well. And of course search them on here once I find any "possibilities".

[PilotMan]

I have a few searches

1. postcode set, proximity, female and order results by registered date. This shows my any new talent registered on my manor.
2. I use the same search above but change order results to Modified date. These results require a bit more sifting through but will pick up any talent with an older profile that has moved on to the manor.
3. General search as per Bassman above if I'm out and about and on a different territory. I usually do a 1 mile radius to the location I'm going to or to Postcodes along my route if I'm driving.

I sort out the talent in to saved lists which are in ranking order according to my likes. Oh, and not forgetting my "Completed" list 

I would be interested to hear of others search and hot list techniques.

[mrhappypants]

I have a few searches

1. postcode set, proximity, female and order results by registered date. This shows my any new talent registered on my manor.
2. I use the same search above but change order results to Modified date. These results require a bit more sifting through but will pick up any talent with an older profile that has moved on to the manor.

I would be interested to hear of others search and hot list techniques.

Agreed a very useful topic.

Like you my 1. and 2.  searches are by registered date and by proximity (I actually run 1. both with and without a screen for factors like age (18-26), dress size (6-8), area (5 miles) and CIM which are more a matter of personal choice).

My 3. is a favourite, by registered date, area 10 miles, verification photo displayed.  These allows me to see new profiles in the broad area still displaying the verification picture.  I generally save the verification pictures with profiles listed in the last day or two.  This together with 1. is my main source of potential TOFTT candidates.

[PilotMan]

My 3. is a favourite, by registered date, area 10 miles, verification photo displayed.  These allows me to see new profiles in the broad area still displaying the verification picture.  I generally save the verification pictures with profiles listed in the last day or two.  This together with 1. is my main source of potential TOFTT candidates.

I think I'll give that a go - really useful with Veri Pics

I'll have to limit it to a lot less than 10 miles though - in London that could be two hours away 

[mrhappypants]

I think I'll give that a go - really useful with Veri Pics

I'll have to limit it to a lot less than 10 miles though - in London that could be two hours away 

1) They move about
2) There are some very interesting finds, particularly established girls setting up new profiles.

[Mr Farkyhars]

when I get the results i look at all the profiles and any profile that does not impress me I put the profile on my BLACKLIST so it does not come in my search again when i search again

I would have thought, surely, the problem with that is if/when that profile is swapped and the new WG owner is much better, or even if the existing WG owner sharpens up her act, you're going to be oblivious to the improvement.

[Georgejetson]

I think it isn't the search criterion.  It is the weighting you give to the variables. "Big tits vs small".  "Blonde  vs all else". "Licks my ass vs will not". All such things are legit. Except, in my opinion, one: distance. This gets notoriously overweighted here, IMO.  If you have to travel 20-30 more minutes to get what YOU want, with a very high UKP rating...do it. Stop sweating the travel time. 

Or have a shit miserable 1 hour time with a Bad WG, but save an hour of your day on the tube. "Close by" is an overweighted virtue. Bring a book or a video game on your iPhone, and the longer  tube ride flies by.

[St33]

I put in a postcode 2 mile radius and last update, scan through if i see a profile that looks like baywatch poster or profiles like Alexis Texas I just avoid, and tend to paste number or link to UKP to cross check. Now a days i avoid romanians altogether as it looks and must feel like shagging a couch no effort at all from experience.

[mrhappypants]

I think it isn't the search criterion.  It is the weighting you give to the variables. "Big tits vs small".  "Blonde  vs all else". "Licks my ass vs will not". All such things are legit. Except, in my opinion, one: distance. This gets notoriously overweighted here, IMO.  If you have to travel 20-30 more minutes to get what YOU want, with a very high UKP rating...do it. Stop sweating the travel time. 

Or have a shit miserable 1 hour time with a Bad WG, but save an hour of your day on the tube. "Close by" is an overweighted virtue. Bring a book or a video game on your iPhone, and the longer  tube ride flies by.

That may be your experience - the opposite applies to me. An hour punt generally takes three hours out of my day, so extra travel time is a huge extra investment. Travelling further is absolutely no guarantee of a better punt, and reduces the practicality of keeping a regular.  Walking before paying with a local punt is reasonably low investment - not the case if you have just made an hour journey. The one major change in my punting is much more focus on my local area.  Travelling is a mugs game in my book. 

[pervertpunter]

Sorry for hijacking a bit but I'm relatively new to punting and I want to ask what is your best method to search and find all escorts in your area? Because being on here I've seen people post girls from my area that I couldn't find...

I usually go on Local Escort tab and then my area (London based) or sometimes I go to the "Quick Search" and put in how many miles away and my post code and that's it but seems I get the same women all the time

[Mr Farkyhars]

I've seen people post girls from my area that I couldn't find

What do you mean? Didn't they post links to AW or any other site? If not, ask them on the thread in question..

[pervertpunter]

What do you mean? Didn't they post links to AW or any other site? If not, ask them on the thread in question..

I mean they post links from AW that I can't find...how do you search on AW? is there a "right way" of doing it?

[DonDickDraper]

I mean they post links from AW that I can't find...how do you search on AW? is there a "right way" of doing it?

If you click on an AW link and you can't find it then that means that the girl has closed the account, or it is temporarily hidden. Nothing to do but move on to the other kitties in the litter.

For me, personally, the best way to search for girls is this:
1. Select: female, escort
2. Dislike: Bareback, Unprotected Sex
3. Like: CiM, OwO
4. Proximity search: postcode +5miles
5. Search for UKP reviews

I don't always choose any likes as some girls might have stuff like cim and owo as an extra written into their profile.

There's no right way, only the way that best suits your needs.

[PilotMan]

I would have thought, surely, the problem with that is if/when that profile is swapped and the new WG owner is much better, or even if the existing WG owner sharpens up her act, you're going to be oblivious to the improvement.

I have a set search for "new profiles", then I use the same search and change the search priority from registered to modified. That throws up older profiles that have relocated on to my punt manor.

[PilotMan]

That may be your experience - the opposite applies to me. An hour punt generally takes three hours out of my day, so extra travel time is a huge extra investment. Travelling further is absolutely no guarantee of a better punt, and reduces the practicality of keeping a regular.  Walking before paying with a local punt is reasonably low investment - not the case if you have just made an hour journey. The one major change in my punting is much more focus on my local area.  Travelling is a mugs game in my book.

Totally agree.

In Central London a punt could be 2 miles from me but take 40 minutes each way travelling. Typically a punt takes two hours from my day. If I have to travel 40 minutes and get a B&S or no show then I'm  Plus it takes a lot of time for a plan B as well as organising the Plan A.

If it's a ten minute drive and a dud, then I can get back to base and make another plan.

[dami3n]

Agreed a very useful topic.

Like you my 1. and 2.  searches are by registered date and by proximity (I actually run 1. both with and without a screen for factors like age (18-26), dress size (6-8), area (5 miles) and CIM which are more a matter of personal choice).

My 3. is a favourite, by registered date, area 10 miles, verification photo displayed.  These allows me to see new profiles in the broad area still displaying the verification picture.  I generally save the verification pictures with profiles listed in the last day or two.  This together with 1. is my main source of potential TOFTT candidates.

similar factors though have 2 saved searches and 2 hotlists and a massive blacklist.

Plan A hotlist is basically regulars or girls I've seen and reviewed and would defo see again
Plan B hotlist has those I haven't seen but either by UKP reviews or instinct I would like to see, depending on the punt I move plan B's to plan A

saved search 1: bog standard local scouting, age 25, 5 mile radius, viewable ratings, price cap, signed on in the last week,
saved search 2: I'm either feeling flush or desperate age 30, 7 miles, no price, play it by eye+UKP

blacklist: obviously keeps your seaches more civilized over time ...anything gross or with more UKP negatives than positives, any "no blacks", excessive photoshop, excessive blah blah profile or obviously fake/PG Scam

all tasks made so much easier with the amazing AW script I added in a browser plug in that shows the bareback warning, age, nationality, cup size, rates and UKP review count right on the AW page and directly links the reviews at a click (saves copying and pasting AW ID), once I see red numbers pop up on the AW page ...insta blacklist.