Juicyrebeccca3 - Kensington. Fake Review

[Jerrypuntalot]

Where: Kensington

A lot of controversy surrounding this WG so I decided to check it out for myself, on initial contact she suggested I provide a deposit to secure a booking, I politely refused and suggested If I could come for a incall and guaranteed her that I wouldn’t ghost her or be a no show, she agreed upon a incall at 3:30pm on November 5th, I was provided with a address in Kensington which didn’t seem too bad as I checked on Google maps to ensure I wasn’t being deceived, I went to the address at the agreed time and knocked on the door, to my surprise she matched her photos and it turned out to be a rather good punt in which il discuss the details below

The Punt: as I arrived I was surprised to find a attractive young woman, she is not British but American and had divulged to me that she is a cam girl in the US, was offered a drink and a shower, I started with a shower and came out to her wearing latex, I was extremely pleased with how amazing she looked and we both layed down on the bed as touched me all over whilst I asked her about her career and how long she is in the uk for, she is here temporarily for 3 months, we started with DFK and OWO, the punt ensued with lots DFK and rimming and Reverse oral, to finish up She rode me cowgirl and I popped into the bag, parts of the session was recorded for her to upload to her Social media platforms with my face not included as I don’t intend to become a pornstar anytime soon, the punt was positive although not overly stimulating due to the fact that she did not seem overly enthusiastic although it may have appeared as if she enjoyed it to the average punter, I sensed she was probably faking which is not a issue as she provided a good experience for the price and how attractive she is.

Incall : £200

External Link/Members Only

[lillythesavage]

Really ?

You post a shit review of someone well reviewed to try and give this one credibility 

Not even a good effort .

[rafathegaffa]

Oddly similar writing style to the other "review" about the same WG.

You're telling us you saw her after seeing the other thread + this wg hiding her AW feedback?

I have a great idea, for my new hotlist, I'm going to only see girls with hidden feedback and suspicious reviews. That's the point of this forum, right? 

Come on, be smarter if you're trying to be a con. Poor effort. 

[daviemac]

Really ?

You post a shit review of someone well reviewed to try and give this one credibility 

Not even a good effort .

You need to give some sort of explanation, we have no idea what your issue is, your report makes no sense.   

[lillythesavage]

You need to give some sort of explanation, we have no idea what your issue is, your report makes no sense.   

A dodgy review yesterday and this one, mentioning it and noting all the points brought up in that one as genuine? With a brief review of one of the most reviewed woman here just before it?

[daviemac]

A dodgy review yesterday and this one, mentioning it and noting all the points brought up in that one as genuine? With a brief review of one of the most reviewed woman here just before it?

What is dodgy about the review he posted yesterday? 

[Fuzzyduck]

A dodgy review yesterday and this one, mentioning it and noting all the points brought up in that one as genuine? With a brief review of one of the most reviewed woman here just before it?

You need to bear in mind that there's no "evidence" and any conclusions you might draw are based on circumstantial evidence. I'm sure the mods have done the usual checks for return offenders but this thieving cunt probably has some smarts, though clearly not in review writing. The mods needs to be fair and objective so I can understand DM's challenge to your accusation.

That said, I do agree with you. This is likely the banned thanos-sized-penis come to make another really poor attempt at marketing.

[lillythesavage]

What is dodgy about the review he posted yesterday?

I cannot be the only one seeing it  .

There was a fake review for this one a few days ago, this review mentions it, tries to address all the issued brought up in that one, and he left a review lacking detail before this one, for a very well reviewed SP with so much detail on here anyone could make up a decent review, to make this look like a second review to give it credibility.

Come on Davie, wipe the sleep from the eyes  .

If I am wrong the thread will get a humble apology 

[Cheshuk]

I did have the same thought when I saw this review, however no one had commented yet but I could anticipate the comment section

[daviemac]

I cannot be the only one seeing it  .

There was a fake review for this one a few days ago, this review mentions it, tries to address all the issued brought up in that one, and he left a review lacking detail before this one, for a very well reviewed SP with so much detail on here anyone could make up a decent review, to make this look like a second review to give it credibility.

Come on Davie, wipe the sleep from the eyes  .

If I am wrong the thread will get a humble apology 

Don't take the piss or you'll find yourself gone as well. When you make a report it pays to give some kind of indication of what you think the issue is.

"They are trying again lol" doesn't cut it, we aren't mind readers, who are 'they' and what are 'they' trying again. Sensible punters who have noticed something wrong include the details in their report. LOL

Edit

Just to add, the mods don't follow every thread, the information lillythesavage eventually included on this thread is what should have been included in the report then that gives us half a chance of knowing what the issue is.

[Fuzzyduck]

Thanks to DM and the other mods for clearing out these thieving bastards. As I said on the other fake review, I hope members do their research before trying to book this one.

[daviemac]

You need to bear in mind that there's no "evidence" and any conclusions you might draw are based on circumstantial evidence. I'm sure the mods have done the usual checks for return offenders but this thieving cunt probably has some smarts, though clearly not in review writing. The mods needs to be fair and objective so I can understand DM's challenge to your accusation.

That said, I do agree with you. This is likely the banned thanos-sized-penis come to make another really poor attempt at marketing.

Nothing was immediately obvious when I approved his first review and the report by Lilly that "They are trying again lol" after his second didn't give a lot to go on.

Normally in a case like this the report will include the suspicion that the reviewer is a returner, what his previous name was, what links the two and what the reviews concerned are. But trying to get info out of Lilly is like drawing teeth.

Finding out the above information meant we could look into it further and link Jerrypuntalot to Thanospenis.

[IAmNotFamous]

This is why this forum is great. Team work.

AW feedback not reliable.

UKP are which is why I’m grateful we have sharp eyed members to whittle out the fakes.

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

By the way I’m guillible to have believed the fake review and given I be in Birmingham this month, would have been horny to gone see the SP.

[Fuzzyduck]

Nothing was immediately obvious when I approved his first review and the report by Lilly that "They are trying again lol" after his second didn't give a lot to go on.

Normally in a case like this the report will include the suspicion that the reviewer is a returner, what his previous name was, what links the two and what the reviews concerned are. But trying to get info out of Lilly is like drawing teeth.

Finding out the above information meant we could look into it further and link Jerrypuntalot to Thanospenis.

Ah right. Yes, clearly he could have been a little more helpful to save you guys wasting your time and being able to act more quickly.

[daviemac]

Ah right. Yes, clearly he could have been a little more helpful to save you guys wasting your time and being able to act more quickly.

Had he given all the information in the report I wouldn't have had to post on the thread and we would have, like you say, acted quicker.

Then to get all sarky implying it's my fault.   

[Illya Kurakin]

'She' is back in back in London but one hopes the hidden feedback (as well as this thread) would scare away any thoughtful punters from paying a deposit.

[Jedi123]

Doesn't answer the phone.