Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Sophie - FBSM independent - Marylebone  (Read 5857 times)

Callisto

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only  /  External Link/Members Only

After good notes about her in the Massages.me thread, I decided to take the plunge. 

Comms: She didn't reply to two texts earlier in the day, but answered when I phoned. Subsequently she replied to texts rapidly, in broken English.

Flat: A nice, smart basement flat close to Lisson Grove and five mins from Marylebone.  Her dog, a small cute chihuahua-like delight, was there, but doesn't come in the massage room, which is a small room with a proper massage table and towers and sheets professionally arranged on it.  Clients can also use a shower in a bathtub, and are given a bottle of water - nice touch.  It felt classy.  Sophie said something about only being there some days, though - she rents it, I think - so book her and you might well end up somewhere else in the vicinity.  Certainly the flat's location doesn't tally with the times quoted on Locanto.

Girl: Beautiful, IMO. The Locanto pic and the second Massages.me pic are most representative, and all three pics are definitely her. She's smiley and warm, too, which helps.  Age-wise, I'd guess late-20s.  Body-wise: size 8 with medium, faintly saggy breasts, very small nipples, and a completely shaven pussy.  Lovely firm, squeezable ass.  Hot, hot, hot.

Punt: We agreed £70 for half an hour's B2B and HR; an hour was £100, but it was getting late.  Both fair costs, I'd say, given the private flat, quality of girl and level of service.  You can respectfully touch - breasts mainly - and kiss her body a bit, but no lip-kissing and definitely no oral / FS.  She stripped to her panties and did 10 mins of increasingly raunchy inner-thigh work and CC swipes, then took off the panties and started sliding over me (still FD), and breathing into my air.  I was terribly aroused, feeling those breasts on my back.  After the flip, she did more of the same, coming inches from kissing me, and then using her breasts to masturbate me.  The only slight downer for me was her probably-fake sighing.   A glorious, slow hand job followed; after I came, she said "well done", which was a new one to me!  I had a shower, and we chatted easily as I dressed.  She is going to move back to Poland more or less permanently in October.

I'd whole-heartedly recommend this one.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Cheers for the review. Did you sense there was more any mileage to be had?

Offline LLPunting

Cheers for the review. Did you sense there was more any mileage to be had?

Doesn't sound like it.

At 100 ph she's too much for just nude b2b and hr with no mutual.

The more people who indulge in high cost HR the worse it is for the entire punting market at the lower end.  "Classier" escorts will reduce their services to "no sex, (shitty) massage only" for no reduction in their rates.  Shitty escorts will move from 60 to 100 ph for shitty sex services.  Parlour girls will insist on 80-100 for 10 mins of naked no-sex and mugs will be paying c.150 for crap.  :thumbsdown:

May have to look at starting sex touring in other countries and go back to wanking for the few months between trips  :dash:

Callisto

  • Guest
Cheers for the review. Did you sense there was more any mileage to be had?

Perhaps YMMV with repeat bookings, but not for a first-time visitor, nope.

Online Prince

Doesn't sound like it.

At 100 ph she's too much for just nude b2b and hr with no mutual.

The more people who indulge in high cost HR the worse it is for the entire punting market at the lower end.  "Classier" escorts will reduce their services to "no sex, (shitty) massage only" for no reduction in their rates.  Shitty escorts will move from 60 to 100 ph for shitty sex services.  Parlour girls will insist on 80-100 for 10 mins of naked no-sex and mugs will be paying c.150 for crap.  :thumbsdown:

May have to look at starting sex touring in other countries and go back to wanking for the few months between trips  :dash:



I 100% endorse your sentiment. 

I cannot understand why anyone would pay this amount.
It should be £50 for the hour!

P

Callisto

  • Guest
At 100 ph she's too much for just nude b2b and hr with no mutual.

As per below, there is some mutual...

You can respectfully touch - breasts mainly - and kiss her body a bit

Value-wise, I stand by my assessment above.  In a shop you'd likely pay 45+40 for an hour plus B2B, and most often that B2B part only happens close the end of a non-arousing massage.  This was arousal-focused throughout + a semi-luxurious set-up + some mutual + a very hot girl.  It's hardly the stuff of bargains, but neither is £100 a rip-off.

Offline LLPunting

As per below, there is some mutual...

Value-wise, I stand by my assessment above.  In a shop you'd likely pay 45+40 for an hour plus B2B, and most often that B2B part only happens close the end of a non-arousing massage.  This was arousal-focused throughout + a semi-luxurious set-up + some mutual + a very hot girl.  It's hardly the stuff of bargains, but neither is £100 a rip-off.

You're right, value in the parlours is not often great at least for the first meet, but those that give the service and you get along with will give you more naked time if not more mileage.
Your combo is sadly hard to find at 100 even now, which is on that slope I described, the sliding began a while back.
Thankfully there are still some (very) pretty masseuses out there who will indulge the mutual naughtiness for a little less to a smidge more than the 100 milestone.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 11:59:12 am by LLPunting »

Offline Kostas



Value-wise, I stand by my assessment above.  In a shop you'd likely pay 45+40 for an hour plus B2B, and most often that B2B part only happens close the end of a non-arousing massage.  This was arousal-focused throughout + a semi-luxurious set-up + some mutual + a very hot girl.  It's hardly the stuff of bargains, but neither is £100 a rip-off.

+1

Offline Fuzzyduck

Cheers for the review. Did you sense there was more any mileage to be had?

Thanks

Offline Fuzzyduck

I 100% endorse your sentiment. 

I cannot understand why anyone would pay this amount.
It should be £50 for the hour!

P

I totally agree but, pray tell, where are all these hot girls in nice London surroundings who offer arousal-focussed B2B with some mutual for £50/hr all in? In a shop you're paying anywhere from £40-50 for an hour just to get in the door.

Callisto

  • Guest
I totally agree but, pray tell, where are all these hot girls in nice London surroundings who offer arousal-focussed B2B with some mutual for £50/hr all in? In a shop you're paying anywhere from £40-50 for an hour just to get in the door.

Yes, quite. Everything I had for £50? Hardly.  I do thoroughly agree that, judged by days of yore, £100 is a lot, and that's a mighty shame which could compel us all to make for Eastern Europe. But in today's environment, and given the particular circumstances, it were all right...

Offline Fuzzyduck

Yes, quite. Everything I had for £50? Hardly.  I do thoroughly agree that, judged by days of yore, £100 is a lot, and that's a mighty shame which could compel us all to make for Eastern Europe. But in today's environment, and given the particular circumstances, it were all right...

I agree with LLP. £100 is the benchmark for a quality service and any more is a slippery slope and we should resist. Unfortunately too many tourists and people with more money than sense are greasing that slide. Few years back this one EE (who was incredibly hot to be fair) proposed £100 for B2B (on top of the £45 entry). I declined. The £60 I paid in the end was still too much. I didn't return.

Offline LLPunting

I agree with LLP. £100 is the benchmark for a quality service and any more is a slippery slope and we should resist. Unfortunately too many tourists and people with more money than sense are greasing that slide. Few years back this one EE (who was incredibly hot to be fair) proposed £100 for B2B (on top of the £45 entry). I declined. The £60 I paid in the end was still too much. I didn't return.

Thing is if you're with a masseuse but want some hanky panky for a (small) part of the time then why would you pay more for her than you would for a solid hour of shagging with an arguably prettier, younger, hornier SP with a wider range of services for the same money (or less)?

Offline lebon121

Thing is if you're with a masseuse but want some hanky panky for a (small) part of the time then why would you pay more for her than you would for a solid hour of shagging with an arguably prettier, younger, hornier SP with a wider range of services for the same money (or less)?
You are right . This what I was explaining in every other thread regarding erotic massage .
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline Fuzzyduck

Thing is if you're with a masseuse but want some hanky panky for a (small) part of the time then why would you pay more for her than you would for a solid hour of shagging with an arguably prettier, younger, hornier SP with a wider range of services for the same money (or less)?

Agreed. Horses for course I reckon. Massage is an occasional thing for me. Personally I attach a lot of stock to a deep tissue/sports massage (mild masochism I think) and the arousal/sensual part of the journey. Most pretty young sex bombs haven't got a scoobies about how to work the traps.

Offline lebon121

Agreed. Horses for course I reckon. Massage is an occasional thing for me. Personally I attach a lot of stock to a deep tissue/sports massage (mild masochism I think) and the arousal/sensual part of the journey. Most pretty young sex bombs haven't got a scoobies about how to work the traps.
:D :D :D
 
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

snotrag

  • Guest
Thing is if you're with a masseuse but want some hanky panky for a (small) part of the time then why would you pay more for her than you would for a solid hour of shagging with an arguably prettier, younger, hornier SP with a wider range of services for the same money (or less)?

Not everybody wants shagging, some prefer massage.
If the girl is crap at massage id agree with you.
But if she is truly a skilled masseuse and your in the market for that kind of service then maybe its worth paying the extra.

Id pay that for a girl that really knew how to do a klixen style edge...
Not found a single girl that comes close.

Offline LLPunting

Not everybody wants shagging, some prefer massage.
If the girl is crap at massage id agree with you.
But if she is truly a skilled masseuse and your in the market for that kind of service then maybe its worth paying the extra.

Id pay that for a girl that really knew how to do a klixen style edge...
Not found a single girl that comes close.

No doubt you pay for what you want.  ;)

If you're after a specialist then you'll pay the premium but edging isn't a "guaranteed" skill for a masseuse, you're just as likely to get it from an experienced escort, assuming you can't teach an SP how you like it.

My point is about the generality of massage girl vs WG.


Online webpunter

 :lol:

A glorious, slow hand job followed; after I came, she said "well done", which was a new one to me!

Thanks for the intel

She is going to move back to Poland more or less permanently in October.

Online tantraman

Cheers, Callisto :hi: ... I seem to be returning to my FBSM roots lately, so I'm glad to collect Sophie and such options.

:drinks:

Callisto

  • Guest
My point is about the generality of massage girl vs WG.

I personally don't enjoy the escort experience, so - referring to the previous point - the reason I'd pay the equivalent hourly fee or higher for a FBSM experience with no / much less hanky panky rather than opt for an "arguably prettier (although not than Sophie, frankly), younger, hornier SP with a wider range of services" is....... because I prefer to.  Because I'll enjoy it more.  Because I'll get more of my rocks off.  Etc etc.

That's just me and some other OPs, I realise; it's not every SP.  But anyone who reacts to a FBSM review with a dismissive comment about the equivalent value of escorts blah blah blah is utterly missing the point. 

The soaring price of FBSM is a separate issue.  I still maintain that Sophie represents semi-decent value at £100 in today's market, considering all the factors mentioned.  But a few years ago she most definitely wouldn't have, and that's the real sadness here.

Offline LLPunting

No disrespect re your preference, we all have our own.   :cool:
It is a shame though that in paying the premium the SPs believe there's a general will to pay more and then along come the more money than sense brigade and believe that something so pricey must be worth it so they have a go and then more opportunists with no service orientation pile in... market fucked.  :dash:

Let's see how prices and the demographic of providers alters once the economy tanks.  Not that so many of us will still be playing...  :cry:

snotrag

  • Guest
If you're after a specialist then you'll pay the premium but edging isn't a "guaranteed" skill for a masseuse
You miss my point.
I was trying to point out that edging on its own is a limited service but I would pay a premium rate if the provider was a specialist.
This was in response to the general theme that.... "MORE SERVICES EQUAL MORE MORE MONEY"
In general I would agree but that rule obviously cant always be applied.


It is a shame though that in paying the premium the SPs believe there's a general will to pay more and then along come the more money than sense brigade and believe that something so pricey must be worth it so they have a go and then more opportunists with no service orientation pile in... market fucked.  :dash:

I agree there is a "Knock On Effect" but would you expect the OP to stop spending his cash on the service that he wants in order to stabilize the market for others ??

Offline LLPunting

You miss my point.
I was trying to point out that edging on its own is a limited service but I would pay a premium rate if the provider was a specialist.
This was in response to the general theme that.... "MORE SERVICES EQUAL MORE MORE MONEY"
In general I would agree but that rule obviously cant always be applied.


I agree there is a "Knock On Effect" but would you expect the OP to stop spending his cash on the service that he wants in order to stabilize the market for others ??

I think we're on the same page but at crossed purposes about edging.  I agree with your clarification  :drinks:

I have no such expectation and know it would be pretty futile.  That said it's the same as when we've all been talking about the going rate for HR, THR, NHR @ 20/40/60 and trying to get everyone to try to hold to this structure.  As much as I enjoy massage it won't be long before pricing will push it into BVFM compared to escort rates, unless the latter's rates also spiral out of control, in which case a lot of us will be adversely affected as far as for getting our jollies often enough.

Best we debate this elsewhere if wanted rather than continue to go OT.  Apols to OP for the diversion.

Offline Spartan20

Thanks again for the review Callisto, led to a great session and positive review. Didn’t ask if she was leaving but will be a pity if she does.

JAG4555

  • Guest
i told you Calisto, Sophie is very good (in my review of sophie). im glad you had a good time.

In regards to price. YES. Its expensive for a massage But its Expensive for a good escort.
now adays, if you want a good looking, fit girl that delivers a good service, its practically £150 a hour. yes, you can have a lot of fun, but after cumming, its a long wait for the refill and usually spend the time chatting, or having a shite massage. by the time you pop in round 2. time is over and so id £150.

But with massage, the one hour, a fit girl id touchijg your body. its a fun relaxing experience, i get horny seeing a fit girl, fully clothed, then undressing, and i get to do a bit of oral. kiss, lick body.

Dont get me wrong. i love both escort visits and massage.

Online webpunter

A very long wait for the refill !  :dash:
Trying to pop twice in an hour is a struggle
Hardly seems worth the effort, especially if i have to take over & bash the living daylights out of littleWP to get it over the line for round two
IMO with FS, escorts are more likely to want to get things over & done with
Then its like 'WTF shall we do now'
Whereas massage burds seem more likely to draw things out
I much prefer being edged through through the booking, the 'pressure' being built up
And saying goodbye to 80-100 [+20 ish for OWO] rather than 120-150 is preferable
Just sayin

i told you Calisto, Sophie is very good (in my review of sophie). im glad you had a good time.

In regards to price. YES. Its expensive for a massage But its Expensive for a good escort.
now adays, if you want a good looking, fit girl that delivers a good service, its practically £150 a hour. yes, you can have a lot of fun, but after cumming, its a long wait for the refill and usually spend the time chatting, or having a shite massage. by the time you pop in round 2. time is over and so id £150.

But with massage, the one hour, a fit girl id touchijg your body. its a fun relaxing experience, i get horny seeing a fit girl, fully clothed, then undressing, and i get to do a bit of oral. kiss, lick body.

Dont get me wrong. i love both escort visits and massage.