A need for a new section on ukp ?

[lovemachine]

What has prompted me to start this thread is that I was previously very tempted to see a wg who didnt offer BB,but if I recall I read some negative points about her on UKP so never got round to seeing her.However I have now seen that the same girl is offering BB. External Link/Members Only This is something I have noticed quite a bit recently.
  I think there should be a new section for wgs that advertise as not doing BB but do in fact do it, or also advertise as offering BB with another profile.
I believe that the biggest concern to most ukp punters going to see an unreviewed girl would be if she offers BB. If it turns out a shit punt or even if you get scammed,surely that cant be as bad as unwittingly going with a barebacker.
 Searching ukp for a new unreviewed girl is very likely to show up nothing,but there must be many a case that punters are aware of non BB AW profiles as being suspect.
I also realise that alot of punters like well reviewed girls so this wont affect them ,but these details could be of help to some .

[Midlane]

She's been a member for three days. How recently was this?

[Nagilum]

What has prompted me to start this thread is that I was previously very tempted to see a wg who didnt offer BB,but if I recall I read some negative points about her on UKP so never got round to seeing her.However I have now seen that the same girl is offering BB. External Link/Members Only This is something I have noticed quite a bit recently.
  I think there should be a new section for wgs that advertise as not doing BB but do in fact do it, or also advertise as offering BB with another profile.
I believe that the biggest concern to most ukp punters going to see an unreviewed girl would be if she offers BB. If it turns out a shit punt or even if you get scammed,surely that cant be as bad as unwittingly going with a barebacker.
 Searching ukp for a new unreviewed girl is very likely to show up nothing,but there must be many a case that punters are aware of non BB AW profiles as being suspect.
I also realise that alot of punters like well reviewed girls so this wont affect them ,but these details could be of help to some .

No point, we all know that the girls are getting bare backed by somebody.  It would only drive you mad trying to second guess it.

BB girls are no big deal, provided you stay protected. 

The details could help yes, but the review section works well and those that offer BB are often negatives, which people pay attention to most.  If the girl is unknown then its a TOFTT and somebody will report it.

[FootieMadJonny]

I think this would be a great idea! Name and shame the disgusting barebackers!

[Steely Dan]

I agree with you on the need, but the search takes care of it.  We don't need a section - not broken don't fix it.  What I mean is from now on, if anyone searches for this girl by this AW number, they will find your post.  So even if later she changes her profile, they can read your comments.  And they can reflect and decide what is right for them.

[lovemachine]

No point, we all know that the girls are getting bare backed by somebody.  It would only drive you mad trying to second guess it.

BB girls are no big deal, provided you stay protected. 

The details could help yes, but the review section works well and those that offer BB are often negatives, which people pay attention to most.  If the girl is unknown then its a TOFTT and somebody will report it.

I think there is a point,Im trying to avoid those that actively offer it,and this would avoid second guessing.Sorry to disagree but BB girls are a big deal,what about dfk and RO for starters.And as I said ,Im talking about unreviewed girls.

and in answer to steely dan,what if I hadnt mentioned that girls profile .

[OakTree]

Surely you don't need a new section. Can't you just start a thread and list them?

[Steely Dan]

and in answer to steely dan,what if I hadnt mentioned that girls profile .

But you did. So you want a thread, not a section.  You have it now.  We have a thread on best boobs, pooh on arses and bad pictures, why not on BB?    Post others that you notice also. Let nature take its course.  Meaning we dont need to debate - if you and others post then it will stay alive.

Not sure how many offer it then don't offer it later, but if I am searching for info on a TOFTT girl, I would be happy to see a comment about her profile.

[Poopster]

Surely you don't need a new section. Can't you just start a thread and list them?

Exactly what I was thinking.

No need for a new section on anything unless it's likely to significantly dominate traffic anywhere else.  The BB issue isn't particularly massive so no need for an entire board dedicated to it. 

Just make a thread... oh, you already have.

[Tallboy2]

What are you worried about? If you use a condom you are reducing the risk of the hazard of contracting a SDI. If you regularly see WGs then get  hep B vaccinated to reduce the risks of that. Hep B is easier to contract than HIV. You are very unlikely to catch either of the above from OWO or DFK.
Gonarea and clymidia are easier to contract through OWO but it's still low risk and more contagious through unprotected sex.
Let's ask this question: is a BB more likely to have an SDI than a non BB?
I think we should assume that all WGs could have a SDI and  therefore we protect ourselves by using a cover.
We protect ourselves further by getting ourselves checked regularly.
This game is not without risk, but what I'm saying is you won't catch a deadly SDI if you wear a condom when shagging a BB

[Nagilum]

what about dfk and RO for starters..

What about them?

Sorry to disagree but BB girls are a big deal

No need we are only discussing.  To some bare back is no issue, there are punters that actively seek it knowing the risks it poses and decided its worth it.  They would argue about the calculated risk behind it.

Like I said every girl is getting BB, by a boyfriend, pimp or regular.  You have to accept that as reality.

[seward]

 Lovemachine   I don't know which area your in but if you look in the West Midlands section you'll find two threads on a similar theme "Bloxwich punt" and "Dudley BB capital" this subject really has got to be taken seriously! It's the most Yuk part of punting

[Midlane]

What are you worried about? If you use a condom you are reducing the risk of the hazard of contracting a SDI. If you regularly see WGs then get  hep B vaccinated to reduce the risks of that. Hep B is easier to contract than HIV. You are very unlikely to catch either of the above from OWO or DFK.
Gonarea and clymidia are easier to contract through OWO but it's still low risk and more contagious through unprotected sex.
Let's ask this question: is a BB more likely to have an SDI than a non BB?
I think we should assume that all WGs could have a SDI and  therefore we protect ourselves by using a cover.
We protect ourselves further by getting ourselves checked regularly.
This game is not without risk, but what I'm saying is you won't catch a deadly SDI if you wear a condom when shagging a BB

Absolutely understand what I think you are saying, however a couple of things:

- getting checked regularly doesn't protect you from contracting anything. It just tells you if you have.

- you could catch a deadly "SDI" if you wear a condom but it is extremely unlikely.

- the risk of a girl having an "SDI" to pass onto you is higher if she BBs anyone/everyone than if she BBs a boyfriend / regular / pimp. Increased numbers = increased risk.

[Nagilum]

Absolutely understand what I think you are saying, however a couple of things:

- the risk of a girl having an "SDI" to pass onto you is higher if she BBs anyone/everyone than if she BBs a boyfriend / regular / pimp. Increased numbers = increased risk.

Naturally, so always wear protection and you are OK

[Steely Dan]

So no need to convince anyone.  Post the girls AW profile.  No one is stopping you.  Then we have extra information and can make our own choices.

Perhaps do it on the regional board - but it doesn't matter where, or if she changes regions, when I search the site before I TOFTT, I'll still see it.

[smiths]

What are you worried about? If you use a condom you are reducing the risk of the hazard of contracting a SDI. If you regularly see WGs then get  hep B vaccinated to reduce the risks of that. Hep B is easier to contract than HIV. You are very unlikely to catch either of the above from OWO or DFK.
Gonarea and clymidia are easier to contract through OWO but it's still low risk and more contagious through unprotected sex.
Let's ask this question: is a BB more likely to have an SDI than a non BB?
I think we should assume that all WGs could have a SDI and  therefore we protect ourselves by using a cover.
We protect ourselves further by getting ourselves checked regularly.
This game is not without risk, but what I'm saying is you won't catch a deadly SDI if you wear a condom when shagging a BB

You will find condoms can break so personally I wish to avoid WGs who advertise they offer BB plus I have no interest in meeting such fucking idiots let alone punting with them.

[Tallboy2]

You will find condoms can break so personally I wish to avoid WGs who advertise they offer BB plus I have no interest in meeting such fucking idiots let alone punting with them.

Yes reduce risk further by avoiding BBs , drug addicts, and any other higher risk groups. We can only be sensible and reduce the risks we cannot eliminate them altogether. I do understand the ops concern but don't think a new section on this forum is necessary

[Buttons]

Just a thought, whilst I see the value in this as a topic (I think a dedicated section is overkill), isn't there a risk that it would attract the wrong type of punter? The type that would use it as a directory of bareback providers.

[FlyingBreadMan]

This new section could be abused. At the same time contributors may be the target of abuse.

Just thinking, what if a well known model was accused of offering bb by a well know punter?

[Steely Dan]

what if a well known model was accused of offering bb by a well know punter?

No different to now.  If it is on her AW profile then useful to some (as per the girl noted above).  But if not then it is bull shit and this site has a pretty good track record of sniffing out said excrement.

So to you keen posters of BB skanks - not see any names what are you waiting for?

[vw]

Surely you don't need a new section. Can't you just start a thread and list them?

Can see it being used as a stick to bash people and also a dedicated section would attract the bug chasers here to read our research.

Quite frankly wouldn't rely on that info personally.

Half the punters here don;t even notice its on the escorts profile FFS, every other info request is a barebacker that the main sign has been missed !

[smiths]

This new section could be abused. At the same time contributors may be the target of abuse.

Just thinking, what if a well known model was accused of offering bb by a well know punter?

Fuck knows why you call WGs or prostitutes models, I have noticed you refer to them as models before, very odd, anyway this subject has been discussed before on here and it didn't lead to a dedicated section as the OP has suggested so I leave it to admin, but my own view is I see no reason for such a section

[Randolph69]

What are you worried about? If you use a condom you are reducing the risk of the hazard of contracting a SDI. If you regularly see WGs then get  hep B vaccinated to reduce the risks of that. Hep B is easier to contract than HIV. You are very unlikely to catch either of the above from OWO or DFK.
Gonarea and clymidia are easier to contract through OWO but it's still low risk and more contagious through unprotected sex.
Let's ask this question: is a BB more likely to have an SDI than a non BB?
I think we should assume that all WGs could have a SDI and  therefore we protect ourselves by using a cover.
We protect ourselves further by getting ourselves checked regularly.
This game is not without risk, but what I'm saying is you won't catch a deadly SDI if you wear a condom when shagging a BB

Completely agree. As has been pointed out by Nagilum, most if not all WGs are having unprotected sex with someone, even if not with punters. BB girls are little more risk than others, so long as you are thorough in the use of protection.

[lovemachine]

I was not trying to discuss how ok/risky/right or wrong it is to go bareback,just an way of having this usefull information about unreviewed girls who seemingly dont offer it but really do.It wouldnt be open to abuse or attract the wrong punter if both freely available profiles are put up.Like this example
 External Link/Members Only
and her other profile External Link/Members Only

[vw]

It wouldnt be open to abuse or attract the wrong punter if both freely available profiles are put up.Like this example
 External Link/Members Only
and her other profile External Link/Members Only

Well would attract the wrong sort of user via google search they would think what a great resource and join the fun that is UKP, and no way of stopping them !

So abuse is impossible, posting a link exposes noting about the poster at all anyone can post a ink honestly or maliciously !  what ever happens its been posted !

Clearly you have great faith in mankind and don;t know much about how most people arrive here in the first place !

[cueball]

Imo a thread is more than adequate.

As VW says, we (a lot of us) don't want this forum as a resource for the bug chasers. It's wide open for corruption too.

Nice idea op and I appreciate your motives but I don't think it'd be practical on here.

[FlyingBreadMan]

Fuck knows why you call WGs or prostitutes models, I have noticed you refer to them as models before, very odd, anyway this subject has been discussed before on here and it didn't lead to a dedicated section as the OP has suggested so I leave it to admin, but my own view is I see no reason for such a section

Soho days, and other walk ups in Zurich referred to WG as models. It just stuck to me.

[OakTree]

Completely agree. As has been pointed out by Nagilum, most if not all WGs are having unprotected sex with someone, even if not with punters. BB girls are little more risk than others, so long as you are thorough in the use of protection.

You have to ask yourself why is she prepared to offer BB. There's a strong chance she's already got something particularly nasty and doesn't give a shit if she passes it on. I for one would rather not just rely on protection to keep me safe but just stay well away instead.

Of course probably most WGs and also punters have BB sex with someone and that's usually their partner. I don't think you can compare that to having endless bare cocks up her all day from God knows who.

For me any prostitute offering BB payed sex should be avoided.

[cueball]

You have to ask yourself why is she prepared to offer BB. There's a strong chance she's already got something particularly nasty and doesn't give a shit if she passes it on. I for one would rather not just rely on protection to keep me safe but just stay well away instead.

Of course probably most WGs and also punters have BB sex with someone and that's usually their partner. I don't think you can compare that to having endless bare cocks up her all day from God knows who.

For me any prostitute offering BB payed sex should be avoided.

Well summed up

[seward]

Now here's a worry for all of us gents I've just been checking AW feedback and some names come up quite a lot and one connection is a Barebacker in Wolverhampton after a quick check the amount of cross connection is fantastic no wonder some hide their feedback. Now imagine how far something nasty could travel and how quickly

[Bangers and Gash]

Hasn't Admin got enough on his plate already? 

[Jimmyredcab]

Hasn't Admin got enough on his plate already? 

+ 500

Frivolous post reports don't help either.     

[mikexxlong]

Imo a thread is more than adequate.

As VW says, we (a lot of us) don't want this forum as a resource for the bug chasers. It's wide open for corruption too.

Nice idea op and I appreciate your motives but I don't think it'd be practical on here.

To right
this forum should be about punting & helping other punters find good service providers, and offer advice on being safe ,getting the best from a punt etc.

Not as a resource for weird screwball freak bug chasers who deliberately go out to get infected, what kind of abnormal fucking degenerates are they, who in the right mind would do that

But what are worst are the despicable vile abortions, sometimes known as gift givers who go around deliberately infecting unsuspecting victims,

Do not inadvertently give these disgusting pieces of shit, that contaminate society, any assistance what so ever

[LL]

Hmmm, and and what do you want next, OP? Another new section for posting stupid requests like this one?

[Tallboy2]

Hmmm, and and what do you want next, OP? Another new section for posting stupid requests like this one?

Stop being mean to the OP

[seward]

To right
this forum should be about punting & helping other punters find good service providers, and offer advice on being safe ,getting the best from a punt etc.
Not as a resource for weird screwball freak bug chasers who deliberately go out to get infected, what kind of abnormal fucking degenerates are they, who in the right mind would do that

But what are worst are the despicable vile abortions, sometimes known as gift givers who go around deliberately infecting unsuspecting victims,
Do not inadvertently give these disgusting pieces of shit, that contaminate society, any assistance what so ever

That is exactly the reason I didn't give the AW profile   

[Marmalade]

If there's not a separate section on something there's always probably a good reason for it. More efficient to work out what that is that . UKP is a leader in the field (or the leader) not a follower.

[Jimmyredcab]

If there's not a separate section on something there's always probably a good reason for it.

+1000     

[Bangers and Gash]

+ 500

Frivolous post reports don't help either.     

+ 1000

And neither do touting and trolling posts.