30 min vs 1 hour booking

[Jayjay1]

Been reading few reviews and see some members prefer 30 min session compare to 1 hour.

From the reviews it doesn't seem to be P&D and the full package is offered. Kissing, oral , sex in multiple positions.

Never tried 30 mins before I prefer the longer session and get to know the girl well and have a more homely GF experience.

Those that tried both 30 and hourly do you see a difference in WG attitude or effect. Ie in 30 min might try to rush u to cum etc

[B4bcock]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=42891.msg569301#msg569301

[Rochelle]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=42891.msg569301#msg569301

Considering the last post on that thread was over six years ago, what exactly was the issue with him starting a new one?

[B4bcock]

Considering the last post on that thread was over six years ago, what exactly was the issue with him starting a new one?

I have no issues at all about this thread.  OP is a recently new member on here so I thought it might be helpful for him to chew over previous discussions of the subject.  Perhaps he can reply and let us know if he found it to be of any use.

[Gordy555]

I prefer the one hour punt as I feel more relaxed and the build up isn't rushed. I take a while to come, and a full 30 minutes would just about be enough time to finish for me, so I would feel a bit more stressed.
If it was someone new, I would probably  now go for the 30 minutes, after reading  experiences on here. Been disappointed a few times going for the hour with someone new.

[Dazz1976]

I’ve found a lot of sp’s will charge extra for things in 30mins that would be free in an hour (owo,cim,dfk etc)

[OakTree]

Always book an hour. Tried half hour once and just felt I was racing against the clock.

It’s horses for courses. I admire those that do fifteen minute quickies. Rock up, cock out, sucked off, quick fuck and 3.2.1 you’re back in the real world.

Hats off to guys who do that but not for me.

[petermisc]

Have to admire the poster who could remember a 6 year old thread!

Surprised there hasn't been a queue of posters asking why you need to pay for any more than 15 minutes.  If there is one thing I have learnt from this forum is that no two punters are after the same thing.  For some, it is about how many times they can pack into a session.  For some, it is the GFE that is important, for others it is timewasting.

Only you can know what is important to you.  It is worth experimenting, however.  If you are used to hour sessions, for example, try a half hour session with one of your regulars ("sorry, I am pushed for time today"), and see how you get on.

[Jonestown]

I'm long past wanting to get to know the girl, plus it would take a miracle to get me to cum more than once in an hour, so with the exception of a massage meets, a 30 minute session is fine for me.

[SALIBA]

Alot of this depends on the SP I find. For a 1 hour booking you need to find an SP who is happy to spend that amount of time with you, with no rushed serviced.

[Home Alone]

Having spent my first couple of years as a punter visiting the Parlours in Manchester where 30 minutes was the usual time limit, it felt liberating to graduate to AW where you became used to hour-long sessions.

I now have 4-hour sessions with my current Regular but that's because she doesn't offer Overnights.

[Slaveofnature]

I suppose it all depends on what you are looking for in your punting.  If it's straightforward sex then half an hour is probably enough but my thing is loosely scripted role play and BDSM and I find that 1.5 hours works better as it gives room for the experience to develop slowly leading inexorably towards the climax.  2 hour sessions are even better but stretch my budget a bit too much.  Of course its a bit harder to find an SP who can do the role play/BDSM well as opposed to straight sex SP's of whom there are dozens but they are out there even if they are few and far between.

[ulstersubbie]

my thing is loosely scripted role play and BDSM and I find that 1.5 hours works better as it gives room for the experience to develop slowly leading inexorably towards the climax.  2 hour sessions are even better but stretch my budget a bit too much.  Of course its a bit harder to find an SP who can do the role play/BDSM well as opposed to straight sex SP's of whom there are dozens but they are out there even if they are few and far between.

Perfectly understandable. As a BDSMer myself, 30 Min is a non starter. Prolonged sessions are desirable but budgetary constraints do play a part. I would love an overnighter but just not feasible in terms of finance.

[Coriniumstud]

Had a regular who I would see for an hour but as she is no longer around I stick to half hours now

[luv2kiss54]

I only come once and when i do i lose interest to be honest so half hour is much my preferred option. I can do everything i want to do in 30 mins and cost wise its obviously better.

[jlike]

As last post, I am a one shot wonder. Also used to do most of my punting when in my lunch hour when I was working so 30 mins worked just fine. Working in a city centre it was not difficult to find sp's within 10 mins of work, often only 5 mins.

[Al]

Having done a mix of 30 and 60 mins I would say broadly you do get an element of rushing for the 30 mins - usually it starts OK for the build-up but IME they normally want the sex part finished quickly as you are knocking on 20-25mins by then.

The problem is that something more like 45 mins is ideal for me as with 60mins I often feel there is a bit of padding towards the end and sometimes finish and leave with 15-20 mins left anyway. The other major problem is that the extra 30 mins may cost anywhere between £50-£80 extra and often isn't worth it - particularly if it is someone you have never seen.

IMO only the very exceptional escorts who really make you feel like a king for a full hour with no clockwatching are worth the full hour.


Summary - if I had unlimited budget - 60 mins every time. Otherwise I save the 60 mins for girls who I really want to see or think will fill the time.

[Jayjay1]

Having done a mix of 30 and 60 mins I would say broadly you do get an element of rushing for the 30 mins - usually it starts OK for the build-up but IME they normally want the sex part finished quickly as you are knocking on 20-25mins by then.

The problem is that something more like 45 mins is ideal for me as with 60mins I often feel there is a bit of padding towards the end and sometimes finish and leave with 15-20 mins left anyway. The other major problem is that the extra 30 mins may cost anywhere between £50-£80 extra and often isn't worth it - particularly if it is someone you have never seen.

IMO only the very exceptional escorts who really make you feel like a king for a full hour with no clockwatching are worth the full hour.


Summary - if I had unlimited budget - 60 mins every time. Otherwise I save the 60 mins for girls who I really want to see or think will fill the time.

Love the summary- prob do that going forward. It jogged my memory when 1 girl didn't answer my call for a planned meeting so called up few girls working in a famous hotel in Sloane Square. One answered and I took the 1 hour offer, which wasn't enjoyable and I left before the hour.

[drillaaaa]

I prefer 1 hour bookings as you tend to get to cum more than once. Usually twice or as many as you can manage. Also like you mention, a less rushed and GF like experience.

[David1970]

I only come once and when i do i lose interest to be honest so half hour is much my preferred option. I can do everything i want to do in 30 mins and cost wise its obviously better.

Got to agree, I am the same.

[luv2kiss54]

Having done a mix of 30 and 60 mins I would say broadly you do get an element of rushing for the 30 mins - usually it starts OK for the build-up but IME they normally want the sex part finished quickly as you are knocking on 20-25mins by then.

The problem is that something more like 45 mins is ideal for me as with 60mins I often feel there is a bit of padding towards the end and sometimes finish and leave with 15-20 mins left anyway. The other major problem is that the extra 30 mins may cost anywhere between £50-£80 extra and often isn't worth it - particularly if it is someone you have never seen.

IMO only the very exceptional escorts who really make you feel like a king for a full hour with no clockwatching are worth the full hour.


Summary - if I had unlimited budget - 60 mins every time. Otherwise I save the 60 mins for girls who I really want to see or think will fill the time.

Absolutely agree with what you are saying about the hour bookings; if you want 45 mins, however, it does no harm to ask a girl if she would do a 45 min option at pro rata rates. On the rare occasion i have asked for it i have got it. 

[mr.bluesky]

For an fbsm massage half an hour is usually enough for me unless I want to cum twice. For a full service I prefer an hour so your not racing against the clock but I hate it when you book an hour and you don't get the full hour.

[willie loman]

30 mins is fine, in fact the sexual component of the meet is usually over within 15 minutes, those of you who are forcing yourself to have 2 pops to get your moneys worth are giving yourself grief, would you try and have 2 pops in 30 mins in civvy st?not to mention the insane changing of position.

[alabama1]

For me it's 30 minutes with an unreviewed first meet. 1 hour with a girl i have met before or a well reviewed/established girl.

[TheGreatCornholio]

For me it's 30 minutes with an unreviewed first meet. 1 hour with a girl i have met before or a well reviewed/established girl.

Exactly this for me, unless it's a touring lass that's very well reviewed on here who I've not seen before, then I'll go for an hour.

30 mins is fine, in fact the sexual component of the meet is usually over within 15 minutes, those of you who are forcing yourself to have 2 pops to get your moneys worth are giving yourself grief, would you try and have 2 pops in 30 mins in civvy st?not to mention the insane changing of position.

Very good point, although I don't like feeling rushed so I tend to like the relaxed nature of an hour meet.

[Trex]

For me it's 30 minutes with an unreviewed first meet. 1 hour with a girl i have met before or a well reviewed/established girl.

Yes I do that as well. I had booked girls who I never met for 1 hour if she well reviewed on here.

I would do 30 mins if she unreviewed or mixed reviews on here.

[JamesKW]

At the moment,I am doing thirty mins with the same girl two or three times a month,I find it can often go over a couple of mins  and can be quite intense,whereas with an hour session you can finish early and feel you are just filling the time for the sake of it.Also I can have 30 min sessions more regular than hour ones (she charges exactly double for an hour session so there is no cash gain) so there is not as long wait between sessions.

[signy]

...she charges exactly double for an hour session so there is no cash gain...

A good point. OTOH, some escorts will charge the same for 15/30/60 minutes, making it clear they don't like the shorter bookings, in which case just as well go for the unrushed hour. Not all situations are the same.
 

[vindici]

I only come once and when i do i lose interest to be honest so half hour is much my preferred option. I can do everything i want to do in 30 mins and cost wise its obviously better.

Same for me. I only book an hour when I'll abroad, and only because that is the minimum time slot. I think I've only ever been fully satisfied with a 1hr book once in my punting career in the UK, once I clocked on that 30mins worked better for me, I've not looked back.

[Ben1983]

1 Hour
For a regular or someone we’ll reviewed on here

30 Mins
For someone I’m not 100% sure of
If the booking goes well, I usually go back for an hour if they are local again

[Choosehappy2018]

I prefer 30 minutes. I am a one pop guy and 30 minutes is enough and doesn’t feel rushed tbh. It also tend to do bookings during my lunch break at work (back in the days when I actually went into the office) and half hour is just perfect to do this discretely.

[Crazyoldhaag]

I always go for 30 minutes. Even more so with regulars. I'm a one shot man and I go for at least two punts per week. I always come prepared and showered, so there's no need to waste valuable time, unless of course, SPs insist on a quick freshen up to get OWO or the trip took longer than normal, etc. It generally costs just over one 1hr punt and most importantly it gets my balls emptied on a more regular basis(I'd rather have sex every 3 days than 7), which in turn makes me last a bit longer and perform better on subsequent punt.

[The0neAnd0nly]

Started off with 1 hour bookings but always regretted it when I nutted first time after 30 minutes or whatever. When I was inexperienced used to stay for the hour and pop a 2nd time even though didnt really feel it.

Then started to change 1 hour bookings to 30 minutes after popping mid session which wasnt fair to SPs. Never had a SP kick off but they clearly werent impressed when I asked to cut my season short.

Finally did a complete u turn and only started booking 30 minutes and rarely extended to 1 hour if I was still horny and SP could accommodate. Dont think I'd ever start with booking 1 hour by default now.

[shiptonlad]

45 minute bookings for me most of the time. Chinese tend to agree to it. Lots of others don't. Have had some try to charge the 15 min plus the 30 minute rate making it more than the hourly rate. I query it and politely decline.

[alabama1]

The only problem i have with 30 minute bookings is financial. Rarely, if ever, is the fee charged 50% of the hourly rate. In my experience it is often around 75%.

[robo90]

I normally prefer 1 hour depending on distance and how well reviewed, prefer an SP that doesn't have a cum limit aswell as tend to find I can relax more and enjoy it without worrying how to try and time things! I'd go for 30mins if I'm unsure on an SP and/or only really feel the urge to pop once though

The only problem i have with 30 minute bookings is financial. Rarely, if ever, is the fee charged 50% of the hourly rate. In my experience it is often around 75%.

I'd be concerned if it is 50% tbh, is the SP putting any value in spending any time in between bookings to shower etc or just straight onto the next one

[Supersix4]

I'll book 30mins if its a first time with the girl. Trouble is i rarely go back a second time. The one SP that became a regular of mine was so much better in a hours booking.

[Home Alone]

I remember negotiating a first visit to a then-newish SP on AW. I always booked an hour's meeting in those days 10 years or so ago now but she initially declined because she only wanted 1/2 hour for first visits but eventually 'made an exception' for me. It was, I recall, somewhat of a 'meh' meeting and within a few weeks, she'd disappeared from AW, never, afaik, to return.

[Zincon]

I've booked maybe 3 girls for 1 hour and never done 30.  Only one of them (UK glamour milf) was actively interested/up for trying to make me cum a second time.  They others just lost interest...  (hot Brazilian & hot Romanian ).  Probably now I know how to handle the situation better and stretch out the session to suit me!

I would go back and see the Romanian girl, she was incredibly pretty indeed for like 30 mins.  Usually it takes me a while to cum, and I exhibit good stamina, but she just knew how to gyrate her pussy around my cock that I just lost control, literally.

So perhaps in future I might see someone new for 30 mins.. and see how that goes instead.

[Marmalade]

Both have advantages in my opinion.

30m bookings (or even shorter) are great if you can strip fuck and leave. That makes them great value and they are more likely to run over in my experience than the one hr which are too easily cut short a bit on some excuse. You can even pop one in a lunch break or do 2 or 3 in a day off (my max was 6 but that was in cheapo times!) If you do 30mins and it’s a dud there’s time for a plan B without the expense that an hour would have incurred.

But 1hr gives more opportunity for GFE (if the P4P is capable of it, which of course some are not!). It lets you relax into it. Or give you more recuperation time if you want to have two shots. I thinks it’s maybe worth being sure of the p4p and go for a 30mins first if she’s an unknown quantity. Some ‘Romanians’ I’m bored with them after 10 minutes, whereas the better p4p can actually make an hour booking interesting. If it involves much travel it can seem an hour is needed just to make it worthwhile.

Just my opinion. You find out what suits you (and it may change at different times of life), you practice, see how it goes, takes your pick.

Enjoy!

 

[Crackpot11]

An hour is certainly preferable but I find half hour is usually enough to try out a new escort, hours are better with regulars.

[FiveKnuckles]

Not had a success in reloading after pop and don't kiss or do RO, so stick with 30mins or quick pd. 

I suppose if I found an attractive regular and feel more relaxed, I'd take the risk and do things I usually wouldn't.

[Nagilum]

If I struggled with a single pop during a session then I would cut it down to 30 mins. For me its 1 hour every time as I'm lucky enough (for now )to manage two.

[JamesKW]

Its easy to over shoot a 30 min booking,its easy to under shoot a 1 hour booking.

[JamesKW]

The only problem i have with 30 minute bookings is financial. Rarely, if ever, is the fee charged 50% of the hourly rate. In my experience it is often around 75%.

This is the only case where a one hour is beneficial as you dont mind leaving a little early,if the price is half the hour booking then you can have two half hour bookings and smaller gaps between bookings.

[petermisc]

This is the only case where a one hour is beneficial as you dont mind leaving a little early,if the price is half the hour booking then you can have two half hour bookings and smaller gaps between bookings.

Agreed, rarely is an hour twice the cost of a half-hour.  Usually it is only 50% extra, if that. 

It all depends what you are looking for.  If all you are after is a quick p&d, then half an hour is likely long enough to satisfy you.  If you are after something more, then the small extra cost for an hour is probably worth it to avoid the risk of leaving feeling rushed and less than happy.  Better to leave happy if early, than late and unhappy.

[Whiteknight]

30 mins is enough for most bookings

Why waste the extra money if you don't need it.

[alabama1]

30 mins is enough for most bookings

Why waste the extra money if you don't need it.

You are stating your own preference here though aren't you.

[petermisc]

30 mins is enough for most bookings
Why waste the extra money if you don't need it.

As I said, if all you are after is a quick p&d, then half an hour is likely to be enough, and so I agree that paying for extra time would be a waste of money.  But 30 minutes has never been long enough for me to get all I want out of a punt, so paying for only 30 minutes would be a false economy.

I do sometimes wonder if those punters who seem satisfied with a quick p&d with a disinterested Rom wouldn't be better off investing in a sex doll.

[ReginaldPerrin]

I generally only come once. New girl 30 mins.
If I like the SP and go back then I will do 1 hour and slow it down further.
Even then I find I leave after 50 mins or so as I would rather be doing other things than talking bollocks to an SP.
I would never do 1 hour until I know the SP is genuine and VFM.
Rather 2 punts a month than 1 and find its shit.