Sgk Burnley

[scutty brown]

Ah, in the face of such erudite sobriquets, I relinquish the stage 

I'm still waiting for your proof that I'm a pimp.
Or if you cant find any an apology would seem appropriate

[chrishornx]

I'm still waiting for your proof that I'm a pimp.
Or if you cant find any an apology would seem appropriate

don't expect you will get either any time soon

[scutty brown]

don't expect you will get either any time soon

I'm sure you're right Chris.
Actually this thread is an interesting example of how this forum has morphed over the last couple of years. When I joined, a claim of whiteknighting or touting, however tenuous, would almost always result in a rapid ban - even when the claim was clearly wrong.
Nowadays the claims are few and far between, those that are made are rarely upheld - and the members who make them tend to end up with egg on their faces.
Its yet another example of how this forum is becoming far more tolerant and pleasant - and more realistic in its overview

[chrishornx]

I'm sure you're right Chris.
Actually this thread is an interesting example of how this forum has morphed over the last couple of years. When I joined, a claim of whiteknighting or touting, however tenuous, would almost always result in a rapid ban - even when the claim was clearly wrong.
Nowadays the claims are few and far between, those that are made are rarely upheld - and the members who make them tend to end up with egg on their faces.
Its yet another example of how this forum is becoming far more tolerant and pleasant - and more realistic in its overview

Agree with that but your accuser was out of order and the ponce comment was a downright insult

[frankc]

Rightly or wrongly, swapping WG's numbers has always gone on via PM's and always will but, only desperate idiots post asking for a number on a review thread

[chrishornx]

Rightly or wrongly, swapping WG's numbers has always gone on via PM's and always will but, only desperate idiots post asking for a number on a review thread

sums it up nicely I would PM you a number if you asked but not an idiot

[opal]

I'm sure you're right Chris.
Actually this thread is an interesting example of how this forum has morphed over the last couple of years. When I joined, a claim of whiteknighting or touting, however tenuous, would almost always result in a rapid ban - even when the claim was clearly wrong.
Nowadays the claims are few and far between, those that are made are rarely upheld - and the members who make them tend to end up with egg on their faces.
Its yet another example of how this forum is becoming far more tolerant and pleasant - and more realistic in its overview

Tolerant in giving information freely to semi lurkers. but not so sure about pleasant when those who have posted dozens of FRs are called pimps and ponces without justification.

[cueball]

Rightly or wrongly, swapping WG's numbers has always gone on via PM's and always will but, only desperate idiots post asking for a number on a review thread

Indeed franko

In all my time on here I've yet to ask for a lasses number, I just email and ask HER.

If she doesn't pass it on then I sack the idea of podging her, I'm not that fussed these days and never have been.... It's a paid podge and there's plenty of others.

[Scotpunter]

As the person who brought up not sharing SGK's number, I hope nobody thinks I was white knighting. I personally don't see any post being like that on this thread.

What I would say is turn the situation around. I'm sure none of us would be happy if SGK gave our number to a WG friend of hers without checking it was OK first.

[opal]

As the person who brought up not sharing SGK's number, I hope nobody thinks I was white knighting. I personally don't see any post being like that on this thread.

What I would say is turn the situation around. I'm sure none of us would be happy if SGK gave our number to a WG friend of hers without checking it was OK first.

I wouldn't worry its not you that has a problem!

[T13]

I did ask for a number on a thread cos it wasn’t on her profile,
However I’m not an idiot I just didn’t think there was much wrong with it, with a non contributer I get that of course.
However I do now see why it isn’t a good idea as no permission given etc. and I was naive asking for it on a thread should’ve been more private about it.
Ps thanks to the person who pm me the number. You know who you are 👍

[Kriss]

What I would say is turn the situation around. I'm sure none of us would be happy if SGK gave our number to a WG friend of hers without checking it was OK first.

Well no, but then we are not prostitues, are we? 

[chrishornx]

Well no, but then we are not prostitues, are we? 

And what point does that make?

 Are you demeaning the ladies?

[T13]

Well no, but then we are not prostitues, are we? 

Well yeah that is a good point tbf.
I suppose I can see both sides on this on the fence as I wanted a number and was helped

[opal]

Well no, but then we are not prostitues, are we? 

So you are saying WGs have no right to any privacy when they clearly state they are not working, wheras you have every right to privacy because you're a punter?

[lewisjones23]

Why doesnt she have her work phone off if she isnt working?

I suspect that she is actually working but just doesnt want new clients

[scutty brown]

Why doesnt she have her work phone off if she isnt working?

I suspect that she is actually working but just doesnt want new clients

So what? It comes to the same thing: she won't want unsolicited calls. As for turning it off.........do you turn your phone off to avoid unwanted calls from doubleglazing salesmen?

[scutty brown]

Well no, but then we are not prostitues, are we? 

So that means prostitutes have no right to privacy?

[lewisjones23]

So what? It comes to the same thing: she won't want unsolicited calls. As for turning it off.........do you turn your phone off to avoid unwanted calls from doubleglazing salesmen?

I dont sell my holes to people off the street 

If she is that arsed about privacy then she should have a ‘ work ‘ phone and leave it off when she allegedly isn’t working

[Captain caveman 69]

Ffs not this old chestnut again

[opal]

Why doesnt she have her work phone off if she isnt working?

I suspect that she is actually working but just doesnt want new clients

The OP was told early on in this thread that SGK is definitely not working until at least September but offered to speak to regulars who have her number.

What this thread is really about is passing the phone number of a WG who states she is not working to a virtual lurker whos only use for the number at the moment could be for a free chatline.

[T13]

if She’s not working should she not hide/take off temporally her aw account.

[chrishornx]

So that means prostitutes have no right to privacy?

I have asked what he meant but not the greatest at answering. Certainly seems to suggest the ladies don't deserve the same respect as punters

[T13]

But at the same time she provides a service. You wouldn’t hear of a bricklayer only giving there numbers to certain people.
That said it’s her decision,her life so her choice how ,when and who to see

[chrishornx]

But at the same time she provides a service. You wouldn’t hear of a bricklayer only giving there numbers to certain people.
That said it’s her decision,her life so her choice how ,when and who to see

not sure that is a fair comparison as totally different 'trades'

[T13]

True but if you can’t handle the heat don’t be a chef 🤷‍♂️

[T13]

Again that said if she’s not working and the fact it’s a non contributor then no number shouldn’t be given out

[T13]

I asked for a number on here for poppy as its never displayed (now learnt it’s displayed when she’s free)
Trouble being I have to book in advance. I didn’t see anything wrong with what I was doing.
However this scenario is different this girl isn’t working and don’t want number given out.
Mine just wasn’t displayed.

[chrishornx]

Again that said if she’s not working and the fact it’s a non contributor then no number shouldn’t be given out

??

[chrishornx]

Mine just wasn’t displayed.

why would your number be displayed ??

[T13]

This spellcheck thing on my phone. I meant hers wasn’t displayed which is y I asked for it. But yeah it’s her life so her call.

[Kriss]

 Are you demeaning the ladies?

No, I'm calling a spade a spade; prostutute, hooker, whore. "Ladies"??? 

[Kriss]

So that means prostitutes have no right to privacy?

No, not when they are flogging their fannies all over the internernet. Whats up anyway? Did you fall in love with her or what     

[softlad25]

surely if she's only talking to regulars she would have their numbers stored in her work phone
so doesn't have to answer calls that are not in contacts
so no problem. Probably can cancel calls who aren't contacts on her phone settings

[opal]

surely if she's only talking to regulars she would have their numbers stored in her work phone
so doesn't have to answer calls that are not in contacts
so no problem. Probably can cancel calls who aren't contacts on her phone settings

Brilliant! So here's the answer. Dont give the phone number of a non working working girl to a virtual lurker to use as a free chatline as she wont answer numbers not in her contact list so you are wasting your time.

[scutty brown]

surely if she's only talking to regulars she would have their numbers stored in her work phone
so doesn't have to answer calls that are not in contacts
so no problem. Probably can cancel calls who aren't contacts on her phone settings

Considering that any punter with at least half a brain changes his punting phone number on a regular basis, then that's clearly not going to work.

But overall the whole approach here is almost like victim-blaming or shaming. Its as if you all think you have a right to her phone number, that because she is a sex worker she has no expectation of privacy, and that when she wants privacy its her fault for depriving you and you'll put her straight by passing on her details despite her wishes.

[chrishornx]

..... then no number shouldn’t be given out

what does that mean??

[scutty brown]

No, not when they are flogging their fannies all over the internernet. Whats up anyway? Did you fall in love with her or what     

It strikes me that you have a dangerous mindset. If as you say, sex workers have no right or expectation of privacy, and by implication from your earlier comments no right to withhold their personal details from public perusal, does it follow that they have no right of refusal when you call them uninvited asking for sex? Saying they have no right to privacy is only a short step to saying they have no rights over their own bodies.

[chrishornx]

No, not when they are flogging their fannies all over the internernet. Whats up anyway? Did you fall in love with her or what     

you really aren't endearing yourself to the SP's on here but with your derogatory attitude towards them that won't concern you but I am certain a lot of guys hold them in higher respect than you do

[chrishornx]

It strikes me that you have a dangerous mindset. If as you say, sex workers have no right or expectation of privacy, and by implication from your earlier comments no right to withhold their personal details from public perusal, does it follow that they have no right of refusal when you call them uninvited asking for sex? Saying they have no right to privacy is only a short step to saying they have no rights over their own bodies.

Agree

interesting to see if any SP responds

[scutty brown]

No, not when they are flogging their fannies all over the internernet. Whats up anyway? Did you fall in love with her or what     

And I'm STILL all waiting for your proof that I'm a pimp and a ponce. Or an apology.
Put up or kindly fuck off

[opal]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Are you her pimp? 

 

[chrishornx]

 No, just a self-appointed appointed ponce, methinks 

and maybe Scutty he can explain what the above means

[Kriss]

 ... call them uninvited asking for sex?

You are talking about the woman with 600 plus AW ratings? the one that does gang-bangs? has movies of herself "riding cock"? the one that is "not a shy girl"? 

What a t**t you are 

[scutty brown]

You are talking about the woman with 600 plus AW ratings? the one that does gang-bangs? has movies of herself "riding cock"? the one that is "not a shy girl"? 

What a t**t you are 

Rather than resorting to insults try answering the question(s).
Or is it implicit in your reply that you do not believe she has the right to refuse you sex?

[Kev40ish]

No, not when they are flogging their fannies all over the internernet. Whats up anyway? Did you fall in love with her or what     

Fuck me your sound like one serious misogynistic cunt...

Live in the real world your the cunt that pays for sex!!!!

Respect each other’s choice it’s not difficult

[chrishornx]

Fuck me your sound like one serious misogynistic cunt...

Live in the real world your the cunt that pays for sex!!!!

Respect each other’s choice it’s not difficult

bang on

 this guy has issues and isn't needed on this site he has been antagonistic throughout this thread, and cowardly in not answering questions

[T13]

what does that mean??

It means that her number shouldn’t of been given out.

[Richthescouser]

bang on

 this guy has issues and isn't needed on this site he has been antagonistic throughout this thread, and cowardly in not answering questions

With people making posts like his, it’s no wonder the public see forums such as this as a negative thing. Nobodies interested in the decent guys, it’s the odd one who describe WGs like this that stand out.

[chrishornx]

It means that her number shouldn’t of been given out.

'no number should be given out' would mean that

presumably another typo ?