Seeking arrangement - Rules change

[martini2429]

Not a chance I would do that. 

One thing that puts me off is when the girls proper keen to meet really fast. Always feel I’m about to get set up and robbed or something.  Maybe paranoid who knows

Nope, don't feel paranoid, very keen to meet usually does set off loads of red flags (not always though)

 

[martini2429]

Agreed I suppose its a numbers game ie send out 100's of "Need cash urgently" requests some mug might pay

Never mind "some mug might pay" it's 100% some mug WILL pay 

[YorkshireLad]

I wish I could get back in the main thread

[theoriginallingam]

Are their rules for this thread ?

If so where can they be found?

[AlTerminator]

I got an email about daddy summer discount on seeking 33% off if anyone wants to try now lockdown is easing. I haven't been on since end of last year. Not sure if it's worth going on yet 🤔, tempting though.
Anyone had any recent success? Might be too early.

[finn5555]

The issue is to many pro$$ies on there nowadays or girls thinking they can charge stupid money 

The good days have passed

[AnthG]

I was emailed the 30% discount, so was going to sign up for 3 months. But its £145 and on trying to take some selfies just now my bottle is kind of going.

Has any ugly people had any success on this place?

The issue is to many pro$$ies on there nowadays or girls thinking they can charge stupid money 

The good days have passed

This in my mind sounds perfect to me, as the girls on there in the NE I have not seen them working on AW or agencies, so if they are just prostitutes in their own minds, but just more exclusive by being on SA alone and don't put themselves on Adultwork. It seems a godsend. Especially during the whole Covid19 issue.

But still, I am just looking at my photos and thinking, I shouldn't bother.

If you look like John Candy in Uncle Buck. Would you stand a chance? - I don't look fat in the mirror. But these photos I look just like John Candy. This whole the camera adds 10pounds is true. Or at least for men it is.

[mgkerx]

I was emailed the 30% discount, so was going to sign up for 3 months. But its £145 and on trying to take some selfies just now my bottle is kind of going.

Has any ugly people had any success on this place?

This in my mind sounds perfect to me, as the girls on there in the NE I have not seen them working on AW or agencies, so if they are just prostitutes in their own minds, but just more exclusive by being on SA alone and don't put themselves on Adultwork. It seems a godsend. Especially during the whole Covid19 issue.

But still, I am just looking at my photos and thinking, I shouldn't bother.

If you look like John Candy in Uncle Buck. Would you stand a chance? - I don't look fat in the mirror. But these photos I look just like John Candy. This whole the camera adds 10pounds is true. Or at least for men it is.

Hi
I wouldn't get to hung up on your looks as it's not really a dating site,ie most girls on SA aren't looking for a boyfriend
What makes you attractive to the SB's is;
££££'s and willingness to splash the cash,
Enjoying a nice meal that their usual skint boyfriend could never offer
Some mentoring and life skills
As often said get inside her head then getting inside her knickers is the easy bit.
Hope this helps

[James]

I was emailed the 30% discount, so was going to sign up for 3 months. But its £145 and on trying to take some selfies just now my bottle is kind of going.

Has any ugly people had any success on this place?

This in my mind sounds perfect to me, as the girls on there in the NE I have not seen them working on AW or agencies, so if they are just prostitutes in their own minds, but just more exclusive by being on SA alone and don't put themselves on Adultwork. It seems a godsend. Especially during the whole Covid19 issue.

But still, I am just looking at my photos and thinking, I shouldn't bother.

If you look like John Candy in Uncle Buck. Would you stand a chance? - I don't look fat in the mirror. But these photos I look just like John Candy. This whole the camera adds 10pounds is true. Or at least for men it is.

Face tune is what you need or some selfie filter app. i find selfies make you always look fat, Most of the girls their use filters so its the age for us men too. Im average looking and find it hard to find girls their or on dating sites, hence punting. Some of the apps lets you smooth skin, make your face slimmer and eyes bigger etc. play around

[AnthG]

Face tune is what you need or some selfie filter app.

I went onto the playstore to download this, but seen it was rated as 4.0 out of 5. And the top rated app was one called Airbrush with 4.8 out of 5.

So downloaded this and this allowed everything - make yourself look slimmer, fix your skin tones, fix your chin, nose, eyes, the works. I clicked save and then it asked "You must subscribe for £19.99 to allow you to save your photo".

I then clicked cancel and then pressed the volume down and power buttons and took a snapshot of my phone screen and stuck two fingers right up at the £20.00 as this has gave me the edited photo for free via snapshot. I then used a different app to crop out the onscreen editing options from the photo.  I figured the tip was worth mentioning to save anyone else some money.

[Steve2]

Thanks Anth. I did that with a birthday card app recently

As previously said , most of the girls on SA are more interested in the £££'s than your looks

[AnthG]

I put the photo in, and my profile text. And it said it needed 12hrs for someone to review

The review came through minutes, ago and then about 5mins after I have been favourited by a 24year old in Venezuela (for those not sure, its a county in South America that is undergoing civil war right now)

Does this mean she seen my profile and is seeking a UK visa marriage type thing to get permanently out of there and stay in the UK? Or does this mean SA is just full of fakes and this is the hook to make guys think girls like them?

I know I am overthinking this (I always do this) but it was a little strange she found me so fast and set me as one of her favourites

[DrConners]

I put the photo in, and my profile text. And it said it needed 12hrs for someone to review

The review came through minutes, ago and then about 5mins after I have been favourited by a 24year old in Venezuela (for those not sure, its a county in South America that is undergoing civil war right now)

Does this mean she seen my profile and is seeking a UK visa marriage type thing to get permanently out of there and stay in the UK? Or does this mean SA is just full of fakes and this is the hook to make guys think girls like them?

I know I am overthinking this (I always do this) but it was a little strange she found me so fast and set me as one of her favourites

Yes I think you are mate.

I was on SA for almost a year, this happened to my account ALOT - I punt in the SE, the SE SA selection was full of hard luck cases just asking for a handout or profiles with out of date, inaccurate pictures. (Although I've spoken to another SA member in the SE recently who has had more luck, so things can change depending on circumstances of SB ect)

I had lots of profiles from abroad adding me as a favourite - I just ignored them - IMO just focus on what look like 'honest' profiles in and around your location and message them as you would if your were 'chatting up a girl'.

As others have said - don't mention PPM in your comms - At all.

I think John Candy got plenty of pussy anyway 

[cim_lover]

Womem who are remium users from experience are they  more likely to be legit then scammers? Do you guys look for any verifications lile fb or insta

[AnthG]

I was on SA for almost a year, this happened to my account ALOT

I have now been favourited 6 times now in a profile only being active for 6hrs. All from women nowhere near where I live.

So either, I am a total hunk, these girls a totally desperate, or they're fakes.

I wish it was the first one. But nope, no way. I get the feeling these profiles are similar to Private Gallery Scammers on AW. Its annoying as hell though all these favourites coming in. 6 in 6hrs is too many.

*Edit* Spoke to soon, 5mins have passed and its now 7. Flippin hell, 8 now after another 2mins....

[whiskyfan]

Face tune is what you need or some selfie filter app. i find selfies make you always look fat, Most of the girls their use filters so its the age for us men too. Im average looking and find it hard to find girls their or on dating sites, hence punting. Some of the apps lets you smooth skin, make your face slimmer and eyes bigger etc. play around

I wonder how well it would go down on here if you suggested escorts use photoshopped and unrepresentative pictures of themselves?

[AnthG]

I wonder how well it would go down on here if you suggested escorts use photoshopped and unrepresentative pictures of themselves?

And yet a good number of them do, I would even say most of them do. You really think that selfie is untouched. Open the door and enter planet reality....

And before you say, where's your evidence. You can spot the telltale signs when you know what to look for.

[whiskyfan]

And yet a good number of them do, I would even say most of them do. You really think that selfie is untouched. Open the door and enter planet reality....

And before you say, where's your evidence. You can spot the telltale signs when you know what to look for.

Yes, and when their pictures are found to be out of date or misleading they are rightly criticised on here for it. Odd then that the suggestion is to join them in this deceit.

[AnthG]

Yes, and when the pictures are found to be out of date or misleading they are rightly criticised on here for it. Odd then that the suggestion is to join them in this deceit.

No, I said touched up. Not out of date. Nearly every WG on AW or on the other forum uses touched up photos for selfies. You can tell from telltale signs.

Do you respond to all of them saying "touched up" or not? Why not? You are outraged and yet you let it pass every time it seems. I take it you are going to start criticising them from now on in? Or are you still not going to do it and keep totally quiet?

[whiskyfan]

No, I said touched up. Not out of date. Nearly every WG on AW or on the other forum uses touched up photos for selfies. You can tell from telltale signs.

Do you respond to all of them saying "touched up" or not? Why not? You are outraged and yet you let it pass every time it seems. I take it you are going to start criticising them from now on in? Or are you still not going to do it and keep totally quiet?

Where am I "outraged"? Go back and read what I said, "rightly criticised" not necessarily by me but I certainly have done before, "out of date or misleading" ie photoshopped. Do I have to spell it out each time?

[hungrypunt]

Womem who are remium users from experience are they  more likely to be legit then scammers? Do you guys look for any verifications lile fb or insta

I find premium women to be more pro

[YorkshireLad]

Are we ever going to be able to get back into this topic?

[AnthG]

Are we ever going to be able to get back into this topic?

I would love to be able to see it as well

[mh]

Are we ever going to be able to get back into this topic?

I used to have access when I was using SA. I lost access as there was some requirement introduced to prove membership regularly rather than just once (I think it was that anyway!) and I'd stopped using SA for a while due to time demands. I did use a lot of the tips and warnings. Would be good to see what's happened in the last year!

[londonhunter008]

May I ask if anyone can share the subscription fee on SA?
I am using SA for a while and till last year
monthly premium membership was around  £70 GBP
Then starting of this years they asked for Price are £84 GBP

Is it the case for everyone else as well ? or the new members are asked to pay less?

[AnthG]

Is it the case for everyone else as well ? or the new members are asked to pay less?

I paid a total of £144.60 for 3 months. However, this was after they emailed me a 30% discount to celebrate the end of the COVID lockdown. But remember, the prices include 20% VAT ontop of what they quote you to reel you in that only shows on the very final page before clicking "pay now".

It is very expensive to sign up.

[hungrypunt]

May I ask if anyone can share the subscription fee on SA?

 

proper SD style that is kinell get 84 of us to chip in, quid each anyone (as harry potter said)
oh you just made my night "sugar daddy"

good luck wi that one bud,

[Brumish]

proper SD style that is kinell get 84 of us to chip in, quid each anyone (as harry potter said)
oh you just made my night "sugar daddy"

good luck wi that one bud,

 

[Evildog101]

SA banned me for talking to girls and doing arrangements for sex.

[Natwest]

SA banned me for talking to girls and doing arrangements for sex.

On the various threads that are open to all regarding Seeking Arrangements, there have been plenty of warnings about being careful what you discuss on there? How long into your subscription were you and what did you actually say?

[JAYZ]

On the various threads that are open to all regarding Seeking Arrangements, there have been plenty of warnings about being careful what you discuss on there? How long into your subscription were you and what did you actually say?

I'd be interested also. Would stating that you were "looking for intimacy" be reason to be banned by SA?

[Natwest]

I'd be interested also. Would stating that you were "looking for intimacy" be reason to be banned by SA?

Just to be careful, I always say "I am not looking for platonic". Ever since reading these threads I have become even more careful and though some girls really wind me yup with their attitude, not only on their profile but by their correspondence, I just let it wash over me.

[AnthG]

I'd be interested also. Would stating that you were "looking for intimacy" be reason to be banned by SA?

Yes. 100%. I put this in my profile, my profile was rejected and I was given a warning. There is a tick box you need to tick also saying you wont include this in messages as you are not paying for sex as that is prostitution.

Many of the girls however, get annoyed like hell in your messages that you are not getting down to the nitty gritty when you message them. You really need to get them off SA and onto Whatsapp or KIK ASAP, within 2 messages if you can.

[JAYZ]

Yes. 100%. I put this in my profile, my profile was rejected and I was given a warning. There is a tick box you need to tick also saying you wont include this in messages as you are not paying for sex as that is prostitution.

Many of the girls however, get annoyed like hell in your messages that you are not getting down to the nitty gritty when you message them. You really need to get them off SA and onto Whatsapp or KIK ASAP, within 2 messages if you can.

Many thanks AnthG & Natwest, this is very helpful as the thread as a whole has been in learning from the experiences of others.

[Hobbit]

how can I have access to the old hidden seeking arrangements topic? could someone please allow me access? I have been using seeking for several years now and would be happy to help and contribute.

Thanks

[Blackie]

just re-registered for SA, ive used it pretty much for 3 years now.

I would advise against it, pretty much every woman on there operates like a whore, not only do they charge 150 an hour, yeah they straight up say per hour, they are also picky about who they see.

In 6 days ive been on, must have spoke to at least 20 whores. All off them wanting 250 for 2 hours.

Where im lost is how did this change come about, was in the punters who fecked the market up or have they just realised its possible to use it as an escorting site.

[martini2429]

just re-registered for SA, ive used it pretty much for 3 years now.

I would advise against it, pretty much every woman on there operates like a whore, not only do they charge 150 an hour, yeah they straight up say per hour, they are also picky about who they see.

In 6 days ive been on, must have spoke to at least 20 whores. All off them wanting 250 for 2 hours.

Where im lost is how did this change come about, was in the punters who fecked the market up or have they just realised its possible to use it as an escorting site.

If you are sure that they are all escorts that you are talking to then I would suggest that you either post their page links as a warning to others on the Open Seeking thread on the main board or in the Area thread of where they are, a lot of videos on You tube advocate per hour ppm's, so doesn't mean they are all escorts, just charging what they have heard and what they can get away with.

 

[Blackie]

Hungry punt

I wrote ‘operate’ like a whore

That’s not quite the same as is a whore

[daviemac]

just re-registered for SA, ive used it pretty much for 3 years now.

I would advise against it, pretty much every woman on there operates like a whore, not only do they charge 150 an hour, yeah they straight up say per hour, they are also picky about who they see.

In 6 days ive been on, must have spoke to at least 20 whores. All off them wanting 250 for 2 hours.

Where im lost is how did this change come about, was in the punters who fecked the market up or have they just realised its possible to use it as an escorting site.

Why are you posting this on the 'rule change' thread, what has it to do with the rules regarding access to the locked SA thread.   

There's a dedicated open SA thread for those who do not have access to the locked one. That is the place for you to moan on about all things SA related. 

[martini2429]

Hungry punt

I wrote ‘operate’ like a whore

That’s not quite the same as is a whore

OK, but if you think they are taking the piss then post their details as a warning for others

 

[hungrypunt]

Hungry punt

I wrote ‘operate’ like a whore

That’s not quite the same as is a whore

What are you talking about, why mention me? I think you are talking about Martini

Im the one you have been pestering on PM to get you access to the thread which I told you has nothing to do with me, and then to ask me to search grls out for you for warnings? in the closed thread etc.
ask admin for access
And yes I found your post that Martini referred to suspect to say the least, and as Daviemac said why post in this thread.

[wirralpunter]

May I be added to this forum please, I have been on Seeking for two weeks and can see myself staying on it as its working so well for me.

[scutty brown]

May I be added to this forum please, I have been on Seeking for two weeks and can see myself staying on it as its working so well for me.

access to that thread is closed, you've no chance

[tynetunnel]

access to that thread is closed, you've no chance

Before he vanished, AnthG was granted access 

[tantric talents]

Just wish this thread wasn’t locked in to my “New replies” list every time I login

[daviemac]

Just wish this thread wasn’t locked in to my “New replies” list every time I login

You've revived this thread and brought it back to the top of the board after nearly 12 months just to point that you aren't capable of ignoring it. Are you for real.   

[stokecity]

Ok, back on Seeking after a while - some observations and experiences if anyone's interested.

Firstly, I was banned from Seeking for seeking sex in return for compensation or whatever they like to call it. Made me chuckle, obvs.

That was right at the end of my last membership in maybe march or something - anyway, I fancied joining again for a month, but was blocked - however, I e mailed them and said some embarrassing cringey apologies and sucked up to them a bit and they let me back in.

Also, during the course if this, I'd set up a new profile and they e mailed me after 3/4 days with a 25% discount code....then a few days later with a 33% discount - so by the time I got to join it only cost 65 quid or something...might work for others too hopefully.

Anyway, I'm back in...further observations to follow

[GingerNuts]

Ok, back on Seeking after a while - some observations and experiences if anyone's interested.

Firstly, I was banned from Seeking for seeking sex in return for compensation or whatever they like to call it. Made me chuckle, obvs.

That was right at the end of my last membership in maybe march or something - anyway, I fancied joining again for a month, but was blocked - however, I e mailed them and said some embarrassing cringey apologies and sucked up to them a bit and they let me back in.

Also, during the course if this, I'd set up a new profile and they e mailed me after 3/4 days with a 25% discount code....then a few days later with a 33% discount - so by the time I got to join it only cost 65 quid or something...might work for others too hopefully.

Anyway, I'm back in...further observations to follow

Please see reply #238.

[scutty brown]

Ok, back on Seeking after a while - some observations and experiences if anyone's interested.

Firstly, I was banned from Seeking for seeking sex in return for compensation or whatever they like to call it. Made me chuckle, obvs.

That was right at the end of my last membership in maybe march or something - anyway, I fancied joining again for a month, but was blocked - however, I e mailed them and said some embarrassing cringey apologies and sucked up to them a bit and they let me back in.

Also, during the course if this, I'd set up a new profile and they e mailed me after 3/4 days with a 25% discount code....then a few days later with a 33% discount - so by the time I got to join it only cost 65 quid or something...might work for others too hopefully.

Anyway, I'm back in...further observations to follow

wrong thread

[stokecity]

Aaaah, when I click on the old Seeking thread - the original started by Peter, it directs here...

I used to have access to that thread - contributed a fair bit as I recall - I thought I was one of the OGs!

What's happened then? Am I not allowed on there any more?