Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Abbie-British. 4561604. Avoid at all cost  (Read 5060 times)

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
Wrong mate. 
All kinds of bodies get plenty of attention in the punting game.  Services count for more.
Combine excellence of the two and the girls can start charging silly money but that excellence doesn't just mean classic supermodel looks.

This guy has never even seen me?

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
Abbie, such a terrible injustice you had to suffer. :rolleyes: Pretty sure this is not the first denigratory and unjust review for a prossy, anyway...

Do you sense any incongruence between the two statements?
You may want to consider that your figure it's kind of important and relevant for the very job you do.
We do judge cars for their handling and mpg figures and hookers according to their body/face/enthusiasm/prowess in bed,etc. It really doesn't seem rocket science to me.
If you think you're gonna be evaluated according to how well structured is your AW profile, you may want to reconsider your priorities.


‘Hookers’? .... astounding

Offline LLPunting

Well well well. We are going to start a “he said she said” keyboard battle here?

I just want to say I stand by everything I wrote.

That latest photo of her showing her flat tummy and trying to prove her being size 6. I can take a selfie of myself, early in the morning before breakfast, exhale, tuck my beer belly in. How hard is it?
LLpunter I know you were critical of my review, but I respect you for calling her out for the photo may not be a reflection of her body size.

It’s funny she mentioned she kicked someone out the other day, that was not me (I would be glad if it was, I could have saved some money!). I am not surprised to hear there are other victims out there!!

Anyhow I am going to leave it here, I’d just urge other punters to see for yourself.

There's no "we", you threw down the gauntlet by posting a Neg review in a public forum.  Girl's entitled to respond regardless of your rating.

You can stand all you like but as you have zero credibility it doesn't improve matters for you or your review.

I advised her that she could do herself a better favour by posting a different shot.  Even if her body size is 8 or 10 it's still a very svelte and desirable looking but expensive treat.

"Victims" who persist with a punt despite all the contra-indicators, and I've been one more than a few times, deserve to lose their money.  Again it's just as much the victim's fault, this isn't a case of robbery like DG, it's pure foolishness.  SPs will indulge fools because they're easy money for a little inconvenience.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2018, 02:19:01 am by LLPunting »

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
There's no "we", you threw down the gauntlet by posting a Neg review in a public forum.  Girl's entitled to respond regardless of your rating.

You can stand all you like but as you have zero credibility it doesn't improve matters for you or your review.

I advised her that she could do herself a better favour by posting a different shot.  Even if her body size is 8 or 10 it's still a very svelte and desirable looking but expensive treat.

"Victims" who persist with a punt despite all the contra-indicators, and I've been one more than a few times, deserve to lose their money.  Again it's just as much the victim's fault, this isn't a case of robbery like DG, it's pure foolishness.  SPs will indulge fools because they're easy money for a little inconvenience.


Again... I’ll not happy with being depicted that way. I’d rather not see someone and cancel a booking within the first ten minutes charge free that tolerate rude behaviour. The OP clearly has it in for me. If your intention was to cause a minor speed bump in my week and gain a reaction then you have indeed succeeded.

Clap clap.

I’m also fed up of repeating my body size. If I was a size ten I’d say that! I don’t think being a 6/8 makes one more attractive?!   

The mutual review system on adult work is fair. An unregulated space where reviews like this can exist is extremely damaging.


Abbiebrit

  • Guest
There's no "we", you threw down the gauntlet by posting a Neg review in a public forum.  Girl's entitled to respond regardless of your rating.

You can stand all you like but as you have zero credibility it doesn't improve matters for you or your review.

I advised her that she could do herself a better favour by posting a different shot.  Even if her body size is 8 or 10 it's still a very svelte and desirable looking but expensive treat.

"Victims" who persist with a punt despite all the contra-indicators, and I've been one more than a few times, deserve to lose their money.  Again it's just as much the victim's fault, this isn't a case of robbery like DG, it's pure foolishness.  SPs will indulge fools because they're easy money for a little inconvenience.


Would there be any point in me doing that though? Going from what I’ve witnessed so far there will claims that I’ve skipped a meal / be holding in my stomach or whatever else...regardless of perspective ... :/ 


Offline marcello

Wrong mate. 
All kinds of bodies get plenty of attention in the punting game.  Services count for more.
Combine excellence of the two and the girls can start charging silly money but that excellence doesn't just mean classic supermodel looks.
Yeah, you're right here great service get much more attention and positives than great looks.
Also, I don't often realise how many in here have different tastes and want to go for something outside of the classic stunner type.

Offline Belgarion

Yeah, you're right here great service get much more attention and positives than great looks.
Also, I don't often realise how many in here have different tastes and want to go for something outside of the classic stunner type.

Who established the "classic stunner type"? Was there a meeting?

I've always had a preference which is established by my loins.

People need to be free thinkers

Stowaway

  • Guest
Who established the "classic stunner type"? Was there a meeting?

I've always had a preference which is established by my loins.

People need to be free thinkers

Personally I think the last 2 lines contradict each other  :drinks:

Offline Dopedj

Hidden Image/Members Only

Today
Don’t know why you are bothering trying to reason with these lot on this site
You gonna to lose at the end —

James999

  • Guest
Don’t know why you are bothering trying to reason with these lot on this site
You gonna to lose at the end —

Here they come...……………

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 04, 2018, 08:41:25 am by James999 »

Offline Belgarion

Personally I think the last 2 lines contradict each other  :drinks:

How so? My preference is my preference. May not be the next guys preference.

That's the point.

Offline Belgarion

Don’t know why you are bothering trying to reason with these lot on this site
You gonna to lose at the end —

Says Mr No Reviews  :rolleyes:

Offline LLPunting

Don’t know why you are bothering trying to reason with these lot on this site
You gonna to lose at the end —

Actually no.  The only person giving her particular grief is the OP.  Am sure there are more than a few regulars and interesteds lurking and planning a dabble.  Now if only she would join Tontober.

Offline LLPunting


Would there be any point in me doing that though? Going from what I’ve witnessed so far there will claims that I’ve skipped a meal / be holding in my stomach or whatever else...regardless of perspective ... :/

Post the photo, if you do fake it there are enough experienced veterans who will call you up on it, BUT if you're not faking then they'll also support the shot, in fact you get more kudos for being honest.  We hate trolls and saboteurs more than SPs who may post overly flattering shots for marketing purposes.

Offline LLPunting

Personally I think the last 2 lines contradict each other  :drinks:

Nope they don't.  Think about it a little harder.

Offline LLPunting

How so? My preference is my preference. May not be the next guys preference.

That's the point.

+1
It's evident in the reviews posted in the last 2 weeks alone.

Offline king tarzan

I am not one to wave the flag for bad escorts but THIS
REVIEW IS UTTER 100% BULLSHIT..

Some disgruntled individual with a GRUDGE..


anyone can see the woman is slim and seems pretty facially..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Film Director


anyone can see the woman is slim and seems pretty facially..

Agreed, but £250/hr with no CIM rules her out for me  :cry:

Offline The Film Director

Agreed, but £250/hr with no CIM rules her out for me  :cry:

Now that's what I call service - she seems to have added it following my comment  :thumbsup:

Stevensmiles

  • Guest
At least the lady is having her say.
Her feedback on AW should be taken into consideration should anyone feel like booking her.
Who knows, the fact she is arguing her corner on here might actually attract some punters.


Offline MajorPayne

I am not one to wave the flag for bad escorts but THIS
REVIEW IS UTTER 100% BULLSHIT..

Some disgruntled individual with a GRUDGE..

anyone can see the woman is slim and seems pretty facially..

From previous reviews -
Quote
Pretty girl with a fabulous figure.
Intelligent and could hold a good conversation.

Quote
The girl -  she is as her pics, slim, attractive, wore some sexy lingerie.

Based on her AW pictures - I'd say she has pretty much a perfect figure.

My only comments would be her level of service possibly needs improving and she is charging too much (imho).

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline MajorPayne

Now that's what I call service - she seems to have added it following my comment  :thumbsup:

Very please to see she has added CIM to her list of likes.       Lack of this is one of the reasons I won't see a wg.

I see Abbie has also swallow on her likes.   :yahoo:   :drinks:   :thumbsup:     Her likes list looks well rounded.   

Now if only Abbie half her charges for an hour  . . .  :D :lol:

Offline ilovekungfu

The mutual review system on adult work is fair. An unregulated space where reviews like this can exist is extremely damaging.

No it isn't. The review system on Adultwork is fundamentally flawed because there are strong disincentives for punters to leave anything other than a positive review for everyone save obvious bad actors.

Whilst you'll find the odd few posters with problematic attitudes here, I wasn't the only poster to shoot down the OP's assertion that a size 10 was 'big'. Your first photo likely did much to discredit a review that had some red flags anyway. As such, many punters researching you on here would be savvy enough to disregard it.

Offline MajorPayne

No it isn't. The review system on Adultwork is fundamentally flawed because there are strong disincentives for punters to leave anything other than a positive review for everyone save obvious bad actors.
+1

Offline Cceon

Maybe I'm a bit thick but surely all photos are ' shoppable ' and so the OP may have a point and the suggestion that one sees for himself and make his own judgements if you want, is a sensible one.
Banned reason: Abusive tosser.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline scutty brown


..............The mutual review system on adult work is fair. An unregulated space where reviews like this can exist is extremely damaging.
No its not. The mutual review system on adult work is NOT fair. The mutuality is the very weakness in the system: it develops a kind of quid pro quo / tit for tat system whereby the punter is scared of posting a genuine review for fear of getting a reciprocal negative. Add to that the problem that certain girls (usually the crooks) seem to have enough clout with AW that they can get negatives deleted and the reviewer banned - its happened to me more than once.
The system also encourages punters to review for credit: give a positive and get a free fuck isn't unheard of. But beyond that is the problem of how easy it is to create fake feedback. Want thirty new reviews? Give me a day and I can forge them for you
« Last Edit: October 05, 2018, 08:56:18 pm by scutty brown »

Offline MajorPayne

Maybe I'm a bit thick but surely all photos are ' shoppable ' and so the OP may have a point and the suggestion that one sees for himself and make his own judgements if you want, is a sensible one.

Have you read her other reviews from other OPs?  If not I suggest you do.

Offline LLPunting

Maybe I'm a bit thick but surely all photos are ' shoppable ' and so the OP may have a point and the suggestion that one sees for himself and make his own judgements if you want, is a sensible one.

OP ultimately has offered nothing of useful substance in his review (now highly suspect) or his subsequent statements which have either been bunkum or facile.  Anything "sensible" he has said is already best practice for any punter using this site or wise to the failings of AW and other sites.

Whilst her photos could be shopped some of the most useful ones are pretty untouched, so a fairy genuine impression of her figure is discernible.

Offline LLPunting

No its not. The mutual review system on adult work is NOT fair. The mutuality is the very weakness in the system: it develops a kind of quid pro quo / tit for tat system whereby the punter is scared of posting a genuine review for fear of getting a reciprocal negative. Add to that the problem that certain girls (usually the crooks) seem to have enough clout with AW that they can get negatives deleted and the reviewer banned - its happened to me more than once.
The system also encourages punters to review for credit: give a positive and get a free fuck isn't unheard of. But beyond that is the problem of how easy it is to create fake feedback. Want thirty new reviews? Give me a day and I can forge them for you

+1

Offline Cceon

Have you read her other reviews from other OPs?  If not I suggest you do.


Think post #75 answers you.  :)
Banned reason: Abusive tosser.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cceon

OP ultimately has offered nothing of useful substance in his review (now highly suspect) or his subsequent statements which have either been bunkum or facile.  Anything "sensible" he has said is already best practice for any punter using this site or wise to the failings of AW and other sites.

Whilst her photos could be shopped some of the most useful ones are pretty untouched, so a fairy genuine impression of her figure is discernible.

Not a bad thing to be reminded of BP now and then. My personal rules ( which apply to me and me only) are when in doubt, give the benefit to the punter.
Banned reason: Abusive tosser.
Banned by: daviemac

Punter1963

  • Guest
Noticed her name changed to Gracie-Brit. I wonder why.

I know people has been calling my review BS.

Glad to see more negative reviews showed up at her AW profile, e.g. she asked for payment upfront, she turned up to a booking drunk etc. Sounded exactly like what I experienced.

Offline Honestperv

And you still haven't posted any other reviews..

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
My stalker has resurfaced;) was this account created purely to monitor and vilify me??

Can you please ban this guy as he appears to have no other purpose as a user on this site?
« Last Edit: January 04, 2019, 10:51:19 pm by Abbiebrit »

Abbiebrit

  • Guest

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
May I just highlight that the individual has another account it would appear where there are several reviews over several years despite his newbie claims.

Offline scutty brown

May I just highlight that the individual has another account it would appear where there are several reviews over several years despite his newbie claims.

He's banned now

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
Yes very pleased to see. Now if only we can take now this hate campaign of a fake review.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2019, 11:31:46 pm by Abbiebrit »

Offline HailWood

May I just highlight that the individual has another account it would appear where there are several reviews over several years despite his newbie claims.
It seems Admin agrees with you. Abbie, you come out of this sorry tale with credit IMO.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2019, 11:34:40 pm by MikeTheBike »

Abbiebrit

  • Guest

Abbiebrit

  • Guest
Ok I get you. I’m glad I persisted in defending myself now despite the various obstacles.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2019, 11:49:23 pm by Abbiebrit »

Stevensmiles

  • Guest
Wrong mate. 
All kinds of bodies get plenty of attention in the punting game.  Services count for more.
Combine excellence of the two and the girls can start charging silly money but that excellence doesn't just mean classic supermodel looks.

Spot on  :thumbsup:

Offline scutty brown

Congrats Abbie, you won.
No longer counts as a review. Not often that that happens

Offline HailWood

Congrats Abbie, you won.
No longer counts as a review. Not often that that happens
Fair result IMO and goes to show this is a fair forum if one conducts oneself in the right way.