I'll repost this
External Link/Members Only
It's hurting Russia more in terms of loss of life, but from an economy point of view not that much.
Sanctions seem to have been ineffective. Where american companies have pulled out, Russian ones have filled their place.
This isn't a pro Russian stance btw, but realistically this can go on for a long time for Russia, whereas it's spreading the finances and military resource of the West much thinner.
50k troops lost is obviously no small thing, but again, how much regard is there for that loss of life on the Russian side?
I think this was the previous point which was disputed, Russia has a long history of not giving a fuck about how many men get killed so long as they can keep finding more to replace them however it was questioned whether that is currently happening albeit not to the same extent of WW2
Where indeed does it all end
Realistically if the West / Nato had got actively involved then the shitty Russian conventional equipment and tactics would have been wiped aside, remember those 40+ mile columns of stranded Russian vehicles in the early stages, what a fucking joke
The only reason Russia wasn't wiped out (and I don't mean Russian soil I mean Russian troops in Ukraine) is the fact Putin has Nukes and if we had destroyed his conventional stuff then I guess there was a possibility he could / would have thrown his toys out the pram
So here we are sending Ukraine another trickle of weapons which won't allow them to make significant advances or to win but should help to slow the Russian advance
I would agree it does prolong the war but the only other options would be to escalate it with the West getting actively involved which could end badly for everyone or to simply roll over and let Putin take whatever he wants
I don't agree with simply rolling over and letting Putin win in exactly the same way we didn't roll over and let Hitler win
Is the West stalling for time until there is enough weapons to give Ukraine so they can actually win, basically in the same way Churchill had to wait until things were ready and let Poland get invaded
I would like to see some meaningful dialogue from Nato in the form of a solid statement that it doesn't intend to ever invade / take / capture any Russian territory whatsoever, I believe that has always actually been the case and we were never going to advance but perhaps it needs to be clarified
We would however immediately run into a problem that we would want the border to be drawn from a few years ago and possibly prior to Crimea whereas Putin would want whatever he's got now
Part of the problem here is that Putin displays a lot of the common traits that dictators have like paranoia and a deep down insecurity complex, it's hard to talk sense with these people, just like his followers on here who think he can do no wrong