WG's without a private gallery on AdultWork

[Turtle Z]

Anyone else take this as a good  sign for established profiles? It's rare to find an AW profile without a private gallery but where I do find them my experience has always been that the girls seem more focussed on service provision.

[tesla]

does not bother me, I never look at private galleries any more as I feel they are only there for income generation. If I cant tell if I want to see a WG from the main profile page then I don't bother with her

[stevedave]

The only time private galleries bother me is when the girl doesn't have a free gallery and the main profile picture/pictures aren't enough to go on. I refuse to pay for the PG's, so more often than not no free gallery results in no booking from me.

[Jimmyredcab]

I have no problem paying for a private gallery ------------ as long as it does not cost over £2, I do however expect to see a face picture which is not always the case.

[wannabe]

The only time private galleries bother me is when the girl doesn't have a free gallery and the main profile picture/pictures aren't enough to go on. I refuse to pay for the PG's, so more often than not no free gallery results in no booking from me.

Exactly the same for me.

[Redhead Lover]

To me, it looks like the profile is almost a work in progress if they've not got a PG!  Esp. if it's a new-ish profile too.  I guess if their feedback and reviews on here are up to scratch, then it's not a issue.

[vw]

Don't buy them, don't really care if they have one, the free galley is good enough for me, if not good enough I move on !

[Blackpool Rock]

Anyone else take this as a good  sign for established profiles? It's rare to find an AW profile without a private gallery but where I do find them my experience has always been that the girls seem more focussed on service provision.

I have thought this myself as logically an established girl without a PG is offering a genuine service rather than being a PG scammer etc, I actually look at no PG as raising the girls authenticity but not as much as a positive review on here from a respected punter

[Jimmyredcab]

I have thought this myself as logically an established girl without a PG is offering a genuine service rather than being a PG scammer etc.

A girl who offers a private gallery is not always a scammer.   

Sometimes they feel more confident about showing their face if it is in a private gallery.

I doubt they would get rich from PG's ---------- it helps to pay their charges to display phone number etc.

I would rather risk £1 or £2 than go on a "blind date" wild goose chase.   

[Turtle Z]

I have thought this myself as logically an established girl without a PG is offering a genuine service rather than being a PG scammer etc, I actually look at no PG as raising the girls authenticity but not as much as a positive review on here from a respected punter

Agree with JRC that it doesn't mean she's a scammer if she doesn't have a PG but if a girl has an established profile and doesn't have one then she has very little reason to be on there other than to provide a service. I think it says something about the attitude of the WG if she has no interest in putting up a private gallery.

[Jimmyredcab]

I think it says something about the attitude of the WG if she has no interest in putting up a private gallery.

Michelle Independent has a private gallery ---------------- she has 82 reviews on here, 80 of them positive. 

[Turtle Z]

Michelle Independent has a private gallery ---------------- she has 82 reviews on here, 80 of them positive. 

I think you're missing the point of this post JRC, which is not that it isn't possible for girls to have a PG and still be well reviewed.

[stevedave]

Michelle Independent has a private gallery ---------------- she has 82 reviews on here, 80 of them positive. 

While I don't doubt Michelle is a very good WG, Jimmy, your constant use of her as an example is as dull as people pointing out that James doesn't post reviews. There's no need for it.

Plenty of good WG's have private galleries, no need to point any specific ones out. Many don't either,

[Blackpool Rock]

A girl who offers a private gallery is not always a scammer.   

Sometimes they feel more confident about showing their face if it is in a private gallery.

I doubt they would get rich from PG's ---------- it helps to pay their charges to display phone number etc.

I would rather risk £1 or £2 than go on a "blind date" wild goose chase.   

Agreed JRC plenty of genuine girls with PG's to help cover the cost of displaying phone number etc but if there is no PG then logically the girl is a genuine service provider
I do occasionally subscribe to PG's if they are a reasonable cost and like others have said I expect a face pic to be included.

[Blackpool Rock]

Agree with JRC that it doesn't mean she's a scammer if she doesn't have a PG but if a girl has an established profile and doesn't have one then she has very little reason to be on there other than to provide a service. I think it says something about the attitude of the WG if she has no interest in putting up a private gallery.

Exactly

[oring123]

 a pg at a reasonable cost ie up to £3 is a good check
see before you buy
some are  much more £,s and are wg money makers 

[Horizontal pleasures]

The only problem with a private gallery other than those mentioned here - and I do not often look but sometimes I have to, to see who I might meet -  is when I find a really sickening photo and I do not know I if I should put it in the Worst Escort Picture Challenge thread from a PG?

[seward]

I have never gone for PGs as I don't want to use a credit card or buy one of those prepay cards,I can live without because Photoshop can be used a lot  on AW , and I bet there's quite a lot of it in PGs, and some just look like total scams

[Arley Hall]

Girls usually put their worst (and possibly most true-to-life) photos in their PG. That's why it can be worth investing a couple of quid to view the private pics - even when the free pics are good and show their face etc. Obviously this only applies if you're seriously considering visiting them.

[webpunter]

Girls usually put their worst (and possibly most true-to-life) photos in their PG. That's why it can be worth investing a couple of quid to view the private pics - even when the free pics are good and show their face etc. Obviously this only applies if you're seriously considering visiting them.

Very good point.  I find that real pics that i find attractive make me much more likely to make a booking.  Photoshop city is a complete non-starter for me.  I don't mind some glam type shots but it fucks me off when the PG pics are way different.  I then put the PG spend down in very worthwhile category

[webpunter]

I have never gone for PGs as I don't want to use a credit card or buy one of those prepay cards

You can pay by text on your mobile - but it costs twice as much approx