Well, I've always written truthful reviews, including where I'm easily identifiable by the activities carried out and am critical where criticism is due. Look at the recent one where I say the girl had bad breath.
Nobody said anything about no kissing? There was loads of kissing.
She wants recent tests for OWO and CIM for very good reason and I was happy to comply. I told her I expected her to reciprocate and she did. We agreed timescales and processes that we were happy with. Most girls will do these activities with no testing, so how you can say this one "clearly doesn't care about hygiene" is bizarre.
It doesn't oesnt matter what bank account I used, there's this thing in the banking industry called Know Your Customer, you can't just open a revolut or any other bank account with a made up name.
She definitely is not mentioned on any bare baking threads here. She isn't reviewed here, other than in passing in other reviews, so no one is discussing her here. That's why I thought it odd she mentioned that people were talking about her barebacking. As far as I'm aware this is the only escort review site that has any significant activity. 
I was perfectly happy with revealing my name and other details to her. She's not going to blow my life up, but she might if I review and a load of folk say I've accused her of bare backing even though I haven't. In hindsight I perhaps shouldn't have started this thread, or should have worded it differently.
To clarify I am not accusing you of lying previously I am saying that in order to leave an "anonymised" review for this SP, now that you have this thread on record, you would have to tell some "lies". Depending on just how much memorable, individual detail you'd enjoyed between you two you might have to withhold or alter what happened, including services partaken and how they were delivered. That might compromise the review, at least compared to your previous ones'.
For your previous reviews, did the girls also have your real name and bank details? That was your specific concern. Having your number tagged to your UKP id is inconvenient but manageable, having a girl know your RL personal details is a whole other thing.
The point being made is that she has more potential leverage to make things difficult for you if she decides to, regardless of the review contents. We have had SPs get upset from things said in positives that may not have even been that critical.
The point about the tests is that they are of limited comfort given incubation periods and what you and she could've gotten up to separately in the days before the tests were performed and since but before the meet. The tests would therefore miss anything in incubation or not yet active enough to trigger a positive. You get some reassurance and perhaps an HIV all clear.
Were your tests results a comprehensive list of STIs and positive or negatives for each or did she ask you to be tested for specific ones?
I'm not talking about BB threads on this site. There are plenty of active sites with reviews on.
My bank card only lists my initials and surname, so even if an SP were to glimpse it, she wouldn't get my exact identity. The transaction record for a transfer lists account no., sort code and whatever you choose to state as a reference, it doesn't necessarily reveal the full name of the account holder. Setting up a separate account to punt from removes the transactions from your personal account and also keeps the SPs at least one step away from your real life. The bank/provider you set up the account/prepaid card with will know whatever personal credentials you register with but those details are not disclosed to any payee.
