Minge profile photos

[kiltedviking]

Is it just me or are AW profile photos that have close ups of their minge a bit gross (not to mention crass and a bit desperate)?

I love a figure shot,  face shot or if they have to do a close up,  make it the boobs ,  but a slimy looking fanny turns me right off.

I know I'm browsing a site where I'm picking a girl to pay for sex (or her time if the coppers are reading) but have a little class eh ladies?

Anyway,  rant over,  just wondered what other guys views were on this topic.

[Hank Moody]

Is it just me or are AW profile photos that have close ups of their minge a bit gross (not to mention crass and a bit desperate)?

I love a figure shot,  face shot or if they have to do a close up,  make it the boobs ,  but a slimy looking fanny turns me right off.

I know I'm browsing a site where I'm picking a girl to pay for sex (or her time if the coppers are reading) but have a little class eh ladies?

Anyway,  rant over,  just wondered what other guys views were on this topic.

I know what you mean but I have mixed views on this. For me one of the most exciting things about the first time with a new girl (either WG or civvy) is when you peel off those panties for the first time and see whats underneath. Profile pics take away that thrill. On the other hand when you are paying a large amount of cash for an hour or two of fun and you discover it looks like roadkill you can end up with a serious case of buyer's remorse  If there are pussy pics on view I will generally have a little look as it can be a deal breaker for me.

[kiltedviking]

Fair point mate,  don't want to be staring at failed surgical procedure when I've paid my money,  just don't want it on the main profile photo.

[Hank Moody]

Ah yeah, I see what you mean. That is a bit tacky.

[rider10]

As long as there's a pic showing her figure as well it doesn't matter too much to me. If she only has close up photos than I'd be asking why she doesn't want you to see more of her. A close up of her pussy doesn't tell you much about her body type or likely personality.

[SirFrank]

It generally does little for me. I'd rather leave a bit to the imagination

[pking_paul]

I like to see full figure really, but a glimpse of pussy is a good thing too.

[Jimmyredcab]

Is it just me or are AW profile photos that have close ups of their minge a bit gross .

I want to see their face not their pussy.   

[Anadin]

I want to see what I'm paying for, the more the better. That's why I like pornstars and camgirls.

[WHBStoke]

To be fair, who wouldn't enjoy looking a picture like the one on this profile?

External Link/Members Only

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

I'm glad Scarlette in Bristol doesn't show hers on her profile.

[lostandfound]

Don't mind them myself. If I'm thinking of booking a provider then I like to see the works.

[Cuntminion]

I like a pretty / cute face does not have to be sexually provocative

Minge shots are actually the last thing I want to see on a profile

[Grumbleguts]

Pussy is like fish, better with batter on,looks and tastes better Not a fan of selfie shadowy pussy shots myself, best left to the imagination

[Cuntminion]

To be fair, who wouldn't enjoy looking a picture like the one on this profile?

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[CatBBW]

Minge shots on main profile pics are SUPPOSED to be not allowed on AW. What AW actually say and do are 2 different things though.

I had a MOUTH picture removed from my main profile because the word "orgasm" was in the pic description. Not allowed.

[Hank Moody]

To be fair, who wouldn't enjoy looking a picture like the one on this profile?

External Link/Members Only

Christ on a bike!!  Makes you wonder what's in the Private Gallery!

[lostandfound]

I'm glad Scarlette in Bristol doesn't show hers on her profile.

Though it might have saved you the cost of a punt with her?

[hattiejacques]

It's incredible how nice some fannie's look and also how bad other fannies look.

Back in the day I dated a redhead that had a fanny that looked like an aerial photo of the battle of The Somme. Plus it smelt nauseating. Probably mustard gas.  Sacked her off double quick. Mind you I've no doubt our bits look every bit as daft to women.

 Not sure how I feel about mines for profile pictures. Does seem a bit lacking in class.

[nike]

Don't mind them myself. If I'm thinking of booking a provider then I like to see the works.

+1

When ur paying for the goods , it's good to see what ur getting before u buy.

[RedKettle]

+1

When ur paying for the goods , it's good to see what ur getting before u buy.

I get that and agree - bloody annoying when there is only 1 photo and in that she is dressed!!  But a full on photo just of that is not needed IMO and if there should be tucked away in the gallery.

[Donnie69]

I think a full on pussy shot is almost essential.  I want to see what I'm getting.

[Cuntminion]

I think a full on pussy shot is almost essential.  I want to see what I'm getting.

Oh god your one of those ebay cunts that ask for a dozen extra photos and still don't buy aren't you?

[Hank Moody]

It's incredible how nice some fannie's look and also how bad other fannies look.

Back in the day I dated a redhead that had a fanny that looked like an aerial photo of the battle of The Somme. Plus it smelt nauseating. Probably mustard gas.  Sacked her off double quick. Mind you I've no doubt our bits look every bit as daft to women.

 Not sure how I feel about mines for profile pictures. Does seem a bit lacking in class.

 

[kiltedviking]

I've never found fannies to be at all attractive,  so seeing photos of them never done anything for me.

That said I'm sure a lot of women don't care for the site of my aging, wrinkley fella.

[lostandfound]

Clearly some punters don't like pussy photos included in main gallery. What's worse from my perspective is looking in PG expecting to see pussy and tits and ass - not necessarily in close up - but not coyly hidden, and finding the PG photos are no more explicit than those in the public gallery. The visuals during a punt are pornographic and important to me both during the punt and as a memory I take away with me. I want the galleries to show me what to expect before I go see a provider for the first time.

[Gordon Bennett]

Holy grail for me is a normally posed full length body shot that accurately portrays their figure. All the close up shots of tits, arse, fanny, feet etc are just pointless and useless. I think all the close ups are a way of hiding fact they are saggy, fleshy or wrinkly.

[Hank Moody]

Clearly some punters don't like pussy photos included in main gallery. What's worse from my perspective is looking in PG expecting to see pussy and tits and ass - not necessarily in close up - but not coyly hidden, and finding the PG photos are no more explicit than those in the public gallery. The visuals during a punt are pornographic and important to me both during the punt and as a memory I take away with me. I want the galleries to show me what to expect before I go see a provider for the first time.

That is it in a nutshell for me. Nothing worse than paying for PG and seeing nothing that gives you any extra information but I do like to get a general idea of what I should expect when I get there. It's also really helpful if you are struggling to make a decision between a number of lovely girls for your next punt. Maybe that's just my preference though because a lot of my biggest turn-ons are visual.

[JimmySW]

To be fair, who wouldn't enjoy looking a picture like the one on this profile?

External Link/Members Only

And she has 782 photos in her public gallery, 1599 in her private gallery, been a member of AW since April 2013, does A levels CIM and everything else so why hasn't she got any reviews? Oh hang on it must be the £350 a bloody hour! I know it's London and she does it all including squirting but isn't that a bit steep for AW?

[unclepokey]

I'm sorry but I'm a fan of meaty piss flaps. There's a woman just up the M1 from me that has some of the biggest in the world so that's lovely for me.
As to photos thereof on AW all I can say is 'if you've got it, flaunt it' You might get a new customer.
Uncle Pokey

[howrude]

I also like to leave something to the imagination, so I prefer front-bottoms to be covered. In the same way, I like the pictured to be revealing so I can see what the girl is like. But I do prefer bulging cleavage photos that nearly reveal the nipples or a girl with their tits out but the nipples covered to bare tits. Or a girl bent right down with skimpy knickers to a bare bottom. There's something just that little bit more sexy about it.

Then again I do like to collect profile photos of the girls I've seen so a few total revealing ones are good in that way.

[MrBond]

I've noticed the latest trend in private galleries seems to be things inserted inside, namely vegetables and even a sky remote in one... not attractive to me!

[nike]

I've noticed the latest trend in private galleries seems to be things inserted inside, namely vegetables and even a sky remote in one... not attractive to me!

I wonder if that's an extra charge or is it included in the premium sky package. 
I agree,  I  like the vagina to be reasonably tight,  if you can shove stuff that size up there,  my modest pecker isn't going to touch the sides.

[lewisjones23]

Very much a fan of small neat pussys so I look out on AW for any pictures

Really dislike big flappy fannys - so much so that i've not had repeat bookings with a girl because of them