I do recall being in Diplomat parlour once in Sheffield however (this was relatively recently) and there was a stunner there. I didn't choose her though because she looked miserable.
That happened to me once and I definitely made the right decision. Whilst the other girl wasn't as hot looks wise, she was amazing in the room, and soon after quite a few reports appeared about the miserable girl which were all negative.
I don't get why this kind of topic comes up so often though, surely after years of reading punting boards you guys must know that men can't be generalised when it comes to the women they fancy. Sure, the majority probably go for slim, busty 18-25 year olds, but not everyone does. Hell, some 18 year old's fancy 60 year olds, which makes no sense to me, but if they do, who cares? And why slag off so many women who are visually unappealing to you all the time and refuse to believe there's a market for such women, when loads of reports from trusted punters prove otherwise? I mean, do you get a kick out of writing nasty stuff about these women? And if not, why do you do it over and over again?