posting personal pics

[SwenyTodd]

What's the rules regarding posting pics of WGs which they've sent privately?
Is it bad form or does it help others verify they are genuine as the pics will be different to what you see on their profile?

[Paul31]

Personally I would say it’s something I wouldn’t do as the girl has sent this to you

[Hectorshouse]

ST - I would think it may be bad form to publicize them, as she gave you them privately - she must trust you to do such a thing.

I know what you are trying to do, give more information so we can make a choice.

In my view, just confirm that the WG is indeed a true reflection of her profile, without the private pics being shown.

Can I ask who is it?

[wannabe]

Agree with the posts above. Don't post pics here or elsewhere that have been sent to you privately. The woman has a right to maintain her privacy if she wants to. If you post pics
you are outing her, which could cause problems with her family, employer, friends etc. She could end up quitting escorting which defeats the purpose of this forum.

It could even put her in physical danger from a partner.

Instead you can describe her looks here, compare her to celebs she may resemble, and let us know if pics on her profile are accurate.

[arrow0404]

If the WG allowed you to take pics .. would it be ok to post ?  Or does it fall under the same category as the OP post ?

[Bogof60]

If the WG allowed you to take pics .. would it be ok to post ?  Or does it fall under the same category as the OP post ?

No
Its a cunts trick

[wannabe]

It's never OK to post pics unless the wg has agreed that you can.

The whole way this hobby operates is that we keep things private, we expect wg's to be discrete and they expect the same from us.

Posting pics without the girls agreement will just fuck things up for all of us in the long run.

I'm amazed we keep getting questions like this.

[lewisjones23]

from what i gather

if the WG has posted it on AW or a personal website then Admin is fine with it being posted

pictures gained from research in to a WG’s private life arent

happy to be corrected

[OakTree]

If she’s sent them you privately then it comes down to wether you care or not. She’s not your friend, colleague or neighbor and some might argue more fool her then. It really comes down to your conscience. You don’t really need to ask on here wether it’s ok to post pics she’s privately sent you. You have a moral compass, go by that.

[Blackpool Rock]

OK so regarding privacy the site rules state-

- Privacy of service providers
It is not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles. Hotels used by service providers may not be named. General description of incall locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers or street names or postcodes. Linking porn work is allowed. Modelling work is also allowed depending on circumstance, e.g. face pics showing on both prostitution profile and modelling profile. News items may be posted depending on circumstances (e.g. criminality). Previous working names are never censored, regardless of reasons (see below for more). Objections from service providers to any privacy-related info will need to be raised with Admin for consideration.

I think it's still open to interpretation slightly however i'd say that if her face pic is available on her profile or even in an AW PG that you have subscribed to then it's fine to post.
In your case however if she has sent you a private pic which isn't freely available or advertised then i'd say it was bad form to post it

[arrow0404]

OK so regarding privacy the site rules state-

- Privacy of service providers
It is not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles. Hotels used by service providers may not be named. General description of incall locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers or street names or postcodes. Linking porn work is allowed. Modelling work is also allowed depending on circumstance, e.g. face pics showing on both prostitution profile and modelling profile. News items may be posted depending on circumstances (e.g. criminality). Previous working names are never censored, regardless of reasons (see below for more). Objections from service providers to any privacy-related info will need to be raised with Admin for consideration.

I think it's still open to interpretation slightly however i'd say that if her face pic is available on her profile or even in an AW PG that you have subscribed to then it's fine to post.
In your case however if she has sent you a private pic which isn't freely available or advertised then i'd say it was bad form to post it

This would also include her WhatsApp profile pic if she has one.
I guess there are grey areas.

[Corus Boy]

I do really wonder sometimes!

The OP asks what the 'rules' are?

Stuff the rules, to me, common sense and respect do not need rules.

A WG sends you private pictures, lets you take some photos for your own memories, they are 'PRIVATE'  really it's as simple as that.

From their website, from an AW profile or another hooker site, that's in the public domain and although there are copywrite rules.

From what I would call public sites or those not connected with her business, personal Facebook page etc, that's their private life and that's where they should stay.

If you think differently that's fine but take a moment and consider how you would feel if a SP found your Facebook page and posted your pictures on UKE or SAAFE or even used them on her profile for some strange reason.

[mrhappypants]

Yep four points based on my experience of Admin’s editing.

Stuff that a WG publishes on her profile is and remains free for reproduction even if she later removes it.  Once it is out it is out.  Someone I reviewed has made repeated attempts to get the photos she published in her public gallery removed from my review as she has put them in a private gallery.

Admin has removed a verification picture others added to my review.  I now suspect this was sent privately and never published on the profile.

On the general point, this is an anonymous activity and helps no-one if we don’t respect that and the privacy of providers and other punters.

On a specific - Please ALWAYS edit out the identifying details if you publish a veri pic that includes an identity card / passport.

[bushman]

Personal pics = Personal. 

[itk]

What's the rules regarding posting pics of WGs which they've sent privately?
Is it bad form or does it help others verify they are genuine as the pics will be different to what you see on their profile?

What’s with you wanting to keep posting private pics? You’ve already done this on the SA thread after one SB had sent you private pics on What’s App.
If the pics are sent privately then they shouldn’t be posted here imo

[finn5555]

What's the rules regarding posting pics of WGs which they've sent privately?
Is it bad form or does it help others verify they are genuine as the pics will be different to what you see on their profile?

Ask yourself this would you be happy with her posting your personal pics on saafe for instance