Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: delusional escorts  (Read 3366 times)

Offline sirloverman

So she is 4 ft11 41 years of age that hides her face.
Yet, she calls herself a Goddess and charges £2000 per hour.
Escorts are becoming delusional.

External Link/Members Only

Online southcoastpunter

she is a cammer not an Escort - unless someone really wants to pay a silly amount for her! that is her way of making sure no-one actually books her as an Escort!

Lets not have another thread on prices - especially listing girls we think charge too much as we would have pages and pages of them . if someone isn't for you (whether price or other reason) just move on and choose someone else!

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
How novel yet another thread about prices.  :wacko:

OP learn to read the profiles and understand how they work before starting threads. She has 373 feedbacks but not one for escort meets, they are all for direct cam or direct chat. In fact there isn't even a section for escort feedback.

She does NOT escort, she has ticked the escort box so she shows up in more searches in the hope of attracting more cam bookings but puts a high escort rate to stop people trying to book.

However at the end of the day they can charge what they like and if you can't afford the price they want move on to one you can afford.

Edit

Her face doesn't look very hidden to me?



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 30, 2023, 09:09:45 am by daviemac »

Offline Colston36

she is a cammer not an Escort - unless someone really wants to pay a silly amount for her! that is her way of making sure no-one actually books her as an Escort!

Lets not have another thread on prices - especially listing girls we think charge too much as we would have pages and pages of them . if someone isn't for you (whether price or other reason) just move on and choose someone else!

Exactly. If you're walking down the street you don't start moaning if you see something that's too dear for you. You find what you can afford. Why so many witter on here if they can't afford some pussy is a mystery. There are whole pointless threads about it.

Offline Stevelondon

Exactly. If you're walking down the street you don't start moaning if you see something that's too dear for you. You find what you can afford. Why so many witter on here if they can't afford some pussy is a mystery. There are whole pointless threads about it.

Sorry to go off topic here. But thanks for that Colston.
Not enough use of words like “dear” as far as I’m concerned.
In this context I mean.
These younger blokes would have said expensive. Not nearly as good a word as far as I’m concerned 😂


Online scutty brown

"of TheLondonGems_"

is also a very big clue that she doesn't escort

Offline hairdownthere

So she is 4 ft11 41 years of age that hides her face.
Yet, she calls herself a Goddess and charges £2000 per hour.
Escorts are becoming delusional.

External Link/Members Only

I cant see a single photo where her face has been hidden, and since she has not logged on since the 27th, that would have been the case when you looked.

Specsavers?

Its also clear she doesn't escort

Offline sirloverman

In retrospect I have many flawed observations and point was expressed poorly. but, the fact that she doesn't escort and has those prices proves my point.

Even if she her face does show in some pictures, she is still 4ft11 and 41 years old calling herself a Goddess charging £2000 per hour this is delusional in my opinion and I'm wondering what is this indicative of in general.

Imagine If a former boxer at 41 years old who has never boxed outside of York hall, called himself a god after knocking out 2 drunks in Leicester square. Then decided to try and go pro, to fight heavyweight just because he is fit, big and can fight. This behaviour is delusional and we would critique his choices. I see the sex market in a similar way.

Personally, I am doing ok financially and can keep up with the higher prices in general but those that can't will not be able to punt and most likely have little opportunities sexually in the real world too .

The point is,  this thread was meant to raise the concern that we could be going through an era where all areas of sex work are approached with a findom attitude and the residue of this attitude is seeping it's way out of findom and into camming, stripping and escorting.

This is an observation.



 

Offline Cheshuk

In retrospect I have many flawed observations and point was expressed poorly. but, the fact that she doesn't escort and has those prices proves my point.

Even if she her face does show in some pictures, she is still 4ft11 and 41 years old calling herself a Goddess charging £2000 per hour this is delusional in my opinion and I'm wondering what is this indicative of in general.

Imagine If a former boxer at 41 years old who has never boxed outside of York hall, called himself a god after knocking out 2 drunks in Leicester square. Then decided to try and go pro, to fight heavyweight just because he is fit, big and can fight. This behaviour is delusional and we would critique his choices. I see the sex market in a similar way.

Personally, I am doing ok financially and can keep up with the higher prices in general but those that can't will not be able to punt and most likely have little opportunities sexually in the real world too .

The point is,  this thread was meant to raise the concern that we could be going through an era where all areas of sex work are approached with a findom attitude and the residue of this attitude is seeping it's way out of findom and into camming, stripping and escorting.

This is an observation.
 

theres tons of these profiles, more analogous a guy who doesn't fight being saying he'd fight Ngannou for way over his worth

your point contradicts itself, the fact she doesn't escort proves your point about escorts??

fwiw was reading this the other day, not unique to hookers overestimating their hotness

External Link/Members Only

Offline hendrix

In retrospect I have many flawed observations and point was expressed poorly. but, the fact that she doesn't escort and has those prices proves my point.

Even if she her face does show in some pictures, she is still 4ft11 and 41 years old calling herself a Goddess charging £2000 per hour this is delusional in my opinion and I'm wondering what is this indicative of in general.

Imagine If a former boxer at 41 years old who has never boxed outside of York hall, called himself a god after knocking out 2 drunks in Leicester square. Then decided to try and go pro, to fight heavyweight just because he is fit, big and can fight. This behaviour is delusional and we would critique his choices. I see the sex market in a similar way.

Personally, I am doing ok financially and can keep up with the higher prices in general but those that can't will not be able to punt and most likely have little opportunities sexually in the real world too .

The point is,  this thread was meant to raise the concern that we could be going through an era where all areas of sex work are approached with a findom attitude and the residue of this attitude is seeping it's way out of findom and into camming, stripping and escorting.

This is an observation.



 

It's simply to deter people from asking her to escort when she clearly doesn't. Nothing delusional about that at all. Even if she was escorting at £2k, what's delusional about any escort setting a price that they believe can get? If they can't command £2k, they'd have to drop the price. This is basic stuff.

I charge the maximum I can get for my work, why wouldn't anyone else?

Offline GingerNuts

I charge the maximum I can get for my work, why wouldn't anyone else?

Because charging the maximum you can get doesn't necessarily result in the best income.

Offline hendrix

Because charging the maximum you can get doesn't necessarily result in the best income.

Sure, and that's a choice/calculation you make. The point is that you maximise your income however *you* see fit. The market will let you know if you got it wrong!

Offline GingerNuts

Sure, and that's a choice/calculation you make. The point is that you maximise your income however *you* see fit. The market will let you know if you got it wrong!

The point is there are reasons not to charge the maximum you can get for your work.

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
In retrospect I have many flawed observations and point was expressed poorly. but, the fact that she doesn't escort and has those prices proves my point.

Even if she her face does show in some pictures, she is still 4ft11 and 41 years old calling herself a Goddess charging £2000 per hour this is delusional in my opinion and I'm wondering what is this indicative of in general.

Imagine If a former boxer at 41 years old who has never boxed outside of York hall, called himself a god after knocking out 2 drunks in Leicester square. Then decided to try and go pro, to fight heavyweight just because he is fit, big and can fight. This behaviour is delusional and we would critique his choices. I see the sex market in a similar way.

Personally, I am doing ok financially and can keep up with the higher prices in general but those that can't will not be able to punt and most likely have little opportunities sexually in the real world too .

The point is,  this thread was meant to raise the concern that we could be going through an era where all areas of sex work are approached with a findom attitude and the residue of this attitude is seeping it's way out of findom and into camming, stripping and escorting.

This is an observation.
 
What part of she isn't an escort do you not understand?  :dash:  She hasn't even got a section to post escort feedback. She is purely a webcammer who is advertising to as wider audience that she can.

Apart from that people moaning about escort prices has been done to death on here then it's been done to death again and to top it off done to death loads more times. It's boring mate, escorts can charge what they want and punters can pay what they want, punt with those you can afford.

Have to say one thing this escort's advertising strategy is working spot on, she's got you advertising on her behalf.  :wacko:
« Last Edit: September 30, 2023, 03:51:42 pm by daviemac »

Offline jamiekinkxxx

The point is there are reasons not to charge the maximum you can get for your work.

Quite frankly that comment is bollocks. I charge the max I can for the services I offer, why would I not?  :unknown:

« Last Edit: September 30, 2023, 03:42:16 pm by jamiekinkxxx »

Offline Doc Holliday

I'm also struggling with the concept that somebody under 5 feet tall should be in a different 'price band' to someone who is maybe much taller?

Offline hendrix

The point is there are reasons not to charge the maximum you can get for your work.

Crack on!  :thumbsup:

Offline hairdownthere

In retrospect I have many flawed observations and point was expressed poorly. but, the fact that she doesn't escort and has those prices proves my point.

Even if she her face does show in some pictures, she is still 4ft11 and 41 years old calling herself a Goddess charging £2000 per hour this is delusional in my opinion and I'm wondering what is this indicative of in general.

Imagine If a former boxer at 41 years old who has never boxed outside of York hall, called himself a god after knocking out 2 drunks in Leicester square. Then decided to try and go pro, to fight heavyweight just because he is fit, big and can fight. This behaviour is delusional and we would critique his choices. I see the sex market in a similar way.

Personally, I am doing ok financially and can keep up with the higher prices in general but those that can't will not be able to punt and most likely have little opportunities sexually in the real world too

The point is,  this thread was meant to raise the concern that we could be going through an era where all areas of sex work are approached with a findom attitude and the residue of this attitude is seeping it's way out of findom and into camming, stripping and escorting.

This is an observation.
 

So because she's under 5 foot and over 40 she should change her name to 'short arsed old bint'?  She can call herself whatever she wants, and charge whatever she wants, she might believe she's a goddess, and if she does, so what?  Some people might think she's a goddess too.  So what?

Your review is for an SP called GreatestNicola, I've looked at her profile and whilst I would punt with her, she's certainly not the greatest Nicola I've ever seen or known.  Should I message her and  tell her that she's delusional and that she should change her name to 'NotReallyGreatestNicola' and tell her to lower her prices because I saw a much greater Nicola at 70hh?

Saying that those who cant afford to punt have less sex in general is a lot of utter shite.

Your findom comment is shite too, no-one who is seeking sexual services is forced into financial domination, a person chooses to do that.



Offline contentguy


fwiw was reading this the other day, not unique to hookers overestimating their hotness

External Link/Members Only

Dunning Kruger Effect applied to attraction perhaps.


Offline jesse4585

The point is there are reasons not to charge the maximum you can get for your work.
True. There's dozens of such reasons.
Such as wanting to give good value. Or a sense of fairness where you want to see other people have a good livelihood too, not always wanting to take a big share of their pie just as random market forces have given you a strong position.

It's been widely known for decades that free market ideas like 'Rational choice theory' / 'utility maximisation'  etc don't predict how most people behave out in the real world.  In fairness to Jamie & Hendrix, people do act in accordance with rational choice in certain markets, and there's quite a few traders & bankers in London much more successful than a soft touch like myself, who seem to think rational choice explains everything.


Online southcoastpunter

as you saying jesse4585 that in your opinion, most trades people do not charge at the higher end of what they think they can get in their local area/market? Because i think that most electricians, plumbers etc do excactly that!! And whilst as a customer i don't like it, i can't really blame them!

Offline jesse4585

Saying that those who cant afford to punt have less sex in general is a lot of utter shite.
Maybe in some parts of the world it is.   But sirLoverman  is correct if we're talking about the English speaking world.  I dont have a link to hand for UK, but the situation state side  is quite similar - here's a 2023 report on 60% of young US men not being in relationships, compared to only 30% of young women.   External Link/Members Only

Granted, there's always going to be some poor but really good looking guys who get a lot of sex. And sure, a few who are neither rich nor attractive are ok due to charm, good luck, "Love is blind" reasons etc.  But generally blokes too poor to punt dont do well with civvies either. This has been well studied, look up "sex recession" to see more on the fact  less people are having sex. The increasingly large proportion of young women dating (& sugar babeing) older men while leaving young men single aren't doing it as they find baldness & wrinkles more appealing!

Your findom comment is shite too
I though it was interesting. Not a big part of the picture, but the attitude may be seeping into FS , camming etc like SirLover says . Findom is  a more well known thing these days.  As is the fact that some lasses now make 500k / year + as sex workers.  It's less well known that it can only be possible for a tiny minority to make that kind of money. There probably is some 'delusional' thinking going on, part of the reason why WG prices seem to be increasing even more than inflation. (At least I know they are here in London at certain agencies).

All this is not to say society is changing to be benefit of women at the expense of men, i dont think that at all, but it does look that way if you look just at certain parts of the sex industry.


Offline jesse4585

as you saying jesse4585 that in your opinion, most trades people do not charge at the higher end of what they think they can get in their local area/market?
I not go as far as to say most no. One hears stories of them occasionally giving dicounts or even pro bono to people in needs, but  have to admit most plumbers & builders are like you say.

It would be really interesting to know if WGs are increasingly starting to have the same attitude. I kind of think it's became more common than it used to be. But maybe prices are going up for many other reasons including the internet making everyone more aware of the going rate...

Online akauya

Oh goody, a thread about prices. I was getting withdrawal symptoms - we haven't had one for about a week!!


Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline sirloverman

So because she's under 5 foot and over 40 she should change her name to 'short arsed old bint'?  She can call herself whatever she wants, and charge whatever she wants, she might believe she's a goddess, and if she does, so what?  Some people might think she's a goddess too.  So what?

Your review is for an SP called GreatestNicola, I've looked at her profile and whilst I would punt with her, she's certainly not the greatest Nicola I've ever seen or known.  Should I message her and  tell her that she's delusional and that she should change her name to 'NotReallyGreatestNicola' and tell her to lower her prices because I saw a much greater Nicola at 70hh?

Saying that those who cant afford to punt have less sex in general is a lot of utter shite.

Your findom comment is shite too, no-one who is seeking sexual services is forced into financial domination, a person chooses to do that.

The greatest nicola does not charge £2000 per hour and she has a great ass.

I agree, Calling herself the "greatest" is not indicative of humility. I will give her a good spanking when I see her next.  :drinks:

Offline sirloverman

Maybe in some parts of the world it is.   But sirLoverman  is correct if we're talking about the English speaking world.  I dont have a link to hand for UK, but the situation state side  is quite similar - here's a 2023 report on 60% of young US men not being in relationships, compared to only 30% of young women.   External Link/Members Only

Granted, there's always going to be some poor but really good looking guys who get a lot of sex. And sure, a few who are neither rich nor attractive are ok due to charm, good luck, "Love is blind" reasons etc.  But generally blokes too poor to punt dont do well with civvies either. This has been well studied, look up "sex recession" to see more on the fact  less people are having sex. The increasingly large proportion of young women dating (& sugar babeing) older men while leaving young men single aren't doing it as they find baldness & wrinkles more appealing!
I though it was interesting. Not a big part of the picture, but the attitude may be seeping into FS , camming etc like SirLover says . Findom is  a more well known thing these days.  As is the fact that some lasses now make 500k / year + as sex workers.  It's less well known that it can only be possible for a tiny minority to make that kind of money. There probably is some 'delusional' thinking going on, part of the reason why WG prices seem to be increasing even more than inflation. (At least I know they are here in London at certain agencies).

All this is not to say society is changing to be benefit of women at the expense of men, i dont think that at all, but it does look that way if you look just at certain parts of the sex industry.

 :thumbsup:  :drinks:

Online scutty brown

Maybe in some parts of the world it is.   But sirLoverman  is correct if we're talking about the English speaking world.  I dont have a link to hand for UK, but the situation state side  is quite similar - here's a 2023 report on 60% of young US men not being in relationships, compared to only 30% of young women.   External Link/Members Only


Look at that more critically, it means 70% of young women are in a relationship, while only 40% of young men are.
Assuming a 1:1 ratio of the sexes, that means either 30% of young women are shagging older men (hard luck on older women). Or..........30% of younger women are in a relationship with a bloke who's two-timing them.
Or, as is most likely, the stats are total bunkum

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Oh goody, a thread about prices. I was getting withdrawal symptoms - we haven't had one for about a week!!


Hidden Image/Members Only

Me too!  :D

Offline jesse4585

Look at that more critically.
With pleasure Scutty!

Those stats are consistent with dozens of other studies over the past decade or so. Many of them are in Japanease, long been one of the worst places in the world for young male virginity. But here's some other stats from the a study released in 2019 by the United States' National Opinion Research Center (NORC) - they did a really big rigorous study.

Between 2008 -  2018, the number of men under 30 who said they'd not had sex at all in the last year rose about 30x faster than it did for young women!  (And in total, 28% of under 30 year old men reported no sex in the last year by 2018.)
External Link/Members Only

It's also a well know thing from life experience. I'd eat my hat if one of the younger more switched on punters here (e.g. Payyourwaymate) denies that dating has become much harder for young men in recent years. One of the causes for increased demand for WGs, unlikely to be helping with prices in most areas.

(hard luck on older women)
Agree with this - one of several reasons why these underlying social changes seem to  hurt women as well as young men.
It's maybe even more interesting to consider reasons why young women in particular may not be benefiting.  If you look at the 2023 article I posted before, it says one of the reasons for more lasses dating than lads, is that young women are increasingly dating themselves!

As you likely know, it used to be the case that men were more often found in same sex relationships.  The basic biological fact that folk with a strong preference for homosexual relationships are more likely to be men is unlikely to have changed. But what has changed is that young women these days are less likely to be directly economically dependent on men. And as the article says, they may be choosing same sex relationships as they can't find young men who are good on the emotional side.

While I'd say most of the reason for the imbalance is lasses dating older men,  there do seem to some young women missing out on their own ideal sexual preferences, just so they can find someone who's good with their emotions.  In a way you have to feel bad for young men. On the one hand their hearing nonsense from ultra feminists. On the other, they're getting fed nonsense by grifters in the manosphere, and being misled by too much porn and overly compliant AI girlfriends.

Thank the Emperor for UKpunting where at least members try to tell the truth about sexual matters for the benefit of other punters, without ulterior motive.

Online akauya

With pleasure Scutty!

Those stats are consistent with dozens of other studies over the past decade or so. Many of them are in Japanease, long been one of the worst places in the world for young male virginity. But here's some other stats from the a study released in 2019 by the United States' National Opinion Research Center (NORC) - they did a really big rigorous study.

Between 2008 -  2018, the number of men under 30 who said they'd not had sex at all in the last year rose about 30x faster than it did for young women!  (And in total, 28% of under 30 year old men reported no sex in the last year by 2018.)
External Link/Members Only

It's also a well know thing from life experience. I'd eat my hat if one of the younger more switched on punters here (e.g. Payyourwaymate) denies that dating has become much harder for young men in recent years. One of the causes for increased demand for WGs, unlikely to be helping with prices in most areas.
Agree with this - one of several reasons why these underlying social changes seem to  hurt women as well as young men.
It's maybe even more interesting to consider reasons why young women in particular may not be benefiting. If you look at the 2023 article I posted before, it says one of the reasons for more lasses dating than lads, is that young women are increasingly dating themselves!

As you likely know, it used to be the case that men were more often found in same sex relationships.  The basic biological fact that folk with a strong preference for homosexual relationships are more likely to be men is unlikely to have changed. But what has changed is that young women these days are less likely to be directly economically dependent on men. And as the article says, they may be choosing same sex relationships as they can't find young men who are good on the emotional side.

While I'd say most of the reason for the imbalance is lasses dating older men,  there do seem to some young women missing out on their own ideal sexual preferences, just so they can find someone who's good with their emotions.  In a way you have to feel bad for young men. On the one hand their hearing nonsense from ultra feminists. On the other, they're getting fed nonsense by grifters in the manosphere, and being misled by too much porn and overly compliant AI girlfriends.

Thank the Emperor for UKpunting where at least members try to tell the truth about sexual matters for the benefit of other punters, without ulterior motive.

I think you're conflating several issues but I would like to comment on the bit I highlighted. I read the article you mentioned in your earlier post and I think you misread what it says.

The Hill:
"Some of them are dating each other. One-fifth of Generation Z identifies as queer, and research suggests bisexual women make up a large share of the young-adult queer community."


That doesn't say women are increasingly dating themselves. It's merely stating that about 20% of women identify as queer. When you say "women are increasingly dating themselves!" (including the exclamation mark) you are suggesting that women "decide" to become queer and date themselves rather than men. People (men and women) don't suddenly decide to become gay. They are born that way. I can believe some bisexual women could decide to no longer date men but I would suggest the numbers are so few that would probably not make much difference to the overall statistics.

My one criticism of this article, and many others touching similar subjects, is the clickbaity approach to it. They sensationalise the statistics and put a negative slant on it. This kind of articles are picked up by some impressionable young men who may be having problems engaging with women thereby creating a sense of victimhood.

Articles like this, although great in the purpose of identifying current societal trends can, inadvertently, create resentment among some men. Basically the slant some men can take is "women aren't dating us anymore" so it's their fault we are not getting sex. You yourself misrepresented the article (I'm guessing you did not do that on purpose) so this is easy pickings for the Red Pill brigade and expand on this kind of articles and show them as proof of something nefarious and how "men are under attack".

Basically by highlighting the difficulties some men suffer, articles like this one may unintentionally drive some men to online incel forums, where they will, more than likely, receive some sort of affirmation and a feeling of belonging. It would be more beneficial for everyone if articles like this would propose that we should not view this a wholly negative trend, but more like a positive societal evolution.

They can easily balance out the message by showing that single young men may be shifting towards greater individual freedom and autonomy in their choices - just as modern women are able to do nowadays. Instead of inadvertently causing gender division, they could emphasise how women's empowerment is a great step towards gender equality, rather than viewed as removing men from the equation (women are not dating themselves). One thing that the article didn't touch on is the fact that not all single people are lonely or disconnected; many people, both men and women, choose to be single for personal reasons or to focus on their careers and personal development - surely that's a good thing.

Also, do we know how many of those young people not having sex actually want to have sex? There is this thing called asexuality after all.

Lastly, I would suggest that rather than women being the major problem here (by supposedly not wanting sex with men) it's just one of the problems young men face towards their self esteem. A bigger problem, in my opinion, is men themselves. We, men, tend to boast about everything, we boast about having better jobs/cars, better this, better that, how many women we slept with (supposedly), we tend to do that a lot - how much of the boasting is true though? How many of the reviews include a lot of embellishment of our sexual prowess with sex workers I wonder? We celebrate and promote porn, sometimes extreme kinds of porn. When young men show some kind of insecurities we tell them to "man up", "grow a pair", etc. When young men want to talk about their insecurities and fears we don't listen to them. Don't be a pussy, we tell them. We like to show that we are Alpha males (we pretend to at least) and that they should be Alpha too.  That attitude certainly doesn't help young men who are finding it difficult to engage socially or romantically with women or just trying to find their place in society.

Sadly, us "normal" older men are not listening to young men, but have you noticed who is listening to them? Yep, the Red Pill brigade with their warped version of how male/female relationship "should" work.


Offline Bertiebeenthere

Sorry for sounding thick, but what is "the red pill brigade"?


Online akauya

Thanks for that Doc but I think this is a better article explaining the Red Pill movement in its current form:

External Link/Members Only

 :hi:

Offline Doc Holliday

Thanks for that Doc but I think this is a better article explaining the Red Pill movement in its current form:

External Link/Members Only

 :hi:

Thanks for that.

I actually went down a bit of a rabbit hole myself a good while ago, when this topic was being discussed. This was out of interest only though and it was partly triggered by my perception (rightly or wrongly) that there were more and more younger men participating on punting forums over the last two decades and during the existence of such platforms.

Touching on some of the points you raised in your initial post, data from questionnaires is always problematic and the principle of 'the answer will be highly dependent on how the question is asked' holds true.
When asking people how much sex they are having, then there is a known tendency for them not to be truthful irrespective of of the anonymity of the survey. It is possible that in more recent times people are more willing to admit to having less sex. Nonetheless whilst you should not consider the actual percentage numbers highly accurate, there is no doubt all the studies do show a trend.

The one definite trend from the available data, be it US or UK or elsewhere, is that the frequency of sex appears to have declined across all age groups during the last 30 years.

As you also pointed out, one of the issues with this subject (and many others these days) is that people latch onto a particular statistic and then concentrate on that one figure and then from there maybe just one factor leading to it.

The more you read up on it (and it is quite fascinating) you realise just how many possible and complex factors are at play and that experts and different studies/analyses recognise such, but do not always agree on apportioning the degree to which each factor is having most influence.

I came to the conclusion that this was a case of all these factors gradually combining and that after a period of decades from the 'swinging sixties' and which began a change in sexual behaviour generally and an increase in sexual activity across the spectrum, the world had changed in so many ways, not least technology, and that this was just a resultant evolution of such. Nothing stays the same.





« Last Edit: October 07, 2023, 09:52:56 am by Doc Holliday »

Online southcoastpunter

The one definite trend from the available data, be it US or UK or elsewhere, is that the frequency of sex appears to have declined across all age groups during the last 30 years.

i find that very hard to believe - so,  youngsters these days, say in the 16-25 age range, are having less sex than we did? I know i didn't have as much sex when young as some of my mates but these days (at least it seems) all youngsters are at it all the time!
« Last Edit: October 07, 2023, 10:54:17 am by southcoastpunter »

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
i find that very hard to believe - so,  youngsters these days, say in the 16-25 age range, are having less sex than we did? I know i didn't have as much sex when young as some of my mates but these days (at least it seems) all youngsters are at it all the time!

How do you know they are having lots of sex? People used to say university students are 'at it all the time' but my experience was the opposite, not me personally but the students I shared halls with.

The lower activity rate I have heard mentioned in a few podcasts, YouTube videos, doesn't make it true.


Offline Southernbloke

How do you know they are having lots of sex? People used to say university students are 'at it all the time' but my experience was the opposite, not me personally but the students I shared halls with.

The lower activity rate I have heard mentioned in a few podcasts, YouTube videos, doesn't make it true.

I was in this age group in the late eighties and early nineties, I have to say that I wasn’t having loads of civvie sex then , absolutely scared of HIV which a lot of people that I knew were terrified of because of bad news coverage at the time

Offline Doc Holliday

i find that very hard to believe - so,  youngsters these days, say in the 16-25 age range, are having less sex than we did? I know i didn't have as much sex when young as some of my mates but these days (at least it seems) all youngsters are at it all the time!

That was also my perception and which interestingly is a common point raised by younger members here ie that us oldies are out of touch with the reality.

I found the following links saved in my 'archives' from when I have read up on this topic in the past. I have copied and pasted them all as I don't have time to filter them. There will therefore be much duplication.

One observation from the stats I recall, is that those in a relationship are much more likely to have an active sex life ... something which will be 'out of synch' with many members here.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Offline Doc Holliday

How do you know they are having lots of sex? People used to say university students are 'at it all the time' but my experience was the opposite, not me personally but the students I shared halls with.

I'm sure I have posted this before, but my experience being a student in the early 70's was that a small section of fellow students were very sexually active with multiple sexual partners, but the majority did not fit that category and either had almost no sexual activity at all or had sex as part of a monogamous relationship, which developed during their five years. Interestingly most of those relationships actually stood the test of time.

Fast forward to the millennials and that picture is probably broadly the same but is not deemed acceptable to some men, who feel they have some kind of right to be in my promiscuous group of the 70s?