I am probably one of those who post reviews that can lack detail. In fact I think I was called out for it once. I assumed the point of a review was to provide a basic overview of the SP, including cost, location and looks with some basic info on services. I don't find reviews with excess details interesting or useful as I only look at the top line details. I certainly have no interest in becoming an erotica author for people to get off to. I suppose all this means I naturally keep the reviews short and to the point because its what I would find useful. I very much see the value in leaving reviews, as I always find them useful. After reading this thread though perhaps I will try and add a bit more detail in the future if people find it more useful. After all I only post the reviews to be useful and give something back, so I am open to trying to improve the quality of them.
A good review which is well written, can do alot of good for an escort, should it even be explicit, and we get the gory details of what went on
I prefer to know what the escort likes, and maybe not, and over a number of years have written a lot of reviews, mostly on the site we can't mention. On this site I wrote many times about Kelly from New Blythswood Sauna, Glasgow, and she must have had 100+ reviews, all of the good and detailed. Now it was these reviews, that tempted me to book her, for 1 hr massage, to see what the fuss was about, and you know, the details were exact, she was a fucking nympho
Done other reviews for plenty other girls from the Glasgow massage scene, Karen, Marrion, Cathy, Michelle, Linda, and a few others, but with Kelly I posted a few reviews over the time I had seen her. To put the reviews of Kelly, she pretty much was into anything, kissing, orsal both ways, sex in numerous position, and she was easily turned on and would come very noisily