Yes woman have the chance to stagger home in the rain with an ugly drunk who takes ages to come, that is the reality.
Any woman who isn't ugly and even many who are, will have a lot of decent and sometimes good looking guys hitting on them. It's rare they will settle for someone they think is ugly although it does happen and in those cases it's for other reasons and them being "ugly" isn't as bad as it sounds to us (as women tend to care less). But when they want good looks, it's easy for them to get it (or at least easier than it is for 99% of men). The exception is if they have rare, specific tastes or very high standards (because the best looking men are often tough to get). In those cases though, Tinder (or similar apps/sites) provide the solution, except perhaps for old or ugly women (or those who live in a very rural location).
As for taking ages to cum due to being drunk, a woman can pretty much dictate when the guy will leave whenever they want. As such, the guy does not need to be drunk nor does it mean he'll take too long too cum, especially since when not drunk most guys have the opposite problem. Anyway, there's still no guarantees with male escorts.
I m always astonished that men think woman have the upper hand when it comes to sex, very few woman in or out of relationships are getting much quality shagging.
I agree that many seem to exaggerate how easy it is for women (especially if they don't want to risk embarrassing themselves or being labelled as slut etc - which is very important for most women) but how could you not think women have the upper hand when it comes to getting sex? The only advantage men have is that we have many more characteristics and potential "tactics" that can allow us to get sex (because looks aren't as important for us) and age is less important for us too. Those things actually make being a man an often underrated thing IMO.
It's true that many women don't get much quality shagging but the only reason women don't get much quality shagging is because they "settle" for whatever they're getting and either don't know about or are too lazy or afraid to take the necessary and
easy steps to get good sex. Basically, that means getting themselves out there, being very slightly forward (nothing drastic but most women are reluctant to do anything to move things forward, except when drunk) or just going on Tinder. Some women are also afraid/reluctant to have many different sexual partners (which is often necessary to find good sex unless you get lucky). Women absolutely do have the upper hand, the fact that some of them don't make use of it does not prove your point.
Tinder proves my point excellently, ANY woman (or at least any under the age of 60) can set up profile and as long as they have photos that aren't trash quality and live in a built up area, they will have plenty of matches. Yes, quite a lot of duds in there but it's still quite low effort for them to arrange a stream of at least decent looking men to come round straight to their place and fuck. The only guys who can do that look like male models.
There is some demand for male escorts (from women) but it's low (extremely low in comparison to female escorts) and it's exactly what the guy you quoted said:
Unless you are model fit, a qualified masseur and or hung like a donkey then you are goin to have a very dusty phone.
