Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: redhotsof, Waltham Forest  (Read 3734 times)


11 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6445307) (10 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline peterpiper

External Link/Members Only
All I can say is wow , She seems to love sex , better looking than the pics .
Dfk as soon as she walks in the door and didn't stop for the whole HR.
All her likes were on offer although I had to stop after 2nd pop in the mouth both swallowed. Very chatty friendly girl ,was £130 for the hour which was a bargain for what she does.


Offline MLawro93

Perhaps its worth me trying to book again

Offline lillythesavage

Perhaps its worth me trying to book again

This review mirrors mine, 3 positives now, and loads of lurkers been trying to keep her quiet, That Joelawrence being one of them, no doubt about it, a fine bunk up.

Offline deek12345

"AAAh"" says redhots, (or her pimp) looking at her review "was £130 for the hour which was a bargain for what she does". "Time to jack up my prices then".

If a review on UKP gives a good description of the meeting, readers can form their own view about about whether a WG is good value at a given price and level of service, and looks, and would probably mostly agree among themselves about that. It doesn't need saying openly on UKP.

The only benefit in saying on UKP that a WG is good value, is to her, since it means she can probably get away with charging more.

I think this point has been made a few times

 :dash:

Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Online puntingking

What is the best hotel chain (budget) for a outcall? And would she travel to east London?

Thanks.
And thanks for the review  :hi:

Offline peterpiper

Premier Inn can be had for around £40-50 .
She lives in East London so I wouldn't think that would be a problem

Offline Fuzzyduck

What is the best hotel chain (budget) for a outcall? And would she travel to east London?

Thanks.
And thanks for the review  :hi:

Have you not had your morning coffee yet?

There are loads of threads about outcall options.
In terms of whether she'd travel you could (a) ask her since only she can really answer that or (b) look at where she says she's based and the location given in her reviews so far.
FWIW she was happy to travel to central London when I asked her.

Online MP778

"AAAh"" says redhots, (or her pimp) looking at her review "was £130 for the hour which was a bargain for what she does". "Time to jack up my prices then".

If a review on UKP gives a good description of the meeting, readers can form their own view about about whether a WG is good value at a given price and level of service, and looks, and would probably mostly agree among themselves about that. It doesn't need saying openly on UKP.

The only benefit in saying on UKP that a WG is good value, is to her, since it means she can probably get away with charging more.

I think this point has been made a few times

 :dash:

exactly this.

and yes WGs think about raising prices anyway and may do it after some positive reviews even if they don't comment on price but there's no way the word "bargain" doesn't jump off the page (or screen) to them. 

Offline lillythesavage

exactly this.

and yes WGs think about raising prices anyway and may do it after some positive reviews even if they don't comment on price but there's no way the word "bargain" doesn't jump off the page (or screen) to them.

Well it does now two of you have highlighted it and repeated it on the thread :dash:.

Saying so does not make the OP a pimp :lol:, There are plenty of threads and reviews where prices are discussed, it is part of a review to highlight VFM and if the price paid is not mentioned in the review, people, included mods jump on it.  :unknown:

Offline lillythesavage

"AAAh"" says redhots, (or her pimp) looking at her review "was £130 for the hour which was a bargain for what she does". "Time to jack up my prices then".

If a review on UKP gives a good description of the meeting, readers can form their own view about about whether a WG is good value at a given price and level of service, and looks, and would probably mostly agree among themselves about that. It doesn't need saying openly on UKP.

The only benefit in saying on UKP that a WG is good value, is to her, since it means she can probably get away with charging more.

I think this point has been made a few times

 :dash:

The " Positive" reviews you and @Tomcat for obvious B&S Mr Lee pimped Chinese places,  are far more promotional than this, usually followed by a big RED if anyone else does try.  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 07, 2021, 10:02:43 am by lillythesavage »

Offline Fuzzyduck

This review mirrors mine, 3 positives now, and loads of lurkers been trying to keep her quiet, That Joelawrence being one of them, no doubt about it, a fine bunk up.

That's often the price to pay for an early, strong positive review: Freeloaders jump on board and don't give back. Watch how many of them pop up on future reviews going "oh yeah, she was like that with me". To fair, it works both ways: loads of reviews on here makes it difficult to get a booking and I've found that with incall SPs, the service level drops since they are seeing a lot of traffic.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Well it does now two of you have highlighted it and repeated it on the thread :dash:.

Saying so does not make the OP a pimp :lol:, There are plenty of threads and reviews where prices are discussed, it is part of a review to highlight VFM and if the price paid is not mentioned in the review, people, included mods jump on it.  :unknown:

I don't see what your beef is. IMO neither of them suggested OP was a tout or a pimp. They challenged the use of the word "bargain". Price is often discussed and everyone can make their own judgement about VFM (one review the other day called an hour 2-girl @ £500 VFM. I thought "like WTF?"). However, I also believe that use of the work "bargain" in this context should be discouraged and anyone who says a SP should raise their prices (an easy next step after "bargain") should be positively slated.

Online MP778

Well it does now two of you have highlighted it and repeated it on the thread :dash:.

Saying so does not make the OP a pimp :lol:, There are plenty of threads and reviews where prices are discussed, it is part of a review to highlight VFM and if the price paid is not mentioned in the review, people, included mods jump on it.  :unknown:

you're missing the point completely.  no one accused the OP of being a pimp, read the post again carefully.

yes it's true talking about the issue on the thread highlights it more.  i'm doing it in the hope future reviews of this and other WGs will tone down the bargain talk.

and no one is talking about not mentioning price in the review. of course you should mention price and duration. stating a WG is VMF is useful information, i've done it myself, but there are ways to do it. clearly there is a difference between saying you think a WG is VFM and proclaiming her a bargain.

the best thing for punters would be if there was a common understanding among us to just tone it down when talking about VMF because we know how inflation works.  prices may go up anyway but it costs you nothing to just hold your enthusiasm and watch your language when talking about how great a WGs price is.

Offline lillythesavage

Any positive review is a promotional tool. Prices often go up after a positive review because demand goes up, leeches pile in, and some of them mention the review in the hope of god knows what.
It would not take more than 5 minutes to check the price other women are charging, if the leeches did not mention reviews most SP,s would be none the wiser, other than an increase in demand, and may well want to increase prices on the back of it.

Slating the OP for using a word to describe VFM that would make no difference, than saying "excellent value for money" for instance, you are just highlighting something and making it bloody obvious.

Offline MrMakers

Any positive review is a promotional tool. Prices often go up after a positive review because demand goes up, leeches pile in, and some of them mention the review in the hope of god knows what.
It would not take more than 5 minutes to check the price other women are charging, if the leeches did not mention reviews most SP,s would be none the wiser, other than an increase in demand, and may well want to increase prices on the back of it.

THIS.  it's the in person wannabe good guy best friends that you have to worry about (and can't police), that say shit like "You are worth so much more, I paid more last month too an uglier girl that didn't even kiss!".  Pussy is a hell of a drug, turns people into white knights in advance.  But its guys like that that cause rate increases.  Same reason girls at places like HoD go independent and still increase rates even though they dont have to pay a cut anymore, it's the fluffy cheerleaders in person, not the online reviews

Offline deek12345

in reply to Lily the S, i've looked again at my review of the "Suki" I saw.

The is no mention of her being a bargain, a good buy, or even VFM. There is no recommendation for people to visit her. Many punters might not even think it worth visiting, given the rather limited range of service, whatever the price. But next week's "Suki" may be different.

Was my review "pimping. ? Only if ANY positive review is pimping, so that's a pointless comment. I described my visit accurately, as did Tomcat.

As for this thread (even with suggestions of "bargain") being likely to raise prices generally, because it draws even more attention to prices, I don't agree. Suggesting that punters don't use words like bargain will possibly stop price hikes across the whole field, but at least in individual cases.

I think we've exhausted this topic chaps



Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lillythesavage

in reply to Lily the S, i've looked again at my review of the "Suki" I saw.

The is no mention of her being a bargain, a good buy, or even VFM. There is no recommendation for people to visit her. Many punters might not even think it worth visiting, given the rather limited range of service, whatever the price. But next week's "Suki" may be different.

Was my review "pimping. ? Only if ANY positive review is pimping, so that's a pointless comment. I described my visit accurately, as did Tomcat.

As for this thread (even with suggestions of "bargain") being likely to raise prices generally, because it draws even more attention to prices, I don't agree. Suggesting that punters don't use words like bargain will possibly stop price hikes across the whole field, but at least in individual cases.

I think we've exhausted this topic chaps


UKPunting »Discussions & Reviews »Escort Reviews »London »Natalie, Diva, Earls Court, perfect GFE, outstanding VFM.

I do not see any of you piling into @Jacksaint, but you choose to use the word " bargain" in this guys review as a red flag, one word against several lines and the header in the above link :lol:.
So tell us, do you think " Bargain" and " outstanding VFM" have different meanings?  Some people have different ways of speaking, and are not good at putting it in print.

Is it because you all piled in on the back of my review, have not reviewed yourselves in the hope of keeping her quiet, ignored the second review to move it down, but got the hump with a third and it being replied too?  :mad: Not the Ethos of the site.

Guess what, no price increase, yet, still a bargain and outstanding value for money, which ever you prefer. :lol:

Offline One for the road

Hoping to see a review and comments on the lady.
This thread has gone off track.

Offline deek12345

the ethos of the site is that people stay calm and not angry

the ethos of the site is that people are entitled to say what they think, if they make calm, polite comments about what anyone else has said, or done

the ethos of the site is that if someone makes a comment about one punter's review, or a post, the are not obliged to make a similar comment about every one of UKPs 70,000 members.
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lillythesavage

the ethos of the site is that people stay calm and not angry

the ethos of the site is that people are entitled to say what they think, if they make calm, polite comments about what anyone else has said, or done

the ethos of the site is that if someone makes a comment about one punter's review, or a post, the are not obliged to make a similar comment about every one of UKPs 70,000 members.

LOL, leeches came out of the woodwork because someone dared review the one they were trying to keep quiet, dare to suggest she was VFM in current times,  and were dumb enough to keep bumping it by picking on the only word in the review they possibly could.

If they said nothing the review would have disappeared down the list like the second one, if you cannot see that and wish to keep bumping it for them, I am sure they will be grateful.  :hi:

« Last Edit: December 09, 2021, 08:31:04 am by lillythesavage »

Offline deek12345

LOL, leeches ?? (what ?????) came out of the woodwork because someone dared review the one they were trying to keep quiet (what ???) ,

Did this ranting diatribe start with someone simply suggesting best not to use the word "bargain"
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac