Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Palomaxx - Birmingham  (Read 2820 times)


57 review(s) for Palomaxx (45 positive, 7 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Faraday

So - this has to be one of the most unusual punts I've had for a while.  Not the most unusual - but enough for me to think long and hard about my review.  Ultimately settled on a Neutral, but could have easily been a Negative.  Still not sure even as I write this now.  Meet took place about a month ago now.  I've withheld some of the details, as I don't want to reveal my identity given some of the stories I've read about her on this forum - but everything pertitent included in the review.

Adultwork Profile: External Link/Members Only

Details
£150 for 1 hour. No extras.

Comms
Professional and businesslike.  Straight to the point - relatively quick with her replies.  Time agreed and postcode provided.  I messaged when I arrived and she called me back within minutes and gave further details of her location and guided me in.

Venue
Really nice apartment in the centre of Birmingham.  Paid parking on the street in a nice enough area.  Some other nice cars on the street so felt safe to park up and leave my car.  Apartment itself was quite spacious and really nice.  Clean sheets on the bed and an inviting atmosphere.  Very bright light in the room too - so got to see her in all her beauty.

Palomaxx
She's definitely a looker as others have reviewed and profile pics/age seemed spot on to me.  Magic door trick on arrival and I wasn't disappointed.  She met me in a nice two piece lingerie set and walking behind her to the room I got a great view of her pert bum.  Easily her best asset in my opinion.  Body wise 10/10 for me - pert boobs and pretty face.

Our time together
Paperwork out of the way, we settled on the bed for a chat - just general life things initially.  Seemed to go on for a while until I initiated some kissing.  More LFK here than DFK and felt like she was holding back.  She soon stopped then started telling me about the gifts some of her clients have given her - not sure why that's appropriate, but I let her chat for a bit longer.  I asked for some OWO after a few more minutes of this, which to be fair and objective was actually really good.  She's got a great technique here.  Unfortunately when she made eye contact she felt a little cold and appeared as if she wasn't enjoying herself.  OWO lasted for a good 10 minutes though.  I asked if I could give her some RO, which she seemed happy enough with, but was quite lifeless.  She does have a small clit, but I was definitely in the right area.  I'm presuming she isn't that sensitive down there.  Not a major problem in the grand scheme of things.  After a few minutes of RO and her lying there motionless, it was on with the condom and she asked which position I'd like.  I always opt for CG first as it's one of my favourites and she climbed on.  She must have made about 3 or 4 strokes, before hunching over me and wrapping her arms around me for a cuddle and stopping the sex in favour of the cuddle.  Odd - but I went with it and reciprocated and cuddled her back.  She stayed like this for 5 minutes or so and little man started to go soft - she then proceeded to climb off and lay back next to me, saying she was worried the condom would break - odd again.  She then started to tell me about her lifes troubles and woes.  This combined with her stopping and wanting to just cuddle literally as I was just getting into the sex had remnants of trying to get me emotionally invested in her.  Fortunately I'm strong willed here and don't see SP's for emotional attachment.  I'm quite sated in my normal life there - and do punt with my OH on occasion, but I digress.  I eventually asked her if she could do some more OWO - which she seemed willing to do.  Great technique again and I was just getting into my stride again when she stopped and said time was up and didn't seem interested in getting me to completion - we had about 5 minutes left to be fair but by the time I'd got dressed and was out of the door, it was bang on the hour.

Summary
So - I didn't really get the service I wanted or expected here.  A lot of stalling tactics and just stopping - with what I felt was wholly inappropriate conversation.  She came across as quite lonely and needing cuddles and attention - which I'm more than positive she gets from other regulars.  It felt like a "trick" being completely honest to get me emotionally invested.  I'm sure had I reciprocated with some level of emotion I may well have got better service, but - that's not what I'm there for.  Enough red flags here for me to avoid.  Almost feels like this should be a Negative after reading my review now I've written it, but will leave it as a generous Neutral due to her OWO skills.

Positives
Great BJ technique
Lovely derriere
Great apartment

Negatives
Felt a bit "cold" personality wise at times when she made eye contact. 
Remnants of "lost puppy" technique I've seen other SPs try to get you emotionally invested in them to return.
Just stopped at various times and started chatting either about her life, or gifts she's received.
Didn't seem interested in giving me a climax.

Would I return? Nope.  Something didn't feel quite right here.
Would I recommend? Afraid not.  I got the feeling she preys on EAS with some of the things which happened.

Offline johnybravo

Sorry to hear how that went

Should be a Negative surely

Off my list , for sure

Offline Faraday

Should be a Negative surely

I'm properly torn over this one.  Her BJ tipped it to a Neutral - that was really excellent and she didn't shy away from it - well, until time ran out at the end.

If enough people think it's a Negative though over the next day or two after reading, I'll happily request it changing.

Let's see...

Offline alabama1


Offline mrfishyfoo

That reads like a reet crock of shite.  :scare: :scare:

Your punt your rating MrF albeit I'd have redcarded her.  :hi: :hi:

Offline Cal55

I'm properly torn over this one.  Her BJ tipped it to a Neutral - that was really excellent and she didn't shy away from it - well, until time ran out at the end.

Tbh OP, it sounds like you paid £150 for a 'glorified BJ.' Definitely reads as a negative.

Her AW profile is an interesting read too. Excerpt from profile:

"Highly educated and well rounded personality. (The fact that I refuse to fuck for free already suggests that I am an intelligent person)

More like: what a clever way of justifying being a prostitute love. :D
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline alibirmingham

Sorry to say I’m with the majority here and it would be a big fat NEG from me if I was you. £150 to hear about her life story is hardly a worth while punt. And doesn’t she say something like no time wasters on her aw profile? So why waste a punters?

However I’m not gonna rush and say I’m not gonna see her as I do like the way she looks. I read a review earlier today that said she prefers a natural flowing meet rather then a checklist type affair but seems checklist is better as you then get what you went there for. Maybe that’s why she doesn’t like that type of booking.

Anyway hope the next ones better  mate.

Online Jayne_cobb

Negative from me too - kept stalling the action and told you times up before you popped? No, that’s a terrible service. Negative all the way.
Sounds properly bizarre

Offline thecretin

Definitely a negative.

Main paragraph, first line, 'We settled on the bed for a chat', i would never have done this and once you let her get away with it she had you down as a 'mark' and took advantage the rest of the punt which then proceeded to go downhill to an unsatisfactory climax (or no climax in this case).

You should have been more assertive from the start in saying that you wanted to get on with it, if she goes into a mood (which she probably wold have done given her previous reviews) then you need to tell her it's not going to work, ask for your money back and leave, this way you don't waste your money and hopefully she learns that she can't get away with this kind of shit.

We can all only learn from experience and better luck next time.


Offline Cal55

However I’m not gonna rush and say I’m not gonna see her as I do like the way she looks. I read a review earlier today that said she prefers a natural flowing meet rather then a checklist type affair but seems checklist is better as you then get what you went there for. Maybe that’s why she doesn’t like that type of booking.

That review came across a little weird too. Not in the way that, that OP wrote it or his experience per say. But, surely he had read her profile before he went to visit. She then gives him the service she wants anyway. Thereafter, has to ‘declare’ it to him she doesn’t like ‘checklist’ type bookings? You get the impression it’s a very set/minimal type of effort affair if anything.

Oh and alibirmingham, if you do choose to see her could you ask if she’s getting rid of that PS5? Xmas and all… those things are really hard to obtain right now. :lol:

Hidden Image/Members Only
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Wood2017

I'd have to agree with others here OP i think it's a negative for me but it's your review and your meet.

It sounds like she's took the piss though with timewasting and not even allowing a cum shot. Deary me  :dash:

Offline Faraday

OK - so, overwhelming feedback here on it being a Negative.  I have to agree and am swayed now.

I'm used to a quick chat before we get down the action on 1 hour bookings - I've not really had issues with poor service following on from that - but it does appear she likes to control proceedings and get away with the bare minimum.  I initiated services multiple times and overall I was just left feeling it was a bad punt.

Oh - she still has the PS5 too - she seemingly loved the fact one of her marks regulars got it for her.

Maybe I got her on an off day?  No idea - but for sure I'll not be back and didn't fall foul of her tricks.  I should have left partway through, but the BJ had me hooked so yep - £150 for an expensive BJ.

Fortunately I saw my regular a couple of days after this lacklustre booking and she more than made up for it.

Can some kindly Mod please change to a NEGATIVE please.

Thanks.

Offline shed

Personally don't agree with a consensus decision on any reviews re ratings. It was your review and at the time your gut feeling was to award a neutral. The review was well detailed and informative so any punter can make up his own mind about whether to visit or not. A rating isn't a exact science it's just based on your opinion following the visit, nobody else's  :hi:

Offline The Owl

Paloma seems to have form for preying on punters rather than being a top notch service provider. The bontempora car wreck revealed her ro be a self obsessed leech that would even throw an escorr mate under a bus if it got her more gifts. If an escort wants to tell you all her woes then she should do it after she's properly emptied your balls and preferably in her own time. If she has personal problems she can always pay a psychotherapist for proper professional help, not have use a paying customer spending his money for her to turn a punt in to a counselling session.

Offline Cal55

Personally don't agree with a consensus decision on any reviews re ratings.

A rating isn't a exact science it's just based on your opinion following the visit, nobody else's

Although, in this case OP was in ‘2 minds’ when posting his review about the rating.

Ultimately settled on a Neutral, but could have easily been a Negative.  Still not sure even as I write this now.

As well as, thereafter collectively seeking other forum members advice… which he has done. Imho - the rating is based on not only the reviewers opinion but, their experience too and this doesn’t read like a ‘neutral’ one at all.

Oh - she still has the PS5 too - she seemingly loved the fact one of her marks regulars got it for her.

What a fucking Simp lol! :dash:

And I bet the poor bastard still ‘paid’ her fees (on top) for her to even touch him. Of course she’s probably loving it: PS5’s cost near enough £500! :wacko:

What kills it in that pic is if you look closely, the PS5 box seems to be sitting on towels she’s clearly knicked from a hotel. :lol:
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Online 90125

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 0
Personally don't agree with a consensus decision on any reviews re ratings. It was your review and at the time your gut feeling was to award a neutral. The review was well detailed and informative so any punter can make up his own mind about whether to visit or not. A rating isn't a exact science it's just based on your opinion following the visit, nobody else's  :hi:

Correct. We don’t run polls to decide the rating.

Offline Faraday

Personally don't agree with a consensus decision on any reviews re ratings. It was your review and at the time your gut feeling was to award a neutral.

My gut feeling was hovering between Negative and Neutral and I changed it at least 5 times whilst writing it between the two.  I tend to not ever want to leave an SP a Negative unless they've done something shockingly bad or B&S.  This was just "unusual" for me with some bad elements so was keen to hear other people's opinions based on my fact based review.  Having heard the feedback from others, my gut feeling has now landed squarely on a Negative.

I typically don't go for consensus opinions either, but given the history and mixed reviews on this SP I cast out the net for feedback.

In anycase - Negative or Neutral as you rightly state my review of her is here now. 

Offline Cal55

My gut feeling was hovering between Negative and Neutral and I changed it at least 5 times whilst writing it between the two.  I tend to not ever want to leave an SP a Negative unless they've done something shockingly bad or B&S.  This was just "unusual" for me with some bad elements so was keen to hear other people's opinions based on my fact based review.  Having heard the feedback from others, my gut feeling has now landed squarely on a Negative.

I typically don't go for consensus opinions either, but given the history and mixed reviews on this SP I cast out the net for feedback.

In anycase - Negative or Neutral as you rightly state my review of her is here now.

Yeah but I think in this case the decision needs to come solely from you. Opinions can change after reflection. However, if you’re happy to keep it as your current rating keep it. Otherwise, if you now feel it’s a solid negative then only you request the change from a mod yourself, based on your own merit.
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Faraday

Yeah but I think in this case the decision needs to come solely from you. Opinions can change after reflection. However, if you’re happy to keep it as your current rating keep it. Otherwise, if you now feel it’s a solid negative then only you request the change from a mod yourself, based on your own merit.

I don't really care that much tbh.  Review is there - if a mod wants to change it (as I already requested it changing to Negative) feel free to do so - or leave it as a Neutral.

Life's too short to toil over this.  The bottom line - avoid this one IMHO.

Offline longshot11

Thanks for the review, this one came off my HL a few weeks ago. Given her uncertain attitude & vanilla service I'll pass

Offline Straightsix

Ah dunno,  the lady is well reviewed and spoken of. FFS just pay your money, put your cock in and be done yeah?
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Straightsix

What kills it in that pic is if you look closely, the PS5 box seems to be sitting on towels she’s clearly knicked from a hotel. :lol:
😄
Some people are so simple that a PS5 is all their dreams come true.
Personally I aim for 142 million on the euro lottery. Call me materialistic.
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Cal55

😄
Some people are so simple that a PS5 is all their dreams come true.
Personally I aim for 142 million on the euro lottery. Call me materialistic.

In my life ‘some people’ are mostly kids in the family… aged around 11/12 at most… where a PS5 is “all their dreams come true!” 😁

No, no… I second that. 142 million is dreaming much bigger! Viva Las Vegas! :drinks:
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Straightsix

In my life ‘some people’ are mostly kids in the family… aged around 11/12 at most… where a PS5 is “all their dreams come true!” 😁

No, no… I second that. 142 million is dreaming much bigger! Viva Las Vegas! :drinks:
Haha!, imagine the hookers! Gambling! Hot dogs!
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Cal55

Haha!, imagine the hookers! Gambling! Hot dogs!

Not to sound boastful but: been there, done it and got the t-shirt. Although, having 142 mil would seriously change the scale of it! :D

Remember the sex I had with an American hooker… I swear I think she thought we were shooting a porno!!! :lol:
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Straightsix

Obviously working for a tip as is the culture. How much did you leave her?
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Cal55

Obviously working for a tip as is the culture. How much did you leave her?

$200 in total for the hour. Although, no tip was required/wanted. I agreed price/services beforehand. She was a lovely lass and even after the hour: offered to go outside for a cigarette and thereafter to "hang out" in her hotel room. I respectfully declined both as was tired after my long night out, and then fucking her but, in hindsight probably could've gotten a lot more for my money.   
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline alibirmingham


Oh and alibirmingham, if you do choose to see her could you ask if she’s getting rid of that PS5? Xmas and all… those things are really hard to obtain right now. :lol:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Fucking hell mate. If you said you needed one I could of hooked you up last week lol. Had 6 which i flogged. Gave me a small profit (sold for £525 a piece) so using that to find my next few punts.

But back to the topic at hand op we shared our thoughts but it’s your call now. Do what you feel is right. If you want I can change it to a neg but if you want to leave it as it that’s ok too. We all made our minds up that for us this experience would be a neg so the rating itself doesn’t matter much after reading it.

Only downside of leaving it as is, is someone is flicking through the reviews to decide if they want to see her and only reading neg reviews to see why and where she’s lacking (I do this often) They may skim past this review (as it’s a neutral) and never get the info you shared and therefore this review didn’t help them.

Offline guymids-72

Sounds like a negative to me, I reviewed her a neutral as she was a bit lifeless and functional, no effort to make it feel like not a "paid for" experience

Offline Cal55

Fucking hell mate. If you said you needed one I could of hooked you up last week lol. Had 6 which i flogged. Gave me a small profit (sold for £525 a piece) so using that to find my next few punts.

lol I got one sorted a while back. It was just a tongue-in-cheek way of highlighting, the bs she was coming out with that OP mentions in his review. And to be that obtuse about it on your own AW profile is beyond anyone. :unknown:
Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Tender.french.kiss

  The bottom line - avoid this one IMHO.
I think thar tips it towards the red card then.

150 sheets for a BJ and delaying tactics is clear pisstake imho. Sorry you had a bad punt. Thanks for helping me putting her definitely on my blacklist and saving money. Was hesitant due to her personality issues,  with a bit of me still tempted a bit. Not anymore. She's definitely gone downhill in my book. She might still be top notch with regulars showering her with gifts but I won't the risk as a new client
« Last Edit: December 04, 2021, 05:41:04 pm by Tender.french.kiss »

Offline Freddybigstuff1983

I think thar tips it towards the red card then.

150 sheets for a BJ and delaying tactics is clear pisstake imho. Sorry you had a bad punt. Thanks for helping me putting her definitely on my blacklist and saving money. Was hesitant due to her personality issues,  with a bit of me still tempted a bit. Not anymore. She's definitely gone downhill in my book. She might still be top notch with regulars showering her with gifts but I won't the risk as a new client

Yeah same here. 
I had her on my no go list after she went apeshit on here when I left a negative for last minute cancelling me because "Her gym PT moved her appointment"
The recent positive made me think about getting a new punting number to see her.
But this one has confirmed this girl is entitled, lazy, and not looking to give a good service.
Permenant blacklist for me.

Thanks for the review

Offline pbrown355

Thanks for the review. Would have been definite neg for me. Reviewed her a while ago, shortly before her drama on here. Got a good service and enjoyed. Haven't been back though.

Offline Cal55

Reviewed her a while ago, shortly before her drama on here.

Did some due-diligence on here and what a shit-show that was! :dash:

The bottom line - avoid this one IMHO.

Not to mention that she can literally have you threatened. Temperamental/dangerous. :bomb: :wackogirl: :bomb:

Banned reason: Accusing me of drug taking.
Banned by: daviemac