Seeking.com (East of England)

[mar356]

Have seen a couple of local threads for seekingarrangements.com, anyone in east of England use it regularly? Let’s get a local discussion going, share tips, talk experiences etc.

[Steve2]

Hmmm. 11 posts, no reviews in 3 years

What are you going to contribute to this thread?

[Naughtyboyuk]

I have zero experience with SA so would appreciate some input and advice from others.

I punt, and review, regularly via AW, some agencies and local massage places....always on the look out for the next hottie who fancies being fucked...so wondering if SA offers a decent source of young fit girls willing to get it on with a 50 something without too much hassle

[mar356]

I have zero experience with SA so would appreciate some input and advice from others.

I punt, and review, regularly via AW, some agencies and local massage places....always on the look out for the next hottie who fancies being fucked...so wondering if SA offers a decent source of young fit girls willing to get it on with a 50 something without too much hassle

It definitely does that. Usually uni girls looking to make a bit of money. Membership of the site is 70/80 quid a month so not cheap, but if you’re serious about meeting it’s great.

[Naughtyboyuk]

It definitely does that. Usually uni girls looking to make a bit of money. Membership of the site is 70/80 quid a month so not cheap, but if you’re serious about meeting it’s great.

Other Questions which run through my mind are:

a) what’s the typical £££ for a meet including sex
b) how much effort with comms etc do you need to put in before any meet
c) how does it compare to simply using AW for normal escort meets...VFM and quality

I guess I am asking for people’s opinions whether it’s a comparable alternative to AW and worth the bother

[cunnyhunt]

Other Questions which run through my mind are:

a) what’s the typical £££ for a meet including sex
b) how much effort with comms etc do you need to put in before any meet
c) how does it compare to simply using AW for normal escort meets...VFM and quality

I guess I am asking for people’s opinions whether it’s a comparable alternative to AW and worth the bother

a) I have not found a common figure, some want ridiculous amounts, others reasonable.
b) You need to do some serious leg work to get anywhere, the girls on SA are not like WG's waiting for a customer, they will answer when they are in the mood or when they want shoes/handbag etc
c) AW is far easier and less hassle, AW generally offers better VFM as what you want is (nearly) guaranteed. Some SA girls are very flaky.

You are up against some on SA that will drop ridiculous amounts on girls to impress them. When I had access to the SA thread there was talk of one girl that I was also talking to, I had confirmed a meet with her but in the meantime another who is/was a member here met her for just a chat and dropped £500 on her. That is entirely his choice to do so but it raised her expectation for anything more than a chat, I could have matched and raised but decided to cancel. In the end I met her socially some months later and fucked for a nominal sum but she turned out to be a bit strange and drank too much for me so I cut contact. I  later found that she had tried to find me through others but without success. WG's don't tend to do that sort of behaviour.

I still use SA, but not as much.

[tarkus]

I haven't used SA for a while now but I had a lot of success with it. I still see two of the girls I met through SA from time to time for hook ups.

IMHO for SA to work you have to invest some time. I used to filter out the girls asking for insane money and then engage with those I liked the sound of via messaging. You can wheedle out the one word responders and, usually, the crazies. I would then meet for a drink/coffee, always in a public place. That's the time to discuss money and sex. It might just be me but there's something pretty horny about discussing sexual preferences with a pretty girl in Costa 

I never paid any girl for the initial coffee meeting, tbf none of them asked me too.

After that the most I ever paid was £150 plus accommodation. But for that I had some of the best sex of my life, usually overnight so multiple pops.

You have to remember that it isn't AW and the girls don't consider themselves escorts or prostitutes. You do have to watch for EAS, so the use of fake names, email addresses and burner phones is sensible - just like punting in general.

Good luck!

[Mrbenn2016]

I am based in the South East of England.
I have paid and renewed my membership a few times. Twice this year with a break. I have just paid my last subscription.

Success rates can depend quite differently based on numerous variables such as the number and quality of pictures, quality of bios, choices of filters and the distance willing to travel 40-80 miles will generate 2, 000 and10,000 profiles. I did not notice a particular increase in numbers due to Christmas or New Year.

There are a lot of fake uk profiles and scammers on the site as well as ones abroad. More than there were in the summer. The genuine SA girls are not pro's and can be more selective than AW girls. It can be addictive and time consuming sorting the wheat from the chaff.

Regarding rates for PPM there are benchmarks £300-400 for London/South East. That might not include an overnight. 7/10 girls will still want £250. You can negotiate this but there is a risk of no shows gazumping. You might be able to get better value to in East Anglia. Every girl will have a tail of some guy who has paid them £1,000 per night.

If you want more of a dating experience then SA is advantageous. If you want more frequent sex with different people it is probably more economic to stick with AW

[The_Grinder]

Thinking of signing back up on SA but its seems they have taken the 1 month option away, there is one that says 30 days but says auto renewed, has anyone done this and managed to cancel the auto renew all ok?

[Froomey]

Thinking of signing back up on SA but its seems they have taken the 1 month option away, there is one that says 30 days but says auto renewed, has anyone done this and managed to cancel the auto renew all ok?

Yes. No difficulty in cancelling. That's the option I use.

[The_Grinder]

Yes. No difficulty in cancelling. That's the option I use.

Thanks for the help.

Since become active on there again I've been inundated with massages that I can't read being a free member, seems a lot of time wasters and no, I don't want a SB in the Philippines, Cambodia etc etc.....50 - 50 on weather its worth paying out for

[dieseldriver]

Just like Illicitencounters. Pricy for a months membership. And like most similar sites, the men heavily outweigh the ladies. So can understand why out of say 50 messages sent to ladies, lucky to get 1 reply. And the replies I did get was like ping-pong messaging.
They say looking for a discreet encounter, but never follow through.   
 

[martini2429]

Be aware, in addition to the £69.99 monthly fee, they are now adding VAT onto the price, so it makes it around £84 per month

 

[James]

Be aware, in addition to the £69.99 monthly fee, they are now adding VAT onto the price, so it makes it around £84 per month

 

No vat if you do via the play store, get the mobile app and when you click upgrade it takes you to play store and it 69 after dollars get converted to pounds

[itk]

I found SA extremely rewarding years back, but you need loads of time to spend organising a meet. Rejoined on a one month go at the beginning of the year and found no end of girls demanding mental prices for a few hours. In my situation only day meets were what I was after, so found it slightly more difficult.
I believe if you’re single, plenty of time and cash, it’s a great place to find sex which is so much better than with a WG.

[Greenanchor]

I have only ever met anyone via SA or secret benefits, although 2 of the  girls were also on AW. Those 2 professionals who are also on AW cut to the chase quickly.  Otherwise, I would say SA is a bit like “Tinder, but with cash”.  Scammers a-plenty and some just looking to sell nudes, rather than meet.   Agree serious time needs to be invested, and I don’t use it that much. Secret Benefits has a different (cheaper, IMO) £ structure, but is not as big or busy as SA.  I’m more sugar daddy than punter, so I’m looking for a regular fuck I want to go back to lots, rather than clock up body count. Just my preference. £ is pricier to give to the girls. Paid between £200 to fuck at her house or paid hotel costs (no overnights)  on top of the £200.   If you are pushed for time and want guaranteed strike rate, then my guess is AW is much better.

[thundercrackerxx]

I've met a lot of girls from SA over the years. There seem to be three types of girl on there. The professionals who will instantly be asking for an allowance and want silly money. There there are the amateurs who like the idea of an arrangement but are also open to just meeting and going out. Then there are girls who want a daddy but in a more sexual and dominant sense rather than financial. I've found it the best place to meet women now. I have noticed over the last year though that the quality of girl on there is gradually going down hill. More and more are out of shape and average looks or over weight. If it's like that on SA I dread to think what kind of girls are using POF now haha!
A couple of years ago SA got mentioned in a lot of news papers and tv and radio articles which seemed to be good advertising as a lot of nice attractive girls heard of it and tried it. Now the buzz has died down not so many girls seem to be hearing about it and joining.

[mar356]

Anyone ever used the Ibis hotel next to the station during the day? I’ve got a meet planned for there and have booked through DayUse, just wondering about privacy and checking in etc? Any feedback would be appreciated

[masseyferguson]

Anyone ever used the Ibis hotel next to the station during the day? I’ve got a meet planned for there and have booked through DayUse, just wondering about privacy and checking in etc? Any feedback would be appreciated

There isn't an Ibis near the station, do you mean Travelodge ?

[Dick Emeroids]

There isn't an Ibis near the station, do you mean Travelodge ?

Oh yes there is! Less than 100m from the station main entrance.
2 Station Square, CB1 2GA

[masseyferguson]

Oh yes there is! Less than 100m from the station main entrance.
2 Station Square, CB1 2GA

Oh, Cambridge, yea there might be one in Cambridge, I didn't know we where talking about Cambridge, sorry.

[potbellypete]

Is anyone actually seeking in the Cambridge, Bedford, Pboro, Northampton area?

I am using SDM and since we can no longer have access to a 'closed' thread would be interested in sharing some background on the good and the bad, maybe via some closed group if possible to keep details of of a public forum.

[Keepcool]

Anyone ever used the Ibis hotel next to the station during the day?

I would rather opt for Travelodge. They are too procedural with IDs at the ibis.

[JayEZ2K]

It definitely does that. Usually uni girls looking to make a bit of money. Membership of the site is 70/80 quid a month so not cheap, but if you’re serious about meeting it’s great.

I'm not keen on the price... it costs one of my monthly punts. Kind of seems the site owners are fleecing people because they can.

Do the girls have to invest anything?

My experience with dating sites many years ago is that girls get hundreds of responses, and end up sitting back and cherry picking.

I like the convenience of punting, and I don't want to spend a lot of time writing emails that go nowhere, or haggling prices.

Is it a lot of time and effort to get a Seeking punt?

[Chorley]

I would rather opt for Travelodge. They are too procedural with IDs at the ibis.

Aren't Ibis notorious for being covert knocking shops anyway?

[Cambridgy]

I'm not keen on the price... it costs one of my monthly punts. Kind of seems the site owners are fleecing people because they can.

Do the girls have to invest anything?

My experience with dating sites many years ago is that girls get hundreds of responses, and end up sitting back and cherry picking.

I like the convenience of punting, and I don't want to spend a lot of time writing emails that go nowhere, or haggling prices.

Is it a lot of time and effort to get a Seeking punt?

As per ^^ the OPs above - it is time consuming and quality can be variable there are true nuggets of gold though. I’d add these thoughts…

> Subscribing for a month (or three) when there’s a 25% discount offer is enough to build a solid contact list to follow up with off the site….I have a few made from three or four years ago that are still good.
> It’s a godsend if you travel internationally - for USA, Asia etc.
> As comments above you need to watch for EAS, but by being selective you can find fun, intelligent young women who are properly into older men.
> Costs do vary - set a cap you are comfortable with - many of the women on there are working on professional qualifications, have second jobs - and a bit extra can make a big difference to their quality of life.

[monstar]

I've recently resubbed and the number of quality girls up for meeting has decreased from years ago, early stages but still a few gems to be found.

150 but more often 200 was discussed as the typical ppm in East of England and still accurate in my search so far.

Many will claim to have had previous guys paying £500 and more a meet or week for lunch dates, but quickly accept less for bedroom action - you can decide if you think they're truthful! 

Some will stick to their high amounts wanted - don't be afraid to move on, you'll find another girl happy with your offer.

[thundercrackerxx]

The media were publicizing the site a few years ago with newspaper articles and shows like Jeremy Vine discussing it which caused a massive influx of girls quite naive to it all. Now that's died down and especially with universities being closed there's very little quality in the area. I'm finding it almost as bad as POF ended up. Mostly fat girls and single mums that are self entitled. During lockdown I think too many horny guys made do paying for pictures so now it's put the idea in many girls minds that they can just make money selling pictures on there and not actually doing anything. Luckily SA are cracking down on it so as soon as a girl tries to flog me pictures I screenshot the message and report their profile. Usually they're taken down pretty quickly.

[monstar]

The media were publicizing the site a few years ago with newspaper articles and shows like Jeremy Vine discussing it which caused a massive influx of girls quite naive to it all. Now that's died down and especially with universities being closed there's very little quality in the area. I'm finding it almost as bad as POF ended up. Mostly fat girls and single mums that are self entitled. During lockdown I think too many horny guys made do paying for pictures so now it's put the idea in many girls minds that they can just make money selling pictures on there and not actually doing anything. Luckily SA are cracking down on it so as soon as a girl tries to flog me pictures I screenshot the message and report their profile. Usually they're taken down pretty quickly.

Concur with point on lockdown changes, and findings of increased fat - or I think we have to say "curvy" now  and entitled single mums. You may have had message with the "curvy" mum expecting cash for dinner dates as she feels like it's prostitution otherwise?

However I wouldn't say it's most girls fall into those categories. Still some nice looking girls, but again my experience is 25 to early 30 girls are the serious about meeting and I can't set up successful meetings with younger girls - lots of conversations just stop with no explanation even after positive messages from them.

Possibly my profile and approach quickly filters them out to stop with me if they are only looking for easy money selling their feet pics.

[LORDHAY]

Looked at the website and fine unless you want to pay £80 month just to read messages etc.

[thundercrackerxx]

A familiar face External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Looks hideous, covered in scribble and even includes a pic of herself smoking some weed. But has the cheek to describe herself as classy.



Hidden Image/Members Only

[Chorley]

A familiar face External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Looks hideous, covered in scribble and even includes a pic of herself smoking some weed. But has the cheek to describe herself as classy.



Hidden Image/Members Only

  Fucks sake

[Wyltk89]

Recently paid the subscription for July. Got to be honest, not to impressed with the quality on there. It may improve in September with the new influx of students etc but currently nothing really taking my fancy. Would recommend sticking to AW at the moment 

[lvtpunt]

I've read a few posts recently about how AW is dieing and sa type sites, where girls can pretend they aren't sp's, are the future. But it all sounds like a lot of hard work, not to mention expensive too. I mean if you have to chase after these girls and more or less chat them up, doesn't sound much different to normal dating, just with extra costs for the privilege. Plus with profiles like the above the site  , no thanks.

[olddognewtricks49]

Just wonder what chance a 70 plus stands! 

[Wyltk89]

Just wonder what chance a 70 plus stands! 

As good as any I would say, just be aware that in Norfolk At least there are a high amount of fakes. I do agree with the posts above, quality has dropped off. AW would still be easier and more convenient (and free!)

[thundercrackerxx]

We're between a rock and a hard place. Aw has very little to offer in the area but fat English women the wrong side of 30 or europeans with a bad attitude and fake pics. But on SA at the moment most girls only want to have an ''online arrangement'' which basically means try to flog you pictures.

[Greenanchor]

I’ve used Seeking a few times in Norfolk, Suffolk and north Essex. Only once did it cost me dinner. All fucked on the first, as required.  Allot are looking for online or are just selling nudes. However,
a bit of online chat and you can usually sort it out, and get one who’s decent looking and down to fuck.

I’ve also tried Secret Benefits and that’s not as good. The women on there are less dtf, and so seeking is less effort if you want to empty your balls.

[Wyltk89]

I’ve used Seeking a few times in Norfolk, Suffolk and north Essex. Only once did it cost me dinner. All fucked on the first, as required.  Allot are looking for online or are just selling nudes. However,
a bit of online chat and you can usually sort it out, and get one who’s decent looking and down to fuck.

I’ve also tried Secret Benefits and that’s not as good. The women on there are less dtf, and so seeking is less effort if you want to empty your balls.

SB is a waste of time, now a days everything is extra. You will likely find the same woman on both, and it’s easier to send out more messages on. Max conversations you can start on SB is 20 with the cheapest bundle

[winkywanky]

A familiar face External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Looks hideous, covered in scribble and even includes a pic of herself smoking some weed. But has the cheek to describe herself as classy.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Maybe she won't let you fuck her until you've played with her tits first, some girls can be picky about that 

[Benjboy87]

Herd it all now.

Got in contact with username chantelle from Bedford (easy search)

Little chat on Seeking, swiftly moves to watts app. In Bedford, thing going ok.

Discussing meets, she agrees £150 for couple of hours. I ask her what is she ok with. I ask if she is ok with Oral, Kissing etc. Response: "no to both". Where can I cum? I ask. Nowhere near me.

I ask how you have sex without kissing, cuddling or indeed touching? Response: "carefully, with minimal contact."

Blocked both on watts app and Seeking.

[finn5555]

Herd it all now.

Little chat on Seeking, swiftly moves to watts app. In Bedford, thing going ok.

Discussing meets, she agrees £150 for couple of hours. I ask her what is she ok with. I ask if she is ok with Oral, Kissing etc. Response: "no to both". Where can I cum? I ask. Nowhere near me.

I ask how you have sex without kissing, cuddling or indeed touching? Response: "carefully, with minimal contact."

Blocked both on watts app and Seeking.

That’s a link to your SA inbox

[daviemac]

That’s a link to your SA inbox

Then why not edit it out of the quote instead of creating more work.   

[finn5555]

Then why not edit it out of the quote instead of creating more work.   

Calm down  I was pointing out his mistake simple as that

[daviemac]

Calm down  I was pointing out his mistake simple as that

Yes and I have to come along and edit it out instead of you doing it as you post it, by not doing so it makes you as bad as the OP.

It isn't really rocket science to not repeat something that shouldn't be there.

[Benjboy87]

Calm down  I was pointing out his mistake simple as that

That's exactly what I wanted to do.

But had no option to edit?



Hidden Image/Members Only

[daviemac]

That's exactly what I wanted to do.

But had no option to edit?

You only have so long to edit your post before a mod has to removed what shouldn't be there. The point I was making is why do people insist on quoting the very thing they say shouldn't be posted when the option is there to remove it from the quote. If it shouldn't be there don't repeat it.

[cunningman]

Not sure we have one here?

Anyway just to say that: External Link/Members Only
was very fast to get me on telegram, ask to swap pics, and then be incredibly coy about meeting.

Much less coy about how great crypto investing is.

Normally its asian pictures.  Ho hum.

[Lewis]

Not sure we have one here?

There is.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=269172.0

I've asked if it can be merged into that thread.

[cunningman]

There is.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=269172.0

I've asked if it can be merged into that thread.

Thanks.  I've just noticed I could have narrowed with Advanced Search.  I've actually never used that.

Anyway this woman: External Link/Members Only

A bit less direct, but also coy about meeting - and eventually claims to have independent investments, and wants to talk crypto.
Same old same old, just not Asian pictures.