New 'Site Rule 29'

[garfield]

What about them?

Can they be posted?

[daviemac]

Can they be posted?

I've never seen one, didn't know they had them. I've just looked at a few adverts and there's no mention of a verification photo.

[garfield]

Think they’ve only just started doing them

External Link/Members Only

Theres a link just under the pic (on mobile site)

[daviemac]

Think they’ve only just started doing them

External Link/Members Only

Theres a link just under the pic (on mobile site)

Then no, they are face pics that aren't shown on the main profile as the AW ones were.

[scutty brown]

Think they’ve only just started doing them

External Link/Members Only

Theres a link just under the pic (on mobile site)

I suppose you're going to ask next if cat photos are allowed

[Kev40ish]

Think they’ve only just started doing them

External Link/Members Only

Theres a link just under the pic (on mobile site)

There’s no harm in pointing out if they have them showing just don’t post them on here

[Iloveoral]

Must admit the guy that spends his time updating all the veri photos is a legend and in times Ive found it extremely helpful, that said are all on here for free and should adhere to whatever rules the site owner asks of us.

[Fuggedaboutit]

I suppose you're going to ask next if cat photos are allowed

Cat no, pussy yes...

[Gordon Bennett]

Similar thread/points from 6 months ago......

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=285589.msg2974158#msg2974158

I think a condition of signing up to the forum is an acceptance of the rules. Rule 29 is easy to grasp - take note and keep one's nose clean going forward. Not much else to say really is there?

[whoya.kiddin]

Sorry I just picked this up now. I read the rule as applying from this point forward.  If it also applies retrospectively can someone from the management please advise?

[daviemac]

Sorry I just picked this up now. I read the rule as applying from this point forward.  If it also applies retrospectively can someone from the management please advise?

Not sure what you mean, how can you go back in time to post a picture? posts can only be made from this point on.   

I honestly don't know what people are finding so difficult with it.

[David1970]

Sorry I just picked this up now. I read the rule as applying from this point forward.  If it also applies retrospectively can someone from the management please advise?

FFS
What is difficult about this rule, or are some members just trying to be thick

[MissWolf]

I think what he means is are the verification pictures that already exist in several threads on the site going to be removed 🤔

[winkywanky]

I think what he means is are the verification pictures that already exist in several threads on the site going to be removed 🤔

That's how I read it.

And it would perhaps make sense after this rule change, as I think it's a relatively easy thing to do from a site management POV?

[dreamwrx]

No complaints from me. Good opportunity to say thanks to the site owner .. what a fabulous service this forum provides.

[daviemac]

I think what he means is are the verification pictures that already exist in several threads on the site going to be removed 🤔

If that was the case the question should have been - "are existing pictures going to be removed"  the rules clearly states pictures can not be posted and posts can only be made from this point on.

BTW it would be a major operation to remove all existing verification pictures.

[winkywanky]

BTW it would be a major operation to remove all existing verification pictures.

Apologies for my comment which was probably ill-advised, I'd meant it to mean deleting the actual Veri Pics thread, but of course Veri pics are elsewhere on the board 

[The Owl]

No problems with the new bosses rules. The verification pictures were useful but a lot of them probably ended up on here because AW apparently made it an arse ache to keep them private. If an escort hides her face in all her work pictures then in my opinion she has a right to not have an accident revealed face picture with an AW numbers spread all over the internet. I certainly wouldn't want the same to happen to me if an escort found my personal social media and started posting it on Twitter as a good client/absolute cunt of a client*.

* although if I was an absolute cunt of a client I'd probably deserve it.

[MissWolf]

If that was the case the question should have been - "are existing pictures going to be removed"  the rules clearly states pictures can not be posted and posts can only be made from this point on.

BTW it would be a major operation to remove all existing verification pictures.

I totally agree Davie he worded the question very badly and it would be a mammoth and pointless task as there will be screenshots by the hundreds out there already.
Didn't mean to pull you up btw was hopefully just trying to help, I occasionally speak numpty so thought I'd translate 

[daviemac]

I totally agree Davie he worded the question very badly and it would be a mammoth and pointless task as there will be screenshots by the hundreds out there already.
Didn't mean to pull you up btw was hopefully just trying to help, I occasionally speak numpty so thought I'd translate 

Didn't think you were, just pointing how the question would be understood a bit better.  After all we're on page 2 and post 69 trying to explain we can no longer post verification or private gallery pictures and as a rule of thumb if it isn't in the public domain then don't post it.

[Xtro]

Didn't think you were, just pointing how the question would be understood a bit better.  After all we're on page 2 and post 69 trying to explain we can no longer post verification or private gallery pictures and as a rule of thumb if it isn't in the public domain then don't post it.

daviemac and 69......   

[theejaculator]

Well ive updated my avatar ....had a verification pic up till now...gone with Trump stained pants...AKA the Trumpin shroud 

[Blackpool Rock]

Well ive updated my avatar ....had a verification pic up till now...gone with Trump stained pants...AKA the Trumpin shroud 

Ah excellent Mr Shit Stain himself 
Hopefully your new Avatar doesn't fall "Foul" of the rule on politics 

[winkywanky]

Ah excellent Mr Shit Stain himself 
Hopefully your new Avatar doesn't fall "Foul" of the rule on politics 

"Any resemblance of the shit stain to a recent President is purely coincidental"

Well if the phrase is good enough for Hollywood...

[Aj280]

I really don't understand why people are wittering on about this, questioning this and that, even linking to the fucking Human Rights Act?!

Putting it in the most simple terms:

Man who owns website says it's not allowed. End of chat. It really isn't a difficult concept 

Quit your moaning. If he didn’t want us to discuss, he would’ve locked the thread and that would be that, since he didn’t do that he clearly doesn’t mind us asking questions and discussing it.

[daviemac]

Quit your moaning. If he didn’t want us to discuss, he would’ve locked the thread and that would be that, since he didn’t do that he clearly doesn’t mind us asking questions and discussing it.

Does that go for me as well.   

Didn't think you were, just pointing how the question would be understood a bit better.  After all we're on page 2 and post 69 trying to explain we can no longer post verification or private gallery pictures and as a rule of thumb if it isn't in the public domain then don't post it.

As far as I'm concerned threads like this give a bit of an insight into people's attitude to the rules and the forum in general.

[Aj280]

Does that go for me as well.   :unknown:As far as I'm concerned threads like this give a bit of an insight into people's attitude to the rules and the forum in general.

Maybe overreacted a bit. Would delete that post if I could.