So the idea is a profile system without the advertising part and with most details specified by the punters instead of the service providers. Such a profile system actually exists on paid reviewed websites such as Captain and TER but of course they don't have many reviewers in UK. On Captain there is the ‘Add an Escort’ and ‘Add an Agency’ options which are filled up by the first reviewer. In the following snapshot I merge Captain and UKP to give an idea of how in my opinion a fairly original and ideal profile would look like (data of the profiles are unrelated/fictional):
External Link/Members OnlyBelow is a summary of what it will be good to be included in the profiles:
(i) Type of service provider: Independent, Agency, Parlour
(ii) Contact : (i) Website urls (AW link, personal website link or agency or parlour link), Phone, Email (if any)
(iii) State of the profile based on the url: Active/Deleted/Abandoned
(iv) General Details (ethnicity, nationality, age group, height, build, bust)
(v) Location (region, city and first part of postcode e.g. London W2)
(vi) Services: Perhaps all listed in the profile but reviewers doing a thumbs up or thumbs down if provided (see image link above)
(vii) Rates, extras
(viii) A url to an profile in image form (imgur hosted)
(ix) Reviews at the end with the
date posted, author, rating BUT also duration, and selection of solo or moresome (FFM etc)
(x)As many punters don’t post proper reviews but short feedback when they post on review threads to have an option whether the reply to be a general reply/question or feedback comment with a rating. If feedback response is selected then the post to be viewed under a short feedback section (see image link).
Furthermore:
(a) linking reviews of old and new profiles of a certain prossie. For example
Sexy 19 Nicole with
sweet&kinky Nicole with the new one she will create in the future.
(b) Search for outcall only profiles (option in a profile to be outcall only)
(c) As for the age groups: A. 18-20, B. 21-24, C. 25-29, D. 30-34, E:35-39, F: 40-44, G:45-49, F: 50 or older
As for the AW rival. I don't think it is the way to go Adam. I think we can co-exist but not compete. Best to restrict into profiles created by punters submitting reviews … this is the best way of having verified profiles. Going the AW fully verified way with non-reviewed profiles just becomes too tedious plus we will have touting, profile swapping etc. Also main problem with all escort directories is the dedication to the profiles by the WGs who create them as most of the time the profiles are abandoned or are out of date.