Sexy Natasa - Acton

[cricket2]

Link:
External Link/Members Only

1h - £90

Pretty straightforward booking process over text with services and extras confirmed. Comms most likely handled by someone else.

Location: As mentioned in one of my previous posts, this was a a disappointment. However, keep in mind that I normally don't punt at this price point, and this was my first time visiting a shared WG house with other people present in it. Aside from that, the location and general atmosphere in the place just didn't feel right. Again, this might just have been my inexperience and gut instinct, and others might have a different experience.

I can however confirm the cleanliness issues raised by one of the other reviewers. She advertises a shared shower which I fancied, but once I mentioned it she said she'll need to clean the bathroom first. Told her not to bother.

Girl: One of the few positives, although not a stunner she is a lot better looking than the heavily made up pics on her profile. Without make up she looks miles better, absolutely beyond belief how she thinks the profile pics are more marketable than her natural face. She is slim built, and about 5"6 or 5"7. Had quite a few tattoos all over her body, some of which are visible on the aw pics

Services: Generally good, provided everything that was advertised on her profile but just not with level of passion you get from Russian or British escorts. DFK was provided, but there was a distinct smell of either something she smokes, or just bad breath. OWO and sex was decent.

Despite the moderately good service, I decided to leave early due to feeling uneasy with the location, and the lack of hygiene.

I wouldn't recommend if you are looking for a proper GFE, but if you are looking for a quick shag and don't mind the location, then she might float your boat.

Happy to answer any questions.

[Ron89]

Cheers useful feedback. Ironically, this has made me even more tempted to punt her now.

[LLPunting]

Which Russian and Brits are you comparing her to from how recently?  Your reviews provide little to go by.

[cricket2]

Both recently and in the past, like Aelita, Aquamarine, Tavolga etc. They are all well reviewed here and I had nothing contradictory to add.

[LLPunting]

Both recently and in the past, like Aelita, Aquamarine, Tavolga etc. They are all well reviewed here and I had nothing contradictory to add.

The past is just that given the deterioration of the market this past 24-36 months and if you're comparing her to more expensive established SPs who may be gone then that's not particularly valid.  If you are talking about new talent still working at a comparable price point then we would like to hear who they are.  A few months of being on a conveyor belt in London often changes many an eager starter.