Prison populations, wars, shitty cyclist behaviour, aggressive driving, corporate predation, bar behaviour, nightclub behaviour, online behaviour, labour exploitation, human trafficking...
[Thread drift alert]
This sort of crap suits a narrative. I won't argue that on balance, men are more likely to commit these sorts of barbaric atrocities, but the way this sort of crap is pedalled, it's like the vast majority of men do it, and,as usual, raw numbers mask the real numbers.
Prison population is a poor indicator by itself without considering many other factors such as the distribution of the offences committed, the length of time in prison, the mental state of the offender at the time, the situation at the time, etc. This may seem PC, but consider that many offences will be non-violent and usually involve theft, etc, you would have to ask why? Is the male in the breadwinning position of the family, trying to keep head above water, etc? Also, there is a cultural aspect - at least in western societies, judges are far less likely to send women to prison for the same offences they are willing to send men to prison (there have been many studies on this). Obviously, for more serious offences they will go to prison, but the terms are usually 25% or more, less (if that makes sense). Not saying that women come close to men on any adjusted basis, but you do have to look beyond the numbers.
Wars is another - Throughout history, women haven't been at the helm quite as much as men to start or defend against wars. Even in modern day wars, the concept of a woman being in charge of countries that tend to perpetrate wars is anathema. If we look at North Korea, the world is far more fearful of Kim's sister than he.
Shitty cyclist behaviour - again.. how many male to female cyclists do you see on the road? Very skewed anecdotal evidence. I used to commute cycle to work in London, and I gave up because the commie cyclists were more dangerous than the cars, motorcycles, buses, mopeds and trucks combined. And, on a per-capita basis, I didn't observe too much difference in behaviour between the genders.
Corporate "predation" - the fact is there are disproportional more men in positions to perform this than women, so it stands to reason that there will be more men performing it. However, isn't one of the most famous corporate predators in the UK, Tessa Cohen? From experience or corporate politics, the women play just as good game of it as men.
Bar and nightclub behaviour are really one and the same. Yes, men tend to spike girls drinks, get into fights, and make persiisntently unwanted advances (and worse) to women - far more than men. While I don't condone (and in fact would condemn) this behaviour, it is sadly a product of, especially in younger men's biology. Yet, how many women actually like the thought of men fighting amongst themselves for their hearts (or more accurately, the use of their genitalia)? More than care to admit to, I bet - because it is part of finding out the fittest/strongest they may mate with. With respect to sexcual predatation, unf, one alcohol gets involved and inhibitions are lost/consequences not thought through - I would have to concede in this area, on a per-capita basis, at least my observations are men are likely to be the culprits (but not always).
Online behaviour? Yoiu have to be kidding. Yes, sexting is a problem.. but women are equally bad at it as men - you just don't hear it that much.. and for some reason, men don't complain when they are sent unsolicited and often unwanted images of naked sexter women - it's just not in our nature. Also, online witchhunts (torolling) by women.girls of their "friends" have led to many suicides. I think this is one where you should do a bit more research before using this as even a justification that men are worse than women.
Labour exploitation - again - the men were in the decision making authority in the most part - there are many examples of where women were at the helm or at least calling the shorts, things like slavery (past and modern day) went and still go on.
Human trafficking.. hmm.. in virtually all of the human traffickers that have been reported as being brought to justice, hasn't a woman also been charged.. But look at the difference in prison terms?
I am surprised you didn't mention things like rape and domestic abuse. With the latter, studies indicate that the rate domestic abuse by the woman against men is surprisingly closer than the official numbers would have it in most western societies due to both the hesitancy of the make to report it, and the general disregard paid to reported instances by law enforcement. Intuitively, you would still say men perpetrate it more than women.. However, if you take into account mental abuse, the numbers may even up a lot more.
Rape.. which is normally a crime of violence and control, may be similar in that there is an amount of it committed by women that goes unreported, or, as in many western jurisdictions, is not considered a crime capable to be committed by a women. There was a famous case in Victoria, Australia, where three or four girls pinned a fella down who refused to have sex with him, coaxed his dick hard (it is sensory, so it will normally be able to be coaxed even in tenuous situations where the stroking stimulates), and mounted it. The problem is, rape is defined as non-consensual sex, in terms of penetration into the vagina or mouth. As he was rejecting their advances, it was clearly non-consenting (by him), but he was not penetrated and they had nothing to penetrate him with. They were not guilty despite admitting to the facts. In other countries apparently, it specifically excludes women from being able to commit rape, or at least explicitly states only the woman can be the victim of rape.
Of course, I am not suggesting for one minute than women are equally likely to rape a man... but it isn't as one way as most think.
[/Thread drift]
On the question of whether it costs more per hour of sex with a SP v the wife, well, it depends.. doesn't it.. Very difficult to measure.. Say you buy the house together and you end up paying for the mortgage.. is it even a cost if the value of the house goes up more than the mortgage payment? And if the missus finds out that you have been having a bit on the side with a SP, and divorces you, taking, say, 80% of the value of your assets, was that the cost of your wife, or the cost of you having a punt or 2?
The best answer to that question is..... <drum roll>... it depends.
