Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Yet another positive review of Sweet Monique  (Read 8088 times)

mrhappypants

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

BEAUTIFUL FACE, GOOD SERVICE, ACCESSIBLE LOCATION, HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
fk, owo, hr, dt, 69, prostrate massage, cim, uniform 120 ph

Thanks to d00fer, MrSmiles, West8 and Maximus for the early reviews.

It was rather a long journey on this punt as I had not originally intended to book monique.  This actually came about by way of two coincidences.  Originally I
was trying to book lovelyemily106 but got the numbers swooped External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - Get QR Code

Monique picked up the message and offered me a booking. 

Secondly, on the same day I realised that this is the girl West8 had failed to see (at that time). Sorry Westy, but the thought of you reading a positive review of the
girl you had failed to meet had to be a bonus.   

Monique fits my standard Modus Operandi of 8's physically and facially £120ph or less, reasonable service list and local.

Her comms are very good, both as a reflection of her strong English (both spoken and I suspect written) and her care and attention to managing her brand and her
punters.  She has done "civvie" jobs that require good English and dealing with the public; it is readily discernable in the way she manages the punt.  You
get the impression of someone who is trying to give a good service. I initially made contact by calling then text to a series of text replies.  She does
occassionally answer the phone but text is the most reliable and she replies quickly.  I found she switches her phone on about 10am and I think you could
reliably make a booking several days in advance.  She was clear that she wanted a text when I was on the street where she works. After an initial abortive
booking, she politely explained that she had been holding on for me.  When I checked my text messagess I realised that I had missed the fact that she was
unable to make my original time.  I apologised and she invited me to rebook.

The location is the familiar Street with walking distance of Kings Cross; she is in one of the top floor bedrooms which has a mirror on the wall and she
deploys this to good effect

Let us pause a moment on her appearance.  Monique is beautiful - no other word for it. She has a more than passing resemblence to Michelle Pfeiffer; the same
chisled jawline, striking eyebrows and dramatic profile. If a pretty face is important to you and you find Michelle Pfeiffer attractive then I would recommend. In my view her facial attractiveness is a high eight possibly up to a nine.  She was dressed in a short dress which was OK but, for me, she could
make more of a very pretty body. I asked her if she would wear something I bought and she seemed fine with it.  Physically she told me she was between a size
six and eight (which looks right) and pretty.  Personal preference here but to my mind the boob job is the only blemish and she is in the eights in terms of
a rating.  The boobs are the right size (D rather than DD I think?) but have a slightly "stuck on" look to them with very outlooking projective nipples,
although I do have to admit that, as previously noted, when she shoving them into your face and mouth it is all rather persuasive...I had certainly warmed to
them by the end of our meeting.

I am a slightly slow burn kind of guy and she is a bit pacy for me.  She is SO pretty that I kind of wanted her to slow down and let me enjoy the view. I
think after the deed she clicked that I was after something a bit more measured and involved than a PSE when we were talking and we both got into a open
personal conversation.  Be interesting to see how this plays out next time.   
She said that she could do requests - given that she missed my dress request and did not seem to really get the service request I'll be interested to see how
this plays out on a second booking.

The bj is very good.  deep, eye contact..  The fk is great.  I am not a fingers guy. She was curious that I did not want sex.  If we get the tempo right next time I will be giving it a try.  The commitment to service also comes through when she offers to go and change into my dress
request - very impressive.  I had a nice time and, although the tempo was too quick for me, she did not rush me out of the room. 

Without passing judgement I should mention that she was very familiar with her reviews.  I quote "they come and see me and tell me to put my prices up, then
they write reviews criticising me when I do."  I am not going to point the finger, but this puts recent commentary on the board in an interesting light and
perhaps some of those who have written or commented on recent reviews would like to pass comment?

Now one more thing.  I think she said she was planning on working until the end of the year and only remaining at S... Street for a couple of months.
Don't quote me, I tried to clarify but she was not entirely clear, but I am going to be operating on the assumption she will be around for a little while
yet.

Thanks again for the previous reviews.

Dave
 

 
« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 11:41:03 am by mrhappypants »

Offline MrSmiley


 I quote "they come and see me and tell me to put my prices up, then
they write reviews criticising me when I do."  I am not going to point the finger, but this puts recent commentary on the board in an interesting light and
perhaps some of those who have written or commented on recent reviews would like to pass comment?


To those dickheads who tell prossies to put their prices up please FUCK OFF and stop doing it. What's the point? Are you trying to flatter them? It burns everybody else's money at a faster rate including yours.

Offline bestbefore

To those dickheads who tell prossies to put their prices up please FUCK OFF and stop doing it. What's the point? Are you trying to flatter them? It burns everybody else's money at a faster rate including yours.

+1

Completely agree. Escorts earn an unbelievable amount of money. Just do the math!

Some easily earn in a day what I used to earn in a week.

And just for a quick shag for fucks sake. And with loads of stuff 'at discretion'

We should be saying in our reviews that they are overpriced, and should be charging LESS.

Please guys, NEVER tell an escort she should charge more and never write it in a review.

And lets not call the girls who put their prices up. They will soon come down again if their phones gather dust.



Sylvester

  • Guest
I have never suggested a girl should increase her prices, nor would I because I'm not fucking stupid.

It's about market forces however.  The only barometer a girl needs is her phone.  How often it rings will tell her if she's got her pricing right.

In Monique's case, she is very quickly building up a body of good reviews on this site.  I would suggest that is causing her phone to ring more, which in turn causes her to raise her prices.  I suspect this has a far greater impact on her pricing structure than the odd dazzled punter saying 'you're amazing, you should charge more'.

So actually, the biggest likely impactor on prices is positive reviews.  You may as well say we should stop writing those...

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
Without passing judgement I should mention that she was very familiar with her reviews.  I quote "they come and see me and tell me to put my prices up, then they write reviews criticising me when I do."  I am not going to point the finger, but this puts recent commentary on the board in an interesting light and perhaps some of those who have written or commented on recent reviews would like to pass comment?

So Monique is not to be completely blamed for increasing her prices. It's the guys she sees who are advising her to do so. I bet some of these generous money burning dumbos are also members of this forum. How pathetic! Those stupid punters have not just ensured Monique increases her rates but will open the doors for other ladies to follow. What a sick bunch of punters that are driving up escort rates in general. What a sad state of affairs!
« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 03:07:33 pm by marty_mcfly »

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
To those dickheads who tell prossies to put their prices up please FUCK OFF and stop doing it. What's the point? Are you trying to flatter them? It burns everybody else's money at a faster rate including yours.

FANTASTIC POST. I LOVE IT. These dickheads probably think that flattery will get them perks from the escort concerned. Maybe Monique will give these sick guys special complimentary services such as Anal and Swallowing.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
+1

Completely agree. Escorts earn an unbelievable amount of money. Just do the math!

Some easily earn in a day what I used to earn in a week.

And just for a quick shag for fucks sake. And with loads of stuff 'at discretion'

We should be saying in our reviews that they are overpriced, and should be charging LESS.

Please guys, NEVER tell an escort she should charge more and never write it in a review.

And lets not call the girls who put their prices up. They will soon come down again if their phones gather dust.

Although I believe that a good service provider deserves a positive review and I myself have written positive reviews, but "biting the hand that feeds you" can never be justified via increasing prices.

I might re-think my policy of writing positive reviews if this backfires through higher prices. If prices keep going up then I might have to punt less and watch porn and wank more.

YES, escorts earn a fortune. All they need to do is to see 3-4 clients a day for just 3 days a week and they earn more than what a University graduate does. Besides, the income is totally tax free as usually it is never declared. Unlike other business that rely on credit facilities and the risk of bad debts, escorts run zero risk financially and have excellent cash flow as they only accept cash. If I was a female, then I would burn all my educational certificates, de-register for VAT and work as an escort.

« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 03:23:08 pm by marty_mcfly »

west8

  • Guest
Monique is beautiful - no other word for it. She has a more than passing resemblence to Michelle Pfeiffer.

Spot on. I knew she vaguely reminded me of someone. See the resemblance in the picture below?

Hidden Image/Members Only

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
So let's help her earn money like Michelle Pfeifer too. How about continuing to post highly positive reviews of her and then go knock on her door and keep begging her to raise her prices!

west8

  • Guest
So let's help her earn money like Michelle Pfeifer too. How about continuing to post highly positive reviews of her and then go knock on her door and keep begging her to raise her prices!

Fact of the matter is a simple one: Spring is here and the girls (not just Monique) are testing the water vis-a-vis their rates.

No-one wants to pay more for ANYTHING, let alone a fuck. But market forces and the economics of supply and demand will dictate where rates settle.

Also, to put her 120 into perspective: it's still 40 less than Emily Creme Brulee, who is 5 mins down the road.

Only major difference being that Monique is both (imho) facially more beautiful AND CIM is on the menu.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
Fact of the matter is a simple one: Spring is here and the girls (not just Monique) are testing the water vis-a-vis their rates.

No-one wants to pay more for ANYTHING, let alone a fuck. But market forces and the economics of supply and demand will dictate where rates settle.

Also, to put her 120 into perspective: it's still 40 less than Emily Creme Brulee, who is 5 mins down the road.

Only major difference being that Monique is both (imho) facially more beautiful AND CIM is on the menu.
.

As Monique, by her own admission, reads this forum, thank you for reminding her to push up her prices by a further £40. Other girls will follow too.

West8, you must be very rich. Please give me a decent job!

west8

  • Guest
As Monique, by her own admission, reads this forum, thank you for reminding her to push up her prices by a further £40. Other girls will follow too.

West8, you must be very rich. Please give me a decent job!

Don't be so fucking naive. Girls revise their rates as often as they change location. If the phone gets dusty, they revert.

I was the first one to point out on another thread the four examples of rate increases this past week alone. That is normal at this time of the year - and rates will likely fluctuate somewhat before finding the sweet spot.

Psychologically, 100/hr is a very sweet spot for a LOT of punters, but I pay what I think is justified based solely on Looks + Service.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
No-one wants to pay more for ANYTHING, let alone a fuck.

Bull shit. Then why are these dickheads then asking her to raise her prices?

west8

  • Guest
Bull shit. Then why are these dickheads then asking her to raise her prices?

Do you have any proof that 'they' ever did? Or could it be a brilliant marketing manoeuvre by savvy WGs?

eg 'Last week in London', etc, etc ...

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
I was the first one to point out on another thread the four examples of rate increases this past week alone. That is normal at this time of the year - and rates will likely fluctuate somewhat before finding the sweet spot.

Psychologically, 100/hr is a very sweet spot for a LOT of punters, but I pay what I think is justified based solely on Looks + Service.

West8, this is the first time in 10 years of punting that I have heard of a "mating season" for punters. Are you suggesting that us guys have some hormonal factors that increases our libido during the month of March? What on Earth is this "time of the year" that you mention?

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
Do you have any proof that 'they' ever did? Or could it be a brilliant marketing manoeuvre by savvy WGs?

eg 'Last week in London', etc, etc ...

The OP himself has said the following:

Without passing judgement I should mention that she was very familiar with her reviews.  I quote "they come and see me and tell me to put my prices up, then they write reviews criticising me when I do."

This is sufficient evidence. Furthermore, I have come across countless reviews that state that the escort is "underpriced", "should be charging more", etc. This is enough to suggest that there are dickheads out there who are driving escort prices over the roof.

west8

  • Guest
West8, this is the first time in 10 years of punting that I have heard of a "mating season" for punters. Are you suggesting that us guys have some hormonal factors that increases our libido during the month of March? What on Earth is this "time of the year" that you mention?

Lot of agencies in London dabbled with 160 (from 150) last year. Didn't last long and reverted back to 150. Moreover, the 'baseline' 200 has also seen revision, with many girls preferring a higher footfall at 180. Why would Adultwork girls be any different? Or do you think it's simply a coincidence that many girls upped their rates the moment the first rays of Spring sunshine appeared last week?

It's no coincidence there are so many girls arriving for the Spring to Summer migration. In London at least, it's been happening since I first started almost 20 years ago.

west8

  • Guest
The OP himself has said the following:

Without passing judgement I should mention that she was very familiar with her reviews.  I quote "they come and see me and tell me to put my prices up, then they write reviews criticising me when I do."

This is sufficient evidence. Furthermore, I have come across countless reviews that state that the escort is "underpriced", "should be charging more", etc. This is enough to suggest that there are dickheads out there who are driving escort prices over the roof.

You're missing the point. I'm not disputing what Monique told Dave. I am disputing the notion punters flood through ANY WGs door and proceed to tell her to charge more.

You will also note that I wrote elsewhere that I believe any WG should leave the rate unchanged for regulars. Her prerogative of course.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
It's no coincidence there are so many girls arriving for the Spring to Summer migration. In London at least, it's been happening since I first started almost 20 years ago.

Then that would cause an increase in supply and therefore lower rates. Opposite to what is happening.

West8, please don't take this personally, but I am just having a friendly debate here. No offence intended.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 03:53:04 pm by marty_mcfly »

west8

  • Guest
Then that would cause in increase in supply and therefore lower rates. Opposite to what is happening.

West8, please don't take this personally, but I am just having a friendly debate here. No offence intended.

I see exactly where you're coming from and I'm slightly on the fence vis-a-vis WGs rates. I personally don't care and will pay what I have to pay if I like a particular girl. That said, given the popularity of certain girls on here recently, it's no surprise that they see more customers and decide to capitalise on their apparent newfound fame.

Monique is not unique in that respect. I know from others who have messaged me this week that it's getting hard to book Lexi as well now.

So either we all stop reviewing so much or we share the wisdom and hope to get the meetings we want - when we want them.

Offline NightKid

No need to deflect, wankie. Every lurker and their dog must know by now that you're the 'self-proclaimed millionaire' twat and, having admitted to jacking up a WG's price before, it doesn't take a genius to put 2 and 2 together.  :rolleyes:
I suppose we can expect a negative review of her to magically appear soon. About how she mysteriously became psychotic all of a sudden and offered to bareback you left, right and centre perhaps?  :sarcastic:

P.S. Told you so, folks.

Offline jake9jake9

Early reviews? I think you may have missed her from before her break, she's been around since Nov and well reviewed. It's good to see that she's still as consistently good in providing her service from when I first took the risk in seeing her. A bit of a shame about price increase though, with extra's you could easily be paying in excess of £150-200 an hour.

I guess you have to understand that like many Escorts, they provide their services mainly for business reasons. She must've seen the opportunity (knowing punters will still go to see her) and made the decision to raise prices with business in mind.

« Last Edit: March 06, 2015, 07:59:44 pm by jake9jake9 »

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
I see exactly where you're coming from and I'm slightly on the fence vis-a-vis WGs rates. I personally don't care and will pay what I have to pay if I like a particular girl. That said, given the popularity of certain girls on here recently, it's no surprise that they see more customers and decide to capitalise on their apparent newfound fame.

Monique is not unique in that respect. I know from others who have messaged me this week that it's getting hard to book Lexi as well now.

So either we all stop reviewing so much or we share the wisdom and hope to get the meetings we want - when we want them.

Would you pay her £250/hour?

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Glad you had a good time mrhappypants.

She's getting consistently good reviews and her features sound very attractive. Does she have any face pics in her PG ?

Thanks.

d00fer

  • Guest
Mr B, from a previous post on another review of her

Not sure if it's in her current PG, but Vader's one post was a useful one - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=41387.msg553714#msg553714

The pic is definitely her, but it's a shit one. Personally, and it is subjective, but I thought she was pretty girl facially. Still can't think of a lookalike to give comparison to.

To be fair the slight resemblance to Michelle Pfeiffer isn't a bad shout, but as I said before the pic below isn't great.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Mr B, from a previous post on another review of her

To be fair the slight resemblance to Michelle Pfeiffer isn't a bad shout, but as I said before the pic below isn't great.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Thanks d00fer  :hi:

So many girls, so little time (and funds)  :rolleyes:

d00fer

  • Guest
Thanks d00fer  :hi:

So many girls, so little time (and funds)  :rolleyes:

Np. I'm mixed on her recent price increases. Monique is a good SP and her cowgirl, if your pelvis is up to it, is superb. Lack of CIM isn't a deal breaker for me, so I'd have preferred the option of without at @ 100ph. That said I'd see her again at 120ph and would make sure I availed myself of the now no longer optional CIM.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Early reviews? I think you may have missed her from before her break, she's been around since Nov and well reviewed. It's good to see that she's still as consistently good in providing her service from when I first took the risk in seeing her. A bit of a shame about price increase though, with extra's you could easily be paying in excess of £150-200 an hour.

I guess you have to understand that like many Escorts, they provide their services mainly for business reasons. She must've seen the opportunity (knowing punters will still go to see her) and made the decision to raise prices with business in mind.

JakeJake - apologies.  Thank you for TOFTT and bringing her to the wider attention.  I was late on the scene and did not realise your's was the first review.  Thanks again

A couple of things I should mention. 

1) it was faint but I could tell she is a smoker. 

2) my description of her looks misses the key word; "elfin".

3) I understand the frustration of those on a restricted income that reviews can drive prices up, but to my mind this is a small price to pay for the vastly more transparent market that UKP creates.  UKP and review writting makes it much easier for high value (pretty, willing, service orientated) WG's to get rewarded (higher fees, more punters) and for crap (misrepresented, overpriced, dishonest, uninterested)  WG's to get found out. That has to be good for all punters.

Dave

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
She looks nowhere like Michelle Pfieffer in that photo. Also, being a smoker isn't that encouraging for guys like me who love DFK and are non-smokers.

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
She looks nowhere like Michelle Pfieffer in that photo. Also, being a smoker isn't that encouraging for guys like me who love DFK and are non-smokers.
Once again - west8. I think he needs better glasses.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Marty, Type, I take it from the tone of your comments that neither of you have actually seen her. I'll stand by the comments in my review and, given the small matter that I have seen her and you have not, I'll leave the reader to judge who is better placed to offer an opinion about her appearance.  Marty, if you don't like smokers don't go and see her - nuff said.

Dave

west8

  • Guest
Would you pay her £250/hour?

No, I would not. But not for the reason that you are implying.

I pay £250 an hour quite often. This is what that same 250 can get you:

Hidden Image/Members Only

She's also Polish. Who would you choose?


No need to deflect, wankie. Every lurker and their dog must know by now that you're the 'self-proclaimed millionaire' twat and, having admitted to jacking up a WG's price before, it doesn't take a genius to put 2 and 2 together.  :rolleyes:
I suppose we can expect a negative review of her to magically appear soon. About how she mysteriously became psychotic all of a sudden and offered to bareback you left, right and centre perhaps?  :sarcastic:

P.S. Told you so, folks.

The only thing you have quite clearly told folks is that you are a troll. Anyone and everyone who has read the link you have referred to can draw a simple conclusion: either you have Asperger's or you are simply a little 'challenged'. Given your high failure rate as a punter (as per your own reviews), I think we both know you have a serious problem.


She looks nowhere like Michelle Pfieffer in that photo. Also, being a smoker isn't that encouraging for guys like me who love DFK and are non-smokers.

Are you retarded? No-one said she looks like Michelle Pfeiffer. We wrote that Monique bears a passing resemblence to Michelle Pfeiffer. Jesus, buy a fucking dictionary or at the very least read the comments of others before replying to something that no-one ever said in the first place.

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
No, I would not. But not for the reason that you are implying.

I pay £250 an hour quite often. This is what that same 250 can get you:

Hidden Image/Members Only

She's also Polish. Who would you choose?

I'm sorry she is not my cup of tea. I would prefer to keep this £250 in my pocket.



west8

  • Guest
I'm sorry she is not my cup of tea. I would prefer to keep this £250 in my pocket.

The reason I chose the girl in that picture is that she is a very long-term regular. She is also a similar 'type' to Monique: Polish, blonde, busty, articulate and very skilled in the bedroom.

If the girl above isn't your cup of tea, I honestly don't think you would enjoy Monique either. That said, you never know until you try.  ;)

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
The reason I chose the girl in that picture is that she is a very long-term regular. She is also a similar 'type' to Monique: Polish, blonde, busty, articulate and very skilled in the bedroom.

If the girl above isn't your cup of tea, I honestly don't think you would enjoy Monique either. That said, you never know until you try.  ;)

I just don't fancy fake blondes with fake boobs.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
Are you retarded? No-one said she looks like Michelle Pfeiffer. We wrote that Monique bears a passing resemblence to Michelle Pfeiffer. Jesus, buy a fucking dictionary or at the very least read the comments of others before replying to something that no-one ever said in the first place.

Are you insane? Read your own words. You said "spot on" to someone saying she has a resemblance to Michelle Pfeiffer. You even posted a photo of Michelle Pfeiffer. There is a huge difference between "passing resemblance" and resemblance itself. You're the one in need of a dictionary.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
I'm sorry she is not my cup of tea. I would prefer to keep this £250 in my pocket.


She's neither my cup of tea, not at £250 an hour, when I can have Miss KDD and her outstanding services at £275 for an hour and a half.

Even at £120-£150 per hour, I have seen girls who are at least as attractive.

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
I pay £250 an hour quite often.

No wonder you find the ones at £120-£160 as VFM. Well, I don't pay that much and never have per hour; and neither do most other punters pay that much that often. So please kindly refrain from using the term VFM most of the time, as you are contributing towards price increases through such comments. Girls read this forum, and then increase their rates unfairly.

If you can pay £250 an hour quite often, then good for you. Please don't brag about it here.

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
No wonder you find the ones at £120-£160 as VFM. Well, I don't pay that much and never have per hour; and neither do most other punters pay that much that often. So please kindly refrain from using the term VFM most of the time, as you are contributing towards price increases through such comments. Girls read this forum, and then increase their rates unfairly.

If you can pay £250 an hour quite often, then good for you. Please don't brag about it here.

I think we have to watch the market when west8 publishes his love novels.  :hi:

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest


She's neither my cup of tea, not at £250 an hour, when I can have Miss KDD and her outstanding services at £275 for an hour and a half.

Even at £120-£150 per hour, I have seen girls who are at least as attractive.

+1  :hi:

But you know - some blokes feel better when they say in the office - "I had amazing shag last night, she was worth £250/hour".

west8

  • Guest
No wonder you find the ones at £120-£160 as VFM. Well, I don't pay that much and never have per hour; and neither do most other punters pay that much that often. So please kindly refrain from using the term VFM most of the time, as you are contributing towards price increases through such comments. Girls read this forum, and then increase their rates unfairly.

If you can pay £250 an hour quite often, then good for you. Please don't brag about it here.

A question was asked and answered. If you think 250 notes = bragging, then I wonder what sort of comments reviews of £600 girls would attract.

Moreover, there a HELL of a lot of punters on here who are happy to pay 250+ for 2 hour+ bookings. It's neither unusual not exceptional.

So, 250 notes per se is not the issue. The issue is whether or not to go for an hour with a hottie or a (potentially) facially average girl who gives good service - but takes 2 hours to do so.

Sylvester

  • Guest
A question was asked and answered. If you think 250 notes = bragging, then I wonder what sort of comments reviews of £600 girls would attract.

Moreover, there a HELL of a lot of punters on here who are happy to pay 250+ for 2 hour+ bookings. It's neither unusual not exceptional.

So, 250 notes per se is not the issue. The issue is whether or not to go for an hour with a hottie or a (potentially) facially average girl who gives good service - but takes 2 hours to do so.
There are clearly 2 sides to this.  One the one hand it does feel a bit class warish, and there is no point in berating people for having more resources than you, it's just a fact of life.

On the other hand, there is something to be said for knowing your audience, and most of the folk on here don't have pockets as deep as you Westie, and probably don't appreciate being reminded of it all that much.

Me on the other hand, I just like fucking pretty Polish girls...
« Last Edit: March 07, 2015, 07:02:06 pm by Sylvester »

west8

  • Guest
There are clearly 2 sides to this.  One the one hand it does feel a bit class warish, and there is no point in berating people for having more resources than you, it's just a fact of life.

On the other hand, there is something to be said for knowing your audience, and most of the folk on here don't have pockets as deep as you Westie, and probably don't appreciate being reminded of it all that much.

Me on the other hand, I just like fucking pretty Polish girls...

I don't have deep pockets. I have no pockets. I don't even have a wallet. Agreed on the ridiculous nature of some envious posts. Some guys clearly have a major inferiority complex about more things that their bank balance.

Sylvester

  • Guest
I don't have deep pockets. I have no pockets. I don't even have a wallet. Agreed on the ridiculous nature of some envious posts. Some guys clearly have a major inferiority complex about more things that their bank balance.
Just in it for the hot chicks dude  :cool:


Offline claretandblue

I don't have deep pockets. I have no pockets. I don't even have a wallet. Agreed on the ridiculous nature of some envious posts. Some guys clearly have a major inferiority complex about more things that their bank balance.

you dont own a wallet! i can just picture mustafa rifling through the glove compartment of the jag to hand you a wad of cash as sergei approaches from across the road!

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
you dont own a wallet! i can just picture mustafa rifling through the glove compartment of the jag to hand you a wad of cash as sergei approaches from across the road!
Well i would say .44 Remington Magnum would be better choice for Mustafa when Sergiei approaches  :lol:

Jason

  • Guest
Thank you for the review. Monique should thank you too as each time someone writes a positive review her rate goes up. Here's a bit of mathematics for punters:Four recent positive reviews for Monique mean a £20 increase per half hour appointment. Therefore £5 increase per positive review per half hour.

Expected half hour incall rate will now be £90+£5 = £95.
Although I believe that a good service provider deserves a positive review and I myself have written positive reviews, but "biting the hand that feeds you" can never be justified via increasing prices.I might re-think my policy of writing positive reviews if this backfires through higher prices.
If you are not willing to pay her fee then don't meet her. No one forces you to do so. If her phone doesn't ring enough she will drop her fee. But I doubt this will happen. The certain thing is that bitching here about a girl who raised her fee is pointless. You will not influence anyone and anything. Each punter has their own criteria about what they consider VFM. I paid for this girl £100ph and I thought she was very good VFM. £120 is still fair for her based on competition. Bargains tend to be only at the beginning. If you are a bargain hunter then either TOFTT or TOFY (TOFY-take one for yourself). And if you don’t want to review then don't review. But girls entering prostitution and remaining obscured tend to abandon the market relatively quickly. On the other hand over-reviewing them does have negative implications such as becoming difficult to book and/or their fee going up. Yet again it reveals consistency. In any case use your judgement about whether you deem necessary to review or not. It is up to you.

She's neither my cup of tea, not at £250 an hour, when I can have Miss KDD and her outstanding services at £275 for an hour and a half.
Even at £120-£150 per hour, I have seen girls who are at least as attractive.
You speak about KDD. Guess what? KDD used to charge £100ph outcall when she started and was younger and slimmer (albeit not as experienced) and for a relatively long time she used to be £150ph. External Link/Members Only is a review from when she was still £175 for 1hr. And she recently raised her 1.5 hour fee from £275 to £300 and her 2hr fee from £350 to £400. Also the outcall rate for 1hr went up by £20 (now £220 from £200). The girl you praise is no different to any other WG. They are pro$$i€$. They are in this game for the money and they are looking ways of how to make as much as possible. Whether you want to pay them is a different story.  :hi:

External Link/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

Type_O_Negative

  • Guest
If you are not willing to pay her fee then don't meet her. No one forces you to do so. If her phone doesn't ring enough she will drop her fee. But I doubt this will happen. The certain thing is that bitching here about a girl who raised her fee is pointless. You will not influence anyone and anything. Each punter has their own criteria about what they consider VFM. I paid for this girl £100ph and I thought she was very good VFM. £120 is still fair for her based on competition. Bargains tend to be only at the beginning. If you are a bargain hunter then either TOFTT or TOFY (TOFY-take one for yourself). And if you don’t want to review then don't review. But girls entering prostitution and remaining obscured tend to abandon the market relatively quickly. On the other hand over-reviewing them does have negative implications such as becoming difficult to book and/or their fee going up. Yet again it reveals consistency. In any case use your judgement about whether you deem necessary to review or not. It is up to you.
You speak about KDD. Guess what? KDD used to charge £100ph outcall when she started and was younger and slimmer (albeit not as experienced) and for a relatively long time she used to be £150ph. External Link/Members Only is a review from when she was still £175 for 1hr. And she recently raised her 1.5 hour fee from £275 to £300 and her 2hr fee from £350 to £400. Also the outcall rate for 1hr went up by £20 (now £220 from £200). The girl you praise is no different to any other WG. They are pro$$i€$. They are in this game for the money and they are looking ways of how to make as much as possible. Whether you want to pay them is a different story.  :hi:

External Link/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

If there will be a quick connection between positive reviews and unexpected price rises - i'm sure some members will stop writing positive reviews. Instinct of self-preservation will call. :hi:

marty_mcfly

  • Guest
Jason, damn it, that is a shame Miss KDD raising her rates too. What the hell is going on? I might as well open up an escort agency or get some girls from EE or the Far East by the truckloads. I see £100 per half hour and £180-£200 per hour becoming the norm soon. I will seriously have to cut down on my punts. No choice. By the way, I fully agree with everything you say.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2015, 08:34:39 pm by marty_mcfly »