WGs who don't do BB, but have BB pics

[Toby]

I've noticed a number of WGs who definitely "WILL NOT" do BB, and will "BLOCK YOU" for the slightest mention of it. And then their gallery shows them getting shafted in all holes by different bare cocks.

Does that mean that they have arranged a number of tasteful photo shoots (excuse the pun) with people who have been certified STI free? Or are they just fucking lying? 

I suppose it's another way to weed out the BBackers.

[Ali Katt]

This may interest you Toby, https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=8509.0
I asked a similar albeit slightly different question.

The guys in the picture could be a boyfriend, could be a regular they trusted, a tested pornstar or more they could be swingers. It's easy to speculate, but whose to say some girls don't Bareback on the sly. I've read on profiles saying "not to ask for discount" yet the same person may do a reverse for £100 off. We all know what they say and what they do is elastic.

To be honest, if they don't want men to ask for bareback, not advertising it with pics might be a good start.

[yorkshire123]

All prossie's will do BB sooner or later be it with their husband, boyfriend, pimp, porn performer or a punter. It would be naive to think anything else.
I did question one who had it on her profile & she said it was her husbands cock you could see.

[JV547845]

Have a line on your profile saying you get pissed off when you get asked for BB, and its disrespectful or offensive?  Well don't show it in your pictures then love. 

Yeah, some even show cream pies too just to rub it in (bub um tish).  It's annoying but some of them use the private gallery as an end in itself instead of an example of the services on offer.  Must get annoying trying to find a photographer to join her and her husband in the bedroom if hubbie doesn't want to suit up.  POV shots only are slightly more reassuring then.  If there's more than that then all the more reason to suit up yourself I would have thought. 

[CBPaul]

Personally I think any kind of picture with a cock in it is, bare or otherwise, is not just a waste of space but off putting. I know full well  what stuffing my cock in her mouth / pussy will look like, I want to know what the prossie looks like. I know that these photos may be appealing for some services but it takes a lot for me not to hit the back button.

Admittedly pictures involving uncovered cocks are particularly stupid when the profile is adamant that bb is not on offer. It's best to assume that bb may be on offer at some point / to someone and cover up accordingly.

I do wonder if prossies having no bareback many many time over, together with you'll be blocked if you ask and I value my health and yours protest too much.   

[rolf32313]

People have always markets a product to make it look more desirable. Has any Ford owner in the history of time ever had numerous random underwear models get on the escort M2 in flimsy underwear looking for the "ride of their life" because they own a Ford escort...

If I'm going to look at a penis entering a pussy I don't really want to see in wrapped in a condom. I don't think it's in the slightest bit misleading as they are clearly stating no BB. I met a lovely (but dumb) woman about a year ago who offered me BB but say I couldn't cum inside as that was reserved for her bf... I declined but respected the fact she could chose to let her bf creampie her but not a stranger.

[smiths]

I've noticed a number of WGs who definitely "WILL NOT" do BB, and will "BLOCK YOU" for the slightest mention of it. And then their gallery shows them getting shafted in all holes by different bare cocks.

Does that mean that they have arranged a number of tasteful photo shoots (excuse the pun) with people who have been certified STI free? Or are they just fucking lying? 

I suppose it's another way to weed out the BBackers.

Who knows is my answer. The idea behind these photos is of course to attract punters to the WG. Whether that works over it not working only the WG or her pimp would know. I assume the guys in these photos are the WGs partner or pimp.

Personally i like naked photos of the WG but i dont particuarly wish to see the WG sucking or fucking others as its not them i am interested in punting with obviously.

[JV547845]

I don't think it's in the slightest bit misleading as they are clearly stating no BB.

Yeah for intelligent people who bother to read the profile in full but most girl's with a profile on adultwork must have dealt with enough idiots by now to see the benefit of making it crystal fucking clear for them, if only to get less hassle. 

[Daffodil]

All prossies do bareback. Maybe not with punters (although a lot more do it than who claim to do it), but with boyfriends, husbands, one night stands, etc. Anybody who thinks otherwise is very naive.

I think some punters must live in a fantasy world where their prossie doesn't even fuck anybody else 

[myothernameis]

Another thing I have notice, which relates to bareback, is the Q&A

Q:  Do you do bareback.....A: No
Q:  Do you do extras..........A: Yes, email me for prices

Maybe BB is on the menu, but for the right price, so basicly you have to ask how much for extra, and what the extra are

[doc14]

I think some punters must live in a fantasy world where their prossie doesn't even fuck anybody else 

Don't spoil it for me